and art and architectural history to investigate social, political,

and religious life in Roman and early Christian Thessalonik, an

important metropolis in the Hellenistic, Roman, and early Christian
periods and beyond. This interdisciplinary book includes studies
of New Testament literature, Roman art historical materials, urban
planning in antiquity, material culture and daily life, pseudepigraphy
and the Letters to the Thessalonians found in the New Testament.
Contributors include scholars from Greece, the United States, and
Canada. This volume is the first of its kind and offers new data and
new interpretations to scholars of ancient religion and archaeology in
general, and Thessalonik in particular.

Cover art from: Courtesy of the Greek Archaeological

Service. Mosaic of St. Demetrios and an angel in the
north aisle of the Basilica of St. Demetrios, Thessaloniki

Cover design: Eric Mulder

ISBN-13: 978-0-674-05322-9

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

his volume brings together scholars of religion, archaeology,

HTS
64

From
Roman to Early Christian
Thessalonik
Studies in Religion and Archaeology

editors

Laura Nasrallah Charalambos Bakirtzis Steven J. Friesen

From Roman to Early Christian

Thessalonik:
Studies in Religion and Archaeology
Edited by

Laura Nasrallah, Charalambos Bakirtzis,

and Steven J. Friesen

distributed by

Harvard University Press

for

Harvard Theological Studies

Harvard Divinity School

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

Harvard Theological Studies 64
Series Editors:
Franois Bovon
Francis Schssler Fiorenza
Peter B. Machinist
2010 the President and Fellows of Harvard College
All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in critical articles or reviews, no part of this
book may be reproduced in any manner without prior written permission from the publisher.
For permission use, contact Permissions Department, Harvard Theological Studies, Harvard
Divinity School, 45 Francis Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138.

The foreign language font (Symbol GreekII) and transliteration fonts used in this book
are available from Linguists Software, Inc., PO Box 580, Edmonds, WA 98020-0580;
tel: (425) 775-1130. Website: www.linguistsoftware.com

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonike : studies in religion and archaeology
/ edited by Laura Nasrallah, Charalambos Bakirtzis, and Steven J. Friesen
p. cm. -- (Harvard theological studies .; 64)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-674-05322-9 (alk. paper)
1. Thessalonike (Greece)--Civilization. 2. Thessalonike (Greece)--Church
history. 3. Church history--Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600. 4. Bible.
N.T. Thesalonians--Criticism, interpretation, etc. 5. Thessalonike (Greece)-Antiquities. 6. Thessa lonike (Greece)--Antiquities, Roman. 7. Ecavations
(Archaeology)--Greece--Thessalonike. 8. Architecture--Greece--Thessalonike.
9. Romans--Greece--Thessalonike. I. Nasrallah, Laura Salah, 1969- II.
Bakirtzis, Ch. (Charalambos) III. Friesen, Steven J.
DF261.T49F76 2010
938.2--dc22

2010021681

The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American
National Standard for Information SciencesPermanence of Paper for Printed Library
Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992.
Manufactured in the U.S.A.

Abbreviations
Modern Sources
AA
AAA
AAA

Archologischer Anzeiger
Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology
Archaiologika analekta ex Athenon (Athens Annals of
Archaeology)
AASS
Acta Sanctorum (Paris, 1863-1925)
AB
Anchor Bible
AIS
Archaeology and Italian Society
AJA
American Journal of Archaeology
AM
Athenische Mitteilungen
AmerAnt
American Antiquity
ABD
The Anchor Bible Dictionary
AEMQ
Archaeologikon Ergon st Makedonia kai Thrak
ARA
Annual Review of Anthropology
ArchDelt
Arcaiologiko;n Deltivon Arkaiologikon Deltion
ArchEph
Arcaiologikhv Efhmevri~ Archaiologike Ephemeris
ASMOSIA
Association for the Study of Marble & Other Stones in
Antiquity
BAR
British Archaeological Reports
BCH
Bulletin de correspondance hellnique
BCHSupp
BCH supplment
BHTA
British Healthcare Trades Association
BE
(Ascough)?
BibInt
Biblical Interpretation
BMGS
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies
BoJ
Bonner Jahrbcher
BR
Biblical Research
BSA
Bulletin de la Socit archaologique
Buzantiakav Buzantiakav
Byzantion
Byzantion, Revue internationale des tudes byzantines
CA
Cahiers archologiques
CBQ
Catholic Biblical Quarterly
CH
Church History
CFHB Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae
CIG
Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum. Edited by A. Boeck. 4
vols. Berlin, 18281877

xii

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

CIL
CNRS
CRAI
DNP

Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum

Centre national de la recherche scientifique
Comptes rendus de lAcadmie des inscriptions et belles-lettres
Der neue Pauly. Enzyklopdie der Antike. Edited by H. Cancik
and H. Schneider. Stuttgart. 1996
DOP
Dumbarton Oaks Papers
EA
Epigraphica Anatolica
EHBS
Epeteris Hetaireias Byzantinon Spoudon
EKM
Epigrafev~ kavtw Makedoniva~
EKM I L. Gounaropoulou and M. B. Hatzopoulos, Epigrafev~ Kavtw
Makedoniva~.
Teuvco~ A .v
Epigrafev~ Bev

roia~ (Inscriptions
of Kat

Macedonia.
Fasciculus A. Inscriptions of Beroia).
Athens: de Boccard, 1999.
FAS
Frankfurter althistorische Studien
Gn
Gnomon
GOTR
Greek Orthodox Theological Review
HR
History of Religions
HTR
Harvard Theological Review
HTS
Harvard Theological Studies
IG
Inscriptiones Graecae
ICS Illinois Classical Studies
ILS
Inscriptiones latinae selectae (Berlin 1892-1916)
Int
Interpretation
JAC
Jahrbuch fr Antike und Christentum
JBL
Journal of Biblical Literature
JECS
Journal of Early Christian Studies
JFSR
Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion
JGS
Journal of Glass Studies
JHN
Journal of the History of Neurosciences
JJS
Journal of Jewish Studies
JRA
Journal of Roman Archeology
JRS
Journal of Roman Studies
JSJ
Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic,
and Roman Periods
JSNT
Journal for the Study of the New Testament
JSNTSup
Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement
Series
JSOT
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
JWI
Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes

Abbreviations

xiii

LCL Loeb Classical Library

LIMC
Lexicon iconographium mythologiae classicae
LRCW
Late Roman Coarse Wares
LSJ Liddell, H. G., R. Scott. H. S. Jones, A Greek-English Lexicon.
9th ed. with revised supplement. Oxford. 1996.
MH
Museum Helveticum
MMLA
Bulletin of the Midwest Modern Language Association
MBC
Museum of Byzantine Culture
NA
Numina Aegaea
NCB
New Century Bible
NIBC
New International Bible Commentary
NovT
Novum Testamentum
NTAbh
Neutestamentliche Abhandlungen
NTS
New Testament Studies
OCT Oxford Classical Texts/Scriptorum classicorum bibliotheca
oxoniensis
PAE
Praktika Archaeologikes Etaireias
PG
J. P. Migne, ed. Patrologia cursus completus. Series Graeca.
Paris, 1857-66.
PraktAE
Praktika tes en Athenais Archaiologikes Hetaireias
QDAP
Quarterly of the Department of Antiquities in Palestine
QR
Quarterly Review
RA
Revue Archologique
RB
Revue biblique
RE
Realencyklopdie fr protestantische Theologie und Kirche
Rend.
Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti Classe
di Scienze Morali Storiche e Filologiche
RIDA
Revue internationale des droits de lantiquit
RIG
(Ascough chapter) ??
RPh
Revue de philologie, de littrature et dhistoire anciennes
RmMitt
Rmische Mitteilungen = Mitteilungen des Deutschen
Archologischen Instituts
SBL Society for Biblical Literature
SBLDS Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series
Spec
Speculum
SCJ
Stone-Campbell Journal
ScrHier
Scripta hierosolymitana
Spec
Speculum

xiv

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

SNTSMS Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series

SPhilo
Studia philonica
SR
Studies in Religion
StudRomag Studi Romagnoli
TAPA
Transactions of the American Philological Association
QP
Qessalonikevwn Povli~

TM
Travaux et Mmoires
TRAC
Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference
TynBul
Tyndale Bulletin
TRE
Theologische Realenzyklopdie. Edited by G. Krause and G.
Muller. Berlin. 1977
WUNT
Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament
ZNW
Zeitschrift fr die Neutestamentlischen Wissenschaft
ZPE
Zeitschrift fr Papyrologie und Epigraphie
Ancient Sources

