Internship Report
Internship Report
on
Catastrophe Modelling
At
RMS INDIA
Submitted by
Tushar Gupta-11113114
Kaustubh Milind Kulkarni-1113052
Karan Tyagi-11113048
B. Tech. 4th year
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
This internship proved to be a fruitful endeavor and we heartily thank the entire
Analytics and Exposure Development team and Spatial Modelling Group at Risk
1 | Page
Management Solutions (RMS), India who provided us with this opportunity. A special
acknowledgement is deserved by Farhat Rafique, Kunal Jain, Edida Rajesh, Alpana
Das and Nikhil Sharma who, throughout the internship period, not only helped us in
comprehending various problems but also in developing the skills required to tackle
them. It was because of their help that we could complete this entire task in eight
weeks.
Table of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:........................................................................................................2
INTRODUCTION:.................................................................................................................3
2 | Page
Background.....................................................................................................................3
Catastrophe Modeling.....................................................................................................3
Software and frameworks:.................................................................................................3
EPA-SWMM:.....................................................................................................................3
inp.PINS:..........................................................................................................................4
inpFLOOD:....................................................................................................................5
HEC-Ras:.........................................................................................................................6
SWAT:..............................................................................................................................7
ArcGIS:............................................................................................................................7
Urban flood modeling using SWMM...................................................................................9
Urban Flooding................................................................................................................9
Urban Flood Modeling...................................................................................................10
Urban Flood Modeling Process:.....................................................................................10
STEPS:........................................................................................................................10
Sewer Networks Data:..................................................................................................11
Acquisition of Data.....................................................................................................11
Availability of Data.....................................................................................................12
Conclusion.................................................................................................................12
PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA:................................................................................................12
Storm Water Network Data........................................................................................13
Generating Outlets....................................................................................................14
Cleaning of Data........................................................................................................14
Delineation of Channels.............................................................................................15
Coorelation of sewer networks and delineated channels..........................................16
Corelation of sewer network and road network.........................................................16
Assigning flow direction to road networks.................................................................17
Conclusion.................................................................................................................18
BELLINGHAM CITY, WASHINGTON:................................................................................18
Sewer Network Data..................................................................................................19
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS...............................................................................................20
IMPLEMENTATION.......................................................................................................23
INPFLOOD INVESTIGATION.........................................................................................23
ALGORITHM................................................................................................................24
MANUAL INCREASE OF WATER DEPTH.......................................................................25
3 | Page
NO RAIN CONDITION..................................................................................................27
DERIVING INVERT ELVEVATIONS FROM DEM..............................................................27
NO RAIN CONDITION FOR MODIFIED INVERTS...........................................................28
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................29
SWAT................................................................................................................................29
Deliverables..................................................................................................................29
Working Concept...........................................................................................................30
Overview Of SWAT........................................................................................................30
Calculation of Sub basin Parameters.........................................................................34
HRU Analysis..............................................................................................................36
HRU Definition...........................................................................................................40
Writing Input Tables...................................................................................................43
Edit SWAT Input.........................................................................................................45
Edit Point Discharge Inputs........................................................................................46
Edit Inlet Dischargers Input.......................................................................................47
Edit Sub basins Data..................................................................................................47
SWAT Simulation Setup..............................................................................................47
Output Analysis..........................................................................................................48
Utility Network Analyst Tool.............................................................................................49
Creating Flow Direction for sewer network...................................................................50
Manually Assigning Direction:.......................................................................................50
Trace Options:...............................................................................................................53
Exposure Development:...................................................................................................55
Background...................................................................................................................55
Theory...........................................................................................................................56
PARAMETERS.................................................................................................................57
Building Inventory......................................................................................................57
Size of building..........................................................................................................57
Replacement cost value.............................................................................................57
EXPOSURE CALCULATION.............................................................................................57
EXPOSURE DOWNSCALING...........................................................................................57
OBJECTIVE..................................................................................................................58
METHODOLOGY..........................................................................................................58
Urban Atlas Classification..........................................................................................58
4 | Page
INTRODUCTION:
The following is an account of our work as interns for two months at the Noida office
of RMS India.
We were working in the Spatial Modeling Group and Model Development Group with
Farhat Rafique and Alpana Das as our mentor. We were working on developing
urban flooding models for estimating the flood inundation extents and flooding
models for river basins using SWAT.
