Effect of Pretension On Moored Ship Resp

International Journal of

Ocean
System
Engineering

International Journal of Ocean System Engineering 3(4) (2013) 175-187

http://dx.doi.org/10.5574/IJOSE.2012.3.4.175
Effect of Pretension on Moored Ship Response

Sharanabasappa C.Sajjan 1 and S.Surendran 1*
1
Department of Ocean Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai-600036, India
(Manuscript Received September 15, 2013; Revised October 11, 2013; Accepted November 17, 2013)
Abstract
Moonpools are vertical wells in a floating body used onboard many types of vessels like Exploration and drilling vessels, Production barges, Cable-laying vessels, Rock dumping vessels, Research and offshore support vessels. Moonpool gives passage to underwater activities for different types of ships as per their mission requirements. It is observed that inside a moonpool considerable relative motions may occur, depending on shape, depth
of the moonpool and on the frequency range of the waves to which the ship is exposed. The vessel responses are
entirely different in zero and non-zero Froude number. Former situation is paid attention in this study as the mission requirement of the platform is to be in the particular location for long period of operation. It is well known
that there are two modes of responses depending on the shape of the moonpool viz., piston mode for square shape
and sloshing mode for rectangular shapes with different aspect ratios of opening like 1:1.5 and 1:2 ratios. Circular
shaped moonpool is also tested for measuring the responses. The vessel moored using heavy lines are modelled
and tested in the wave basin. The pretensions of the lines are varied by altering the touchdown points and the dynamic tensions on the lines are measured. The different modes of oscillations of water column are measured using
wave gauge and the vessel response at a particular situation is determined. RAOs calculated for various situations
provide better insight to the designer.
Keywords: Moonpool, Vessel response, Piston mode, Sloshing mode, Touchdown points, Pretension, Dynamic tension.
1. Introduction
An opening in the water plane area challenges the
righting arm stability and reduces the reserve buoyancy of any floating platform. A permanent opening in
the water plane area is required for special types of
platforms and moonpools are provided for such ones.
Such vessels can be self propelled or pushed after
closing the bottom side opening of moonpools. Resistance is minimized under such conditions of voyage of platforms from point A to B, the point of destination. Power and hence fuel is saved by closing the
opening of moonpool in the bottom side of the ship.
In the operating point the vessel is moored to sea
bottom and the catenary of the mooring causes variable stiffness to the floating body. Floating body dy*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +914422574815, Fax: +914422574802,

E-mail address: [email protected]
Copyright KSOE 2013.
Copyright KSOE 2012.
namics has been studied by Rameswar Bhattacharyya

(1978) and is widely referred by Naval Architects and
Ocean Engineers in search of the fundamental parameters of ship shaped floating bodies. Newman (1977)
discussed marine applications for a variety of topics
including viscous and viscous flow around a ship
shaped body.
After fixing the bottom of all mooring lines, the
vessel fitted with instruments suitably positioned to
face the incoming waves. The catenary shape and sag
of the mooring lines is maintained as per scaled down
size. Inclinometer, accelerometer, wave probes and
strain gauge on the upper part of line are connected to
the circuitry through amplifiers and oscilloscope.
Data acquisition system records all the digitized values of signals due to motion of platform by waves.
As drilling operations are conducted in deeper and
deeper waters, it becomes very impractical economi-
176
Sharanabasappa C.Sajjan and S.Surendran / International Journal of Ocean System Engineering 3(4) (2013) 175-187
cally to construct such platforms. In such deeper waters it is becoming common practice to drill from
floating vessels. One of the problems in drilling from
floating vessels is to maintain the ship within the
permissible excursions. One type drilling ship has a
moonpool conveniently provided in the midsection of
the ship. It is through this moonpool usual drilling
operations are conducted. In this case it is desired that
the moonpool stay in fixed position with respect to
the parent ship. The main reason is that the ship can
get aligned with the incoming or head-on waves. The
ship is secured with the mooring cables connected to
the sea bottom.
2. Moonpool and Mooring lines

