Nail Cakirhan - Turkey
Nail Cakirhan - Turkey
Nail Cakirhan - Turkey
Designer:
Nail akirhan
Istanbul, Turkey
Carpenters:
Ali Dura and Cafer Karaca
Mugla, Turkey
Client:
Nail and Halet akirhan
Istanbul, Turkey
Completed:
1971
0213.TUR
Table of Contents
Summary (4 pages)
I. Objectives
The lot measures 2,000 sq.m. ( about 0-5 acres ) and includes tall pine
trees . A road toward the north connects it to the small cluster of houses
that make up the village some 500 meters away . Akyaka has a tradition of
timber houses , but modern concrete structures are increasingly common , as
is true throughout Turkey .
living ( themselves)
gathering ( with friends
) sleeping ( themselves )
sleeping ( friends )
These functions could overlap in the same space or change according to the
time of day . A sheltered outdoor area was to provide additional
the two side rooms , enhancing the multivalency of the house .
The lateral walls of the mabeyn contain ornamental cupboards ( fcr books ,
The loggia is supported on wooden columns with decorated capitals and contains
the traditional raised seat or ayazlik at the west end , where the breeze is
strongest .
The roof has no truss , but simply posts and beams . Wooden planks form its
slopes , which are covered with the round , red "alaturka" tiles of the region .
The walls are filled with brick and rendered with lime-plaster and whitewash .
The floor is wood , over a 5 cm. airspace , except in the shower rooms , the
kitchenette and the toilet . The ceilings and built-in furniture are also wooden
.
2. Structural technology
All major elements were fabricated on-site and the woodwork was crafted by hand .
There were 4 workmen , 2 masons and 2 carpenters supervised by the designer
himself .
Initially a well as was dug for water , and a septic tank for sewage . The house
was connected to the Akyaka electricity lines in 1977 , and to the water system
in 1981 .
The technology was traditional , all materials were locally produced and the
labour force was 100 per cent Turkish .
The first step for Nail Cakirhan was in effect to seek out building craftsmen ,
especially carpenters of the old school . But only two elderly
As the Cakirhans were freqnelty away , a smaller , simpler caretaker's lodge also
seemed necessary .
1. Siting
The house was built on the lower slope of the land , beneath old pine trees ,
facing south towards the cool sea breeze . The caretaker's lodge flanks the
entrance on the upper part of the site . A garage and a store-room were later
added nearby.
A path 2 m. wide and some 50 m. long leads from the entrance to the house . Large
local flagstones were set directly into the ground without cement , so that herbs
can grow between them . The existing forest was preserved , and only local trees
and plants were added . The garden is enclosed on three sides by a traditional
masonry wall about 1.50 m. high , which tapers towards the top : the southern end
is open to overlook the sea .
2. Architectural Aspects
The caretaker's lodge contains two lateral rooms separated by a toilet and a
shower room . It also has a loggia towards the south , which can be entered from
the sides .
3. Decoration
No moveable furniture is used in the house , with the exception of low couches
with cushions placed below the windows in the central hall and
History of Project
The programme and the design were roughed out , without formal drawings , between
September 1969 and September 1970 . Construction started on September 10 , 1970
and preceded in three phases :
The garden wall , garage , storage house , path and ladscaping ware all completed
in a month during 1972 .
Total Cost
The total cost of construction was 97,960 T.L. , equivalent to $ 7,535 in 1983 .
V. Technical Assessment
Funds were completely private .
Design Features
The houses blend well into the natural environment , and in any case , the main
house is hardly visible behind the garden walls . Unfortunately , the
surroundings are changing drastically with the gradual construction of many
concrete houses .
Functional Assessment
The multi-purpose use of space is a major quality of the houses . The only
moveable furniture consists of tray-stands , book-stands and traditional braziers
. Beds are only set out at night , leaving the space free for daytime use . In
summer time , straw mats and kilims ( flat woven carpets ) are spread out in the
loggia and strewn with colorful cushions . The arrangement of the house perfectly
suits the inhabitants' way of life .
Environmental Performance
The house is thermally insulated by the large air space left beneath the tiled
gables of the roof . Hot air is vented through the wooden ceilings . When the sun
is high , the deep loggia and generous eaves provide a band of deep shadow over
the windows and around the house . In the summer , the house remains cool and
comfortably ventilated , yet without drafts . When the fireplaces are lit in the
winter , their glowing coals are
Analysis of Costs
The land was valued at 43,000 T.L. in Summer 1969 . The total cost was
97,960 T.L. ( US$7,535 in 1971 ) , comprising of :
The garden wall and the two entrance gates cost 14,040 T.L. and should be
included in the price of the infrastructure .