Aristides, Apol., Apology

Cicero, Phil., Philippics, Orationes philippicae
Clement, Stromateis, The Stromata
Epictetus, Epictetus Diss., The Discourses as Reported by Arrian: The
Manual, and Fragments
Josephus, Ant., Jewish Antiquities, Antiquitates judaicae
Josephus, J.W., Jewish War, Bellum judaicum
Juvenal, The Satires, Satirae
Ovid, Am., Amores
Philo, Heir, Who is the Heir of Divine Things?
Philo, Embassy, On the Embassy to Gaius, Legatio ad Gaium
Philo, Flaccus, Against Flaccus, In Flaccum
Philo, Abraham, On the Life of Abraham, De Abrahamo
Philo, Confusion, On the Confusion of Tongues, De Confusione Linguarum
Pliny, Nat. hist., Natural History, Naturalis Historia
(Pseudo) Lucian, Eikones, Essays in Portraiture
Tacitus, Hist., Historiae, Histories

Chapter Eleven

Glassware in Late Antique

Thessalonik (Third to Seventh
Centuries c.e.)
Anastassios C. Antonaras

he invention of glass is widely known through what Pliny claims in

his Natural History. Even

if his story has been

proven

technically
impossible, Pliny connects the invention of glass with the Phoenician coast
and natron merchandisers, who sailed from Egypt. Today it is believed
that glasspresenting along with faience the first artificial, human-made
substanceswas probably invented in Mesopotamia around 2200 b.c.e.
Colored glass was already widely used in Egypt from the second half of
the second millennium b.c.e. For many centuries after its invention, glass
remained an extremely expensive material, used only as semiprecious stone,
and later for production of special vessels found only in palaces and temples.
From the classical Greek period onwards, small glass unguentaria became
more widely available than earlier, but were still products for the highest
social strata. The invention of glass blowing, a technological revolution
which took place around the early first century b.c.e. somewhere on the
Levantine coast, led to a gradual fall in the price of glass vessels by the

Pliny, Nat. 36.190192.

Oppenheim et al., Glass and Glassmaking, 4101.

Stern and Schlick-Nolte,

Early Glass, 20, with exhaustive bibliography.
Ibid., 2737, 4453.
Grose, Early Ancient Glass, 11025. Stern and Schlick-Nolte, Early Glass, 3744.

302

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

mid-first century c.e. and made possible their use by wider social strata in
the Eastern Mediterranean.
Although glass vessels had functions similar to pottery ones, glass needs
to be treated quite differently from ceramics, and any researcher should
keep in mind a few basic differences while studying comparatively these
two groups of finds. During the entire period under consideration, glass
was thoroughly recycled. Glassblowers kilns melted all evidence of the
true quantitative distribution and the diversity of original forms. Also, it
should be kept in mind that all didactic parts of vessels, like rims, handles,
and bases, weigh the most and therefore were collected and recycled most
consistently, leaving mainly smaller, noncharacteristic fragments on site.
Thus archaeological finds do not reflect the everyday life of the period or
area under consideration. Rather, they reflect the consistency of recycling.
The only exceptions come from undisturbed strata of abruptly destroyed
and/or abandoned sites, which unfortunately are not the case with the finds
from Thessalonik. Grave goods do offer an undisturbed picture of the past,
but unfortunately reflect only the burial habits of society and not necessarily
everyday life. In addition, because the vast majority of excavations conducted
in Thessalonik are salvage, we glimpse the always already obscure past
through a deforming prism created by the segmented and circumstantial
character of the excavated finds. Furthermore, we must also stress that glass
objects were found almost exclusively in graves; therefore they only represent
part of the repertoire of the vessels and objects used in burial and memorial
rituals and as grave goods.

Glass Workshops
Fig. 1. Remains of the local glass working activity have been spotted in three
parts of Thessalonik: outside the eastern city walls in a building, which
probably was also used as a workshop for clay lamps; in the citys abandoned
public Forum; and in the abandoned ruins of the Roman public bathhouse
where the basilica Acheiropoietos was erected in the mid-fifth century. All
finds are generally dated between the fourth and sixth centuries c.e. Only the

Israeli,
Invention

of Blowing,
4655;

eadem,
What

did Jerusalems

First-Century
B.C.E. Glass Workshop Produce? 44647.

On that matter, see also Antonaras, Uavlina kai keramikav aggeiva, forthcoming.

Trowbridge,
Philological, 1067;
Stern,
Roman Glassblowing, 451.

It appears that
recycling of glass shards was widely introduced only during the Flavian period (6996),
along with the spread of free-blowing technique.

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

303

Fig. 1. Glass Workshops in Thessaloniki. Town Plan and Remains.

workshop from the eastern necropolis yielded relatively secure information

about its products, which probably consisted of several types of lamps.
Raw material, according to its appearance, color, and quality, might have
been partly imported from Syro-Palestinian primary workshops and partly was
acquired from recycling of broken objects, which must have been collected
quite thoroughly.
A. Glass Vessels

In the period under examination, forms and uses of glass vessels in

Thessalonik according to the excavated material could be summarized as
follows.10
Fig. 2. After the middle of the second and during the third century,
Thessalonik flourished, but, as far as glass finds are concerned,
the
number of preserved examples diminished considerably, as did the number of

Antonaras, Endeivxei~ drasthriovthta~, 24753; idem, Ualopoiiva kai ualourgiva,
forthcoming.
10
For a thorough and analytical study of glass vessels from Thessaloniks region, see
Antonaras, Rwmai>khv kai palaiocristianikhv ualourgiva. For

a version of the same study

in English see idem,

Glass Vessels,
forthcoming.

304

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

forms in use. Mainly

tableware

is

preserved

:
arybaloid jugs,

biconical bottles
with indentations, and pear-shaped flasks. Also

, large,

jar-like
unguentaria
are found,
possibly

of
Western

origin
.
Finally
,
during

this
period
,
if

nota
bit
later
, spouted

vessels

appear
with

an
inherent

spout. These vessels are known

Fig. 2. Drawings of second- and third-century glass vessels.

as baby-feeders but were probably used as lamp fillers. These vessels were
produced both in the West and the East, although their handleless variants,
which appear in Thessalonik, seem to be an Eastern product. They continue
to be used and produced in the fourth century, mainly with an applied spout,
as well.
Around
the

end

of

the

second and

during

the

third centuries, the following

new forms
appeared in Thessalonik:
bulbous

flasks;

cylindrical, engraved
beakers; as well as indented, ovoid,
and conical
unguentaria
with horizontal
shoulders, which were Western products.
In
the

second
half
of

the

third century
a
new

period
of

development

started in Thessalonik. In general this was a prosperous period for the city,
as is evident from the erection of new monumental buildings. Its prosperity
was a result of its strategic position on the Via Egnatia and its position on
the sea; both of these elements, which made Thessalonik important for the

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

305

constant military events of this period, led Galerius to choose the city as his
imperial capital.
Fig. 3. After the middle of the third century, the use of glass in Thessalonik
was more widespread; such glass was now mostly produced as large-sized

Fig. 3. Drawings of late-third-century glass vessels.

306

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

vessels, amforisks, jugs, and bottles. These forms,

equally

widespread

in

eastern and western provinces, appeared in the mid-third century and seem
to have lasted until the beginning of the fifth century. The following tall
tableware vessels appear in large numbers: jugs in new shapes, known both
from East and West; pointed and flat-bottomed amforisks; spherical bottles
with cut-off rim and constriction at the base of their neck; spherical and
pear-shaped bottles with outsplayed rim or funnel mouth, ribbed and plain
ones. Aforementioned forms were widely used and produced both in the West
and the East, but probably a large number of them were produced locally.
Also
, flasks

appear in many forms:

pear

-
shaped,
squat

or

slender

; spherical

ones

with

short

or

long

neck
;
ovular

and

cylindrical

ones, some of which

were locally produced. The prevailing form of drinking vessels consists of
hemispherical bowls often bearing engraved or applied decoration, while
ovular beakers appear only sporadically.
Unguentaria too appear among the finds from Thessalonik. These, which
are miniature versions of tableware vessels, are spherical with cut-off or
outsplayed rims or funnel-mouthed. They include pear-shaped ones with
outsplayed rims, wide and cylindrical ones, bulbous ones, and
jar-like
ones
with vertical ribs
. At

the

same

time

cubical

and double-faced mold-blown

unguentaria appeared. All

these

forms

survived

throughout

the
fourth century.
They
seem to have originated

in

the

West
or

even

in

the

Balkans
, while

only

a few

appear

to
be
of

oriental

origin.

Fig. 4.

