Competição Aparente
Competição Aparente
Competição Aparente
429
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Interactions between two species that result in reduced growth rates for both and extinction of one of the species
are generally considered cases of asymmetric interspecific competition. Exploitative or interference competition is
the usual mechanism invoked. Here we describe another mechanism producing the same result, named apparent
competition through facilitation (ACF), observed between Melanoides tuberculata and Biomphalaria glabrata populations. The superior competitor actually gives some benefit to the other species, whose population becomes unstable with progressively increasing oscillations, leading to extinction. A model of ACF using difference equations
suggests initial dynamics distinct from traditional interspecific competition. The dynamics of two freshwater snails
in the field and in laboratory experiments suggest ACF, and these relations should be considered in studies of
schistosomiasis control. ACF could occur in natural populations, but might have gone undetected because the final
result is similar to traditional interspecific competition.
Key words: apparent competition - population interactions - Biomphalaria glabrata - Melanoides tuberculata schistosomiasis control
Competition is traditionally viewed as a negative interaction because it reduces survivorship, growth or reproduction of the individuals concerned (Begon et al.
1996). In many circumstances, it is asymmetric leading to
extinction of inferior competitors. In others, the negative
effect of one species on another does not result from depletion of resources or a direct negative effect. Thus, in apparent competition (Holt 1977) or competition for enemyfree space (Jeffries & Lawton 1984), two species are prey
of a common predator and the increase in abundance of
one leads to an increase in abundance of the predator.
The predator exerts the negative effect on the survivorship of the other prey (Holt 1977, Jeffries & Lawton 1984).
One species of prey affects survivorship of the other negatively, but only indirectly, mediated by predation. Nevertheless, the interaction is still considered competition
because the result is one species affecting the other negatively.
Here in we stretch the concept of apparent competition to include facilitation as another mechanism leading
to a negative association between the abundance of two
species, hereafter named apparent competition through
facilitation (ACF). A simple scenario would be of two species that require similar resources and that are constantly
+ Corresponding
12
10
N/K
8
6
4
2
0
1
21
41
61
21
41
61
21
41
61
1.2
1
0.8
N/K
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1
1.2
1
0.8
N/K
430
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1
Number of Generations
B. glabrata /k1
M. tuberculata /k2
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 98(3), April 2003
3
2.5
2
Extinction
chaos
cycles
r1 1.5
1
Stability
0.5
0
0
+12
Fig. 2: dynamics of an inferior competitor for different combinations of intrinsic rate of natural increase (r1) and intensity of positive interaction (+12). The effect of the inferior competitor on
the other species was always negative (-21= 0.2). A population
was considered extinct when N < 1.
TABLE
Values used in the simulation of apparent competition through
facilitation between two snails
Biomphalaria glabrata
(N1)
Melanoides tuberculata
(N2)
r1
K1
-11
+ 12
r2
K2
-22
-21
1.2
100
0.7
0.3
400
0.2
431