Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

    • 22 views

    Speech and Audio Processing: Lecture-3

    Uploaded by

    Randeep Singh
    This document discusses different techniques for speech coding, including parametric coders and waveform-approximating coders. Parametric coders model speech using parameters like spectral envelope and extract and quantize these parameters, while waveform coders like PCM and ADPCM minimize the error between original and synthesized speech. Hybrid coders combine different coding principles to encode different speech segments. The document also outlines requirements for speech coders like quality, capacity, coding delay, robustness, and complexity.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Speech and Audio Processing: Lecture-3

    Uploaded by

    Randeep Singh
    22 views20 pages
    This document discusses different techniques for speech coding, including parametric coders and waveform-approximating coders. Parametric coders model speech using parameters like spectral envelope and extract and quantize these parameters, while waveform coders like PCM and ADPCM minimize the error between original and synthesized speech. Hybrid coders combine different coding principles to encode different speech segments. The document also outlines requirements for speech coders like quality, capacity, coding delay, robustness, and complexity.

    Original Title

    03

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document discusses different techniques for speech coding, including parametric coders and waveform-approximating coders. Parametric coders model speech using parameters like spectral envelope and extract and quantize these parameters, while waveform coders like PCM and ADPCM minimize the error between original and synthesized speech. Hybrid coders combine different coding principles to encode different speech segments. The document also outlines requirements for speech coders like quality, capacity, coding delay, robustness, and complexity.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    22 views20 pages

    Speech and Audio Processing: Lecture-3

    Uploaded by

    Randeep Singh
    This document discusses different techniques for speech coding, including parametric coders and waveform-approximating coders. Parametric coders model speech using parameters like spectral envelope and extract and quantize these parameters, while waveform coders like PCM and ADPCM minimize the error between original and synthesized speech. Hybrid coders combine different coding principles to encode different speech segments. The document also outlines requirements for speech coders like quality, capacity, coding delay, robustness, and complexity.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 20

    Speech and Audio Processing

    Lecture-3 By: Mohit Goel


    [email protected]

    Speech Coding Techniques


    Waveform approximating coders: Speech coders producing a reconstructed signal which converges towards the original signal with decreasing quantization error. Parametric coders: Speech coders producing a reconstructed signal which does not converge to the original signal with decreasing quantization error.

    [email protected]

    1. Parametric Coders
    Parametric coders model the speech signal using a set of model parameters like spectral envelope, pitch and energy contour, etc. The extracted parameters at the encoder are quantized and transmitted to the decoder. The decoder synthesizes speech according to the specified model. The speech production model does not account for the quantization noise or try to preserve the waveform similarity between the synthesized and the original speech signals.
    [email protected]

    1. Parametric Coders
    The model parameter estimation may be an open loop process with no feedback from the quantization or the speech synthesis. Furthermore, they do not preserve the waveform similarity and the measurement of signal to noise ratio (SNR) is meaningless, as often the SNR becomes negative when expressed in dB (as the input and output waveforms may not have phase alignment).

    [email protected]

    1.1 Linear Prediction Based Vocoders


    Linear Prediction (LP) based vocoders are designed to emulate the human speech production mechanism The vocal tract is modelled by a linear prediction filter. The glottal pulses and turbulent air flow at the glottis are modelled by periodic pulses and Gaussian noise respectively, which form the excitation signal of the linear prediction filter.

    [email protected]

    1.1 Linear Prediction Based Vocoders


    The LP filter coefficients, signal power, binary voicing decision (i.e. periodic pulses or noise excitation), and pitch period of the voiced segments are estimated for transmission to the decoder. The main weakness of LP based vocoders is the binary voicing decision of the excitation, which fails to model mixed signal types with both periodic and noisy components.

    [email protected]

    1.2 Harmonic Coders


    Harmonic or sinusoidal coding represents the speech signal as a sum of sinusoidal components. The model parameters, i.e. the amplitudes, frequencies and phases of sinusoids, are estimated at regular intervals from the speech spectrum. The frequency tracks are extracted from the peaks of the speech spectra, and the amplitudes and frequencies are interpolated in the synthesis process for smooth evolution

    [email protected]

    1.2 Harmonic Coders


    The general sinusoidal model does not restrict the frequency tracks to be harmonics of the fundamental frequency. Increasing the parameter extraction rate converges the synthesized speech waveform towards the original, if the parameters are unquantized. However at low bit rates the phases are not transmitted and estimated at the decoder.

