Gaap and Audit
Gaap and Audit
Gaap and Audit
and
Audit reporting requirements
SA 700,705,706
Presented by
S. Sundaresan
Schedule II Depreciation
SA 705
SA 706
Standard on Auditing(SA)700
Forming an
Opinion and
Reporting on
Financial
Statements
The Standard deals with Clean and unmodified opinion in Audit Report to
make it consistent.
Reporting on the financial statements per auditing standards clearly
demarcated from additional regulatory reporting under the law.
Applicable in case of General Purpose Financial Statements prepared in
accordance with a general purpose financial reporting framework (FRF).
Fair presentation framework
Compliance framework
Form of Opinion
When the auditors concludes that the financial statements are prepared, in
all material respects, in accordance the applicable financial reporting
framework, he shall express an Unmodified Opinion
If the auditor concludes: That based on audit evidence, the financial statements are NOT free of material
misstatements;
That he is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude
that the financial statements are free of material misstatements;
The financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with [the
applicable financial reporting framework]
The financial statements give a true and fair view of in accordance with [the applicable
financial reporting framework].
Necessary to identify the financial reporting framework so that users are aware of
the context in which the report is issued.
Framework:
8. Signature: The report shall be signed in the name of the partner and the
membership number and firm registration number should be mentioned.
9. Date: Report should be dated no earlier that the date when he obtains sufficient
appropriate audit evidence
10. Place: The place of signature should also be mentioned
Modifications to
the Opinion in
the Independent
Auditors Report
Qualified Opinion
Adverse Opinion
Disclaimer of Opinion
The nature of the matter giving rise to the modification i.e. whether the financial statements
are materially misstated
Inability to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence
Auditors judgment about the pervasiveness of the effects or possible effects of the matter
10
Sufficient appropriate
audit evidence obtained
Sufficient appropriate
audit evidence
not obtained
Auditor concludes
that FS as a whole are not
free from material misstatement
Qualified
opinion
Adverse
opinion
Disclaimer
of opinion
In absence of evidence
whether FS may be
materially misstated
Whether misstatement
is or is likely to be
pervasive
What is
PERVASIVE?
Misstatements
Possible misstatements
If so confined,
represent a
substantial portion
Where pertaining to
disclosures, are
fundamental to users
understanding of FS
11
After
obtaining
sufficient
appropriate
audit
evidence
Auditor
cannot
obtain
sufficient
appropriate
audit
evidence
After
obtaining
sufficient
appropriate
audit
evidence
Individual
misstatements
Auditor
concludes
that
OR
Aggregate of
misstatements
Auditor
concludes
that
Possible
effects of
undetected
misstatements
Individual
misstatements
Auditor
concludes
that
OR
Are
MATERIAL
but not
PERVASIVE
QUALIFIED
OPINION
Are
MATERIAL
but not
PERVASIVE
Are
MATERIAL
AND
PERVASIVE
Aggregate of
misstatements
ADVERSE
OPINION
12
Auditor
cannot
obtain
sufficient
appropriate
audit
evidence
Auditor
concludes
that
Auditor
concludes
that
Multiple
Uncertainties
After accepting
engagement,
management
imposes a
scope
limitation
Management does
not
remove it
Possible
effects of
undetected
misstatements
Are
MATERIAL
AND
PERVASIVE
He cannot form
an opinion on FS
due to potential
interaction of the
uncertainties and
their possible
cumulative effect
Auditor requests
management to
remove the scope
limitation
Auditor assesses
that this may
result in a
qualified opinion
or disclaimer
Auditor communicates
this to Those charged with
governance (TCWG)
Considers alternative
procedures
DISCLAIMER
OF
OPINION
If he cannot obtain
sufficient appropriate
audit evidence, and
concludes that
effect of undetected
misstatements is
QUALIFY
Material but not pervasive
Material and pervasive
RESIGN, if allowed to
GIVE DISCLAIMER
13
Qualified opinion
Adverse opinion
Qualified opinion
Disclaimer of opinion
Material Misstatements
A misstatement is the difference between the amount of classification, presentation, or disclosure
reported in the financial statements and the classification, presentation, or disclosure required as
per the applicable financial reporting framework.