5 | Page
Background
Risk Management Solutions is a provider of products and services for the
quantification and management of catastrophe risks. It offers technology and
services for the management of insurance catastrophe risk associated with natural
perils such as earthquakes, hurricanes, and windstorms and risk modeling for manmade disasters associated with acts of terrorism by analyzing the impact of
weapons of mass destruction on property. The company's objective is to help clients
improve financial performance by using products and services to gain the most
complete view of their risk portfolio. In a nutshell, the nature of work of RMS is
classified as catastrophe modeling.
Catastrophe Modeling
Catastrophe modeling is the process of using computer-assisted calculations to
estimate the losses that could be sustained due to a catastrophic event such as a
hurricane, earthquake, storm, flood and so on. The calculated losses are used by the
insurance industry to better analyze the risks associated with their portfolios and
helps in the pricing of premiums depending upon the susceptibility of the property
to any natural hazard. The models simulate natural phenomena by using the
engineering equations associated with the disaster.
inp.PINS:
However, EPA SWMM does not have support for shp files and supports only inp files
which is a workspace for EPA SWMM. inp.PINS is an open source plug in for Map
Windows which converts data from shp files to inp files.
7 | Page
inpFLOOD:
inp.PINS has another module called inpFLOOD which uses the inp file for a particular
project containing geometric and other data about different elements, the rpt file
containing data about the results obtained during the run and the DEM of the region in
order to give the flood map for the region as a shp file.
8 | Page
HEC-Ras:
HEC-RAS is a program that models the hydraulics of water flow through natural
rivers and other channels. It considers only the one dimensional aspects of flow.
Although not the exact purpose for which it is meant, HEC-RAS can model the flood
extents by using the flows from junctions. It requires:
Centerline
Banks
Cross sections
Flows
HEC-GEORAS
Hec-GeoRAS is the plug-in for ArcGIS of HEC-RAS. The necessary layers for HECGeoRAS can be taken as:
9 | Page
Other layers are easily available but automated cross sections are difficult to obtain
from the DEM.
SWAT:
SWAT is a complex integrated river basin scale model which operates either on daily
or hourly time step. It quantifies the impact of land management practices in
hydrology, erosion and non-point source pollution.
The basic concept of SWAT involves water balance while accounting for weather,
surface runoff, return flow, percolation, evapotranspiration, transmission losses,
storage, crops, irrigation, groundwater flow, etc. For the calibration purposes, SWAT
uses LH-OAT which stands for Latin Hypercube One factor At a Time analysis. It
combines LH sampling and OAT design for simulation. It ensures parameter
reduction by filtering out the less influential ones at calibration stage. Thus SWAT
allows to calculate discharge over basins and simulate a model and compare it with
the original data.
10 | P a g e
ArcGIS:
ArcGIS is a geographic information system for working with maps and geographic
information. It is used for creating and using maps, compiling geographic data,
analyzing mapped information, sharing and discovering geographic information,
using maps and geographic information in a range of applications, and managing
geographic information in a database.
The system provides an infrastructure for making maps and geographic information
available throughout an organization, across a community, and openly on the Web.
ArcGIS includes the following Windows desktop software:
Arc Reader - It allows one to view and query maps created with the other
ArcGIS products;
ArcGIS for Desktop, which is licensed under three functionality levels: [6]
11 | P a g e
12 | P a g e
STEPS:
Elevation data
1. Check 10 m DEM
2. Check availability of any other HD DEM
3. Interpolate 10 m DEM to 5m/2m
Delineation
Attributization
Simulation
Correlation of ponding
Junctions
Conduits
Outfalls
Because SWMM uses these layers and corresponding information for simulation.
These layers are a prerequisite and simulations cannot be run in their absence.
Very detailed sewer networks for certain cities such as Los Angeles were available in
the form of shp files with all associated data.
The data for the city of Spokane in Washington was available as a kmz file for
Google Earth
New York however had limited data available only in the form of of sewer outfalls.
The vital sewer data for conduits and nodes wasnt available.
Availability of Data
The data for sewer networks, if available, is usually present on the website of the city or
region. For certain regions, although the sewer network data was not available, related
information such as
15 | P a g e
So, all in all detailed sewer network data is not very readily available.