The total , 170,000 T.L. ( US$13,077 in 1971 ) was about 13 per cent more than
the initial estimate of 150,000 T.L. ( The annual rate of inflation during the
1970's was 30 per cent . ) No professional fees were involved , for Cakirhan
served as his own designer and master-builder The unit cost for construction
was US$38T64 per sq.m. Official statistics for the same year , 1971 , give an
average cost os US$30.98 per sq.m, for housing , which rises to US$64.69 when
the construction is concrete .
The house does not reveal itself easily , even once one is inside the
garden walls , as it turns its back to visitors and is somewhat masked by
trees . Indeed it remains in close harmony with nature . "When
Main Actors
The craftsmen were mainly Ali Duru and Cafer Karaca , master
carpenters from Ula .
III
j
;5': T
i
lr
I ti 1 r
ai
5 ; SS
gj" f r ~
T ** 1 ** r
l.l _ J!. T
f
: \
. *' St
7^V-* J
NAIL
CAKIRHAN 157
HOUSE
Master Jury's Citation: For the purity and elegance in design and
decoration resulting from (he direct continuation and reflection
of traditional values. The design of the house goes well beyond
the simple reproduction of past models; its ornaments are
judicious, sober, and genuine. Its extraordinary harmony with
nature, as well as its multipurpose use and the ambience of its
inner space, gives it great distinction.
This airy and attractive house deserves special attention for
its sensitive revival of craftsmanship and cultural sensitivity as a
whole.
It was as a retirement home for himself and his wife, Halet, that
Nail Qakirhan designed and supervised the building of this
traditional Islamic Ottoman house in his home province of
Mugla. What is particularly interesting about this project is that
Qakirhan, a poet and journalist by profession, was never formally
schooled as an architect but became interested in construction in
his forties while accompanying his wife, an archaeologist, on her
tield trips, and he was over sixty when he began work as an
architect.
Since completing his house he has designed and supervised
the building of thirty other houses (eighteen in Akyaka itself),
renovated several older ones, and completed a hotel. While the
first of these projects were weekend houses for nonresidents,
some of the later ones were designed for the villagers themselves.
Qakirhans work is further assessed and put in context in the
essay on contemporary Turkish architecture (pages 64-75).
Introduction
Nail Cakirhan , a poet and journalist , was not formally schooled as an architect ,
but became interested in construction in his 40's as he accompanied his wife , an
archaeologist , on her field missions . Since the completion of a modest retirement
house for himself and his wife in 1971 , he has realised over 30 projects in this
mountainous region of Turkey . He was over 60 years of age when he began his work as
an architect .
Working with him as colleagues were elder craftsmen skilled in traditional
techniques . After this first house , Mr. Cakirhan was asked by a close friend to
design a second , and soon many requests were received for similar weekend houses
from non-resident clients . Before long , however , local villagers took an
interest , and later realisations include many year-round , permanent residences
for the local population .
This demand for traditional housing has rehabilitated many crafts , woodworking in
particular , and many young apprentices have begun and continue their training . Three
of Mr. Cakirhan's projects have been presented in this volume ; the " M.I. House " and
the " I.G. Residence " , chronologically the second and third in his oeuvre , are
presented in pictorial form . Additional information on these houses is maintained
I. Objectives
For the years following his retirement , the designer sought for himself
and his wife a traditional and well-crafted residence , peaceful and
comfortable , in his homeland and reminiscent of his childhood .
The house was built in three phases . No formal drawings were made : the design
was laid out " on-site " in September 1970 , and the foundations framework ,
walls and roof were completed in 45 days . Woodworking and finishing were
completed in a 24 day period in June 1971 , and an additional 15 days were
taken for the furnishings . Landscaping was undertaken in 1972 .
The total actual cost was TL 170*000 ( US$ 17,800 at the time ) , approximately
11% more than initial estimates . About half the total was expended on
materials , and 1/4 each for labour and for the land .
V. Project Significance
The designer and his team have built over 30 other houses , renovated several
older ones , and have completed a motel . While the first of these projects
were weekend houses for non-residents , some of the later ones were designed
for and have been enthusiastically received by the villagers themselves .
