QSas
QSas
QSas
TECHNOLOGY
CHAPTER 1
COLLEGE OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
The Problem and Its Background
Introduction
TECHNOLOGY
2
COLLEGE OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
folks say that the place used to be the hiding place of the
fresh air and its ever flowing crystal clear water from the
resort.
in attracting guests.
EULOGIO AMANG RODRIGUEZ INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
Conceptual framework
TECHNOLOGY
Common
problem
encountere
d.
EULOGIO AMANG RODRIGUEZ INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
Feedback
1.2 Selling?
of Batis Aramin?
EULOGIO AMANG RODRIGUEZ INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
Hypothesis
Quezon.
time frame of the study was from June 2014 to March 2015.
COLLEGE
HM Students. OF HOSPITALITY
This study is to MANAGEMENT
expand their knowledge
activities.
Definition of Terms
(www.meriamwebster.com).
advertising (www.meriamwebster.com).
Growth anticipated progressive growth especially in
COLLEGE
Patronize to actOFasHOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
patron who provides aid or support
(www.meriamwebster.com).
discounting (www.meriamwebster.com).
position (www.meriamwebster.com).
EULOGIO AMANG RODRIGUEZ INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
2006)
11
In planning
EULOGIO such
AMANGactivities should
RODRIGUEZ INSTITUTE notAND
OF SCIENCE lose sight of
TECHNOLOGY
the facts that sale promotion is actually consisting of two
period that is the planned. What was the sales volume? What
12
12
2010)
TECHNOLOGY
14
COLLEGE OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
process.
services.
15
selling.
(Siegel, 2008)
information.
16
(Stacey, 2006)
Local Studies
17
the place where he wants to find it, and at the way he wants
to get it.
18
conditions;COLLEGE OFit
i.e, when HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
is difficult to get orders or to
get orders,
19
get business.
Foreign Studies
the entire market. the smaller target, the bigger the bulls
eye.
20
(Ghosh, 2011)
21
TECHNOLOGY
TECHNOLOGY
CHAPTER 3
COLLEGE OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
Methodology
Research Design
employees.
technique.
Table 1
f %
Local Community 60 60
Local Tourist 40 40
Total 100 100
COLLEGE
respondents.They wereOF HOSPITALITY
classified MANAGEMENT
according to the following
24
respondents as specified.
Table 2
25
a frequency of 15 or 30 percent.
a frequency of 9 or 18 percent.
percent.
26
52 percent.
percent.
or 60 percent.
Status.
Table 4
27
educational attainment.
Table 5
percent.
28
occupation.
Table 6
Respondents According to Occupation
frequency of 22 or 44 percent.
29
a frequency of 9 or 18 percent.
frequency of 31 or 31 percent.
suggestion.
30
of the study.
data:
EULOGIO AMANG RODRIGUEZ INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND
1. Frequency it is the actual response to a specific
TECHNOLOGY
Formula:
% = f/Nx100
Where:
% = Percentage
f = Frequency
31
X=fx/N or Wm = wx / w
Where:
respondents.
EULOGIO AMANG RODRIGUEZ INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND
3. Percentage This is used descriptive statistics or
TECHNOLOGY
% = f/Nx100
Where:
% = Percentage
f = Frequency
to correlate:
Formulas used:
SD = { xx 2 }
_________________
N 1
32
Where
SD = Standard Deviation
{xx}2 = the summation of mean squared deviation
N = no. of cases
EULOGIO AMANG RODRIGUEZ INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND
a. Standard Deviation TECHNOLOGY
Formula:
COLLEGE OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
SD = Standard Deviation
t= x1-x2
rounding of numerals.
TECHNOLOGY
CHAPTER 4
and selling?
Table 7
4 COLLEGE
4.00 4.19OF HOSPITALITY
EffectiveMANAGEMENT (E)
34
Table 8
Assessment of Pricing on Promotional Activities
Community
EULOGIO AMANG Tourist
RODRIGUEZ INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE ANDCWM
WM VI
TECHNOLOGY
WM VI WM VI
CRITERIA Rank
1. Discounts
COLLEGE OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
for
Citizen
2. Free 3.68 E 3.73 E 3.70 E 2
entrance
CWM 4.08 E 3.95 E 4.02 E
35
36
Table 9
respectively.
of 3.97.
37
Table 10
Degree of freedom = 4
38
TECHNOLOGY
Mean Standard
COLLEGE t-ratio
OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
Computed Decision VI
CRITERIA Deviation
t-value
Tourist 4.08 0.16 Accept No
1.098 Ho Significant
Community 3.95 0.05
Critical t-value = 4.303
Degree of freedom = 2
39
COLLEGE
on promotional OF HOSPITALITY
activities on pricing.MANAGEMENT
Table 12
t-ratio
CRITERIA Groups Mean Standard Computed Decis VI
Deviation t-value ion
Tourist 3.95 0.13
Selling 0.29 Accep No
Community 3.91 0.21 t Ho signif
icant
Tourist 4.08 0.16
Pricing Community 3.95 0.05 1.10 Accep No
t Ho signif
icant
Selling Pricing
40
in terms of selling.
EULOGIO AMANG RODRIGUEZ INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
This implies that the two groups of respondents
COLLEGE
perceived same OF HOSPITALITY
perception MANAGEMENT
on the promotional activities of
41
SubProblem No.3. What are the common problem
Table 13
Problems Encountered
CRITERIA Rank
WM VI WM VI WM VI
1. Discounts
for
PWDs/Senior 2.73 ME 2.93 ME 2.83 ME 2
Citizen
2. Free
entrance for 1.98 SE 2.18 SE 2.08 SE 5
residence
3. Discount for 2.33 SE 2.37 SE 2.35 SE 3
groups
4. Giving
rebates for 2.13 SE 2.72 ME 2.42 SE 4
travel
operator
5. High
entrance fee 2.83 ME 2.90 ME 2.86 ME 1
CWM 2.40 SE 2.62 ME 2.51 SE
Range Verbal Interpretation
42
1.00 1.79 (NE) Not Encountered
EULOGIO AMANG RODRIGUEZ INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND
As presented in the table 12, two groups of respondents
TECHNOLOGY
TECHNOLOGY
CHAPTER 5
Summary
of 3.97.
groups of respondents.
COLLEGE OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
1.1 The computed t-value of 1.098 is less than the t
44
tourists.
respectively.
45
Conclusions
are drawn:
Recommendations
Based on the finding and conclusions, the following
resort.