Wide use of glass vessels in Thessalonik continued in the fourth

century. Vessels

are mainly
Syro-Palestinian

or

imitate
Syro-Palestinian
forms.
Vessels for serving
liquids

appear in a great variety of forms, namely

jugs and flasks. Drinking

vessels

consist of
bowls,
both shallow and

deeper
ones,
and tall

conical

beakers

without
bases
, which were
probably
used

also

as
lamps

.
The following bowls appear: free-blown hemispherical ones, and
mold-blown ones with a honeycomb pattern. Present also are calyx-shaped
bowls and short cylindrical ones with scalloped rims.
Fig. 5. Unguentaria appear in a great diversity of sizes and forms: as small
amphorae, craters, and jugs; as handleless and biconical, squat and spherical,
pear-shaped, cylindrical with short and tall neck; as square bodied with tall or
short neck; and as jar-like. Glass
was

also

used

for

the

production
of

lamps
,
like
the

three-handled hemispherical

and

calyx

-
shaped
bowls.11
A special
group consists of
octagonal
jugs
,
plain
and

with

oblique

ribbing,

which
appear

to be

local
products

of
the

late fourth to fifth centuries

.12
11
12

Antonaras,
Glass

Lamps, forthcoming
.
Idem, New Glass Finds,
2:41320.

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

Fig. 4. Drawings of fourth-century glass tableware.

307

308

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

Fig. 5. Drawings of fourth-century glass vessels.

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

309

Fig. 6.
At

the

end

of

the
fourth
and

during

the early
fifth centuries,

tall conical
beakers with ring bases, indented bowls, and tall cylindrical flasks appear in
Thessalonik. These may have originated in the northwestern provinces.
Fig.
7. In Thessalonik during
the

fifth and

sixth centuries, quite

possibly
several

forms

of

the
fourth-century tableware
, like jugs, bottles,

and drinking

Fig. 6. Drawings of late-fourth-century

Western glass vessels.

vessels, survived. The latter were also used as lamps. The well-known form
of stemmed beakers prevails.
T
he
other

forms

of

lass lamps
known
from

the
area of Thessalonik

are

equally

well documented all over the Mediterranean

region (i.e., three-handled stemmed beakers, hemispherical or calyx-shaped
stemmed lamps, and pointed cylindrical vessels with a smaller or larger knob
forming the base
).13
Examples

of

vessels

found
throughout the in
habited

areas
of Thessalonik
are
few

and
date in the second half of the fourth and in the fifth centuries.
Vessels for carrying liquidslike jugs, deep and shallow bowls, and others
for drinkingprevail. Some bear engraved decorations, indicating their use
by the wealthier people. These engraved vessels, which are probably mainly
of Italian origin, also show Thessaloniks relationship to Rome and the
Italian peninsula in general. Although pagan themes occur, mainly Christian
or nonreligious, geometrical themes prevail. The most interesting fragments
are the following:
Fig. 8.1. Depicted on a fourth-century spherical bottle is a hunting scene
with a female, most likely Diana, with a bow, hunting two deer assisted
13

Idem,
Glass

Lamps, forthcoming.

310

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

Fig. 7. Drawings of fifth- and sixth-century glass vessels.

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

311

by dogs.14 The scene takes place among bushes and trees, and the deer are
running toward a stretched net. Above the scene a partly preserved inscription
reads: USUCI PIE . . . HS META . . . /WN PIE Z . . . S. Although
it

has

been
published

with the lacunae filled with Christian words, like AGION,

etc., I find this reconstruction quite, if not highly, inappropriate, given
the pagan scene covering the vessels body.15 So, it seems more probable
that the text with the wish for this certain Usuvci(o~), owner of the bottle,
could be filled with the words TWN SWN, or TWN OIKEIWN, or TWN SWN
OIKEIWN PANTWN, or, given

the size of the vessels missing part, even

with the names of these OIKEIOIa pattern well known from other similar
finds.16 Therefore, the inscription might be reconstructed as follows: Usuvci,
pive zhv s h/ ~ meta; tw` n sw` n oij k eiv w n pav n twn. Piv e zhv s h/ ~ . Hesychios,
drink
;
may

you

live

with

all

your

intimates
.
Drink; may you live! All other
decorated vessels (shallow bowls and plates) are open-shaped.17
Fig. 8.2. On a plate18 a standing figure is preserved, holding a plant in the
right hand which looks like a poppy (?) and showing what would appear to
be the seed pod. Perhaps also from the same vessel is a herringbone band
preserved around the rim and parts of what once were eight-pointed stars.19

Archaeological

Museum of Thessalonik, reg. no. MQ 7224. For the

vessels
form
see Isings,
Roman Glass, 12223, form 103; Antonaras, Rwmai>khv kai palaiocristianikhv
ualourgiva,
32224, form 145. For Dianas representations on glass vessels, see
Whitehouse,
Roman Glass,
1:26869, no.
457;
Loeschcke and Willers, Beschreibung rmischer Altertmer,
vol. 2, plate 28; Fremersdorf, Die Rmischen Glser, 2:16566, plate 218.
Extremely similar
is the entire hunting scene depicted on a second-century b.c.e. faience Calathos found in
a grave at Neapolis, Thessalonik

, where the hunter is also identified as Diana: DaffaNikonanou, Duvo emeivsakta aggeiva, 26975, fig. 3,
plate

56.
15
Petsas, Anaskafhv panepisthmioupovlew~ Qessalonivkh~, 391, plates

296

and

298,
fig. 12

;
Pallas, Les Monuments palochrtiens de Grce, 75. Pallas sees EUSUCI PIE
....HS META ...... WN PIE Z...S and reads it as: EUYUCEI. PIE ZHSHS
META TWN AGIWN. PIE ZHSHS (
75 n

. 163)
. Feissel

reads it as USUCI PIE ZHSHS

META TWN AGIWN PIE ZHSHS and suggests the fourth century as a possible date.
Idem, Recueil des inscriptions chrtiennes, no. 127.
16
Cabrol and Leclerq, Pie zeses, col. 102331; Auth, Drink may you live! 10312,
where exhaustive bibliography on that issue can be found; Fremersdorf,
Die Rmischen
Glser mit Schliff, 18991, plate 214; 27173.
17
Isings, Roman Glass, 14445, form 116; Antonaras, Rwmai>khv kai palaiocristiamikhv
ualourgiva, 13133, form 16.
18
Archaeological Museum of Thessalonik, reg. no. MQ 21960.
19
For similar plants on rock crystal vessels, see Fremersdorf, Antikes, Islamisches und
Mittelalterliches Glas, 117 nos. 104748, 106162, plate 82.
For parallels in glass:
Paolocci,
I vetri incisi, 15051, 16465; Ru

i
, Rimsko
staklo

Srbiji,

57 no.
1195, plate
43:14.
14

312

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

Fig. 8. Engraved glass vessels.

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

313

Fig. 8.3. From another plate20 a male, beardless head in profile is preserved,
over which letters ZH can be read; these are part of an inscription, probably
a salutation in the form of pive zhvsh~, which was equally
used

in

pagan,
Jewish,

and

Christian

scenes.21 The plate seems to be a product of a Roman

workshop from the second half of the fourth century.22
Fig. 8.4. We find yet another fragment of a plate,23 on which the letter H
can be read, along with an uncertain motif. The decoration on the fragment
could be the leg of a throne or of a cathedra.
Fig. 8.5. The
best
-
preserved

sample
presents a young,
beardless, standing
figure with a nimbus and holding a long staff with his right hand, which ends
up in a chrism.24 Around the nimbus can be seen the letter M, and possibly
a second one, hardly visible today. The figure is flanked by two tabulae
ansatae (tablets with handles), possibly standards, placed perpendicularly at
each side. This plate is likely the product of a Roman workshop at the end of
the fourth to the early fifth centuries. This workshop is known from several
pieces that share the same Christian themes in their detailing, themes similar
to that of the aforementioned plate.25
Identifying
the
figure
is

not

an

easy

task,

and only a few suggestions on

that matter will be made
.
This kind of staff can
be seen held
by Christ and
St. Peter, less often by St. Paul or St. John the Forerunner.26 Also, saints
highly venerated locally are given this insignium, like St. Laurent in Galla
Placidias mausoleum or in a glass bowl from Ostia.27 Finally, if indeed the
letter M above his head is an indication of his name, then possibly he could
be identified with the Archangel Michael or some other saint with an M
in his name. Tabulae ansatae, possibly standards, which are presented
around the figure, have also been observed in association with other
archangels, and lead to the identification of the admittedly wingless figure
with Archangel Michael.28
Archaeological Museum of Thessalonik

, reg. no. MQ 21978.

Cabrol and Leclerq, Pie zeses, col. 102331; Auth, Drink may you live! 10312,
where exhaustive bibliography on that matter can be found.
22
On this workshop see Paolucci, I vetri incisi, 5762. For a thorough study of the
workshops active in Rome during the late fourth and early fifth century, see Sagu, Un
piatto di vetro, 33758.

23
Archaeological Museum of Thessalonik

, yet unregistered, presented in

Antonaras,
Rwmai>khv kai palaiocristianikhv ualourgiva, as vessel no.

36.

24
Museum of Byzantine Culture, Thessalonik

, reg. no.