An important aspect of this project is the motivation that has been given to
local crafsmen , especially among the younger generation . Carpenters whose
work had been limited to frame and formwork for concrete have begun again to
work with traditional joinery .
1. 1.1 C o u n t ry : Tu r k e y ________________
1.2 P r oj e c t : Na i l C ak i r h a n H o u s e
1.3 A r ch i t e c t : N a il C a k ir h a n
1.4 D a te s o f i ) d e s ig n : 1 9 69 - 1 97 0
i i ) c o n s tr u c t i o n : 1 9 70 - 1 97 1
w o od e n h ou s e .
2.2 P r oj e c t Ob j e c t i ve s : T o p r o v i de a m o de s t , p e a c ef u l
r e si d e n c e t o t h e o w n er , w hi c h w o ul d b e
r e mi n i s c en t o f hi s c hi l d h o od a n d wh e r e
h e w o u l d r e t i r e w i t h h i s w if e .
3.3 B u il d i n g M a t e r i al s & T e c h n iq u e s ( i d e n ti f y i n g w h e t h er s e lf h e l p o r
not )
i) F o un d a t i on s : ru b b l e s t on e w a 1 1 w i th c e m en t
m o rt a r # s
2.3 D e sc riiip)t ioWna llof
s Site : ti m b e r f r w i th b r ic k i n fi l l
a n d s u r r ou n d i n g s The sita emi e s l o c at e d be s i d e A k y a k a
i i i) R o of i n g : lovill
c a lage un dthtei lever
: r oat s " al ena t u rofk athe
" Bay
iv) O t he r s p ec i a l of K erm a ( Gtt ko vay) . It d lie in a
f e at u r e s ( i f a n y)pine fo res t a t the base s of rugg ed
moun tai ns .
0,
3. 3.1 S i te A r e a : 2 , 00 0 sq.m . ( 2 ha. )
3.2 B u il d i n g A r e a : 195 s q .m .
3.4 B e ne f i c i ar i e s : N u m b er o f pe r s o n s 2 ________________
T y pe o f pe r s o n s ( s o ci o / e c on . l e v el , et c . )
m e di u m i nc o m e l ev e l
B u dg e t s$ 1 1 ,5 3 8 ( 1 =$ ( 1 983)
9 7 0)
A c tu a l ( to t a l ) * $ 1 3 ,0 7 7 ( 1 97 1 ) _ $ ( 1 983)
B r ea k d o w n o f
A c tu a l C os t s
L a nd $ 3 , 30 5 ( 1 97 0 ) -5 ( 1 983)
I n fr a
s t ru c t u r e .5 1 ,080 ( 1 97 1 ) $ ( 1 98 3 )
B u il d i n g 9$ 7 , 53 5 ( 1 97 1 ) = $ ( 1 98 3 )
T o ta l .$ 1 1 ,920 ( 1 97 1 ) $ ( 1 983)
U n it C o s ts
(i) Unit Cost ( 19 ) ( 19 8 3 )
o f B u i l d in g $ 3 8 .6 4 / s q . m. $ / s q. m .
C o mp a r e s w i t h p r es e n t ra n g e i n c o u nt r y of :
H i gh : $ / s q. m . (1 983)
Med : $ 64 .69 / s q. m . ( 1 97 1 )
Low : $ 30 .98 / s q. m . ( 1 97 1 )
i
( i i) A c t ua l t o t al c o st o f Ho u s i n g U n i t n U S $ 1 9 8 3 ( N i a m e y)
( Ac t u a l C o s t : Nu m b e r o f U n i ts )
( 1
L a nd : $ 9 8 3)
I n fr a s t r uc t u r e : $ ( 1 98 3 )
( 1
B u il d i n g : $ 9 8 3)
T o ta l : $ ( 1 983)
5. C ou n t r y E c o n o m i c da t a
5.1 P e r c a p i ta i n c o me : $ 1 , 47 0 ( 1 98 0 ) (p.a.)
5.2 A v er a g e Ho u s e h o ld
i n co m e : $ ( 1 9 8 3 ) (p.a.)
$ ( 1 9 8 3 ) ( p . m o .)
