International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-2, Issue-2, May 2013
Transitioning Residential Neighbourhoods: A Case Study of Jayalaximpuram, Mysore, India
B. Shankar, [Link]
Abstract: In India, large cities are experiencing rapid population and spatial growths. The rising land costs are making the construction of reasonably priced. Local and Planning Authorities are encouraging to transition to commercial retail establishments or higher-density residential uses that supports the need to supply housing apartments by designating streets and areas. Many streets in residential areas have altered into commercial, public and semi public activity and apartments. Transition of land uses is inevitable in large cities like Mysore. Thus, the residential areas are affected greatly in terms of increasing density and overloading the existing infrastructure facilities by changing dynamics of land use. With a result of this, the residential areas are transforming into mixed land use. The City of Mysore is on the large and emerging metropolitan cities in the State of Karnataka. Jayalaxmipuram residential neighbourhood is one among many residential areas which was developed immediately after Independence. The neighbourhood is experiencing rapid land use transformation. The paper presents the residential neighbourhood transformation due changing dynamics of land use in Jayalaxmipuram, Mysore and proposes planning strategies for addressing the transitioning of residential land use. Keywords: Transitioning, Neighbourhood, Mixed Land Use. Diversity, Residential,
II. BACKGROUND OF MYSORE Mysore is the second largest city in the State of Karnataka and it had a population of 887,446 as per 2011 provisional census figures and it increased from 7,85,800 in 2001. The name of Mysore was derived from mahisha (a demon). Formerly, the city was the state capital and head quarters of the Princely State of Mysore. It is situated at a distance 140kms from Bangalore, on the southern part of Karnataka State at 12 18 North latitude and 76 12 East longitude, and at an altitude of 770 mts above mean sea level. The city lies in a saucer shaped basin flanked by Chamundi hills on the south-east and a raised platform near Hinakal village on the west. The city has a salubrious climate and the temperature varies from 12 C to 35 C. The average annual rainfall is 798mm. The city spreads across an area of [Link]. III. LAND USE PATTERN OF MYSORE The general land use pattern of Mysore city owes its origin to its past. The old city is predominantly the central business district, which scattered around the palace. The land use for different periods from 1966 to 2009 is given in table 1. Table 1: Land Use for the Period from 1966 to2009
Land Use 1966 Area in Hect.. 2997.5 7 211.25 614.32 625.25 1230.6 7 911.77 % age 40.4 0 2.41 13.4 9 5.49 11.3 2 20.2 2 0.49 2.41 3.77 100 1997 Area in Hect. 3057.3 0 182.23 1021.0 1 415.77 856.45 1530.7 3 37.26 182.68 285.34 7568.7 7 % age 42.6 0 3.00 8.73 8.9 17.4 9 12.9 5 0.34 0.53 5.46 100 2009 Area in Hectare. 6747.52 467.04 1281.63 765.36 1517.34 3238.01 % age 47.7 5 3.30 9.07 5.42 10.7 4 22.9 1 47.7 5 100
I. INTRODUCTION Transition of land uses is inevitable in large cities like Mysore. The rising land costs are making the construction of reasonably priced housing more and more difficult. Local and Planning Authorities are encouraging to transition to commercial retail establishments or higher-density residential uses that supports the need to supply housing apartments by designating streets and areas. These kinds of land use decisions are becoming more and more critical to the promotion of economic well-being. Residential land use transition is also evident where development pressures mount at the environs of neighbourhoods in older areas that have become more intensively developed over the years. There is a need to address transition to more intense uses in areas where it would not be well-suited. The City of Mysore city is experiencing changing dynamics in residential areas namely Jayalaxmipuram which need to be recognized and addressed properly by the Planning Authority in its development control regulations.
Residential Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Spaces Public and Semi-Public Traffic and Transportatio n Public utility Water sheet Agricultural Total
23.87 37.23 384.45 7036.3 8
6747.52 14131.9 7
Source: Mysore Urban Development Authority, Mysore IV. BACKGROUND OF JAYALAXMIPURAM
Manuscript received on May, 2013. B. Shankar, Associate Professor in Urban and Regional Planning, Institute of Development Studies, University of Mysore, India. [Link], Consultant in Urban and Regional Planning, Bangalore, India.
Jayalaksmipuram residential layout was developed in the year 1950, in the name of Jayalakshmi Ammani, the elder daughter of the Maharaja Chamaraja Wodeyar IX and it is experiencing fast growth.