2.
14
Financial statements do not include all disclosures required by the applicable financial
reporting framework
Disclosures are not presented in accordance with the applicable financial reporting frame
work
The financial statements do not provide the disclosures necessary to achieve fair
presentation
15
16
17
18
19
Emphasis of Matter
Paragraphs and Other
Matter Paragraphs in the
Independent Auditors
Report
20
Any other matter relevant to the users understanding of the audit, auditors
responsibility or Auditors Report.
Where an emphasis of matter paragraph is required by any other auditing standard,
the disclosure shall be as per this SA.
Such a paragraph shall refer to information presented and disclosed in financial
statements.
The auditor should have obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the
matter is not materially misstated.
21
22
Other Matter
An Other Matter paragraph may be required to enhance users understanding of an
audit
Examples: Relevant to Users Understanding of the Auditors Responsibilities or the
Auditors Report
Reporting on more than one set of financial statements
Restriction on distribution or use of the Auditors Report
Specimen:We did not audit the financial statements of certain subsidiaries, whose financial
statements reflect total assets (net) of Rs. XXXX as at March 31, 20XX, total
revenues of Rs. XXXX and net cash outflows amounting to Rs. XXXX for the year
then ended. These financial statements have been audited by other auditors whose
reports have been furnished to us by the Management, and our opinion is based
solely on the reports of the other auditors. Our opinion is not qualified in respect of
this matter
23
24
Case 3
The company lost the case in High Court and is in appeal
There are many such cases from other High Courts also
There is no favourable case to support
The company and the legal opinion still contends that the
case is different and not comparable to other such cases
Case 4
There is a Supreme Court decision which is clearly against
the matter in appeal and it is more likely than not that the
appear will be decided against the company.
FAQs
Q-: Is it possible for the financial statements to be prepared in
accordance with two financial reporting frameworks and if so,
how is auditors opinion expressed
A: Each framework is considered separately in forming an
auditors opinion. If the financial statements are found to be in
compliance with each of the frameworks, the auditor may issue
two separate opinions, one for compliance with each
framework.
If they are in compliance with one framework but not the other,
an unmodified opinion may be given on the former under this
SA and a modified opinion on the latter under SA 705
25
FAQs
Q: How does an auditor deal with a situation where the audited entity
voluntarily provides supplementary information or where a law or
regulation requires additional information that is outside the scope of the
applicable financial reporting framework?
If such information is embedded in the financial statements, the auditor
discusses with the client if such information could be displayed separately
outside the financial statements.
Where such supplementary information (eg., a GAAP reconciliation
between Indian GAAP and IFRSs included in the Notes to the Financial
Statements) cannot be clearly differentiated from the rest of the financial
statements, the auditors opinion shall have to cover that too. This means
that the auditor would need to audit this information and report on it in the
ordinary course
If the management (or law/ regulation) requires such information not to be
subjected to audit, the auditor must ensure that such information is
presented in a way that clearly shows that it is unaudited. However
under SA 720 the auditor still has the responsibility to read that information
to identify if it contains any material inconsistency with the audited
financial statements
FAQs
Q : How does one decide the nature of modification that
should be made?
An auditor has to evaluate the situation carefully before
making his judgment as to the nature of modification. It is
very important that he, in terms of the principles laid down in
SA 230, Audit Documentation, also documents in his work
papers how and why he reached this professional judgment.
Judgement Judgement Judgement
Document Document Document..
26
FAQs (Contd..)
There can be two situations:
(a) There is a matter for which the auditor has sufficient
appropriate audit evidence to determine that due to such
matter the financial statements are materially misstated,
and
(b) There is a matter for which the auditor is unable to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to determine
whether due to it the financial statements may be
materially misstated.
In either case the report will be modified, but the nature of
modification can be different.
FAQs (Contd..)
Ex: There are certain ongoing income tax matters. There
can be two instances:
- There are similar income tax matters for other assesses
and it was decided against the assess at the High Court,
however the Company is not making provision.