5.3 P o ve r t y th r e s h o ld : $ ( 1 9 8 3 ) h o u s e ho l d / mo .
* * * E x c h an g e r a te US$ 1 = 1 3 .0 0 T . L. ( 1 9 7 1)
U S $ 1 = 2 0 0 . 0 0 T . L . ( 1 9 83 )
E s ti m a t e d a n n u a l i n f la t i o n r a t e : = 30 %
it
later also Bird Tepeli " "
II II
A. Programme Development
1. Date of Commencement September 1969
2. Date of Completion
September 1970
C. Analysis of Costs
2. Public
a. Local none
b. National none
c. International none
I). Materials (describe and indicate whether locally produced or imported) all local
1. Infill brick
2. Indicate which major building parts were fabricated on-site and which were fabricated elsewhere.
All major building parts were fabricated on site .
G. Type of Labour
_65J* .
Force (indicate
-35 % __
percentage) I-
Skilled 2.
100 %
Unskilled
none
11. Origin of Labour
Please describe the genesis of the project, through programme, design and construction to final and present occupancy.
The Istanbul of the thirties . Large and small timber houses , kiosks
,spacious residences (konaks) with their red-tile roofs , within vineyards
and gardens , all still standing . Aged trees : monuments of green . The
Bosphorus with its water-side houses and mansions (yalis) on its shores .
The Asiatic shore : a yali v/e lived in ; windows down to the floor , as
though life proceeded in a boat on the water . The European shore : our
present house ; 150 yeans old and a quarter of a century of our life herein
.
The Bosphorus , its flashing , luminous waters , its bays , its coasts :
a sea of slimy rubbish and Diesel oil .The open air resorts , heartbreaking
: the birds , the nightingales , the reed flutes (ney) in the tea-houses are
silent ; instead , a babbling , screechy , degenerate hassle Voices ,
records , tapes of doubtful character - tedious , shameful , A queer ,
terrible city : one can no more swim in its waters , walk inits streets
, en^oy its open airresorts
What can one do in this town but take to flight ?
1969 - the flight The escape towards the unfergotten , the un-
forgettable places , roads , houses , monumental plane-trees But alas .
The tragedy begins at the entrance of Mugla i row after row , storey after
storey of cement blocks Interspersed between them , old, forsaken timber
houses , roof tiles and windowB broken , helpless , exhausted and destitute
, frightened and crushed in the presence of these concrete monsters . The
khans and bathhouses that made Mugla what it was , levelled to the ground .
In their places apartment houses again and again , the roads and squares all
schorching cement or asphalt The old town still throningabove all this -
for hotf long ?
Ula - still in good shape , but gone is the market , gone are the
squares in the midst of the town , the stone-paved , cool streets , the
rustling plane-trees , the rose-garden cemeteries They are all gone . Gone
are the harmonious , musical voices of the muezzins , the sala Everywhere
in the center tar , asphalt , trucks racing all over , a schorching sun in
the squares , hoarse , growling loudspeakers on the
minarets . The azan by loudspeaker from stereotype tapes and the sala -
for wooden forms for pouring concrete Once cleaned , these partly self-
made hand-tools appeared with their beautiful patina , acquired through a
life-time of work .
Work begun by revisiting old streets , old houses , beginning with those
of Ali and Cafer usta : rooms , windows , shutters ,doors , cupboards ,
dimensions , forms - all as desired . Especially Safer usta's house :
ornamented wooden ceilings with central design , tinted like that of
grandfather's . Then , one by one the villages , towns ,the city .
Everything that was still standing , even though falling apart . The doors
of the cupboards that are now in the central room of 215 TUR was found in a
cow stable during one of these trips . The pinewood frame was worm-eaten ,
but onoe the crust and whitewash were cleaned off , the parts in ornamented
walnut-wood turned out to be still in good shape ( fig. 8 ) .1969 thus
came to a close .
But whatever their age and shape , the main concept of these houses does
not change - all are oriented towards the same goals :
a. An intimate ,harmonious togetherness , a unison , as it were , with
nature , the effort of identification tfith it , not splitting apart .
