Gulliver's Travels is a mock utopia that parodies concepts from Plato's Republic and Thomas More's Utopia. Swift depicts different societies in the lands Gulliver visits that each represent aspects of utopian ideals but also their flaws. The Houyhnhnms appear to be a rational utopia, but they treat Gulliver and Yahoos as less than human. Overall, Swift uses Gulliver's Travels to skeptically examine utopian concepts and argue that an truly ideal society is impossible due to human flaws.
Gulliver's Travels is a mock utopia that parodies concepts from Plato's Republic and Thomas More's Utopia. Swift depicts different societies in the lands Gulliver visits that each represent aspects of utopian ideals but also their flaws. The Houyhnhnms appear to be a rational utopia, but they treat Gulliver and Yahoos as less than human. Overall, Swift uses Gulliver's Travels to skeptically examine utopian concepts and argue that an truly ideal society is impossible due to human flaws.
Gulliver's Travels is a mock utopia that parodies concepts from Plato's Republic and Thomas More's Utopia. Swift depicts different societies in the lands Gulliver visits that each represent aspects of utopian ideals but also their flaws. The Houyhnhnms appear to be a rational utopia, but they treat Gulliver and Yahoos as less than human. Overall, Swift uses Gulliver's Travels to skeptically examine utopian concepts and argue that an truly ideal society is impossible due to human flaws.
Gulliver's Travels is a mock utopia that parodies concepts from Plato's Republic and Thomas More's Utopia. Swift depicts different societies in the lands Gulliver visits that each represent aspects of utopian ideals but also their flaws. The Houyhnhnms appear to be a rational utopia, but they treat Gulliver and Yahoos as less than human. Overall, Swift uses Gulliver's Travels to skeptically examine utopian concepts and argue that an truly ideal society is impossible due to human flaws.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
Gullivers Travels as a Mock Utopia
The tendency to hanker after a utopia is a perfectly human desire. Like
many narratives about voyages to nonexistent lands, Gullivers Travels explores the idea of utopiaan imaginary model of the ideal community. The idea of a utopia is an ancient one, going back at least as far as the description in Platos Republic of a city-state governed by the wise and expressed most famously in English by Thomas Mores Utopia. The literal meaning of Utopia is no place, nowhere. Thomas More gave this term to his ideal commonwealth. Swift incorporates the key concepts of Platos and Mores utopias into his own narrative, though his attitude toward utopia is much more skeptical. One can see the different lands of Gullivers travels as the parody of utopian literature. Hence Gulliver's Travels can be regarded as a mock Utopia. One of the main aspects about these famous historical utopias is the tendency to privilege the collective group over the individual. The children of Platos Republic are raised communally, with no knowledge of their biological parents, in the understanding that this system enhances social fairness. Lilliputians similarly raise their offspring collectively but its results are not exactly utopian, since Lilliputian are torn between conspiracies, jealousies, and backstabbing. Nonetheless, they are prone to making official edicts concerning the lives of the citizens and have well-established systems of granting their law-abiding citizens: Whoever there can bring sufficient proof that he hath strictly observed the laws of his country for seventy-three moons hath a claim to certain privileges. Brogdingnag forms more practical moral utopia than Lilliput. The Brobdingnagians are the epitome of moral giants and their size shows that their morality is also gigantic. Brobdingnagians, however, are not without their flaws. Unlike Gulliver who always considered Lilliputians to be the miniature men, Brobdingnagians cannot consider him a miniature Brobdingnagian. Even the Brobdingnagian king treats him like a little tiny fellow unaware of the grandiose ideas of the diminutive creature. The maids of honour treat Gulliver as a plaything, undress themselves in front of him, and titillate themselves with his naked body.
Swifts clinical dissection of the utopian ideal is at best in the description of
the Houyhnhnms. Swift tells us that the Houyhnhnms use nature and reason as their distinctive features. It is supported by Gullivers assertion that Houyhnhnm societys grand maxim, is to cultivate reason, and to be wholly governed by it. They are in stark contrast with the loathsome Yahoos, brutes in human shape. Indeed the Houyhnhnms possess many laudable qualities. Gulliver finds an ideal society organized entirely along rational lines. This emphasis on rationality leads them to arrange all aspects of social life according to logical patterns. They even brainwash Gulliver, erasing his human nature insofar as they can and replacing it with a pure and abstract rationality like their own. But Gulliver, owing to his unteachable Yahooish nature, endeavours not to become a more rational human being, but to become a Houyhnhnm itself. Thus it is clear that he has not learned the teachings of the Houyhnhnms, for he does not behave rationally at all. Man, of course, can never be a Houyhnhnm, nor was meant to be, but the rational society of Houyhnhnmland nevertheless offers a goal of moral perfection toward which he should strive says Beauchamp. The utopian Houyhnhnms can be lauded as the manifestation of mans rational nature, untainted by mans bestial traits while Yahoos represent mans apish, stupid, unredeemed animal nature. Significantly, Hobbes suggested that human nature is to be warlike in our pursuit of desires, and so life will be, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. Locke would later write a counter argument, that the nature of humankind is inclined more toward cooperation, as opposed to Hobbes that saw humankind in a never-ending state of war. Wedel suggests middle path, Swift is clearly neither Hobbes nor Locke. Gulliver is neither Yahoo nor Houyhnhnm. He cannot attain to the rational felicity of the Houyhnhnms. Neither has he sunk to the level of the Yahoos. Swift ingeniously suggests that the Houyhnhnms do not stand for perfected
human nature but they manifest pre-fallen state of innocent human
nature. The Houyhnhnms cannot be admired or emulated because they are just doing what they inherently do. The same reason is not inherent in Yahoos. The Houyhnhnms are ice-cold reason while the Yahoos are fiery sensuality. Swift places Gulliver somewhere in between Houyhnhnm and Yahoo poles. To Swift, human nature is both sensual and rational. If the reason is extracted man becomes a lump of hideous instincts. Similarly if passion is extinct what remains is a tame animal. Houyhnhnms society is entirely instrumental serving only to maintain itself without any other consideration. Their rationality is focused on the preservation of their static perfection and this instinct of self-preservation overrules their every other impulse and consideration. Houyhnhnms cannot see the world from any other perspective and all their perfection is directed to this end. Also, the dichotomy of Houyhnhnms morality highlights the self-validating nature of their judgments. The Houyhnhnms preserve Yahoos because the benefits of exterminating them do not clearly outweigh costs of keeping them alive. This version of reason is coldly functional, almost Machiavellian, in the way the end is seen to justify the means. The extermination of their yahoo foils mean undermining their self-proclaimed status as the Perfection of Nature. They even expel Gulliver their sole ardent supporter from the Yahoo race. This is the state of their utopia, into which Gulliver stumbles, an eternal, unchanging society built on some values that are intrinsic to the nature of creatures that populate it. Swift thus mocks the very concept of utopia and makes it clear that nowhere an ideal state exists because evil exists in every society in one form or the other. The world of Utopia is doomed to remain a dream in this world because, "whether man is three inches or three miles high, he remains a mana presumptuous zero.