Qualified opinion
- There are similar income tax matters for other assesses
(e.g. denial of benefit of Sec 80IC deduction), however
the matter is yet to be concluded.- a) Qualified opinion if
the impact is material but not pervasive b) If the impact is
pervasive then Disclaimer of opinion.
27
FAQs
Q : What is an auditor obligated to do if he expects to
modify his report
If the auditor expects to issue anything other than a clean
opinion, he has an obligation to communicate this to
those charged with governance (eg, an audit committee
or board of directors or partners/ trustees in case of a
firm/ trust) that he intends to do so, as well as provide
them the proposed wording.
28
Issue 1
Following qualification is given in the basis of qualified opinion
paragraph in Audit Report of a Company:
Attention is drawn to Note No. X1 of Notes on Financial Statements
which is reproduced :
The liabilities to ABC Bank for the various credit facilities granted as
shown in Note No. X2 of Notes on Financial Statements have been
taken over by XYZ Pvt. Ltd. as per the agreement entered into by and
between ABC Bank and XYZ Pvt. Ltd.. XYZ Pvt. Ltd. has served notice
to company for recovery of dues of Rs.XXX Lacs. The Company has
disputed the agreement and has obtained a stay of recovery from DRT.
XYZ Pvt. Ltd. has taken the symbolic possession of mortgaged premises
i.e. 2nd charge on factory and 1st charge on 1000 sq. ft. of office
premise. The matter is pending with DRT for final hearing and disposal.
In view of the above, the impact on the financial statements cannot be
quantified.
Observation
It was noted that the manner of the reporting suggests
that the auditor merely wanted to invite attention to the
subject matter of a particular note without giving any
reason for qualification. If is felt that if the Auditor had
obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the
matter is not materially misstated in the financial
statements, he could have, under Para 6 of SA 706
included an Emphasis of Matter Paragraph instead of a
qualified opinion.
29
Issue 2
It was noted from the Auditors Report that the basis for
qualified opinion states as follows:
In our opinion and to the best of our information and
according to the explanations given to us, attention is drawn
to the following, in respect of these financial statements:
A. In respect of non compliances:
1.
2.
Observation
30
Issue 3
Following qualification has been given in the Auditors Report of a
company:
Opinion
Attention is required to following notes forming parts of accounts1.
2.
Subject to the foregoing, in our opinion and to the best of our information
and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements
give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and
give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
Observations
It is noted that the Auditor has stated his qualification under the heading
Opinion without stating whether it is qualified or not, though he has
indicated that his opinion is subject to but has also not given a proper
description of the matter giving rise to the modification which is not in
accordance with paragraph 16 of SA-705 which states that:
When the auditor modifies the opinion on the financial statements, the
auditor shall, in addition to the specific elements required by the SA 700
(Revised), include a paragraph in the auditors report that provides a
description of the matter giving rise to the modification. The auditor
shall place this paragraph immediately before the opinion paragraph in
the auditors report and use the heading Basis for Qualified Opinion,
Basis for Adverse Opinion, or Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion, as
appropriate.
Hence, the manner of modification of the report is not in accordance
with SA-705.
31
Issue 4
Following qualification has been given in the Auditors Report of a Company:
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial
statements subject to the observations in Para 2 (b) and 2 (e) below, give the information required by the Act
in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally
accepted in India:..
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
b) i. In absence of detailed working papers on physical verification of inventories, discrepancies, if any,
between book and physical inventories could not be ascertained including effect of the same in the
financial statements of the company.
ii. Interest on delayed payment of statutory dues has not been provided for, which has neither been
quantified nor the effect of the same on the financial statements has been ascertained.
iii. No provision has been made against performance Bank Guarantees invoked amounting to Rs. 59.40
Crores against the company and disputed by it.
iv. No provision has been made against sundry debtors amounting to Rs. 442.16 Crores disputed by the
parties and referred for arbitration.
e) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with
the Accounting Standards referred to in subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 except
Accounting Standard 2 ( Valuation of Inventories) issued by The Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India as stated in Para .2 (b) (i) above.