327/1.
25
Paolucci, LArte del Vetro Inciso, 2728; also, Sagu, Un piatto, 33758.
26
Schfer, Die Heilige, 33.
27
Paolucci, I vetri incisi, 52, fig. 18.
28
I would like to thank Dr. Charalambos Bakirtzis for suggesting to me this interpretation
20
21

314

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

Fig. 8.6. Among the nonfigurative themes, we distinguish a Greek cross

inscribed in a round medallion,29 while all the others are just dots, facets,
and bands engraved solely or in combinations that sometimes create more
elaborate patterns.
Regarding the decorative techniques present in our material and their
overall distribution in Thessalonik, we could summarize our remarks as
follows. Almost exclusively free-blown, plain, undecorated vessels were
used. Few forms of fully mold-blown, or more usually, dip mold-blown
occur; these are concentrated mainly in the fourth to fifth centuries. Dip
mold-blowing offered an easy and inexpensive way of decorating vessels
with ribbing, usually oblique or occasionally vertical. From the late third to
fifth centuries, few vessels are incised, mainly with simple bands, while only
a handful bears more complicated figurative decoration. An even smaller
number of vessels bears applied decorations, mainly consisting of simple
threads or dots, alone or in clusters of contrasting colors, while only a couple
of vessels were adorned with pinching.
Fig. 9. This figure summarizes the above data and visualizes in charts the
spreading of different groups of vessels by century. Results of the writers
research on glass finds from Thessalonik dating from the first century b.c.e.
to the sixth century c.e. will be used.30 From this figure, we can observe
that in the second and the beginning of the third centuries the total number
of forms and vessels, compared to that of the first century, diminishes
significantlyrepresenting 7.5
percent

of the total number of forms and just

3 percent of vessels. While tableware still prevails, the number of vessels
for serving liquids increases and the number of unguentaria drastically
diminishes. Additionally, spouted vessels and possibly lamp fillers appear
for the first time. Among the vessels of this period those whose origin can be
traced appear to be western products.
From

the

middle

of

the
third
until the
early fifth century, the spread of glass vessels recovers in Thessalonik. A
large number of unguentaria appears, although tableware nevertheless prevails
even for carrying liquids. A few transporting vessels and some lamps are also
present. Vessels of this period represent fifty
percent

of the total number of

forms and fifty
percent

of the total number of vessels discussed here.

It seems
that imports from the East prevail, especially from Syro-Palestine, while at
of the indeterminable motifs of the tabulae ansatae/standards. Rectangular standards on tall
shafts can be seen held by archangels in the mosaics of S. Apollinare in Classe.
29
For parallels
see
Barag
, Glass
Vessels, plate 52/5;

Iliffe, Tomb

at El
Bassa,
8191
;
from a grave of the last decade of the fourth century, represented in Paolucci, I vetri incisi,
7273, fig. 36.

30
Antonaras, Rwmai>khv kai palaiocristianikhv ualourgiva.

315

Fig. 9. Distribution Chart of Glass Vessels.

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

316

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

the same time the total number of local products also rises considerably.
Later, during the fifth and sixth centuries, lamps dominate among the
indeed quite scarce number of finds. Lamps, representing three percent of
the total number of forms and 2.7 percent of the number of vessels studied,
demonstrate one of the main needs that glass objects fulfilled throughout
the Byzantine era. No securely dated seventh-century finds have yet been
unearthed or published.
Fig. 10. As has already been mentioned, the majority of the extant material
was found in cemeteries. Therefore, the surviving samples elucidate the
general repertoire of vessels used during burials as grave goods and during
the memorials (i.e., mnmosyna).
Spouted vessels, pseudobiberons, or rather lamp fillers, as well as examples
of the entire repertoire of glass lamps have been found in large quantities
at the necropoleis of Thessalonik. These finds witness to the well-attested
custom of letting a lamp burn over the grave for the first forty days after the
burial and additionally on special occasions and fixed dates during the year.31
Several graves were equipped with a special rectangular niche (lucernarium)
where the lamp was placed.32
The presence of unguentaria and partly of larger, close-shaped tableware
vessels (e.g., jugs, flasks, and bottles) is connected with the mutually pagan
and Christian custom to anoint the deceased ones, mutual to the extent that
the fathers of the Christian church castigated it.33 Also, the vessels must have
held oil used in the symbolic act performed by the priest when he poured
it crosswise over the corpse at a funeral in order to show that the deceased
lived and died in accordance with the sacred canons.34 Additionally, this
custom was connected with an attempt by the deceaseds loved ones to render
the frequently luxurious burial garments useless and thus to discourage the
desecration of the grave.35
31
Koukoules, Buzantinw`n bivo~, 4:20814. For an early reference on the continuous
burning of a lamp on a grave, see Egeria

s
Travels,
12324,
47.3.

32

Marki, H nekrovpolh th~ Qessalonivkh~, 11516, 208, where local examples are cited;
Makropoulou, Grave Finds, 56. For representations of burning lamps and candelabra in
wall paintings from tombs in Thessalonik, see Mark, H nekrovpolh th~ Qessalonivkh~,
16768, figs. 11315, plate 15; 171, fig. 123, plate 17.
33
Koukoules, Buzantinw`n nekrika; e[qima, 380, esp. 89, 13. All the information
from this article with new thoughts on that matter can be found in English in
Kyriakakis,

Byzantine

Burial
Customs,

3772.
34
Kallinikou, O cristianiko;~ nao;~, 56061; Koukoules, Buzantinw`n nekrika; e[qima,
4344; Loucatos, Laografikai;, 47.
35
Kyriakakis, Byzantine Burial Customs, 51; Antonaras
,
Early

Christian

GoldEmbroidered
Silks
,
4547; idem,
Late Antique Gold-Embroidered
Silks
,
1819.

Fig. 10. Glass Vessels used as grave goods, thirdfifth century Museum of Byzantine Culture, Thessalonik.

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

317

318

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

Tableware fragments, found in and around the graves or scattered around

at the necropoleis, are connected with the memorial ceremonies and the meals
(makaries) that Christians offered above the graves.36 All aforementioned
vessels, used for the burial or in the cemetery, were not supposed to be brought
back to the deceased ones house, as they were not considered clean anymore.37
This belief could partly explain the fact that vessels found in the graves are
usually completely new, bearing no traces of use, even if they are sometimes
found broken.38 It seems that these vessels were bought to be placed in the
graves. To some extent, this practice explains their often lower quality or
evidence of a few faults, such as body deformations or poor balance, that
might have excluded them from the normal market.
Also, one must keep in mind that such vessels had other uses, for example,
in medicine or alchemy. Although these uses were once quite common, they
are scarcely traced in archaeological finds. For evidence of such uses, we
must rely on the scant and circumstantial finds supported by the information
preserved in pictorial and written sources.
In conclusion, we should note that glass vessels covered just a small part
of the uses and needs that were mainly served by clay vessels. Glass was
utilized by the wealthier social strata or, in special instances, by multiple
lower-strata users who ordinarily covered their needs with clay and wooden
vessels. Applying our scarce knowledge about the price of glass in the
beginning of the fourth century,39 we can calculate that a glass bottle would
cost ten times the price of a similar ceramic vessel, around five to ten
36
For that reason several wealthy graves, found in both necropoleis of Thessalonik, had
atop of their barrel-vaulted ceiling a flat surface, where memorial banquets could take place
(Mark, H nekrovpolh th~ Qessalonivkh~, 114, 209). For relevant finds from other Greek sites
see Laskaris, Monuments funraires palochrtiens, 268. Memorial meals were well attested
in Macedonia during the Roman period, possibly connected with the Italian colonists, in the
form of parentalia and Rosalia, which also involved meals in the cemeteries (see Ascough,
A Question of Death, 51314, with relevant references). For Thessalonian associations
and their importance on burials and memorials, see Nigdelis, Epigrafikav Qessalonivkeia,
101211. For presentations of memorial banquets in Thessaloniks tombs, see Mark, H
nekrovpolh th~ Qessalonivkh~, 14041, figs. 7475, plates 5bg. On representations of burial
banquets on pagan altars, see
Adam-Veleni, Makedonikoiv Bwmoiv, 8691,
where examples
from Thessalonik and ancient Macedonia in general are discussed in detail.
37
Loucatos, Laografikaiv, 7579.
38
For relevant archaeological evidence from Thessaloniks necropoleis, see Makropoulou,
Tafikav eurhvmata,
26667;
eadem,

Grave Finds and

Burial Practices in Thessaloniki
(fourthfifteenth century).
39
On Diocletians edict of 301 c.e., see Giacchero, Edictum Diocletiani. On
prices

of
glass objects, see Barag,
Recent

Important Epigraphic

Discoveries, 11316;

and
Stern,
Roman Glassblowing,
466.