Conclusion
Detailed data for sewer networks is rarely available and even if its available, its
very rarely in a format suited to our purposes. So, instead of relying on sewer
network data for obtaining urban flood maps, the focus should be on using
delineated channels from DEM data or easily available networks like road maps by
TeleAtlas to act as substitute for conduits. The nodes and the outfalls can be
generated from the road network and the elevations can be assigned from the DEM.
The flooding from such an obtained network, and from the actual network for cities
for which data is available, should be compared. The parameters for the derived
network should be calibrated in order to get accurate results so that generating
urban flooding scenarios can be automated for the whole of the US.
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
Investigation revealed that water layers indicated the water distribution network,
and the sewer and the storm water network were separate.
So the only layer useful for flood delineation was the storm water pipes. I found the
missing storm water inlet data on the official site of Bay County which had an
interactive GIS map.
Generating Outlets
Outlets are mandatory for running simulations with SWMM. The data for Panama
City did not have outlet data available.
I used a third party extension for ArcGIS called X Tools Pro for the generation of
outlets.
From nodes and to nodes were generated and then the removal of from nodes
from the to nodes left the outlets. Default parameters were assigned to the outlets.
Cleaning of Data
The storm water pipes are much cluttered and such networks are not necessary for
giving accurate flooding results. Rather, they make the computations for
18 | P a g e
simulations extremely intensive. Hence cleaning the pipe network for removing
obsolete pipes is necessary.
Spatial Cleaning:
The pipes and nodes are represented as a link node data structure and the lower
order pipes can be removed from the network.
For example, if, in an individual tree, the highest order pipe is 5, then all pipes with
order lesser than 2 can be removed and higher order pipes can be left to get
spatially cleaned networks.
Cleaning by attributes:
The information available about the attributes of the pipes can be used for removing
the smaller pipes at the beginning of the network. Attributes like type, diameter,
and material can be used.
Else a combination of spatial and attribute cleaning can be used to clean the
network and get good results.
Delineation of Channels
Delineated channels for a threshold limit of 1000 cells for the 3 m DEM.
Similarly channels were delineated for a threshold limit of 2000 and 4000 cells also.
19 | P a g e
Delineated channels for a threshold limit of 1000 cells for the 10 m DEM.
Similarly channels were delineated for a threshold limit of 5000, 2000 and 4000
cells also.
20 | P a g e
21 | P a g e
22 | P a g e
Conclusion
I could not get flooding maps for Panama City because SWMM requires sub
catchment objects from which flow has to be assigned to a particular node. I had to
perform delineation of sub catchments. InfoSWMM Subcatchment Manager is a
tool that automates the process of delineation of sub catchments, their
characterization and the assignments of sub catchments to the appropriate nodes
and rain gages. I had yet to try out the tool
Back when I did was doing my internship after my first year in MWH Global, they
were working on developing flood maps for Mumbai. The delineation of sub
catchments and the assignment of nodes was done manually over there. However
an automated process would go a long way in deriving urban flood maps for the
whole of US and other countries.
23 | P a g e
24 | P a g e
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
COMPARTMENTS
EPA SWMM consists of different compartments which are used to model the
hydrological and hydraulic processes.
1. Atmosphere compartment
2. Surface compartment
3. Groundwater compartment
4. Transport Compartment
ATMOSPHERE COMPARTMENT
The atmosphere compartment consists of rain gauge objects which can be used to
assign precipitation characteristics. The rain gages can be linked to sub catchments
to model precipitation characteristics for that area. The data can be entered in the
form of a time series or a data file containing precipitation data for the station.
25 | P a g e
SURFACE COMPARTMENT
The surface compartment consists of catchments and sub catchments with various
parameters that are used to distribute the incoming precipitation into surface runoff
and losses, which include evaporation and infiltration.
SUBCATCHMENTS
A large number of parameters are assigned to subcatchments which affect the
surface routing of rain water and hence also affect flooding. The different
parameters are :
1.
Area
2. Width
3. Assigned rain gage
4. Slope
26 | P a g e
5. Percent imperviousness
6. Manning's coefficient for impervious areas
7. Mannings coefficient for pervious areas
8. Surface storage for impervious areas
9. Surface storage for pervious areas
GROUNDWATER COMPARTMENT
The ground water compartments simulates the storage of water below the surface
of the ground using aquifer objects.