To be inside and outside simultaneously , embracing nature , but enjoying
great privacy at the same time . The lightness , comfort and happiness
these houses inspire seem to stem from this symbiosis .
b. In spite of all the intricate - even sophisticated- wood-work ,the
painstaking care , the ornaments , the tinting , everything is modest ,
sober , genuine . No false pretentions , no gaudiness . All forms and
ornaments matured and filtered through centuries , as though passed
through an alembic .
c. These houses seem to be alive , to breathe , as though they had a heart
or lungs . The walls , the fire-places , the ceilings ,all
seem to breathe - never a lack of air , never a feeling of oppression.
d. Each space in these houses is both a piece of the house and also an
entity for itself . The rooms are not limited in their use , all
functions that are needed can be performed in each of them , they are of
multipurpose character : one lives , sits , eats , cooks , sleeps ,
washes and receives guests in them ; beds are made up at night and
cleared away in the morning .
e. With their slight walls letting in beams of light , their ceilings ,
their cupboards and shelves , their doors and windows , their dimensions
Fall 1970 - work on the house in Gokova , Akyaka village . With 2 masons
, the 2 carpenters and 4 workmen foundations , timber walls , brick infill ,
roof and chimneys were completed within 45 days .
When the fire-places are lit in the winter , their glowing coals placed
into the brazier in the central hall and the doors to the lateral rooms
opened , the whole house gets evenly heated
A kitchenette and a toilet have been added on the far end of the lateral
rooms , at either end of the porch , fcom where they are accessible (fig.2 ,
17 ) .
The local forest-earth and vegetation has been preserved and only trees
and plants of local provenience have been planted The garden is enclosed on
three sides by a masonry wall some 1.50 m high , of traditional form
(tapering top) , leaving open the southern end above the^car]
Response to Culture
IX. DOCUMENTATION
Please indicate the materials you enclose for project documentation:
list )
_il---- 34) ffttf Black35 mm.
Slides;Color, bOX (list appended )
5 Drawings: Community plan. Sjtc plan. Floor plans. Sections, fiteratrons. in album(with
list,
cf.VII
Project
Brief/Progr Other (Please specify: work-sketches in album (with list) -)
amme \
also 4 of these on large sheets 40x50 cm
^ pps Biographical Data
Please note: The submission of this Record is a prerequisite to candidacy for the Award. All information contained and submitted with the Form will be kept strictly confidential until the announcement of the 1983
Award recipients. Subsequently, such information may he nadc available by the Aga Khan Award Foundation for scholarly purposes only. Nevertheless, persons wishing to publish, reproduce or reprint such information
shall be required to secure prior permission in each instance.
32, chcmin dcs Grets, 1218 Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland, Telephone (22) 98 90 70
11
A. Projet Title " M.I. House (with which I wish to replace the titlfc
"Inkaya House " )
B. Postal Address Minu Inkaya , c/o Akyaka PTT Qubesi , Mugla , Turkey
C. tXDGQteWX (e g- Economist. Sociologist. Demographer. Engineer) D.c^wwtpwr Constructor : Nail Qakirhan (for
adress , see above)
E. Master Craftsman
Team of local craftsmen
B. Uscr/Occupant
A. Programme Development
B. Design
C. Construction
V. PROJECT ECONOMICS
(For COsts. please give amounts and currencies. Specify their datc(s) of validity) 1 U.S. Dollar C8. 14 ? 11*
A. Total Initial Budget 250 000.- T1
B. Total Actual Costs 225 000.-Tl
C. Analysis of Costs
1. Private 100 %
2. Public
a. Local
b. National
c. International
Specify ihe provisions that were initially made and are now enforced for the present and future maintenance of the bjilding.
Indicate any significant change(s) that have occurred since the project was completed.
The protective coating put on the wooden parts of the exteriojr
during construction was renewed in 1998 and has to be renewed now again ; the
habitual periodical control of roof tiles was carried out as needed . No
changes whatsoever have been made since the project was completed . The
garden , which would need regular care , has been left in its natural , wild
state , with only a very few trees having plant* '
been ;e
p. d
IX. DOCUMENTATION
(Please indicate that which you enclose with the Clients Record)
The Aga Khan Award for Architecture requests from each architect the visual and technical information concerning their work. However, to complete the portfolio for each
project, you may wish to enclose additional materials, such as drawings, textual descriptions, photographs, etc.
------ Biographical Data
Project Brief/Programme - Other
(Please specify: The architact/planner/constructor : portraj.tj
Form is a prerequisite to candidacy for the Award. All information contained in and submitted with the Form il the announceme nt of the Award recipients.
Subsequently, such information may be made available by the holarly purposes only. Nevertheless, persons wishing to publish, reproduce or reprint such
Please note: The submission of this will be kept
strietly confidential un Aga Khan Awards
information shall be n each instance.
Authorized Signature.
