Spouses Ong applied for a P15 million term loan and P5 million credit line from BSA bank for their printing business. BSA only released P10.4 million of the term loan and P3 million of the credit line. BSA promised to release the remaining P2 million of the credit line after the P3 million was paid, which the Ongs did. However, BSA did not release the remaining P2 million. The court ruled that a contract was formed when BSA approved and released the initial funds. It also ruled that BSA violated the terms of the agreement by not releasing the full P5 million credit line after the Ongs complied with the conditions.
Spouses Ong applied for a P15 million term loan and P5 million credit line from BSA bank for their printing business. BSA only released P10.4 million of the term loan and P3 million of the credit line. BSA promised to release the remaining P2 million of the credit line after the P3 million was paid, which the Ongs did. However, BSA did not release the remaining P2 million. The court ruled that a contract was formed when BSA approved and released the initial funds. It also ruled that BSA violated the terms of the agreement by not releasing the full P5 million credit line after the Ongs complied with the conditions.
Spouses Ong applied for a P15 million term loan and P5 million credit line from BSA bank for their printing business. BSA only released P10.4 million of the term loan and P3 million of the credit line. BSA promised to release the remaining P2 million of the credit line after the P3 million was paid, which the Ongs did. However, BSA did not release the remaining P2 million. The court ruled that a contract was formed when BSA approved and released the initial funds. It also ruled that BSA violated the terms of the agreement by not releasing the full P5 million credit line after the Ongs complied with the conditions.
Spouses Ong applied for a P15 million term loan and P5 million credit line from BSA bank for their printing business. BSA only released P10.4 million of the term loan and P3 million of the credit line. BSA promised to release the remaining P2 million of the credit line after the P3 million was paid, which the Ongs did. However, BSA did not release the remaining P2 million. The court ruled that a contract was formed when BSA approved and released the initial funds. It also ruled that BSA violated the terms of the agreement by not releasing the full P5 million credit line after the Ongs complied with the conditions.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
SPOUSES ONG VS BPI FAMILY SAVINGS
G.R. No. 208638
Reyes, Jr., J. CASE DOCTRINE: As a rule, a contract is perfected upon the meeting of the minds of the parties. FACTS: Spouses Francisco Ong and Betty Lim Ong and Spouses Joseph Ong Chuan and Esperanza Ong Chuan (collectively referred to as the petitioners) are engaged in the business of printing under the name and style "MELBROS PRINTING CENTER. In December 1996, Bank of Southeast Asia's (BSA) managers, Ronnie Denila and Rommel Nayve, visited petitioners' office and discussed the various loan and credit facilities offered by their bank. In view of petitioners' business expansion plans and the assurances made by BSA's managers, they applied for the credit facilities offered by the latter. They executed a real estate mortgage (REM) over their property situated in Paco, Manila, in favor of BSA as security for a P15,000,000.00 term loan and P5,000,000.00 credit line or a total of P20,000,000.00. With regard to the term loan, only P10,444,271.49 was released by BSA. With regard to the P5,000,000.00 credit line, only P3,000,000.00 was released. BSA promised to release the remaining P2,000,000.00 conditioned upon the payment of the P3,000,000.00 initially released to petitioners. Petitioners acceded to the condition and paid the P3,000,000.00 in full. However, BSA still refused to release the P2,000,000.00. Petitioners then refused to pay the amortizations due on their term loan. Later on, BPI Family Savings Bank (BPI) merged with BSA, thus, acquired all the latter's rights and assumed its obligations. BPI filed a petition for extrajudicial foreclosure of the REM for petitioners' default in the payment of their term loan. In order to enjoin the foreclosure, petitioners instituted an action for damages with Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction against BPI praying for P23,570,881.32 as actual damages; P1,000,000.00 as moral damages; P500,000.00 as attorney's fees, litigation expenses and costs of suit. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff. BPI appealed to the Court of Appeal averring that petitioners are liable to them on the principal balance of the mortgage loan agreement. ISSUES: 1.) WON there was already a binding contract between petitioners and BSA 2.) WON BSA incurred delay in the performance of its obligations? HELD: 23 CIVIL LAW REVIEW 2 CASES SBCA School of Law (Batch 2018 – 2019) 1.) Yes, there was a perfected contract. As a rule, a contract is perfected upon the meeting of the minds of the parties. In the case of Spouses Palada v. Solidbank Corporation, et al., this Court held that under Article 1934 of the Civil Code, a loan contract is perfected only upon the delivery of the object of the contract. Applying this to the case at bench, there is no iota of doubt that when BSA approved and released the P3,000,000.00 out of the original P5,000,000.00 credit facility, the contract was perfected. 2.) No, BSA did not incur delay. Loan is a reciprocal obligation, as it arises from the same cause where one party is the creditor and the other the debtor. The obligation of one party in a reciprocal obligation is dependent upon the obligation of the other, and the performance should ideally be simultaneous. This means that in a loan, the creditor should release the full loan amount and the debtor repays it when it becomes due and demandable. In this case, BSA did not only incur delay in releasing the pre-agreed credit line of P5,000,000.00 but likewise violated the terms of its agreement with petitioners when it deliberately failed to release the amount of P2,000,000.00 after petitioners complied with their terms and paid the first P3,000,000.00 in full. The default attributed to petitioners when they stopped paying their amortizations on the term loan cannot be sustained by this Court because long before they sent a Letter to BSA informing the latter of their refusal to continue paying amortizations, BSA had already reneged on its obligation to release the amount previously agreed upon, i.e., the P5,000,000.00 covered by the credit line.