Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

    • 84 views

    Report Writing A181

    Uploaded by

    Nur
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating report writing. It assesses content on organization, information provided, and analysis. It also evaluates appearance, grammar/spelling, sources/references, and timeliness. Each category is scored from 0-12 based on criteria like relevance, detail, research, and formatting. Higher scores signify more organization, information, analysis, and proper formatting, sources, and timeliness.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Report Writing A181

    Uploaded by

    Nur
    84 views2 pages
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating report writing. It assesses content on organization, information provided, and analysis. It also evaluates appearance, grammar/spelling, sources/references, and timeliness. Each category is scored from 0-12 based on criteria like relevance, detail, research, and formatting. Higher scores signify more organization, information, analysis, and proper formatting, sources, and timeliness.

    Original Description:

    Report writing Rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a rubric for evaluating report writing. It assesses content on organization, information provided, and analysis. It also evaluates appearance, grammar/spelling, sources/references, and timeliness. Each category is scored from 0-12 based on criteria like relevance, detail, research, and formatting. Higher scores signify more organization, information, analysis, and proper formatting, sources, and timeliness.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    84 views2 pages

    Report Writing A181

    Uploaded by

    Nur
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating report writing. It assesses content on organization, information provided, and analysis. It also evaluates appearance, grammar/spelling, sources/references, and timeliness. Each category is scored from 0-12 based on criteria like relevance, detail, research, and formatting. Higher scores signify more organization, information, analysis, and proper formatting, sources, and timeliness.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Report Writing Rubric

    Semester Session : __________________________________________________


    Course Name ( Course Code) : __________________________________________________
    Lecture group :
    Student Name (Matric No) : __________________________________________________

    Task description :___________________________________________________

    CONTENT (Report Writing)


    Traits Poor Fair Good Excellent Score
    (0-3) (4-6) (7-9) (10-12)
    Organisation Totally unrelated. Remotely relevant. Somewhat relevant. Directly relevant.
    The information Information is organised Information is organised Information is very
    appears to be but paragraphs are not with well-constructed organised with well-
    disorganised. well-structured. paragraphs. constructed paragraphs
    and subheadings.

    Information One or more topics All topics are addressed All topics are addressed All topics are addressed
    were not addressed. and most questions are and most questions are and all questions are
    Information has little answered with about 1 answered with at least answered. _____ x2
    or nothing to do with sentence each. about 2 sentences each. Information clearly
    the main topic. Information clearly Information clearly related relates to the main topic.
    relates to the main topic. to the main topic. It It includes several
    No details and / or provides 1 - 2 supporting supporting details and /
    examples are given. details and / or examples. or examples.

    Analyses Provides insufficient Provides somewhat Demonstrates thoughtful Demonstrates


    evaluation and critical adequate evaluation and evaluation and critical sophisticated evaluation _____ x2
    analysis of the topic in critical analysis of the analysis of the topic in and critical analysis of
    terms of research and topic in terms of research terms of research and the topic in terms of
    comparison to similar and comparison to similar comparison to similar research and comparison
    work done by others. work done by others. work done by others. to similar work done by
    others.

    Grammar & Many grammatical, Some grammatical, A few grammatical, No grammatical,


    Spelling spelling or punctuation spelling or punctuation spelling or punctuation spelling or punctuation
    errors. errors. errors. errors.
    Appearance Unacceptable Appearance is acceptable Appearance is generally Excellent formatting and
    appearance. Does not but a lot could be good; only some elements appearance. Use
    use appropriate table, improved. need to be improved appropriate table, figure,
    figure, font, font size, font, font size, line
    line spacing and spacing and border
    border areas. Unclear areas.
    style.
    Sources & Some sources are not All sources (information All sources (information All sources (information
    References accurately and graphics) are and graphics) are and graphics) are
    documented. accurately documented accurately documented, accurately documented
    References are not but many are not in the but a few are not in the in the desired format.
    cited in text, and no or desired format. desired format. Complete references in
    few references are Few references are cited Most references are cited text and reference list.
    provided in the in text and in the in text and appropriately All references use
    reference list. reference list. provided in reference list. correct style and format.
    Style and format are Most references use Most references use
    incorrect. incorrect style and correct style and format.
    format.
    Timeliness Report handed in more Up to 1 week late. Up to two days late. Report handed in on
    than 1 week late. time.
    Total Score /108

    Lecturer’s Name : _________________________________

    Date :__________________________________

    You might also like