Aalbers (1984) carried out model experiments at
the Netherlands ship model basin in which the hydrodynamics with respect to a moonpool were investigated. A mathematical model describing the
relative water motions inside a moonpool was developed. Day (1990) proposed a method for assessing the performance of the moonpool. Theoretical and experimental studies indicate possible geometries for the moonpool which may be used to
improve the performance of the floating ship. Finally, a systematic procedure for designing moonpool
is developed and illustrated with a worked example
based on an actual design problem. English (1976)
described a method of overcoming the oscillations
without the use closing doors. Fukuda (1977) conducted experiments to show the behaviour of the
water in the well (moonpool) and its effects on the
motion of the ship, under forward motion. Fukuda
and Yoshii (2009) discussed water motion in a twodimensional vertical cavity with a free surface on
the top and current on the bottom. Gaillarde and
Cotteleer (2001) presented solutions to reduce the
oscillations in the moonpool caused by the forward
speed of the vessel. Numerical methods are also
presented to solve the problem in transit and normal
conditions in waves. Molin (2001) studied rectangular moonpools of large horizontal cross sections.
The natural modes of oscillation of the inner free
surfaces are determined, under the assumption of
infinite water depth and infinite length and beam of
the barges that contain the moonpools. The problem
is treated in two and three dimensions, using linearized potential flow theory. Results are given for the
natural frequencies and the associated shapes of the
free surface, for wide ranges of the geometric pa-
rameters. Simple quasi-static analytical approximations are derived that yield the natural frequencies.
Molin (1999) concentrated on estimating the natural
frequency of the piston mode of a moonpool. The
author paid attention to obtain the natural frequencies and Eigen vectors of the sloshing modes. vant
Veer and Tholen (2008) conducted model tests on
rectangular moonpools. The resonant oscillation
mode can be piston or sloshing. The sloshing mode
dominates in longer moonpool, while piston mode
oscillations are dominant in shorter moonpool.
Based on two model tests series carried out at Delft
University of Technology, a resistance prediction
model was constructed for piston type oscillations.
Inoue and Surendran (1994) paid attention to interaction of mooring line with the ocean bottom and
discussed reduction in dynamic tension. The line is
divided into finite number of lumped masses and
linear springs without mass. Cross flow drag across
line causes strain along the length due to stress
caused by differential tensions at consecutive points.
The surrounding fluid always tries to immobilise
the moving chain. This process cause cross flow
drag and creates further strain on the line. The line
stretch and the resulting tension is dynamic in nature. This tension is composed of steady value, inertial effects and drag component. Such dynamic
tension can be normalised by dividing by static
tension value. The damping associated with the
interaction of vibrating chain with the sea bed
which was considered to be elastic, was incorporated in the computations. Surendran (1989) developed a computer program to determine the cable
configuration, tension and various other parameters
for safe tow. A number of curves have been presented based on different case studies to enable the
designer to have better insight into the interesting
behaviour of tow cables. Surendran and Goutam
(2009) concentrated on the dynamic tension of upper point of cable fitted with a sub-surface buoy at a
suitable location. Surendran and Pramod (2006)
studied the non-linear behaviour of a moored floating platform in stochastic seaway generated using
the Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum. Second-order
wave or slow drift forces acting on the structure are
considered as they contribute to a major percentage
for the excursion of a large platform. Components
of damping from wave friction and skin friction
have also been considered in their study to arrive at
the solutions.
Table1. Moonpool dimensions

Moonpool Shape
Table 2: Model particulars
Ratio
Size (cm)
1:92
12.5x24
Length overall
2.37 m
1:1.5
12x18
Length between perpendiculars
2.19 m
Square
1:1
12x12
Breadth
0.36 m
Circular
--
dia 12
Depth
1.89 m
Rectangular
From the above literature survey, it is evident that

the determination of oscillations in moonpool has
been attempted by researchers through experiments
and numerical simulations. In this paper, experimental study has been done to pin point the critical
situations of the vessel motion response due to
moonpool, mooring line oscillations with different
pretension and possible interactions.
It is understood that there are piston and sloshing
modes of oscillations for the water trapped in the
moonpool. The incoming waves interact with the
moored floating body, and the water mass in the
moonpool is excited and creating both circular and
linear motions. Therefore the critical situations like
resonant condition of heave, roll and pitch are to be
investigated as they are important for a moored
floating body. The mooring line in its catenary
shaped stage exerts stiffness which is modified due
to the excursions of the body by the hit of incoming
waves. The tensions on the line can be modified
influencing the total vessel response. The entrapped
water in the moonpool shows different excitations
depending on the shape of the moonpool. A few
Frame details for scale 1:100
shapes with varied initial tensions are to be tested in