    [email protected]

    2. Waveform-approximating Coders
    Waveform coders minimize the error between the synthesized and the original speech waveforms. Examples of this type of coder are Pulse Code Modulation (PCM) and Adaptive Differential Pulse Code Modulation (ADPCM) PCM transmit a quantized value for each speech sample.

    [email protected]

    2. Waveform-approximating Coders
    ADPCM employs an adaptive pole zero predictor and quantizes the error signal, with an adaptive quantizer step size. ADPCM predictor coefficients and the quantizer step size are backward adaptive and updated at the sampling rate. The recent waveform-approximating coders based on time domain analysis by synthesis such as Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP), explicitly make use of the vocal tract model and the long term prediction.

    [email protected]

    2. Waveform-approximating Coders
    CELP coders buffer the speech signal and perform block based analysis and transmit the prediction filter coefficients along with an index for the excitation vector. They also employ perceptual weighting so that the quantization noise spectrum is masked by the signal level.

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    3. Hybrid Coding of Speech


    When the bit rate is reduced, the perceived quality of Adaptive Differential Pulse Code Modulation (ADPCM) ,Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP) coders tends to degrade more for some speech segments while remaining adequate for others. This shows that the assumed coding principle is not adequate for all speech types. In order to circumvent this problem, hybrid coders that combine different coding principles to encode different types of speech segments have been Introduced. A hybrid coder can switch between a set of predefined coding modes. Hence they are also referred to as multimode coders. A hybrid coder is an adaptive coder, which can change the coding technique or mode according to the source, selecting the best mode. [email protected]

    Requirements of speech coders


    1. Quality and Capacity Speech quality and bit rate are two factors that directly conflict with each other. Lowering the bit rate of the speech coder, i.e. using higher signal compression, causes degradation of quality to a certain extent and if bit rate is increased the quality is improved but more data has to be saved.

    [email protected]

    For systems that connect to the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) and associated systems, the quality requirements are strict and must conform to constraints and guidelines imposed by the relevant regulatory bodies, e.g. ITU (previously CCITT). Such systems demand high quality (toll quality) coding. Private commercial networks and military systems may compromise the quality to lower the capacity requirements.

    [email protected]

    2. Coding Delay Coding delay may be algorithmic (the buffering of speech for analysis), computational (the time taken to process the stored speech samples) or due to transmission. Only the first two concern the speech coding subsystem, although very often the coding scheme is tailored such that transmission can be initiated even before the algorithm has completed processing all of the information in the analysis frame

    [email protected]

    For PSTN applications, low delay is essential if the major problem of echo is to be minimized. So, extra echo cancellers will be required if coders with long delays are introduced. 3. Robustness For many applications, the speech source coding rate typically occupies only a fraction of the total channel capacity, the rest being used for forward error correction (FEC) and signalling.
    [email protected]

    For mobile connections, which suffer greatly from both random and burst errors, a coding schemes builtin tolerance to channel errors is vital for an acceptable average overall performance, i.e. communication quality. For other applications employing less severe channels, e.g. fibre-optic links, the problems due to channel errors are reduced significantly and robustness can be ignored for higher clean channel speech quality. This is a major difference between the wireless mobile systems and those of the fixed link systems.

    [email protected]

    In addition to the channel noise, coders may need to operate in noisy background environments. As background noise can degrade the performance of speech parameter extraction, it is crucial that the coder is designed in such a way that it can maintain good performance at all times. 4. Complexity and Cost As more sophisticated algorithms are devised, the computational complexity is increased.

    [email protected]

    One technique for overcoming power consumption whilst also improving channel efficiency is digital speech interpolation (DSI) . DSI exploits the fact that only around half of speech conversation is actually active speech thus, during inactive periods, the channel can be used for other purposes, including limiting the transmitter activity, hence saving power. An important subsystem of DSI is the voice activity detector (VAD) which must operate efficiently and reliably to ensure that real speech is not mistaken for silence and vice versa.

    [email protected]

    You might also like