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

319

denarii, equal to the price of a workers meal or one-fifth to one-third of

his daily wages.40 Glass vessels, or at least the plain ones, were sold by the
pound, just like glass tesserae and window panes. Thus, the workmanship
of the glass-worker offered no added value to the product.41
Also, it is quite easy to conclude that glass was favored for some uses
like unguentaria and medicine receptacles. In contrast, they were only
exceptionally used as storage vessels or as vessels for long-distance trade.
Finally, in the case of tableware, glass, clay, and metal vessels were used
side-by-side in banquets or were interchanged according to what was socially
dictated or requested for every instance.
B. Window Panes

Use of glass window panes is well attested from the first century c.e.42
In Thessalonik, though, unlike other Macedonian sites like Philippi,43
few finds of this kind are published (fig.11). These finds date around the
fourth century.44 Due to the small size of the preserved fragments, their
manufacturing technique is difficult to determine. Nevertheless, it is
quite certain that muff-process or cylinders technique prevailed, as no
fragments are found with the characteristics of the bulls-eye technique or
of production in a mold. Besides, in Late Antiquity the muff-process was
almost exclusively used to make windowpanes. Before closing

this chapter,
I should stress that the paucity of finds does not really reflect the extent of
the use of glass window panes because recyclin was commonplace at the
time. As is only logical, but also supported by archaeological finds, broken
window panes were meticulously collected after the abandonment or the
40
The average bottle or jug widely used in Late Antique Thessalonik weighs ca. 80150
gm. So if a pound (327.45 gm.) costs twenty or thirty denarii, depending on the quality of
glass, a vessel of that kind would cost five to ten denarii.
41
Barag, Recent Important Epigraphic Discoveries, 11316; Stern, Roman Glassblowing, 466.
42
For the latest and most up-to-date information about glass window panes in the Mediterranean world, see discussions in De Transparentes

speculations,
1552.
43
Pelekanidis, H e[xw tw`n teicw`n, 11479;

repr., idem, Studien zur Frhchristlichen,

36061, fig. 19; Kourkoutidou-Nikolaidou, Vitraux palochrtiens Philippes, 27796;
Antonaras, Early Christian Glass Finds, 4951, fig. 2.
44

Romiopoulou, Nosokomeivo ACEPA, 24142,

plate 194

a, where considerable quantities

of window glass were found in the debris of a third-century bath house, possibly part of a
Roman villa
.
Also, similar, still unpublished, material has
been unearthed in the Roman villa
under Galeriuss palace, dated to the second half of the third century. I express my thanks to
the excavator of the site, Mrs. Marianna
Karaberi

,
for
sharing

this

information

with

me
.

Fig. 11. Window Panes from Museum Basilica, Philippi, sixth century. Museum of Byzantine Culture, Thessalonik.

320
From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

321

ruining of a building. The fragments were re-melted, as their mass equaled

that of several costly glass vessels.
C. Jewelry

Glass was used early as a substitute for colorful semiprecious stones already
in ancient Mesopotamia and pharaonic Egypt and may have been invented
for this purpose. During the early imperial period, fancy, colorful gems were
created, developing the Hellenistic tradition of the originally colorless gems
and representing objets dart per se. Buyers in Late Antiquity would not pay
the same prices for glass jewelry as for the crafted gems natural prototypes, as
consumers were well aware of the cheap and easy methods that the production
of glass jewelry involved. Thus, products had to be cheap. Plain artifacts were
created often as inexpensive and massively produced substitutes and handy
solutions of adornment addressed to the wider, less wealthy social strata.
The greatest portion of finds from Thessalonik can be dated to the late
third to sixth centuries (figs. 1213).45 It appears that Thessalonians, just
like other Eastern Mediterranean peoples, used larger beads and pendants
as central pieces for necklaces. Pendants were looped and dark colored with
trails or specks in contrasting colors. At least three to four variants of these
pendants exist: jar pendants,46 sometimes in an elongated47 or simplified
version;48 juglet pendants;49 and the popular disk pendants with stamped
motifs.50 Also, pendants in the form of simplified glass droplets occur.51 Largesized beads are also found frequently. Most were probably used as central
45
Makropoulou, Kosmhvmata, 5669

; idem, Palaiocristianikav kosmhvmata,

6162.
46
Spaer, Ancient Glass, 177 nn.

33238;
Makropoulou, Kosmhvmata, 64, plate 2, end
of third to early fourth century.
47
Bead no. BYM 21/12, in the permanent exhibition of the Museum of Byzantine
Culture, Thessalonik.
48

Spaer, Ancient Glass,

185 nn. 40913, late fourth to sixth century.
49
Bead no. BYM 21/6, in the permanent exhibition of the Museum of Byzantine Culture,
dated to the fourth to early fifth century.
50
Nalpantis, Anaskafhv sto oikovpedo, 63, fig. 32, ca. mid-fourth-century flat, looped discs
with impressed motifs on the one side. No Christian or Jewish motif survives in Thessalonik,
only a lion beneath a crescent and the sun or sol/luna, which is the most popular motif on
these pendants. The lion represents the celestial protective power while the sol/luna motif
over its head, which was used throughout the Byzantine period, denotes that God was the
ruler of time.
For analogous finds, see also Philippe, Le monde Byzantine, 3738; and Spaer,
Ancient Glass, 17984, plates 2930.
51
These are later, degenerated and simplified versions of earlier, more elaborate beads
in the form of glass droplets dated in the late fourth, fifth and sixth centuries (see Spaer,
Ancient Glass,
185 nn. 41422).

Fig. 12. Glass Jewelry, thirdfourth century. Museum of Byzantine Culture, Thessalonik.

322
From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

323

Fig. 13. Glass Jewelry, thirdfourth century. Museum of Byzantine

Culture, Thessalonik.

pieces or pendants and are characterized by their biconical or globular shape

and their dark-colored body usually decorated with white trails52 or specks.53
Also, sometimes large-sized beads are long and cylindrical, occasionally
even looped,54 segmented, and patterned by the segmenting mold, gilded,55 or
Ibid.
,
102, fig. 47; 113 nn. 17072.
Ibid., 127, 129, third to fifth century.
54
Ibid., 103, 113 nn. 17374. On the graves dating, see Nalpantis, Anaskafhv, 63, ca.
mid-fourth century. Rod-formed, wound, looped bead, inspired by the looped pendants, all
of which were imitations of precious, metal amulets, like the golden one from Thessalonik.
See Qessalonivkh, 49, fig. 10:9; 50, no. 10:9.
55
Spaer, Ancient Glass, 13233

nn. 23738.

Identical example from Romano-Byzantine

necropolis at Castra, see ibid., 132, fig. 58, second row from bottom. Long, cylindrical beads,
52
53

324

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

just plain, long, smooth or spirally-ribbed pieces. Ribbed spacersroughly

circular plano-convex objects with two parallel perforations, an apparently
North Balkan or Central European importpresent glass imitations of
jet prototypes.56 Bright, but simple glass beads in striking colors were
occasionally used in earrings as stone substitutes.57
All methods of bead forming known from other sites are also present among
finds from Thessalonik (e.g., winding, folding, molding, segmentation,
drawing, etc.). Generally, these finds indicate their obvious connections with
eastern Mediterranean production centers. Beads of the following shapes
appear: smooth and ribbed (melon-like) globular,58 ovoid, pear-shaped
shapes;59 smooth, ribbed, and patterned cylindrical, cubical, hexahedronlike,60 hexagonal, and multifaceted61 shapes.
Often, necklaces consist of a few beads, eight to fifteen, probably arranged
immovably in predefined distances on the string. Also, beads are used in great
numbers, combined with a few stonesbone or amber onesto achieve
especially tasteful creations. In some cases almost the entire necklace
consists of small, identical beads, interrupted by a few larger, more elaborate
ones. In other cases almost every bead is unique, both in size and color,
forming a dazzling product.62
Bracelets

Glass bangles

of

the

earlier
La Tne period

do

not

occur

in Thessalonik or
ancient Macedonia in general.63
They appear for the first time around the third
segmented and patterned by the segmenting mold, ending in collars, with granular pattern
on their body, imitating granulation of their metal prototypes.
56
Ibid., 66, 76 nn. 56, 57, fourth century, possible eastern European or Pannonian
product.
57
For examples dated from the third to seventh centuries, see Ross,
Jewelry, Enamels,
and Art, 138,

no. 179P, plate

99;
Kypraiou, Greek Jewelry,
156, no. 157; Pa

panikola-Bakirtzi,
Everyday
Life

in

Byzantium,
424 nn. 542, 558, no. 768.
58
An interesting multicolored bead decorated with drawn-trailing, made possibly in the
first century was used later in a composite necklace. For parallels, see Spaer, Ancient Glass,
108, 117 nn. 19899.
59
Folded, pear-shaped or cylindrical beads, similar in technique, but not in colors with
Egyptian date beads, of the second century (see ibid., 11 nn. 160ac).
60
Beads nos. BYM 10/6 and BYM 21/8 in the permanent exhibition of the Museum of
Byzantine Culture, Thessalonik.
61
Nalpantis, Anaskafhv, 133, plate 45, dated to the first quarter of the third century;
also, Spaer, Ancient Glass, 74 nn. 4849.
62
For color photos of necklaces see Antonaras, 2003Glass, illustrations of forty-eighth
to fiftieth weeks.
63
Haevernick, Die Glasarmringe. Venclov, Prehistoric Glass in Bohemia, 14245.