the wave flume and whole details are provided in
the following sections. Results are presented in the
non-dimensional form so that anyone working in
this topic can use the results presented for their
work.
3. Experimental set up
In this study shapes and sizes of the moonpool
considered are shown in Table.1
Main dimensions of a bulk carrier ship considered
here is compatible with drill ships referred by Riaan
Vant Veer and Haye Jan Tholen (2008). The
prepared model is shown in Figure 1. The biggest
size moonpool (12.5cm x 24cm) is fixed to the
model with FRP sealing and other moonpool shapes
are inserted in this and water sloshing is restricted
with the help of wooden strips. Various moonpool
shapes are shown in Figure 2. Table 2 shows the
principal perticulars of model.
.
Figure 3. Ship model with moonpool

Figure 1. Ship model
Figure 2. Different moonpool shapes
177
Figure 4. Opening at the bottom
178
Ring type load cell

Figure 5a Plan view of model in the experimental setup
Figure 5b. Schematic sketch of the experimental set up
A B C
CBA
Figure 5c. Varying pretension in the mooring line by moving touchdown points (analogous to mass with two springs)
Figure 5c is analogous to a mass with two springs

by varying spring stiffness.
Scaled down model of ship in 1:100 ratio is
fabricated in Fiber Reinforced Plastic (FRP) and
moonpool is fabricated using 3mm aluminium sheet.
Ship model with moonpool is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 4 shows the opening at the bottom.
Figure 5a is the plan view of the model in the
wave flume. Figure 5b is the instrumentation and
catenary of the floating system with end connection
of mooring
The measured pretensions when the bottom of the
catenary is at A-A, B-B and C-C are shown in
Table3.
Determination and analysis of vessel response
with different moonpool shapes are done. The response reading are recorded in oscilloscope and
analyzed as follows
Table 3. Distance between touchdown points
Sr.No
Distance between touchdown points (cm)
Pretension
(kg)
A-A
475
0.15
B-B
490
0.3
C-C
505
0.45
A, B, C and A, B, C are touchdown points
4. Results and Discussions

These model experiments were conducted in a
30m x 2m x 1m wave-current flume. The boundary
effects are neglected, since distance between the
model and the wall is more than the double the
width of the model. The far end of the flume is provided with a rubble stone beach to absorb incident
waves and to reduce reflection. Consequent waves
are generated after reaching the calm water condition in the flume.
Experiments are done with different shapes of the
moonpool and with different pretension in the
mooring lines; the results are shown for the same. A
detailed experimental set up is shown in Figure 6.
Model connected with biaxial inclinometer, accelerometer and wave probe are shown in Figure 7.
4.1 Moonpool Wave with Respect to Incident
Wave
Incident and water profile in the moonpool are
measured for all the combinations with different
wave probes but are plotted for a few sets only.
Figure 6. Experimental setup in wave flume
Figure 8a shows the variation of wave in the

moonpool with reference to incident wave for distance between touchdown points equal to 475cm,
12.5x24cm (1:1.92) rectangular moonpool, 3cm
wave height and 1.2 second wave period.
Figure 8c shows the variation of wave in the
Figure 9b shows the variation of wave in the
Figure 7. Ship model with instruments for measurements

Figure 8a. Moonpool wave elevation for Figure 8b. Moonpool wave elevation
3cm wave height and 1.2 second wave for 3cm wave height and 1.6 second
period.
wave period.
.
179
Figure 8c. Moonpool wave elevation for

3cm wave height and 2.0 second wave
period
180
Figure 9a. Moonpool wave elevation for Figure 9b. Moonpool wave elevation for Figure 9c. Moonpool wave elevation for
3cm wave height and 1.2 second wave 3cm wave height and 1.6 second wave 3cm wave height and 2.0 second wave
period.
period.
period.
Figure 10a. Moonpool wave elevation Figure 10b. Moonpool wave elevation for Figure10c. Moonpool wave elevation
for 3cm wave height and 1.2 second 3cm wave height and 1.6 second wave for 3cm wave height and 2.0 second
wave period
period.
wave period.