Transitioning Residential Neighbourhoods: A Case Study of Jayalaximpuram, Mysore, India The area at that time was considered to be in periphery of Mysore city. The area was surrounded by urban villages namely Padavarhalli, Vontikoppal and Kumbarkoppal and newly developed neighbourhoods of Vanivilasa Mohalla. The neighbourhood had a population of 4012 in 1991 increased to 4935 in 2001 and 5785 in 2011. The sites of sizes viz. 40x60. 50x80, 60x80 and 80x 120 and 120x180or higher were designed and allotted to the local residents. The number of houses in these neighbourhood have increased from 917 in 196 to 1157 in 2011. The bigger size plots on major roads has an added advantage for the builders to construct the multi dwelling units with compromising very less on the setbacks. The roads designed at that time were very large enough to sustain the dense population along with the then parking facilities. And thus, vertical growth of residential buildings has gained a prominent role in Jayalaxmipuram. Table 1: Growth Trends of Population and Housing
1991 Population Male Female Houses Road length 4012 1999 2013 917 18.5 2001 4935 2463 2472 983 18.5 2011 5785 2881 2904 1157 21.2
Fig.2 Land Use of Jayalaksmipuram: 2011 Table 2: Land Use of Jayalaxmipuram1960
Land Use Area in hectares 49.40 5.13 8.67 7.10 28.37 98.54 Percentage Norms
Residential Commercial Public and semi public Park and open space Traffic and transportation Total
50.12 5.21 8.80 7.21 28.80 100
45-50 3-5 8-10 12-15 20-25 100
V. NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT OF JAYALAXMIPURAM The earlier neighbourhood design of Jayalaxmipuram is given in fig.1.
In 1960, the land use in this neighbourhood was residential which accounts for 50.12 per cent followed by Traffic and Transportation 28.8 %, Public and semi-public 8.8%, Parks and open spaces 7.21% and commercial 5.21%. The educational institutions, specialized hospitals, popular hotels are located in this area. It is considered as one of the posh localities of the city. The area has many modern shopping malls. The busiest street is Kalidasa road which is always buzzing with activity, with many foreigners and ITBT professionals shopping in the area. Table 3: Land Use Pattern in Different Periods
Fig.1 Concepts of Jayalaksmipuram Neighbourhood Design Jayalaxmipuram Neighbourhood was designed for population between 4,000 and 5,000. It was developed as a low density of 10 families per acre for dwelling area. It had extent of 98.54 hectares. It is served by shopping facilities, hospital, and a library, and a community center, the latter being located in conjunction with the school. Major arterials pass at one end of neighbourhoods, and green buffer is provided to the highway with a service road at the edge of the neighbourhood. The circulation system has been designed to avoid major traffic in the layout except on the edges and mid of the layout namely Gokulam Road. VI. LAND USE OF JAYALXMIPURAM: 2011 The land use in 2011 as per the primary survey conducted by the researchers is depicted in the fig.2.
International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-2, Issue-2, May 2013 The total area covered under residential use is 45.64 hectares. This works out to 46.32% of the total built up area. The net residential density of population, as per 2001 census works out to be 5645 persons per sq km in 2012. The residential use has decreased from 49.40 hectares to 47.60 hectares from 1960 to 2009 and 45.64 in 2012. The area under commercial use is 8.41 hectares forming 8.54% of the total built-up area. Under Commercial use, the areas utilized for retail business, whole-Sale business, ware-houses, shopping mall, cinema theatres, hotels etc., are included. Commercial activity is predominant in this area so the commercial use has increased from 5.13 hectares to 6.23 hectares from 1960 to 2009 and 8.41 hectares in 2012. Hotel industry is predominant in this area; most of popular restaurants and hotels are located in this area. The area under public and semi-public uses is about 14.80 hectares which works out to be 15.0% of the total built-up area. This includes the area utilized for public offices, educational institutions and hospitals. The major specialized hospitals namely Chandrakalla Hospital, Basappa Memorial Hospital are located in this area. Most of the recognized institutions are also located in Jayalakshmipuram . It is becoming a regional-hub for education. All levels of educational institutions from primary school to post graduation levels are located in this area. Mahajana College is one of the prime institutions in this area has educational facilities from pre-school to post-graduation level. An area of 9.45 hectares is covered under Park and open space use which accounts for 4.08 per cent of the total developed area and it very low when compared to the planning standards of size and population of the area. The area under traffic and transportation is 287.40 hectares which accounts for 23.01% of the total built-up area. VII. HOUSING TYPOLOGIES IN JAYAXMIPURAM By 1934, the City Improvement Trust Board had developed 570 sites and 100 model houses at an estimated costs of Rs. 350,000. The model houses were built