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

325

century c.e. and are of dark-colored glass usually called black, although
the color is in fact purple or dark green, only appearing black due to the
thickness.64 They appear in circular, semicircular, and flat, band-like crosssections. They were made by two techniques: There are seamed examples,
made from drawn out canes of glass, and seamless ones, made with the
perforation and centrifugal rotation of a hot mass of glass.65 The majority
are plain, while a few examples bear pressed, geometrical decorations in
the form of oblique ribbing.

They were usually quite wide, ca. 67 cm,

but
whether they were worn around wrists or at the upper part of the arm is not
attested archaeologically. They had been substitutes of similar expensive
jewelry, most probably imitating jet prototypes, which were in fashion during
the fourth century. 66
Glass rings

Early imperial glass rings known in the western part of the empire are not
present in Thessalonik.67 In Late Antique sites of central Macedonia, a couple
of glass rings were unearthed, supporting the supposition that they must have
been sold in Thessaloniks market as well. What do occur in Thessalonik
are glass gems, used in many cases as substitutes for semiprecious stones in
rings, both in cheaper creations68 and in elaborate golden examples as well.69
Of course it should be kept in mind that the same gems were also used for
the embellishment of other luxurious minor objects.
In Late Antiquity, unlike the early imperial period, glass ring gems usually
are plain with no intaglios or other decoration except for their vivid color.
They are small, lenticular, or plano-convex pieces, occasionally in the shape
of a pyramid, sometimes found in graves with no metal remains of their

Spaer, Ancient Glass, 193, 198.

64
Qessalonivkh, 123, 132, photo 133. Kypraiou,
Greek Jewelry, 150, no. 149. Makropoulou,
Kosmhvmata, 65, plate 3, examples dated to the second half of the fourth century.
65
Spaer, Ancient Glass,
193. Antonaras, Use

of Glass
, 33134.
Especially

for later
examples see Antonaras, Uavlina mesobuzantinav braciovlia, 42334
.
66
Nalpantis, Anaskafhv, 35, 133, fig. 10, plate 45, jet bracelet from a grave dating from
the first half of the fourth century.
67
Stern, Roman, Byzantine and Early Medieval Glass, 371 no. 204, with exhaustive
relevant bibliography.
68
Papanikola-Bakirtzi,
Everyday Life, 425, no. 544, a seventh-century copper alloy
example.
69
Nalpantis, Anaskafhv, 34, plate 46, BK 215/2, double, golden ring with green glass
gem, from the first half of the fourth century. Also, Makropoulou, Kosmhvmata, plate 4.

326

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

original setting. They are identical to the ancient Greek and early Roman
gaming pieces, which are not found in Late Antique graves or strata.
Some larger, elongated pieces found in several sites at the vicinity of
Thessalonik, testify for the use of hyelia for the decoration of larger metal
objects, furniture, book binding, or other luxury-type objects.
Enamel

Another form in which glass was used in Late Antique Thessalonik would
be that of enamels. This technique, already fully developed from classical
antiquity,70 has been sporadically traced among our finds. For example, we can
find enamels among early third-century jewelry in the form of micromosaics71
and later as a single layer of glass that covered a greater area, as on golden
earrings with emerald-green inlays.72
Our jewelry finds come almost exclusively from graves, as they were
well-looked-after valuables in peoples everyday lives. A few of the excavated
graves, however, have yielded some jewelry. This rather small number of
finds might be connected to a pragmatic approach by the family of the
deceasedthat something valuable should not be buried in the ground and
be lost for future generations. This paucity of jewelry finds could also be
connected with the Christian familys beliefs. Generally speaking, it appears
that Christian folk indeed respected and followed patristic regulations about
burying their beloved ones without special adornments, rather than burying
them in luxurious vestments.73
In conclusion, we could say that in Thessaloniks glass jewelry we
recognize imports and prototypes deriving from the Levantine coast, which
is something natural and already noted in glass vessels. We see quite clearly
a different aesthetical approach among Thessalonians: a tendency towards
polychromy with the use of several different, smaller beads, sometimes in
large numbers, which was not so usual in the East and could be connected to
local or western traditions. We may assume that our finds were mainly local
products, as it was easy to produce glass beads and bracelets in simple, open
Mikou-Karachaliou, Greek Jewelry, 2829, 65, fig. 11; 74, fig. 26.
Copper alloy brooches covered with enameling, nos. BK 87/15 and BK 244/214, in
the permanent exhibition of the Museum of Byzantine Culture, Thessaloniki.
72
Golden earrings, no. BKo 214/5, in the permanent exhibition of the Museum of
Byzantine Culture, Thessaloniki.
73
Patristic texts focus mainly against the use of luxurious vestments and placing of money
in the graves (John Chrysostom, PG 55.231, 59.465,

50.582, 55.231). No

clear reference on
jewelry was traced, possibly because they were not placed in graves anyway and therefore
no need arose to castigate the custom. See Loucatos, Laografikaiv,
7577.
70
71

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

327

kilns or even braziers, and/or as sidelines of the glass workshops, which were
active in the city at that period. We also see connections with the northern
and central parts of the Balkans.
D. Mosaics

Glass was also used in Late Antique Thessalonik in the form of tiny tesserae,
which were used to form mural mosaics. Wide use of wall mosaics, as attested
in Thessaloniks early Christian churches, demanded huge amounts of
glass. Today, mosaics survive at the walls of the Rotunda, Acheiropoietos,
St. Demetrios, and the Latomou monastery. An average tessera weighs ca.
11.5 gm and covers 0.70.9 sq. cm. If we add the seam around each one of
them, we see that they covered ca. 1 sq cm with ca. 1.2 gm of glass. So, for
every square meter of mosaic, approximately 12 kgs of glass were needed.
The Rotundas wall mosaics originally would have covered ca. 1414 sq m. If
we multiply this figure by twelve, then we see that for Rotundas decoration
alone some seventeen tons of tesserae were needed out of which roughly
thirteen tons would have been made out of glass. Tesserae were often cut
on-site from large glass cakes.74 It is not known whether such cakes were
formed in the city or imported from elsewhere. In the case of Thessalonik,
musivarii were probably working with cakes made with imported raw glass,
which possibly were locally shaped. Supporting this hypothesis is the fact that
the shaping of the cakes is a simple process, which did not require any special
technical skills. In contrast, the work of coloring is difficult; it needs to be
done skillfully and in great quantities in order to get homogeneous coloring
in large enough batches to cover entire commissions.75 The only possible
exception might be presented by the gold-glass tesserae, which required a
certain degree of specialization in their production and might be products
of specialized workshops. Such gold-glass tesserae certainly arrived on site
either in cakes, or, less probably, in tiny already-cut cubes.

Conclusion
As far as glassmaking

and

glass
products

in

Late

Antiquity are concerned,

Thessalonik presents a quite common case, which is not distinguished at all
from other contemporary, major Mediterranean urban centers. Glass was
74
For similar finds from Philippi, see Antonaras, Early Christian Glass Finds, 5455,
fig. 9.
75
James

,
Byzantine
Glass

M
osaic
Tesserae,

2947,
esp
. 39.

328

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

used in Thessalonik by builders for glazing windows and for decorating

the walls of public buildings. Glass was also frequently used in the form of
lamps to light the interiors of both public and private spaces. Thessalonians
of almost all social strata used glass articles to adorn themselves or their
possessions. But most of all, glass in the form of vessels found its place in their
households: on the table, not only to pour and to drink, but also to transport
and to preserve holy substances, medicaments, cosmetics, and ointments.
Glass, in one or another form, was used by increasingly greater segments
of Thessaloniks society, as its price was quite low and local workshops were
active, covering partly the needs of the local market. In Late Antiquity, glass
products reached a degree of distribution which was not surpassed until the
advent of the eighteenth-century Industrial Revolution or the cataclysmic
social and economic changes in the lifestyle of southeastern Europe in the
first half of the twentieth century.
To conclude this overview, the most tantalizing fact, at least for
archaeologists, should be emphasized. We must be aware that the exact
dimensions of the use of glass will never be revealed, as the vast majority of
the evidence is lost forever. These were recycled in the form of cheap glass
shards, easy to obtain and to melt, which found new life within glassmakers
voracious melting pots.