12x18cm (1:1.5) rectangular moonpool, 3cm wave
height and 1.2 second wave period.
Figure 11a. Moonpool wave elevation for

.3cm wave height and 1.2 second wave
period

Figure 11b. Moonpool wave elevation for Figure 11c. Moonpool wave elevation
period
wave period.
Figure 12a. Moonpool wave elevation for

period.
181
Figure 12b. Moonpool wave elevation

for 3cm wave height and 1.6 second
wave period.
Figure 12c. Moonpool wave elevation

wave period.
period
wave period.

wave period.


12x12cm (1:1) square moonpool, 3cm wave height
and 1.2 second wave period.
Figure 14a. Moonpool wave elevation for Figure 14b. Moonpool wave elevation for Figure 14c. Moonpool wave elevation for
3cm wave height and 1.2 second wave 3cm wave height and 1.6 second wave 3cm wave height and 2.0 second wave
period.
period.
period.
182
period.
wave period.

wave period.
Figure 16a. Moonpool wave elevation Figure 16b. Moonpool wave elevation for Figure 16c. Moonpool wave elevation
for 3cm wave height and 1.2 second 3cm wave height and 1.6 second wave for 3cm wave height and 2.0 second
wave period.
period.
wave period.

Figure 17a. Moonpool wave elevation

wave period.

Figure 17b. Moonpool wave elevation

wave period.

wave period.
183
Figure 18a. Moonpool wave elevation for Figure 18b. Moonpool wave elevation for Figure 18c. Moonpool wave elevation
period.
period.
wave period.
Figure 19a. Moonpool wave elevation for Figure 19b. Moonpool wave elevation for Figure 19c. Moonpool wave elevation
3cm wave height and 1.2 second wave 3cm wave height and 1.6 second wave for 3cm wave height and 2.0 second
period.
period.
wave period.

Dia12cm circular moonpool, 3cm wave height and
1.2 second wave period.
2.0 second wave period

184
Figure 12a. Heave RAO for 12.5x24 Moonpool
Figure 12c. Heave RAO for 12x12 Moonpool
4.2 Heave RAO for Different Moonpool Shapes

Figure 12a shows the variation of heave RAO for
12.5x24cm (1:1.92) rectangular moonpool with
different initial tension combinations.
Figure 12b shows the variation of heave RAO for
12x18cm (1:1.5) rectangular moonpool with different initial tension combinations.
Figure 12c shows the variation of heave RAO for
12x12cm (1:1) square moonpool with different
initial tension combinations.
Figure 12d shows the variation of heave RAO for
Dia12cm circular moonpool with different initial
tension combinations.
4.3 Roll RAO for Different Moonpool Shapes
Figure 13a shows the variation of roll RAO for
Figure 13b shows the variation of roll RAO for
Figure 12b. Heave RAO for 12x18 Moonpoo
Figure 12d. Heave RAO for Dia12Moonpool
Figure 13c shows the variation of roll RAO for

Figure 13d shows the variation of roll RAO for
4.4 Pitch RAO for Different Moonpool Shapes
Figure 14a shows the variation of pitch RAO for
Figure 14b shows the variation of pitch RAO for
Figure 14c shows the variation of pitch RAO for
Figure 14d shows the variation of pitch RAO for
Figure 13a. Roll RAO for 12.5x24 Moonpool
Figure 13b. Roll RAO for 12x18 Moonpool
Figure 13c. Roll RAO for 12x12 Moonpool
Figure 13d. Roll RAO for Dia12Moonpool
Figure 14a. Pitch RAO for 12.5x24 Moonpool
Figure 14c. Pitch RAO for 12x12 Moonpool
Figure 14b. Pitch RAO for 12x18 Moonpool
Figure 14d. Pitch RAO for Dia12 Moonpool
185
186
Figure 15a. Normalised tension for 24.5 x 12 Moonpool
Figure 15b. Normalised tension for 12 x 18 Moonpool
Figure 15c. Normalised tension for 12 x 12 Moonpool
Figure 15d. Normalised tension for Dia 12 Moonpool
4.5 Frontal Normalised Mooring Line Tension

