Understanding Outcome Based Education
Understanding Outcome Based Education
INTRODUCTION:
Outcome Based Education is the paradigm shift resulting from the failure of Traditional
Education (TE). TE narrowly focused on the content and produced students with varying
degrees of achievement levels (stratification of achievers). Thus this model did not
produce learners, which could perform effectively in the work place Outcome Based
Education has changed
the focus of learning institutions from the content to the learner. According to William
Spady, a major proponent of Outcome Based Education, three goals drive this approach
to creating academic
curricula.
1) All students can learn and succeed, but may be not on the same day or in the
same way.
2) Each success by a student breeds more success.
3) Academic institutions control the conditions of success.
TERMINOLOGY:
• outcome-based education: An integrated system of educational programs that
aligns specific student outcomes, instructional methods, and assessment.
• scientific knowledge: Knowledge that provides people with the conceptual and
technological tools to explain and describe how the world works.
• curriculum (plural curricula): A plan of instruction that details what students are
to know, how they are to learn it, what the teacher's role is, and the context in
which learning and teaching will take place.
Defition:
Outcome Based Education is a method of curriculum design and teaching that focuses on
what students can actually do after they are taught.
Outcome-based education (OBE) is a recurring education reform model. It is a student-
centered learning philosophy that focuses on empirically measuring student performance,
which are called outcomes.
Important points :
• Your main focus should be on LEARNING rather than teaching.
• Students cannot learn if they do not THINK.
• Thinking is facilitated and encouraged by the PROCESSES that you use to engage
students with the content, as well as by the CONTENT itself.
• Your subject does not exist in isolation—you have to help students make LINKS to
other
subjects.
• You have a responsibility to help students LEARN HOW TO LEARN.
• Clarity of focus
This means that everything teachers do must be clearly focused on what they
want students to know, understand and be able to do. In other words,
teachers should focus on helping students to develop the knowledge, skills
and personalities that will enable them to achieve the intended outcomes that
have been clearly articulated.
• Designing down
It means that the curriculum design must start with a clear definition of the
intended outcomes that students are to achieve by the end of the program.
Once this has been done, all instructional decisions are then made to ensure
achieve this desired end result.
• High expectations
• Expanded opportunities
Teachers must strive to provide expanded opportunities for all students. This
principle is based on the idea that not all learners can learn the same thing in
the same way and in the same time. However, most students can achieve
high standards if they are given appropriate opportunities.
• Generic skills
Biggs (1999) suggested the following points of guidance for planning teaching
strategies:
• Formative assessment
• Summative assessment
The gathering of information at the conclusion of a course, program, or
undergraduate career to improve learning or to meet accountability demands.
When used for improvement, impacts the next cohort of students taking the
course or program. Examples: examining student final exams in a course to
see if certain specific areas of the curriculum were understood less well than
others; analyzing senior projects for the ability to integrate across disciplines.
• Criterion-referenced assessment
• Alternative assessments
A catch all term for assessments that depart from the traditional multiple
choice, norm-referenced tests such as coding live art criticism discussions ,
portfolio reviews, rating performances or art products on criteria established
by teachers and students, journals, authentic task assessment and direct
observation of student performance.
• Authentic assessments
• Performance assessments
Once an assessment tool has been settled on, specific decisions may have to be
made about the criteria by which student work will be assessed, depending on the
learning outcome being assessed and the tool for assessment. Choosing criteria is
where rubrics come in.
A rubric is a set of criteria for assessing student work or performance. Rubrics are
particularly suited to learning outcomes that are complex or not easily quantifiable,
for which there are no clear “right” or “wrong” answers, or which are not evaluated
with standardized tests or surveys. Assessment of writing, oral communication,
critical thinking, or information literacy often requires rubrics.
Rubrics have two dimensions: they identify the various characteristics of the
outcome, and they specify various levels of achievement in each characteristic. Thus,
a well-designed rubric consists of:
Rubrics are also useful when there is more than one evaluator; rubrics can serve as
standardized scoring guides that assist different evaluators to determine the quality
of student work in a consistent manner.
Giving Feedback :
Feedback tells students how they are doing towards achieving intended learning
outcomes. This information can help them to improve their learning and so help
them to enhance their performance in assessment. There is also considerable
research evidence that the most important part of the assessment process, with
regard to supporting learning, is feedback.
Each unit in a programme should normally include not only summative assessment
but also formative assessment for which suitable feedback is provided in time for
students to learn from it before major summative assessment. Coursework often
serves a formative purpose through feedback while also contributing to summative
assessment through the marks awarded; in such cases, feedback should be returned
in time to inform the next piece of coursework.
• First, a list of desired outcomes in the form of student behaviors, skills, attitudes,
and abilities is created. Second, learning experiences are designed that will allow
teachers to coach the students to a mastery level in each outcome.
• Third, students are tested. Those who fail to achieve mastery receive remediation
or retraining until mastery is achieved.
* Prepares students for life and work * Some outcomes focus too much on
feelings,
in the 21st Century. values, attitudes and beliefs, and not
enough
on the attainment of factual knowledge.