with brick masonry with mud mortar, country tiled with lime plastering. A set back occurred in the progress of the City Improvement Trust Board between 1931 and 1937, perhaps due to the world wide economic depression during that period. As a result, the sites formed in Jayalaxmipuram was not be sold as the area was not attractive enough at that time for shelter to purchase sites and build houses. The Board decided to develop the area at its own funds and reduce the rate from 30 paise to 15 or 7 paise per square meter, remotest sites in the extension was the cheapest. Over a period of time, by 1950 the housing typologies have changed from Country and to Mangalore tiled in 1960 to terraced structures in 2011 and the details are given the table 4. Table.4: Housing Typology in Jayalaxmipuram Year 1960 1980 2011 Country Tiled brick and mud 70 54 -----wall Mangalore tiled with brick 157 110 48 walls Terraced with brick 210 657 935 Vacant sites 413 119 85
Fig.3 Housing Transformations in Jayalaxmipuram VIII. RESIDENTIAL TRANSITION The residential transition and its gravity can be known through its diversity and the diversity can measured by using: Hirschmann- Herfindahl Model. In this model, it is assumed that households like a mixed residential urban environment in terms of different land uses other than housing in the present system, where employment is an indicator for land use, this suggests that not just the number of jobs, but also the composition of total employment in different activities of mixed land use. Therefore, it is to define a diversity index so as to be able to examine the impact of a mixture of employment and housing on property values. Let Hh denote the number of households in a neighbourhood of house h and Egh the number of employees in sector g. The diversity index for house is the inverse of the Hirschmann- Herfindahl index:
In other words Pgh and PHh represent employment and household shares of the sum of employment and households respectively. If the activity is only housing the index is one and the index value increases as activities in the neighbourhood becomes more diverse.
Data sets of Jayalakshmipuram
Pgh = 796/(4012+g(796)) = 796/(4012+2388) Pgh =0.124
Type No of shops 16 115 3 7 5 52 Average no of employees 10 3 10 5 15 3 Total Total no of employees 160 345 30 45 60 156 796
Hotels Retail shops Super market Service station Banks others
Transitioning Residential Neighbourhoods: A Case Study of Jayalaximpuram, Mysore, India be anticipated well in advance and planned for to ensure that it occurs in a manner beneficial to the city planning and to the overall community. Encourage less intensive commercial uses, small offices and compatible uses adjacent to existing residential neighbourhoods by allowing adaptive reuse of single-family units on the edge of neighbourhoods. Adopt additional zoning districts to provide more options for appropriate intensity of development, such as neighbourhood business districts and transition districts. Besides, mixed land use has positive and negative environmental impacts. Therefore, formulation of a balanced policy of mixed use considering its environmental impact and the socio-economic is need of an hour. Nonresidential activity on residential premises should be permitted selectively and carefully, taking into consideration community needs, environmental impact and provision for safe and easy traffic circulation and adequate parking. Mixed Use streets to be identified based on traffic/parking studies. For identification of mixed use streets in zonal regulations, mixed use may be permitted on ground floor, in residential plots facing streets/road of minimum 15.0 or 18.0 meters. Only selective commercial/ non-residential activity should be allowed in the residential premises by considering the needs of the residents, environmental concerns, secure and painless traffic movement and ample of parking space. Permissible use of land includes the retail shops, convenience stores and any other specific use or professional activity not considered harmful for the society. The front setback should be used only for parking purpose. The premises are to be entered only from the service lane, but, the direct entry from the main road to be avoided. The planned nature of the residential area is to be preserved. XIII. CONCLUSIONS The City of Mysore is experiencing changing dynamics in residential areas. Jayalaxmipuram is the one of the old residential layouts developed immediately after the Independence India. The diversity index for house is the inverse of the Hirschmann- Herfindahl index and in this neighbourhood Dh =2.30 this indicates activities are diverse in this neighbourhood, Jayalaxmipuram has been transitioning into mixed land use pattern and is difficult to get alter. A well developed policy would set the tone for harmonised development of existing residential areas in to transitional area and mixed land use area by rezoning of existing residential areas. REFERENCES