There are four mooring lines connected to the
model as shown in schematic sketch 5a and 5b.
Obviously when waves are created and hit to the
model there will be more tension in the front mooring lines. One of the front mooring line tensions is
shown in the figures 15a to 15d below. This dynamic tension is measured by ring type load cell. Normalised tension is obtained by dividing dynamic
tension by initial tension in the mooring lines. The
below graphs shows the variation of normalised
tension verses non-dimensional wave frequency,
this non-dimensional frequency is obtained by multiplying wave frequency with length of mooring
line.
Figure 15a shows the normalised tension for
Figure 15b shows the normalised tension for
Figure 15c shows the normalised tension for
Figure 15d shows the normalised tension for

6. Conclusions
A water column oscillation in a moonpool is function of wave period rather than shape and size of
the moonpool.
In case of 12.5x24cm (1:1.92) rectangular
moonpool, as wave period increases from 1.2 to 1.6
seconds wave in moonpool decreases by 50 percent.
Wave in moonpool decreases by 20 percent when
wave period increases from 1.6 to 2.0 seconds. This
is true for all three cases, namely distance between
touchdown points are 475cm, 490cm and 505cm
respectively.
In case of 12x18cm (1:1.5) rectangular moonpool,
12x12cm (1:1) square and Dia 12cm circular
moonpool; percentage of reduction is almost same
for distance between touchdown points equal to
475cm and 505cm. But in the case of 490cm the
reduction in wave in moonpool is 25 percent when
wave period increases from 1.2 to 1.6 second and
1.6 to 2.0seconds.
All motion responses like heave roll and pitch decreases with increase in mooring line tensions. This
increase in mooring line tension increases the vertical stiffness of lines and consequently will restrict
the model.
Heave response decreases for all moonpool shapes
with increase in frequency of incident waves.
Roll response increases with increase in frequency. Roll RAO shoots to maximum at 6 rad/sec frequency. This may be due to the resonance in the
water column.
But pitch response also increases with increase in
frequency and has got peak and trough around 5
and 6 rad/sec respectively.
Normalized tension of frontal lines decreases as
pretension increases.
12.5x24cm (1:1.92) rectangular moonpool normalized mooring line tension has a peak at nondimensional frequency of 3.
12x18cm (1:1.5) rectangular moonpool normalized mooring line tension has two peaks at nondimensional frequency of 1.5 and 4.
12x12cm (1:1) square moonpool normalized tension has trough at non-dimensional frequency of
around 3.
Dia 12cm circular moonpool normalized tension
has a peak at non-dimensional frequency of around
1 and trough at 2.
For rectangular moonpools normalized tension is
almost constant for higher frequencies and it increases in case of square and circular moonpools.
This may be because of piston mode oscillation in
later cases.
Acknowledgements
This work supported by the Department of Ocean
Engineering IIT Madras, India.
References
[1] Aalbers A.B. The water motions in a
moonpool. Ocean Engineering. Vol. 11. No. 6.
pp. 557-579. (1984).
[2] Rameswar Bhattacharyya. Dynamics of marine vehicles, John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.(1978).
[3] Day.A.H. The design of moonpools for subsea operations. Marine Technology Vol 27,
No.3, May 1990, pp 167-179. (1990).
[4] English.J.W. A means of reducing the oscillations in drill wells caused by vessels for-
187
ward speed. The Naval Architect pp. 88-90.