INFILTRATION
Different formulae are used to estimate infiltration of precipitation to aquifers.
Horton
Modified Horton
Green Ampt
Curve Number
TRANSPORT COMPARTMENT
The transport compartment models the flow of water over the surface of the land
and through pipes.
NODES
The transport compartment uses nodes and links to simulate the routing of water
over the surface of the land and through the sewer systems. The outfalls and the
junctions are represented as nodes,
Junctions:
Inflow
Invert elevation
Maximum depth
Surcharge depth
Ponded area
27 | P a g e
Outfalls:
Inflow
Invert elevation
Type
LINKS
Conduits:
Inlet node
Outlet node
Shape
Maximum depth
Length
Roughness
Initial flow
IMPLEMENTATION
The plan was to change the parameters and see the corresponding change in the
flooding maps. The individual parameters for different objects were changed in
SWMM and the simulation run. Using the results obtained from the rpt file and the
data from the inp file and the DEM of the area, inp.PINS delineated the flood extents
for the flood.
The actual results were totally awry from what I had expected and pretty much
similar results were obtained for nearly each and every simulation with weird
changes not corresponding to the expected change as per the change in
parameters. And the results from SWMM were pretty good, so, most probably the
problem lied somewhere with inpFLOOD.
So I began to check as to how inp.PINS derived the flood extents from the data.
28 | P a g e
INPFLOOD INVESTIGATION
The main idea of the tool is to create flood plains, by analyzing max Node Depth on
the rpt file combined with transect data, if it exists and DEM grid. In case the
transect data is not available, inpFLOOD creates the transects from the DEM.
The transect data for the city of Bellingham was not available and hence inpFLOOD
could only perform DEM analysis.
ALGORITHM
The distance between the conduits is divided into units of distance "di",
called as the minimum breaking link distance.
Then the conduit transect for irregular conduit shapes or DEM grid at that
section is analyzed.
The transect is placed along the conduit for each "didistance and its
elevation is changed linearly by the conduit upstream and downstream invert
level.
If these two options are selected inpFlood will give the smallest flood plain
between transect and DEM result.
29 | P a g e
Conduits are analyzed only at di distances and DEM analysis will take place
to define flood plains for non irregular shape conduit.
Inlet OR Outlet Node HGL >= Inv. level + Max Depth - inpFLOOD restricts
building of flood plains only to conduit results that follow this condition. Flood
extents are seen to decrease considerably when this condition is applied.
I found the flood map for a particular region using a particular rain condition.
Then I manually modified the water depths in each node by using Notepad+
+ and Excel and added 2 meters to each depth to see how the flooding map
would be influenced.
30 | P a g e
The results were as expected and the map showed considerably more flood
extents as compared to the original map.
ORIGINAL
EDITED
31 | P a g e
NO RAIN CONDITION
In order to check whether inpFLOOD gave sensible results for Bellingham city, I used
the storm water network to run a simulation for a no rain condition and then
checked the results for flooding.
Funnily, a large part of the city was shown to be flooded!
It turns out that in the event of zero depth of water for a particular node inpFLOOD
takes the invert level of the node as the hydraulic grade line.
On checking by using the field calculator, the invert level of the many nodes
was actually found to be higher than the elevation at that point derived from
the DEM.
This discrepancy is possibly because the data for the DEM and the sewer
networks and the DEM comes from different sources.
In such a scenario using the invert elevations from the sewer networks data
makes no sense as the results are bound to be incorrect.
So, I instead decided to assign the invert elevations from the DEM data.
I found out the value of the DEM rasters at each particular node by using the
Hawths tools for sampling of DEM
32 | P a g e
Then taking the difference between the sewer network invert and rim
elevations, the average difference was found to be 2.92 m
So I subtracted 3 m from DEM elevations for all the nodes and assigned them
as the invert elevations for the nodes.
33 | P a g e
CONCLUSION
Changing the invert elevations by deriving them from the DEM, changing the
minimum breaking link distance and the transverse distance for transects
and modifying the various parameters associated with various elements in
SWMM still could not give sensible results with inpFLOOD.
34 | P a g e
SWAT
Deliverables
SWAT is the acronym for Soil Water and Assessment Tool, a river basin, or
watershed, scale model developed by Dr. Jeff Arnold for the USDA Agricultural
Research Service (ARS). SWAT was developed to predict the impact of land
management practices on water, sediment and agricultural chemical yields in large
complex watersheds with varying soils, land use and management conditions over
long periods of time.
