Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

    • 185 views

    Valdez vs. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 132424, May2, 2006

    Uploaded by

    Myka
    The Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the lower courts in favor of the petitioners in an unlawful detainer case. It found that the petitioners' complaint lacked the necessary jurisdi…
    Full description

    Valdez vs. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 132424, May2, 2006

    Uploaded by

    Myka
    185 views6 pages
    The Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the lower courts in favor of the petitioners in an unlawful detainer case. It found that the petitioners' complaint lacked the necessary jurisdictional allegations to establish a case for either unlawful detainer or forcible entry. Specifically, it noted the complaint did not allege that the petitioners had prior physical possession of the property or that they had given the private respondents the right to occupy the premises. As such, the Court of Appeals concluded the lower court did not have proper jurisdiction over the case and dismissed the complaint.

    Original Description:

    CIVPRO

    Original Title

    6. Valdez vs. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 132424, May2, 2006

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    185 views6 pages

    Valdez vs. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 132424, May2, 2006

    Uploaded by

    Myka
    The Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the lower courts in favor of the petitioners in an unlawful detainer case. It found that the petitioners' complaint lacked the necessary jurisdi…
    Full description
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 6

    Reward Your Curiosity

    Everything you want to read.
    Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.
    No Commitment. Cancel anytime.
    576648e32a3d8b82ca71961b7a986505