(1976).
[5] Guilhem Gaillarde and Anke Cotteleer. Water motion in moonpools empirical and theoretical approach. Maritime Research Institute Netherlands MARIN.(2001).
[6] Inoue.Y and S.Surendran. Dynamics of the
Interaction of Mooring Line with the Sea
Bed. Proceedings of the Fourth International
Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
Osaka, Japan. (1994).
[7] Kazuhiro Fukuda. Behavior of water in vertical well with bottom opening of ship, and
its effect on ship motions, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, Vol. 141,
pp. 107-122. (1977).
[8] Kazuhiro Fukuda and Yutaro Yoshii. Flow
Calculation in Vertical Cavity with Free
Surface and Bottom Opening to Water
Stream. Journal of the Japanese Society of
Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers. pp
23-28. (2009).
[9] Molin.B. On the piston mode in moonpools.
Proc. 14th Int. Workshop on water waves &
floating bodies.(1999).
[10] Molin.B. On the piston and sloshing modes
in moonpools. Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
Vol 430, pp. 27-50. (2001).
[11] Newman N. Marine Hydrodynamics. The MIT
Press, Cambridge. (1977).
[12] Riaan vant Veer and Haye Jan Tholen.
Added resistance of moonpools in calm water. Proceedings of the ASME 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics
and Arctic Engineering. OMAE2008-57246.
(2008).
[13] Surendran S. Depressor Towing using Light
Cables. Marine Engineering Journal Vol.70.
(1989).
[14] Surendran.S and T.P.Pramod. Non-linear
analysis of a dynamically positioned platform in stochastic seaway. Ocean Engineering.Vol.33, pp 878-894. (2006).
[15] Surendran. S and Goutam. Reduction in the
dynamic amplitudes of moored cable systems. Ships and Offshore Structures. Vol. 4,
No. 2, pp 145-163. (2009).

Effect of Pretension On Moored Ship Resp

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Effect of Pretension On Moored Ship Resp

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Effect of Pretension On Moored Ship Resp

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Journal of

International Journal of Ocean System Engineering 3(4) (2013) 175-187

Effect of Pretension on Moored Ship Response

Department of Ocean Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai-600036, India

Corresponding author. Tel.: +914422574815, Fax: +914422574802,

Copyright KSOE 2012.

namics has been studied by Rameswar Bhattacharyya

2. Moonpool and Mooring lines

Table1. Moonpool dimensions

Table 2: Model particulars

Length between perpendiculars

From the above literature survey, it is evident that

Frame details for scale 1:100

shapes with varied initial tensions are to be tested in

Figure 3. Ship model with moonpool

Figure 2. Different moonpool shapes

Figure 4. Opening at the bottom

Ring type load cell

Figure 5b. Schematic sketch of the experimental set up

Figure 5c is analogous to a mass with two springs

Distance between touchdown points (cm)

A, B, C and A, B, C are touchdown points

4. Results and Discussions

Figure 6. Experimental setup in wave flume

Figure 8a shows the variation of wave in the

Figure 7. Ship model with instruments for measurements

Figure 9c shows the variation of wave in the

Figure 8c. Moonpool wave elevation for

Figure 11a shows the variation of wave in the

Figure 11a. Moonpool wave elevation for

Figure 12a shows the variation of wave in the

Figure 12a. Moonpool wave elevation for

Figure 12b. Moonpool wave elevation

Figure 12c. Moonpool wave elevation

Figure 13c. Moonpool wave elevation

Figure 13a shows the variation of wave in the

Figure 14a shows the variation of wave in the

Figure 15c. Moonpool wave elevation

Figure 15a shows the variation of wave in the

Figure 17a. Moonpool wave elevation

Figure 16a shows the variation of wave in the

Figure 17b. Moonpool wave elevation

Figure 17c. Moonpool wave elevation

Figure 17a shows the variation of wave in the

Dia12cm circular moonpool, 3cm wave height and

Figure 12a. Heave RAO for 12.5x24 Moonpool

Figure 12c. Heave RAO for 12x12 Moonpool

4.2 Heave RAO for Different Moonpool Shapes

Figure 12b. Heave RAO for 12x18 Moonpoo

Figure 12d. Heave RAO for Dia12Moonpool

Figure 13c shows the variation of roll RAO for

Figure 13a. Roll RAO for 12.5x24 Moonpool

Figure 13b. Roll RAO for 12x18 Moonpool

Figure 13c. Roll RAO for 12x12 Moonpool

Figure 13d. Roll RAO for Dia12Moonpool

Figure 14a. Pitch RAO for 12.5x24 Moonpool

Figure 14c. Pitch RAO for 12x12 Moonpool

Figure 14b. Pitch RAO for 12x18 Moonpool

Figure 14d. Pitch RAO for Dia12 Moonpool