BSC Hons Arch Studio Arc60306 Project 2 August 2018 v5
BSC Hons Arch Studio Arc60306 Project 2 August 2018 v5
BSC Hons Arch Studio Arc60306 Project 2 August 2018 v5
FINAL PROJECT
August 2018
0
SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING & DESIGN
Centre for Modern Architecture Studies in Southeast Asia
Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Architecture
Final Project
80% of final marks
Submission Weeks 7, 10 and 14
Introduction
From now on, students will concentrate on designing a Learning Centre within an urban infill site.
The design of the building is to consist of appropriate architectural responses that address the
aspects of the urban street context and user behavioural patterns as discerned and analysed in the
Preliminary Studies.
Apart from developing a narrative on architectural strategy in response to the relevant questions
pertaining to community and its context, the design should take into consideration a holistic
application of structural, spatial, functional and environmental requirements to address the user
needs for a Learning Centre. The design development of this project will include an introduction to
the legislative restrictions that impact an architectural scheme, the integration of lighting and
acoustic design, as well as the design exploration and detailing of the façade and building envelopes
that is coherent with the architectural language of the overall design project.
Brief
The studio runs through two projects: project 1: urban study on place making aspects; project 2
comprises of architectural strategy and design development. The site context is Jalan Stesan 1,
South Klang. There is a real life scenario to reactivate the urban spaces in order to connect to the
urban community. The studio project is collaborative with a research project at Taylor’s University
and the scenario of the future vision for the area to be a) a place for the community and b) with
an active frontage of the streets. The major issue being the fall of spatial connections and
engagement to the local community, to the tides of various contemporary forces. The current trend
is fading the rich cultural heritage rather than nurturing it. The solution is in design employing
critical approach to the notion of ‘content’ as a purposeful narrative to powerful questions relevant
to the context (Low, 2010). To begin with, the question is:
To what extent the Learning Centre for All can be connecting to and empowering the urban
community, at the street scale?
Task
Aim: to deduct a position for finding architecture and produce architectural design strategy.
By this time of the semester, the students should be able to find their positions to develop the
Learning Centre. The students are to individually interpret the idea of ‘Learning Centre’ and come
up with architectural strategy for the same. This will be in-reflection to the issues and inspirations
they found in the Project 1 in order to offer to character, continuity and enclose, quality of public
realm, ease of movement, legibility, adaptability and diversity in the city. Architecture is about
geometry. Exploration on form-typologies such as linear, perimeter and diffused in terms of layering,
subtraction, over-lapping etc is compulsory at this stage.
Architectural design strategy should be resolved for form, activity and circulation. The proposed
building should be of an area of minimum 1200 m2 and a maximum of 1300 m2 and 3-5 storeys
high in the given infill boundaries.
Apart from developing a narrative on architectural strategy in response to the relevant questions
pertaining to community and its context, the design should take into consideration a holistic
application of structural, spatial, technical and environmental requirements to address the user
needs for an urban Learning Centre. This will include a focus on lighting and acoustic design, as
well as design of the façade and building envelope that is of a coherent language to the overall
design scheme.
The idea of Learning Centre is recent in the architecture narration. You will have narrow down to a
specific need for the community from your urban analysis of project 1; community could mean
people sharing the urban location, context and of holding similar interests. Your Learning Centre is
Please refer to Nuefert Architect’s Data provided. All areas of the learning must be safe and
accessible for all potential users, regardless of any physical or other disability. Circulation should be
given careful consideration so that the public and community facilities accessed appropriately. This
will influence the design of every part of the building, from convenient drop-off/parking spaces for
people with disabilities and barrier-free access to the entrance, right down to the appropriate height
and stability of furniture and equipment.
The scheme for the Learning Centre should strictly span a total floor area of minimum 1200 m2 and
maximum of 1300 m2, and comprise between 3-5 storeys within its infill lot. Sufficient floor area
must be allocated for the design of a public realm, circulation and ancillary functions reading,
discussion that is required for a Learning Centre of this scale and type.
The design scheme must also take into consideration the appropriate building setbacks and basic
fire requirements (i.e. escape distances, stairs and shaft).
Submissions
Note: These requirements are subject to minor revisions that will be briefed by the Module
Coordinator ahead of the scheduled interims, reviews and submission deadlines as stipulated
in the Module Outline.
References:
References
Main References:
1. Baker, G. 1989. Design Strategies In Architecture (2nd Ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
2. Bentley, I., et.al., 2013, Responsive Environments: Manual For Designers, Routledge, London
3. Lynch, K. 1979. The Image Of The City. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
4. Low, K. M., 2010, Smallprojects, Adaptus
5. Llewelyn – Davies, 2001, Urban Design Compendium 1, Chapter 4 ‘Facades and Details’, , English
Partnerships, the Housing Corporation, London
For Weekly Readings, please refer to the handouts to be provided by the Module Coordinator.
*Note: Students are required to obtain a minimum C grade in this assessment to pass the module.
.
Marking criteria
DESIGN COMMUNICATION
Presentation drawings that demonstrate clarity of information presented / 15
LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS
Design considers and includes expanded aspects of design e.g. regulatory requirements, boundary
setback and fire requirements. / 10
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS & TECHNOLOGICAL INTEGRATION
Consideration and integration of appropriate structural system, lighting, acoustic and façade systems to
suit overall building design. Y/N
TOTAL 100
The above criteria will be evaluated at incremental stages via the following assessment types:
FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT: Week 10
Weekly monitoring and feedback on design process.
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
Final evaluation of design outcomes/project.
SCHEDULE
(Subject to change at short notice)
Week 6 2 8 6
Mon, 8 October Design Development Plan-Section Studies
Week 11 - 10 6
Mon, 12 November Lecture 10: Presentation Skill – Design Development Production of
Diagramming for Design Presentation Model and
Representation Panels
Hafiz Amirrol
Thurs, 15 November Final briefing by Dr suchi Design Visualization
Week 12 - 10 6
Mon, 19 November Design Visualization Pre-final Review #1 Production of
(progress check) Presentation Model and
Panels
Thurs, 22 November Design Visualization Pre-final Review #2
(progress check)
Week 13 - 10 6
26 – 30 November Production of presentation Design Visualization Production of
Presentation Model and
Final presentation Panels
PIN UP 28 NOVEMEBR 2018 Final Presentation
REVIEW 29 NOVEMBER 2018
- STUDY LEAVE 16
10 – 14 December -
- EXAMINATION
Remarks:
1. The Project Brief is to be distributed to the students in the first week of the semester.
2. Any changes to the Project Brief shall be communicated (in writing) to the Programme Director and the approved
revised version must be communicated to the students