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

329

Bibliography
Adam-Veleni, Polyxene
. Makedonikoiv Bwmoiv (Macedonian Altars). Athens
:
TAPA
, 2002.
Antonaras,
Anastassios.
Glass
Lamps of the Roman and Early Christian
Periods:
Evidence from the Thessaloniki Area. In 2nd International Study Congress
on Antique Lighting, Zalau, Clui-Napoca, 1318 May 2006. International
Lynchnological Association, forthcoming.
______.
Glass Vessels from Roman and Early-Christian Thessalonik and its
Surroundings (first century b.c.sixth century a.d.). In Annales du 17me
congrs de lassociation international pour lhistoire du verre, Antwerp, 2009.
Edited by Koen Janssens, Patrick Degryse, Peter Cosyns, Joost Caen and
Luc Vant Dack. Antwerp: Association International pour lHistoire du Verre,
forthcoming.
______. Ualopoiiv

a kai ualourgiva sto rwmai>kov kai palaiocristianikov

kovsmo. Ualourgikhv drasthriovthta sth Qessalonivkh (
Glass
-M
aking
and

Glass
-W
orking

in

Roman

and

Early

Christian

World
: Glass

-W
orking

Activity
in

Thessalonik). ArchDelt, f
orthcoming.
______. Uuavlina kai keramikav aggeiva 3ou7ou ai. m.C Duvo ovyei~ tou ivdiou()
nomivsmato~ (
Glass

and

Ceramic
Vessels
of the ThirdSeventh C

enturies a.d.:
Two

Faces

of
Same
the

[?] Coin

). In Episthmonikhv Sunavnthsh H Keramikhv

th~ Usterh~ Arcaiovthta~ ston Elladikov Cwvro (3o~-7o~ ai.) (Scientific
Meeting Late Antique Pottery in the Area of Greece [3d7th c.e.]), 1216
November 2006. Edited by Stella Drougou and Demetra Papanikola-Bakirtzi.
Thessalonik: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and Archaeological Institute
of Macedonia and Thrace, forthcoming.
______. Rwmai>khv kai palaiocristianikhv ualourgiva. 1o~6o~ ai. Paragwghv
kai proi>ovnta. Ta aggeiva apov th Qessalonivkh kai thn periochv th~ (
Roman
and
Early
Christian

Glassworking

.
1
st
6
th c.e.
Production
and

Products.

Vessels

from

Thessalonik
and

its
Surroundings

).
Athens: I. Sideris,
2009.
______. Early Christian Glass Finds from the Museums Basilica, Philippi. JGS
49 (2007) 4756.
______. Uavlina mesobuzantinav braciovlia. Sumbolhv se qevmata diavdosh~,
paragwghv~, tupologiva~ kai crhvsh~ (Middle Byzantine Glass Bracelets.
Contribution to Issues of Distribution, Production, Typology and Use
).
ArchDelt 27 (2006) 42334.
______. Endeivxei~ drasthriovthta~ ergasthrivwn ualourgiva~ sth
Qessalonivkh (Indications of Glass-Working Activity in Thessalonik). Pages
24753 in 2o Dieqnev~ Sunevdrio Arcaiva Ellhnikhv Tecnologiva, Aqhvna,
1721 October 2005. Athens: , 2006.

330

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

Antonaras,
Anastassios.
New Glass Finds with
Base Marks from Thessaloniki.
Pages 2:41320 in Corpus des signatures et marques sur verres antiques. 2
vols. Edited by Danielle

Foy and Marie-Dominique

Nenna. Aix-en-ProvenceLyon: Association franaise de larchologie du verre, 2006.
______. The Use of Glass in Byzantine Jewelry:
The Evidence from Northern
Greece. Pages

33134 in Annales du 16e congrs de lassociation

international pour lhistoire du verre. London:
AIHV,
2005.

______. Late
Antique

Gold-Embroidered Silks: New Finds from Thessalonik

.
Pages 1819 in 8th Annual Meeting of European Association of Archaeologists,
2429 September 2002, Thessalonik, Hellas, Abstract Book. Thessalonik:
European Association of Archaeologists, 2002.
______. 2003Glass: From the Collections of the Museum of Byzantine Culture,
Calendar-Album of the Museum of Byzantine Culture. Thessalonik:
Association of the Friends of the Museum of Byzantine Culture, 2002.
______.

Early
Christian

Gold
-
Embroidered
Silks

from

Thessalonik
. MBC 8
(2001) 4547.
Auth, Susan Handler. Drink May You Live! Roman Motto Glasses in the Context
of Roman Life and Death. Pages

10312 in Annales du 13me congrs de

lassociation international pour lhistoire du verre.
Amsterdam:
AIHV, 1996.

Barag, Dan. Recent Important Epigraphic Discoveries Related to the History

of Glassmaking in the Roman World.
Pages 10916 in Annales du 10me
congrs de lassociation international pour lhistoire du verre.
Amsterdam/
Lochem: AIHV, 1985.

______. Glass
Vessels

of

the

Roman
and

Byzantine
Periods

in

Palestine. Ph.D.

diss.,
Hebrew
, Jerusalem
University

, 1970. [in

Hebrew]
Cabrol, Fernard and Henri Leclerq. Pie zeses. Columns 102331 in Dictionnaire
darchologie chrtienne et de liturgie 14. Paris: Letouzey et An, 1939.
Daffa-Nikonanou, Alexandra. Duvo epeivsakta aggeiva apov ton tavfo th~
Neavpolh~ Qessalonivkh~ (Two Imported Vessels from the Grave of Neapolis,
Thessalonik). Pages 26376 in Amhtov~, Timhtikov~ tovmo~ gia ton kaqhghthv
Manwvlh Androvniko 1. (Am
tos, Honorary Volume for
Professor Manolis
Andronikos.) Thessalonik:
Aristoteleio

Panepistmio Thessaloniks,
1986.
Egeria. Egerias Travels. Translated by John Wilkinson.
London: S.P.C.K., 1971.

Feissel, Denis. Recueil des inscriptions chrtiennes de Macdoine du III e au VI e

sicle. BCHSupp 8. Athnes: cole franaise dAthnes, 1983.
Foy, Danielle, ed. De transparentes speculations. Vitres de lantiquit et du Haut
Moyen age (Occident-Orient). Exposition temporaire en liaison avec les 20me
rencontres de lassociation franaise de larchologie du verre, sur le thme du
verre plat, Bavay, 1 octobre 2005/31 dcembre 2005.
Bavay-Bagacum: Muse/
site darchologie de Bavay, 2005.

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

331

Fremersdorf, Fritz.
Antikes, islamisches und mittelalterliches Glas, sowie kleinere
Arbeiten aus Stein, Gagat und verwandten Stoffen in den vatikanischen
Sammlungen Roms. (Museo Sacro, Museo Profano, Museo Egizio, Antiquarium
Romanum). Citt del Vaticano: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1975.
______. Die Rmischen Glser mit Schliff, Bemalung und Goldauflagen aus Kln.
2 vols. Die Denkmler des rmischen Kln 8. Kln: Lwe, 1967.
Giacchero, Marta, ed. Edictum Diocletiani et Collegarum de pretiis Rerum
Venalium in integrum fere restitutum e Latinis Graecisque Fragmentis. Genoa:
Istituto di storia antica & scienze ausiliarie, 1974.
Grose, David
Frederick. Early Ancient Glass: Core-Formed, Rod-Formed, and
Cast Vessels and Objects from the Late Bronze Age to the Early Roman Empire,
1600 b.c. to a.d. 50. New

York: Hudson Hills, 1989.

Haevernick, Thea Elisabeth. Die Glasarmringe und Ringperlen der Mittel- und
Sptlateinezeit auf dem Europischen Festland. Bonn: Rmisch-Germanische
Kommission des Deutschen Archologischen Instituts zu Frankfurt a.M., 1960.
Iliffe, J. H. A Tomb at El Bassa c. a.d. 396. QDAP 3 (1933) 8191.
Isings, Clasina. Roman Glass from Dated Finds. Groningen:

J. B. Wolters, 1957.

Israeli, Yael. What

Did
Jerusalems First-Century b.c.e. Glass Workshop
Produce? Pages

5458

in Annales du 16e congrs de lassociation

international pour lhistoire du verre. London:
AIHV,
2005.

