Harshad Mehta Scam
Harshad Mehta Scam
Harshad Mehta Scam
REPORT
from C is paid to B and as a result he has some working capital with him at all times if this goes
on with other banks throughout the week. The banks at that time were not allowed to invest in
the equity markets. Harshad Mehta had very cleverly squeezed some capital out of the banking
system. This capital he invested in the stock market and managed to stoke a massive boom. This
is actually how he got funds to buy the shares of ACC.
Mehta and his associates used another instrument called the bank receipt (BR). Securities were
not traded in reality like in a ready forward deal but the seller gave the buyer a BR which is a
confirmation of the sale of securities. A BR is a receipt for the money received by the selling
bank and pledges to deliver the securities to the buyer. In the meantime, the securities are held in
the sellers trust by the buyer.
Prepared with their evil mind, Mehta needed now banks which would readily issue fake BRs, or
ones without the guarantee of any government securities. His search ended when he found that
the Bank of Karad (BOK), Mumbai and the Metropolitan Co-operative Bank (MCB) two small
and little known lenders, were willing to comply. The two banks agreed to issue BRs as and
when required. Once they issued the fake BRs, Mehta passed them on to other banks who in turn
lent him money, under the false assumption that they were lending against government securities.
Mehta used the money thus secured to enhance share prices in the stock market. The shares were
then sold for significant profits and the BR retired when it was time to return the money to the
bank.
The immediate impact of the scam was a sharp fall in the share prices. The index fell
from 4500 to 2500 representing a loss of Rs. 100,000 crores in market capitalization.
Since the accused were active brokers in the stock markets, the number of shares which
had passed through their hands in the last one year was colossal. All these shares became
tainted shares, and overnight they became worthless pieces of paper as they could not
be delivered in the market. Genuine investors who had bought these shares well before
the scam came to light and even got them registered in their names found themselves
being robbed by the government. This resulted in a chaotic situation in the market since
no one was certain as to which shares were tainted and which were not.
The governments liberalization policies came under severe criticism after the scam, with
Harshad Mehta and others being described as the products of these policies.
Bowing to the political pressures and the bad press it received during the scam, the
liberalization policies were put on hold for a while by the government. The Securities
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) postponed sanctioning of private sector mutual funds.
The much talked about entry of foreign pension funds and mutual funds became more
remote than ever. The Euro-issues planned by several Indian companies were delayed
since the ability of Indian companies to raise equity capital in world markets was severely
compromised.
Post Mehta Scam in 1992, the GoI passed SEBI Act 1992 and conferred statutory
powers to it
MEASURES TAKEN:
Imposed an additional 10% volatility margin on A Group shares as well as margins on
ALBM and BLESS Schemes
Imposed volatility margins on net outstanding sale positions of FIIs, financial institutions,
banks and mutual funds
Banned naked short sales in March 2001
Reduced the gross exposure limit for brokers to 10 times the base capital for NSE and 15
times for other stock exchanges
Rolling settlements system made compulsory
Allowed banks to offer collateralized lending only through BSE & NSE, to increase
liquidity
Launched trade guarantee fund to guarantee all transactions