The SWAT model is:
Thus SWAT is a complex integrated river basin scale model which operates either on
daily or hourly time step and quantifies the impact of land management practices in
hydrology, erosion and non-point source pollution.
35 | P a g e
Working Concept
Hydrologic cycle is simulated by SWAT model, which is based on the following
balance equation:
Overview of SWAT
SWAT allows a number of different physical processes to be simulated in a
watershed. For modeling purposes, a watershed may be partitioned into a number
of sub watersheds or sub basins. The use of sub basins in a simulation is particularly
beneficial when different areas of the watershed are dominated by land uses or soils
dissimilar enough in properties to impact hydrology. By partitioning the watershed
into sub basins, the user is able to reference different areas of the watershed to one
another spatially.
SWAT comes with the option of Automatic Watershed Delineation which allows
delineating stream networks for a Digital Elevation Model data. Instead of
performing different operations individually as done in ArcGIS, it groups all the
options in a single task.
The tools functions are divided into five sections, namely: DEM setup, Stream
Definition, Outlet and Inlet Definition, Watershed Outlet(s) Selection and Definition.
This tool is used to create watershed delineations using a combination of DEM,
digitized network and other user inputs.
36 | P a g e
This is how the dialog box for Automatic Watershed Dileation looks like.
First of all we need to upload DEM on which the analysis has to be carried out.
37 | P a g e
After uploading the DEM, the Flow Direction and Flow Accumulation Raster are
created which gives the total area in acres by counting the number of cells and the
resolution of each cell. The projection system of the DEM also needs to be defined.
The DEM used by me had a resolution of 30m and the projection system used was
NAD_1983_ALBERS.
The other projection systems used are UTM
After creation of the FDR and FAC rasters, the next step is to create streams and
outlets. Streams and outlets are created based on the FAC rasters.
By specifying the threshold limit for Flow Accumulation rasters, the stream networks
can be selected based on the need of user.
I was supposed to work on South Atlantic Gulf Basin area and so the delineated
network for the area looked like this:
Catchment boundaries along with longest reach path and nodes are created.
After the creation of stream networks, inlets and outlets can be added manually in
the DEM based on the need of the user.
After the inlet and outlet definition, all the nodes are selected and based on those
nodes different watersheds are created.
39 | P a g e
It also gives the reach and length of each watersheds and also the respective inlets
and outlets and also the X and Y co-ordinates of each node:
40 | P a g e
HRU Analysis
HRU stands for Hydrologic Response Units. It is the basic modeling unit-defined as
the network of elementary hydrologic areas with the selected discretization (grid
cell, representative hill slope, sub watershed), measure of which is dependent upon
the desired accuracy, as well as upon data accuracy.
Discretization techniques are classified as:
Sub Watershed: It divides the watershed into subbasins based on topographic
features of the watershed. It preserves the natural flow path, boundaries, and
channels required for realistic routing of water, sediment and chemicals.
Grid Cell: The routing methodology is same as that of sub watershed with the
difference being average size of the subbasin and method used to define
subbasin boundaries. It allows user to capture high level of heterogeneity or
variability in the simulation.
Representative hill slope: It allows overland flow from one subbasin to flow
onto the land area of another subbasin. It allows SWAT to model hillslope
processes.
HRUs are lumped land areas within the subbasin that are comprised of unique land
cover, soil, and management combinations.
41 | P a g e
HRU Definition requires assigning Land Use Cover, Soil Cover and Slope Cover data
for the concerned area.
The number of HRUs created are generally much more than the number of sub
basins.
42 | P a g e
These are some of the agencies which provide datasets required for HRU Definition.
Slope Map:
Slope Map cannot be applied directly, rather slope classification map needs to be
created separately and the slope classes for HRU Definition are to determined
accordingly.
SWAT allows to classify slopes in 1 to 5 groups with the highest limit for the last
class being 9999.
43 | P a g e
Soil Map:
Soil Map is inbuilt in SWAT from US STASGO and can be used directly from there or it
can be uploaded manually.