4d 1 r " .................................................................. .... 10 th April 1982
r. AWARD CRITERIA
The Aga Khan Award for Architecture seeks to recognize projects which demonstrate
architectural excellence at all levels. Since architecture cannot be isolated from the
society in which it is created, the Award will consider the context in w hich architecture
is practiced and the processes of design, research and evaluation through which it is
achieved. The social, economic, technical, physical and environmental challenges to
which the projects respond must be important factors in any assessment of their success.
Projects will be chosen as much for their catalytic value in the evolution of a new
cultural and environmental sensibility, as for their individual design merits.
Consideration will be given particularly tc those projects which use local initiatives and
resources creatively, which meet both the functional and cultural needs of their users
and have the potential to stimulate related developments elsewhere in the Muslim
world.
Projects completed or in use between 1956 and 1980 will be eligible for the 1983
Award. Because positive user response and beneficial environmental impact are
essential Award criteria, only projects completed or in use for at least two years will be
considered. All projects arc eligible except those associated with His Highness the Aga
Khan or other members of the Award.
Tele
x
2. Date of Telephone _
Completion
3. Architcct(s)
Postal Address MAlL-QAKIhiiAN ________________________
AKYAKA -KO^U -MAKMAMlS-I-IUGLJi-
TelephoneTelex
T0be Invited
Telephone -f-rom-AKXAKA ------ Telex
post office.
4. Clicnt(s) NAlL CAKIMHAN _______
Pos'al Address 3-MUGLA-
TURKEY
L
Nail Cakirhan House. Akyaka Village. Turkey
III. PROJECT DESCKIPI ION
The reasons for nomination are the same for oil three houses. Thus my
statement is given continously on the three forms.
Tnese tnree houses are the most representative among Air. Kail
Vtkirhsn's Akyaka house group. Ur. Vukirlion, a poet, first worked
in the implementation of my project for the Karatepe Open Air
museum, in 1 in Adana, hater he was the supervisor on my behalf in
The Turkish historical Society building implementation, in Ankara.
The fist house he designed and implemented in AKyake, was his own.
The purity and the modest beauty of the architecture is the direct
continuation and reflection of the Islamic-Ottoman behavioral
values, A real deep sense of exlstance is completed
cost.
V. SUBMISSION OF NOMINATIONS
Nomination is the first of several steps prior to project selection of the Aga Khan Award
for Architecture. Subsequent contact with architects and clients demands a great deal of
time, as does compila'.ion of portofolios for each project. Therefore, we would
appreciate receiving nominations as early as passible to ensure project presentation for
the 1983 Award.
Atbough they are designed for medium class families, they also can b used
as a newly developed specimen for tho low income group housing.
In addition to their architectural values, the low cost of tho buildings
attracted the medium income intellectuals first, then the wealthy people as
Hr. durcan and finally the poor citizens of Akyaka, fer e;.* the nuhtar of
Akyaka.
The use of local materials, the low cost of the construction, the education
of a new generation of craftsmen, actualisation of nrchitec tural problems
and creation of a new visual sensibility among the citizens of Akyaka and a
group of '.Turkish intellectuals are tho most important contributions of
these houses.
Yayla :
People thus move from the plains to the mountains (with cool air ,
cold water and grass for the animals ) , or alternatively from the
towns to the country-side with fields , vineyards , orchards , for the
preparation of winter provisions . Thus Miyla's yayla is some 2-3 km.
from the town, in an extensive area of fields , orchards and vineyards
.
In the near past seaside locations, that were earlier malaria-infested , like
all the present summer resorts of Miyla ( namely Bodrum , Marmaris , Gokova ,
Datca , Koyceziz and Fethiye ) , but which have since been sanitized (
"assainis^s" ) , have also become yayla places .
In this sense , Nail Cakirhan residence is a yayla house much rather than a
"secondary residence" or "week-end" house , both of which concepts have their
roots in the western tradition and both of which presuppose a certain
economical status of their owners , which is incompatible with the yayla
concept .
B n v Hlf AaB
Halet and Nail Cakirhan with guest in their home
-5
Nail Cakirhan House. Akyaka Village. Turkey
OTOW
3lVt> HlYM
0 TO
M
1 _ L_1 ..I
Nail Cakirhan House. Akyaka Village. Turkey
Nail Cakirhan House. Akyaka Village. Turkey
M.I. House: Ground Fl oor plan