______. The

Invention of
Blowing.
Pages 4655

in Roman Glass: Two

Centuries of Art and Invention. Edited by Martin Newby and Kenneth Painter.
London: The Society of Antiquaries of London, 1991.
James,
Liz
.
Byzantine
Glass

M
osaic

Tesserae
: Some

M
aterial

Considerations.
BMGS 30 (2006) 2947.
Kallinikou, Protopresvyterou Konstantinou. O cristianiko;~ nao;~ kai; ta;
telouvmena ejn aujtw`/ (The Christian Church and What Takes Place There). 4th
ed. Athens: Gregori, 1969.
Kitzinger, Ernst. A Marble Relief of the Theodosian Period. DOP 14 (1960)
1742.
Koukoules, Phaedon. Buzantinw`n bivo~ kai; politismov~ (The Life and Culture of
the Byzantines). 6 vols

. Collection de lInstitute franais dAthnes

1013,
43,
73, 76, 90.
Athens
: Ekdoseis tou Gallikou Institoutou
Athenn,
1951.
______. Buzantinw`n nekrika; e[qima (The Burial Customs of the Byzantines).
EHBS 16 (1940) 380.
Kourkoutidou-Nikolaidou, Eutuchia. Vitraux palochrtiens Philippes. Corsi di
cultura sullarte ravennate e bizantina 31 (1984) 27796.
Kypraiou,
Evangelia, ed
. Greek
Jewelry

. 6000 years of Tradition. Thessalonik,

Villa Bianca 21 December 199721 February 1998. Translated by
David Hardy
and Alex Doumas.
Athens: TARA, 1997.
Kyriakakis
,
J
ames.
Byzantine
Burial

Customs
: Care

for the Deceased from Death

to the Prothesis. The Greek Orthodox Theological Review 19 (1974) 3772.

332

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

Laskaris, Nikolaos G. Monuments funraires palochrtiens (et byzantins) de

Grce. Athens: Les ditions Historiques Stfanos D. Vasilopoulos, 2000.
Loeschcke, Siegfried

and Heinrich
Willers. Beschreibung rmischer Altertmer
gesammelt von Carl-Anton Niessen. 2 vols. Kln: von Greven und Bechtold,
1911.
Loucatos, Demetrios. Laografikai; peri; teleuth`~ ejndeivxei~ para; Iwavnnh/ tw`/
Crusostovmw/ (Folkloric Indications on Death by John Chrysostom). Epeteris
tou laographikou archeiou 2 (1940) 30117.
Makropoulou, Despoina. Grave Finds and Burial Practices in Thessaloniki
(fourthfifteenth century). Communication given at the 21st International
Congress of Byzantine Studies, London, 2126 August 2006. http://www.
byzantinecongress.org.uk/paper/II/II.4_Makropoulou.pdf.
______. Palaiocristianikav kosmhvmata apov th Qessalonivkh (Early Christian
Jewelry
from Thessalonik). Pages
6162

in 23o Sumpovs io Buzantinhv~

kai Metabuzantinhv~ Arcaiologiva~ kai Tevcnh~ th~ Cristianikhv~
Arcaiologikhv~ Etaireiva~, Provgramma perilhvyewn eishghvsewn kai
anakoinwvsewn (23rd Byzantine and Post-Byzantine Archaeology and Art
Symposium of the Christian Archaeological Society). Athens: Christianik
Archaiologik Etaireia, 2003.
Makropoulou, Despoina. Tafikav eurhvmata, nomivsmata kai nomismatikoiv
qhsauroiv sta palaiocristianikav koimhthvria th~ Qessalonivkh~
(
Burial Finds, Coins, and Coin Hoards of the
Early Christian Cemeteries of
Thessalonik). Pages 26372

in Afievrwma sth mnhvmh tou Swthvrh Kivssa

(Dedication in memory of Strs Kissas). Edited by Anastasia KalamartziKatsarou and Sapho Tampaki. Thessaloniki
: Ellnik Etaireia Slavikn Meletn/
University
Studio
Press

, 2001.
______. Kosmhvmata apov ton 3o evw~ ton 6o ai. m.C. apov anaskafev~
th~ Qessalonivkh~. Sumbolhv sth melevth th~ palaiocristianikhv~
argurocrusocoi?a~ (Jewelry from the Third to the Sixth Century a.d., from
E
xcavations in Thessalonik

. Contribution

to
S
the

tudy

of
Early
Christian

S
ilver
and

G
oldsmithery
). QP 3 (1997) 5669.
Mark
,
Euterp. H nekrovpolh th~ Qessalonivkh~ stou~ usterorwmai>kouv~ kai
palaiocristianikouv~ crovnou~ (Apov ta mevsa tou 3ou w~ ta mevsa tou 8ou ai.
m.C.) (Thessaloniks Necropolis during the Late Roman and Early Christian
Period). Athens: TAPA, 2006.
Mikou-Karachaliou, Kate, ed. Greek Jewelry, Five Thousand Years of Tradition.
Athens: ELKA LTD, 1995.
Nalpantis, Demetrios. Anaskafhv sto oikovpedo tou Mouseivou Buzantinouv
Politismouv sth Qessalonivkh (The Cemetery on the Grounds of the Museum
of Byzantine Culture in Thessaloniki). Athens: P, 2003.

Antonaras / Glassware in Late Antique Thessalonik

333

Nigdelis, Pantelis Meletiou. Epigrafikav Qessalonivkeia, Sumbolhv sthn

politikhv kai koinwnikhv istoriva th~ arcaiva~ Qessalonivkh~ (Thessalonian
Epigraphics. Contribution to the Political and Social History of Ancient
Thessalonik). Thessaloniki: University Studio Press, 2006.
Oppenheim, A. Leo, Robert H. Brill, Dan Barag, and Axel von Saldern. Glass
and Glassmaking in Ancient Mesopotamia.
Corning, New York:
The Corni
ng
Museum of Glass Monographs 3, 1970.
Pallas, Demetrios. Les Monuments palochrtiens de Grce dcouverts de 1959
1973. Citt

del Vaticano: Pontifico

Istituto di Archeologia

Cristiana,
1977.
Paolucci, Fabrizio. LArte del Vetro Inciso a Roma nel IV secolo D.C. Firenze:
AllInsegna del Giglio, 2002.
______. I vetri incisi dallItalia settentrionale e dalla Rezia nel periodo Medio e
Tardo Imperiale. Firenze: AllInsegna del Giglio, 1997.
Papanikola
-
Bakirtzi, Demetra
,
ed. Everyday
Life

in

Byzantium, Exhibition

Catalogue
, Thessalonik
,
White
Tower

,
October
2001
January
2002. Athens:
Ministry of Culture, 2002. [in Greek]
Pelekanidis, Stylianos. H e[xw tw`n teicw`n palaiocristianikhv basilikhv
tw`n Filivppwn (The Extra Muros, Early Christian Basilica of Philippi). In
A
rchEph 1955 (1961) 11479. Repr., idem. Pages 33395 in Studien zur
Frhchristlichen und Byzantinischen Archologie. Thessalonik
i
: Institute for
Balkan Studies, 1977.
Petsas, Ftios. Anaskafhv panepisthmioupovlew~ Qessalonivkh~ (
Excavation of
the University Campus of Thessalonik
). ArchDelt 22 '

2 (1967).
Philippe, Joseph. Le monde Byzantine dans lhistoire de la verrerie (Ve -XIVe
sicle). Bologna: Patron, 1970.
Romiopoulou, Aikaterine
. Nosokomeivo ACEPA. ArchDelt 31 (1976) 24142.
Ross, Marvin C. Jewelry, Enamels, and Art of Migration Period. Vol. 2 of
Catalogue of the Byzantine and Early Mediaeval Antiquities in the Dumbarton
Oaks Collection. Washington, D.C.: The Dumbarton Oaks Research Library
and Collection, 1965.
Ru

i
, Mira
. Rimsko
staklo

u
Srbiji.
Beograd

: Centar

za

Arheolo

ka
I
srta

ivanja,
1994.
Sagu, Lucia.

Un piatto di vetro inciso da Roma: contributo ad un inquadramento

delle officine vetrarie tardoantiche. Pages 33758 in Studi in memoria di
Lucia Guerrini. Edited by Maria

Grazia Picozzi

and Filippo

Carinci.

Studi
Miscellanei 30. Roma: LErma, 1996.
Schfer, Ernst. Die Heilige mit dem Kreuz in altchristliche Kunst. Rmische
Quartalschrift fr christliche Altertumskunde und fr Kirchengeschichte 44
(1936) 67104.
Spaer, Maud. Ancient Glass in the Israel Museum, Beads and Other Small Objects.
Jerusalem: The Israel Museum, 2001.

334

From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonik

Stern, Eva Marianne. Roman, Byzantine and Early Medieval Glass; 10 b.c.e.
700 c.e.; Ernesto Wolf Collection. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz, 2001.
______.
Roman Glassblowing in a Cultural Context. AJA 103 (1999) 44184.
Stern, Eva Marianne and Birgit Schlick-Nolte. Early Glass of the Ancient World,
1600 b.c.a.d. 50. Ernesto Wolf Collection. Ostfildern: Gerd Hatje, 1994.
Trowbridge,
Mary

Luella. Philological Studies in Ancient Glass. University of

Illinois Studies in Language and Literature13. Urbana, Ill.: University of
Illinois, 1930.
Venclov, Natalie. Prehistoric Glass in Bohemia. Prague: The Archaeological
Institute of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 1990.
Whitehouse, David. Roman Glass in the Corning Museum of Glass. 3 vols.
Corning, N.Y.: Corning Museum of Glass, 1997.