This data set by STATSGO is a digital general soil association map developed by the
National Cooperative Soil Survey and distributed by the Natural Resources
Conservation Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. It consists of a broad
based inventory of soils and nonsoil areas that occur in a repeatable pattern on the
landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped. The soil
maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed soil survey maps.
Where more detailed soil survey maps are not available, data on geology,
topography, vegetation, and climate are assembled, together with Land Remote
Sensing Satellite (LANDSAT) images.
Map unit composition for a STATSGO map is determined by transecting or sampling
areas on the more detailed maps and expanding the data statistically to
characterize the whole map unit.
44 | P a g e
HRU Definition
Before executing SWAT, the distribution of hydrologic response units (HRUs) within
the watershed must be determined based on the land use, soil and slope layers
specified in the previous step. The interface allows the user to specify criteria to be
45 | P a g e
used in determining the HRU distribution. One or more unique land use/soil/slope
combination or HRUs can be created for each sub basin. Subdividing the watershed
into areas having unique land use, soil and slope combinations enables the model to
reflect differences in evapotranspiration for various crops and soils. Runoff is
predicted separately for each HRU and routed to obtain the total runoff for the
watershed. This increases accuracy and gives a much better physical description of
the water balance.
HRU Thresholds:
This option allows to set threshold limits for Land Use, Soil and Slope Class
percentages. Based on the threshold limit, the classes with lower percentages can
be grouped together with a class having higher percentage.
The Dominant Land Use and Soil option will you allow to create only one HRU
for each sub basin defining the dominant landuse and soil class.
The Multiple Hydrologic Response Units option will allow you to create
multiple HRUs within each sub basin.
For the analysis purposes I have considered a threshold limit of 10% for Land use,
15% for Soil class and 10% again for slope class.
46 | P a g e
47 | P a g e
48 | P a g e
This dialog will allow the user to define the input data for rainfall, temperature and
other weather data. For weather data, you have the option of simulating the data in
the model or to read from data tables. If no observed weather data is available,
then information can be simulated using a weather generator. The weather
generator data must be defined before you can continue to define the other data,
like precipitation and temperature.
At this point you have the option to generate all the input data files using the
WRITE ALL option under the INPUT menu or generate each input file separately.
The input files needed are:
For sub basin and main channel input files a prompt asks whether to change the
default Mannings n value. Click No to use 0.014. For the management input file
generation a message prompt verifies if the US weather database is sufficient to
estimate the Plant Heat Units. Click Yes if the study area is within US.
49 | P a g e
By using a procedure similar to editing soils database, the Database option under
the Edit Input menu you can edit or add information to the weather, land
cover/plant growth, fertilizer, pesticide, tillage, and urban area databases.
50 | P a g e
The dialog box allows the input of point source data in one of four formats: constant
daily loadings, average annual loadings, average monthly loadings, and daily
loadings.
51 | P a g e
The above dialog box lets you specify duration of simulation, type of rainfall
whether skewed normal or mixed exponential, whether the results should be printed
daily, weekly or monthly. It also lets you specify NYSKIP which is the warm up
period, that is the time taken for simulation to get adjusted to surroundings and the
results are printed after that particular warm up period.
Output Analysis
After setting up the SWAT simulation, the simulation is saved and the result files can
be imported to the folder Scenarios. The output files can be found inside TxtInOut
folder.
52 | P a g e
Simulated
Observed
The above graph shows the relation between the observed and simulated discharge
over a period of 10 years. As we can see that there is considerable difference
between the two results and hence the simulation needs calibration of different
parameters to match the results.
Using Utility Network Analyst tool we can trace network elements upstream or
downstream from a point which can be used to determine which valves to shut off
when a pipe bursts.
Here the highlighted blue point serves as a source. Notice the change in flow
direction.
55 | P a g e
Types of flow directions: Depending upon the flow options, there are three types
of flow directions, namely:
56 | P a g e
For example, consider a geometric network with the sources and sinks
positioned like this:
In this case, the flow direction for edges 1 and 2 is set; however, edge 3 has
indeterminate flow. To understand why edge 3 has indeterminate flow, consider
the case where only the source is present.
This results in a flow direction of edge 3 to the left. Due to the opposite potential
flow directions of edge 3, this results in a conflict.
For each edge, if the flow direction is in agreement between both the sourceonly and sink-only cases, the flow direction is set to that direction (as seen with
edges 1 and 2). However, if there is a conflict, as there is with edge 3, the flow
direction is set to indeterminate since there are two possible outcomes.
