Rhinoceros-Geetika-3rd Year
Rhinoceros-Geetika-3rd Year
Rhinoceros-Geetika-3rd Year
The play has been largely perceived as an Anti-Nazi play but it's not just Nazism that Ionesco
attacks but all the forms of totalitarianism. B. Mangalam, in her essay 'Who's Afraid of
Rhinoceros?', reminds her readers of the anti-communist position that Ionesco held and the
simple fact that play was written during the cold war. To quote her, ""The aim of this play was to
denounce, to express how an ideology gets transformed into idolatry...how an idea, which was
reasonable enough for a discussion at the start, can become monstrous..." The reference
obviously is to expansion of communist regimes. To be sure, no one would explain Nazism as
an ideology that was reasonable enough for discussion at the start." In the play, Ionesco
condemns French intellectuals associating with communism through the character of Botard.
Botard is ridiculed and shown as this narrow minded stock character that is incapable of thinking
for himself. His association with communism becomes apparent when he quotes Karl Marx.
Ineffectiveness of communism is shown when Botard transforms into a rhinoceros as well.
The collective consciousness of people is hinted at the beginning of the play itself. In the act 1,
we see all the characters having similar reactions to the appearance of rhinoceros and speaking
the same dialogues. Phrases such as "well, of all the things!" or "it's never too late", is spoken
by different characters more than twenty times in the play. This shows that despite being
different, thought processes of the masses are similar. Similarly, Botard's calling the entire thing
'a collective psychosis' is another hint for collective consciousness.
As observed by Dilip K. Basu in his Introduction to the Worldview edition of Rhinoceros, there is
no political reason for which characters choose the metamorphosis. Different characters choose
the transformation for different reasons. Expansion and resistance is rather personal than
political. Dudar and Jean succumb to Rhinoceritis for the simple reason that everyone else is
doing it and they believe that personal welfare is ultimately in following the mass opinion.
Ionesco exposes the hollow lives that men like Dudar and Jean live. From the outside, they look
like men of purpose but from the inside they are lost and out of touch with their individuality.
Similarly Daisy and Mrs. Boeuf's transformation is the result of lack of self-worth and placing
one's happiness in others. Mrs. Boeuf's readily becomes rhinoceros when she discovers that
her husband has become one. Similarly, Daisy fixates her attention to giving motherly care to
Bérenger and losing touch with the rest of the world. This lack of thought is resultant of another
kind of Rhinoceritis called patriarchy where women think of themselves in relation to their male
counterparts. Ironically, Berenger who is thought to be a drunkard slacker by everyone else is
able to preserve his individuality and save himself from the epidemic. However, his resistance is
more from his initial indifference than a conscious well-thought decision.
As noted by B. Mangalam and Dilip K. Basu, Ionesco's condemning all the collectivities as
totalitarian in intention is problematic as one wonders what other ways are there to represent
the interests of the marginalised? Similarly, Ionesco does not check or question his propagation
of capitalism by glorifying the individual. He fails to question or even recognize the dominant
ideology of the first world countries.
Thus, the bigger questions about morality, society, culture and politics are tackled through the
disease of Rhinoceritis.
Bibliography