[1]. Aurand, A. (2010). Density, Housing Types and Mixed Land Use: Smart Tools for Affordable Housing? Urban Studies 47(5): 10151036. Briassoulis, E., 2000. Analysis of Land Use Change: Theoretical and Modeling Approaches. In The Web Book of the Regional Science. S. Loveridge (Ed.). West Virginia University, Regional Research Institute, Morgantown, WV. Britaldo, S. S., C. C. Gustavo, L. P. Cassio, 2001. DINAMICA A Stochastic Cellular Automata Model Designed to Simulate the Landscape Dynamics in an Amazonian Colonization Frontier. Ecological Modeling. 154: Pp 217-235. Burnell, J.D. (1985). Industrial Land Use, Externalities, and Residential Location. Urban Studies, 22(5): 399-408. Cao, T.V. And Cory, D. (1981). Mixed Land Uses, Land-Use Externalities, and Residential Property Values: A Re-Evaluation. Annals of Regional Science 16, 1-24. Cervero, R. (1989). Jobs-Housing Balance And Regional Mobility
PHh = 4012/(4012+ g(796)) =4012/(4012+2388) PHh =0.626 The diversity index for house is the inverse of the Hirschmann Herfindahl index:
Dh = 1/(g(0.124 )+ 0.626 ) = 1/(g0.0153)+ 0.39) = 1/(0.0459+0.39) =1/0.435 Dh = 2.30 If activities in the neighbourhood of the house under consideration are fully concentrated in one sector, or when only households occupy in the neighbourhood of house h , we find Dh=1 and this index increases as activities in this neighbourhood become more diverse. In this sector Dh=2.30 this indicates activities are in this neighbourhood. XI. CHALLENGES The major phenomenon of transitioning residential land use resulting into mixed land use pattern is difficult to get alter. The commercial activities have intruded into residential areas especially all along major roads. In order to address the transitioning residential areas, Jaipur city was planned to introduce mixed residential and non residential activities in the zonal development Plans by identifying the various use-zones/activities to be permitted in various parts of the proposed Mixed Land Use Area. The mixed use in the same building like residential cum commercial or residential cum institutional or residential cum services industry could be permitted as per the Land use Zoning Code. In case of Bangalore, Mixed land used was proposed in Master Plan and the honourable High Court of Karnataka directed the authorities to disallow fresh construction of non-residential nature in areas classified as residential in the Revised Master plan 2015. Strictly speaking, land use changes are not permitted as per zonal regulations. However, there is a potential scope to address the diverse neighbourhood of mixed land use due to transitioning of residential areas by way of introducing a Mixed-land-use concept by amending the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and regulations. XII. PLANNING STRATEGIES The transitioning of residential areas need to be recognised in the Master Plans. Recent trends in the large citys development dynamics indicate a maturing neighbourhood into institutional and commercialising trends and a decrease in traditional housing typologies resulting in market demand changes and preferences. These trends inevitably result in more land uses transitioning to meet the new demands of the area. As a result of needs and demands, change causing inevitable transition of land uses in residential areas. The impact of land use transition need to
[2].
[3].
[4]. [5].
[6].
International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-2, Issue-2, May 2013
[7]. Ligtenberg, A., A. K. Bregt, R. V. Lammeren, 2001. Multi Actor Based Land Use Modeling: Spatial Planning Using Agents. Land Use and Urban Planning. 56: Pp. 21-33. Planning. University Of North Carolina. Batty, M. (2007), 'Model Cities', Town Planning Review, 78(2): 125-178. Post. R. B. (1 964) Criteria for Theories of Urban Spatial Structure: An Evaluation of Current Research M.A. Thesis. Chape1 Hill: Department Of City And Regional Spatial Logic of Morphological transformation, A Paradigm Of Planned - Unplanned Areas In Dhaka City, Nayma Khan, Ref 052. Verburg, P. H., W. Soepboer, A. Veldkamp, [Link], V. Espaldon, S. S. A. Mastura,2002. Modeling the Spatial Dynamics of Regional Land Use: The CLUE-S Model, Environnemental Management. 30 (3): Pp. 391405. Wang, Y., and Zhang, X., 2001. A Dynamic Modeling Approach to Simulating Socioeconomic Effects on Landscape Changes. Ecological Modelling. 140: Pp. 141-162. Xiang W-N, Clarke K C, 2003, "The Use of Scenarios in Land-Use Planning" Environment and Planning B: Planning And Design 30(6) 885 909
[8]. [9].
[10]. [11].
[12].
[13].
Dr. B. Shankar received the B.E. degree in Civil Engineering in 1984, M.U.R.P degree in Urban and Regional Planning in 1989 and Ph.D degree in Urban and Regional Planning in 1997 from the University of Mysore, Mysore. He is working as Associate Professor in Urban and Regional Planning at the Institute of Development Studies, University of Mysore, Mysore. His research interests to include Urban Planning, Land Use Planning, Urban Poverty, Community Development, Heritage Conservation, and Planning Legislation. D. Vidhya received the B.E. degree in Civil Engineering from Shri Jayachamarajendra College of Engineering and [Link] in Urban and Regional Planning from the University of Mysore, Mysore. Presently, she is a freelance consultant in Urban and Regional Planning. Her research interests to include mixed land use, land use planning and infrastructure development.