Another example resulting in indeterminate flow would be if an edge has a
source at both of its ends.
57 | P a g e
Uninitialized flow direction in a network occurs in edges that are isolated from
the sources and sinks in the network. This can happen if the edge is not
topologically connected through the network to the sources and sinks or if the
edge is only connected to sources and sinks through disabled features.
Trace Options:
1. All network elements that lie upstream of a given point in your network
(traceupstream)
network(trace downstream)
58 | P a g e
3. The total cost of all network elements that lie upstream of a given point in
your network (upstream accumulation)
4. An upstream path from a point in your network (find path upstream)
5. The common features that are upstream of a set of points in your network
(find common ancestors)
6. All the features that are connected to a given point through your network
(find connected)
59 | P a g e
7. All the features that are not connected to a given point through your network
(find disconnected)
8. Loops that can result in multiple paths between points in a network (find
loops)
9. A path between two points in the network (The path found can be just one of
a number of paths between these two points depending on whether or not
your network contains loops)(find path)
60 | P a g e
Exposure Development:
Background
Buildings or establishments are constantly under a risk of being razed down by
some catastrophe or the other. This directly results in a monetary risk to the owners
(either individual or a group) of that establishment. In order to reduce the burden on
these owners, the insurance companies agree to share the risk in return of a
comparatively small premium paid to the company. These companies rely heavily
on probability skills in order to evaluate the gain they might have in the entire
process. But, as history clearly demonstrates, there have been certain catastrophes
which have rendered the insurance companies bankrupt.
In order to reduce the risk on the insurance companies, and indirectly help
humanity, Risk Management Solutions (RMS) has been involved in developing
various methods of evaluating the loss these companies might have to bear in case
a catastrophe strikes a particular region insured by them. One of them is exposure
development.
Theory
Exposure can be defined as the amount of rebuild cost of all the buildings in a
region. The basic idea is to calculate the total amount of construction cost of all the
buildings in a region. The rebuild cost, which is the cost required to rebuild an
establishment once it is razed down in some calamity, is directly related to (some
fraction of) this total construction cost.
61 | P a g e
This entire procedure is an arduous one. It starts with the search for the correct data
sets which can be used in the development followed with formulation of a method
for exposure calculations and culminates in an exposure value.
The basic data required in the exposure calculation is the number of buildings or
establishments, floor area of each establishment and the construction cost per unit
area of the establishment. Combining them using correct methodology gives us the
exposure.
PARAMETERS
Building Inventory
It is the total number of buildings or establishments in a geographically well-defined
area.
Size of building
The average size of building, usually expressed in terms of the total floor area of the
buildings.
62 | P a g e
EXPOSURE CALCULATION
If data that contains all the three parameters in the specified manner, then the
exposure calculation is easy and goes about in the following manner
EXPOSURE
TOTAL
=
FLOOR AREA
CONSTRUCTION
COST
*
Since, every country does not provide us the data in this form, hence each of them
require a different procedure to finally yield the above mentioned data.
On developing the exposure for two countries, South Korea and Vietnam, a direct
correlation was observed in between the exposure values and the economic
parameters like GDP per capita, which is what the intuition says. Similarly, the more
densely populated regions had more exposure values.
This exercise, at times, need elaborate calculation. For example, when the data for
construction cost is comprehensive then the cost per unit area is calculated using
the cost of items involved in construction (eg. Cement, steel bars, etc). This is quite
similar to the task of building materials estimation done by civil engineers.
EXPOSURE DOWNSCALING
The exposure calculated using the above mentioned steps, is often obtained at a
very coarse resolution, most often at country or county level. This exposure model
often needs to be downscaled to a finer resolution in order to obtain catastrophe
loss at a fine and detailed resolution. Thus the overall aim of downscaling is to
distribute the total building cost to a smaller resolution, such as municipality level or
a 50m grid level.
OBJECTIVE
The objective was to downscale exposure in Belgium to a 100m grid level
METHODOLOGY
In order to downscale Belgium exposure, parameters were to be selected that could
be used as predictors for assigning exposure at 100m grid level. By doing some
online research, I could come up with 3 such parameters that could be used as tools
for downscaling.