Observation
It may be noted that paragraph 38 of SA 700 states as follows:
Other Reporting Responsibilities
38. If the auditor addresses other reporting responsibilities in the auditors
report on the financial statements that are in addition to the auditors
responsibility under the SAs to report on the financial statements, these other
reporting responsibilities shall be addressed in a separate section in the
auditors report that shall be sub-titled Report on Other Legal and
Regulatory Requirements, or otherwise as appropriate to the content of the
section.
It was viewed that reporting qualification under Report on Other Legal and
Regulatory Requirements is not in accordance with paragraph 22 of SA 705
which states that,
When the auditor modifies the audit opinion, the auditor shall use, the
heading Qualified Opinion, Adverse Opinion, or Disclaimer of Opinion
as appropriate, for the opinion paragraph.
32
Issue 5
Following qualification has been given in the Auditors Report of a Company:
Opinion
a. Attention is invited to the following
The accounts of the Company are drawn up on Going Concern basis even though
the accumulated losses of the Company exceed its paid up capital and reserve. The
Company is Sick Industrial Company under the provisions of Sick Industrial
Companies Act, 1985.
Issue of Takeover Notice by ABC LIMITED due to nonpayment of its dues under
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security
Interest Act, 2002. TheGoing Concern status of the Company is not affected as
physical possession of the assets have not been taken. (Refer Note No 23).
Balances of Secured Loans as at 31.03.2013 are subject to their confirmation and
reconciliation.
Balances of sundry debtors and advances as at 31.03.2013 are subject to their
confirmation and reconciliation.
Subject to the forgoing, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according
to the explanations given to us, the said accounts read with Significant Accounting
Policies and notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in
the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting
principles generally accepted in India:
Observation
It may be noted that SA 705 requires that when the Auditor modifies the opinion, he
shall, in addition to the SA 700 (Revised) requirement, include a paragraph that
provides a description of the matter giving rise to the modification. The auditor shall
place this paragraph immediately before the opinion paragraph and use the heading
Basis for Qualified Opinion; Basis for Adverse Opinion; Basis for Disclaimer of
Opinion.
SA 706 requires that vide paragraph 6 if the auditor considers it necessary to draw
users attention to a matter presented or disclosed in the financial statement that, in
the auditors judgment, is of such importance that it is fundamental to users
understanding of the financial statements, the auditor shall include an Emphasis of
Matter paragraph in the auditors report. Such a paragraph shall refer only to
information presented or disclosed in the financial statement.
It was viewed that the opinion of the auditor is not a qualified opinion, it is more of a
Matter of Emphasis where auditor is trying to draw attention to certain facts.
Accordingly, the same should have been paragraphed his under Emphasis of
Matter.
33
Observation
It may be noted that SA 705 requires that when the Auditor modifies the opinion, he
shall, in addition to the SA 700 (Revised) requirement, include a paragraph that
provides a description of the matter giving rise to the modification. The auditor shall
place this paragraph immediately before the opinion paragraph and use the heading
Basis for Qualified Opinion; Basis for Adverse Opinion; Basis for Disclaimer of
Opinion.
SA 706 requires that vide paragraph 6 if the auditor considers it necessary to draw
users attention to a matter presented or disclosed in the financial statement that, in
the auditors judgment, is of such importance that it is fundamental to users
understanding of the financial statements, the auditor shall include an Emphasis of
Matter paragraph in the auditors report. Such a paragraph shall refer only to
information presented or disclosed in the financial statement.
It was viewed that the opinion of the auditor is not a qualified opinion, it is more of a
Matter of Emphasis where auditor is trying to draw attention to certain facts.
Accordingly, the same should have been paragraphed his under Emphasis of
Matter.
Regulatory Focus
.
Regulator is overseeing whether reporting is
appropriate and not excessive
Regulator is following up on auditors qualification
34
Regulatory focus
SEBI has now decided to put in place a system to monitor
the audit qualifications contained in the audit report
accompanying the audited annual financial statements
submitted by listed companies.
SEBI has constituted the Qualified Audit Review
Committee (QARC) with representatives from Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), stock exchanges,
etc. The QARC shall review the cases received from the
stock exchanges and guide SEBI in processing the
qualified annual audit reports referred to by the stock
exchanges.
35