63 | P a g e
64 | P a g e
65 | P a g e
PROCESS
First Step: Downloaded the Open Street Map data set for Hungary containing
a whole inventory of more than 120,000 buildings classified into various
types by crowd-sourcing of data.
Created a mapping between the OSM classes and the required Lines of
business (Five in number) to classify the buildings in OSM dataset into
required LOBs.
Overlayed the LULC, UA and SS raster layers on the map and spatially joined
these classes to the OSM buildings dataset, to obtain a database which had,
for each building, all the three classes and the assigned LOB.
Divided the Open Street Map dataset for Hungary into two parts, one for
carrying out a logistic regression, and the other smaller dataset for checking
the regression results.
Ran a logistic regression between assigned LOBs and the LULC, SS and UA
classes to obtain probabilities of a building lying in each combination of the
three classes to fall in a particular LOB.
Carried out a logistic regression to assign probabilities of LOB occurrence for
each combination of the three classes .
Applied the regression results on the test sample to check whether assigned
LOBs and predicted LOBs match.
RESULT
66 | P a g e
CONCLUSION
As can be seen from the above table, the mapping between the assigned and
predicted LOBs can be seen, which suggests that only for SFD(Single family dwelling
buildings), the results were very good Almost 94% of the buildings in SFD were
predicted as SFD only. But in the case of other LOBs, the percentage of buildings
mapped into the correct LOB was poor(less than 30%). After discussing with senior
members of the team, we came to the conclusion that these classes(LULC, SS, UA)
were not good enough to be used as predictors for exposure downscaling.
OBJECTIVE
The aim was to develop a machine learning algorithm that could be used to
separate greenery from satellite real color images. This could be really helpful
especially in exposure downscaling as there would be no buildings in green parts of
an image. For this purpose, K-means clustering algorithm was adopted to filter
green pixels from an image.
PROCESS
A program was written which generates a sample of random points on a 2-d plane,
then obtains k values of cluster means and then classifies the data points into
clusters.
These points were divided into 7 clusters, and were color-coded according to their
clusters, so that if the color seperation is good enough, it can be implied that the
clustering algorithm was successful in classifying into the different clusters.
Trying the similar clustering on the pixels of an Image containing greenery, and then
showing the pixels that fell in the green cluster, the results were as follows:
68 | P a g e
Original Image
69 | P a g e
Now trying this method on a map that contains greenery, the result was as follows.
All the green pixels were apparently not separated, but this was surely a motivation
to continue further work on this method, which due to time limits of my vacations I
could not carry out.
70 | P a g e
Objective was to develop the exposure at country level for Belgium for Agricultural
line of business. i.e. Total building cost of all the agricultural buildings in the whole
of country. By doing some online research, I came to know that the buildings in
agricultural LOB contains mostly farm buildings such as small to large warehouses.
71 | P a g e
Since the total floor area data available was of vintage 2013, it had to be trended to
2015 vintage. For this the data containing number of farms at country level was
used, and the average annual growth rate was applied to trend the area to 2015
vintage.
Variation of number of farms in Belgium from 1997-2007
72 | P a g e
73 | P a g e
Construction costs
Steps
Given the steps, following is the summary of building cost per unit floor area that
was available from various online sources.
As is apparent from the above graph, the construction cost are more or less similar
from all the three sources. I used the BKI data from the above three because in BKI,
type of buildings were specifically mentioned as agricultural buildings.
Sources : BKI 2013 , rlb.com, www.constructioncosts.eu
74 | P a g e
CCI
CCI
Since the construction costs that were obtained from BKI were of vintage 2011, they
had to be trended to 2015, using CCI data available. Average growth rate of CCI was
used to trend these costs to 2015 vintage.
Now since the exposure values were to be obtained in USD, the costs were
converted from Euro to USD using the conversion rates in year 2011 available
online.
75 | P a g e
Using this data, the construction costs were converted to be used for 2015Q1.
Source : http://statbel.fgov.be/en/statistics/figures/economy/indicators/prix_prod_con/
Exposure calculations
Now having obtained the sufficient data for the purpose, the exposure calculation
was a simple step, just multiplying the total floor area and construction costs per
unit floor area.
EXPOSURE
RESULT
ArcGIS Work
Key Takeaways:
Statistical concepts
Excel Skills
ArcGIS Skills
Coding in R
REFRENCES:
77 | P a g e