Affective (feeling-centered, attitudinal), not cognitive, learning earns the graduation certificate:
"Many pupils believe they can simply drift through for eight years and secure their school-leaving
certificate even with minimal intellectual performance... [T]hose pupils who are in positions of
leadership... often display unmannerly behavior and laziness at school. in general, it must be said
that school discipline has declined to an alarming extent..."
School-to-Work link: "The new movement offered prospects of future employment at a time of
massive graduate unemployment."
Politically correct standards for right and wrong: "Munich professors [were warned]: 'From now on
it is not up to you to decide whether or not something is true, but whether it is in the interest of the
national Socialist Revolution."
Set affective, not cognitive, goals (outcomes): "The more enthusiastic they get, the easier are the
exams and the sooner they will get a position .... The new generation has never had much use for
education and reading. Now nothing is demanded of them; on the contrary, knowledge is publicly
condemned."
Forget facts. Teach "right" attitudes or "character" through feel-good experiences: An important
aspect of Nazi education was the cult of 'Experience' as being more crucial to the development of
the individual than the academic process of learning with its stress on 'knowledge'. Unlike
knowledge which involves the intellect, experience involved 'feeling' which alone provided access
to the deep truths of Nazism which were essentially based on [ideological unity]. Such an
'experience'... was regarded as essential to character-building.
Reject old authority figures through critical thinking and values clarification: "It appealed to the
desire of youth to be independent of the adult world and exploited the conflict of generations and
the typical tendency for young people to challenge authority figures, whether parents or
teachers."
Confuse students' values through shocking stimuli and values clarification exercises (including
sex and AIDS education): "...particularly teachers in secondary schools, were alienated by the
crudity of its indoctrination."
Arts, crafts, and multicultural experience: "People told stories, danced and practiced
handicrafts..."
Teach math through integrated curriculum: "Other subjects such as math and foreign language
were less subject to ideological contamination. Even here however, Nazi ideology could enter by
the back door, as is clear from the following tests...: 'Question 95: The construction of a lunatic
asylum costs 6 million RM. How many houses at 15,000 RM each could have been built for that
amount?'"
Peer Counseling: "The slogan 'youth must be led by youth'... was ritually echoed and to some
extent followed in practice. But the spirit in which it was applied was very different These young
leaders were not representing an autonomous youth culture but were functionaries of an official
bureaucracy regimented by rules and regulations and following set patterns of training."
Condition students to compliance: "It was preferred that people should not have a will of their own
and should totally subordinate themselves."
Lifelong Learning requires training, testing, remediation, more test and training: "If they have still
not become real National Socialists, then they go into the Labor Service and are polished there...
And if after six or seven months, there are still remnants of class consciousness or pride in status,
then the Wehrmacht will take over the further treatment... and when they return after two or four
years then, to prevent them from slipping back into old habits once again, we take them
immediately into the SA, SS, etc., and they will not be free again for the rest of their lives."
Mandatory service: "Service in the Hitler Youth is honorary service to the German people. All
young people are obliged from the age of 10 to their 19th birthday to serve in the Hitler youth."
Character Education and Cooperative Learning: "We cannot fight our way out of this deep crisis
through intellectualism... The school for character... which is a practical test of true comradeship
in work and living is irreplaceable.... the true, great, practical school is... in the labor camp, for
here instruction and words cease and action begins."
REVISE HISTORY
New content: "...in addition to controlling and indoctrinating the teaching profession, reorganizing
the education system and establishing new elite schools, the regime sought to influence youth
through the content of what was taught in schools." "Relevance" and historical revision: "The
course of history must not appear to our young people as a chronicle which strings events
together indiscriminately, but, as in a play, only the important events, those which have a major
impact on life, should be portrayed."
RETRAIN TEACHERS
First indoctrinate teachers: "The real task of the NSLB is to create the new German educator in
the spirit of National Socialism. It is being carried out with the same methods with which the
movement has conquered the whole nation: indoctrination and propaganda."
Certify compliant teachers. "The Nazi party... realized they could do little with the existing
professors if they outwardly conformed. They concentrated, therefore, on trying to transform the
profession by controlling entry and promotion within it throgh process of political indoctrination...."
The oppressive tactics of the NEA: "Teachers were, however, also subject to control from their
professional association, the National Socialist Teachers' League (NSLB)... it expanded through a
mixture of propaganda and intimidation... The main functions of the NSLB were, first, the
provision of reports on the political reliability of teachers for appointments and promotions and,
secondly, the ideological indoctrination of teachers..."
Conform or resign. "Most academics were either apolitical or approved of at least some aspects
of the regime.... Those who did not, were either forced out or intimidated into silence."
Vouchers and Christian schools: "Private schools and denominational schools gradually
succumbed to various pressures: the loss of government subsidies or tax concessions...."
Arrogant students: "Teachers, in particular, were also concerned at the contempt for intellect
cultivated by the HJ and at the arrogance displayed toward them by pupils who were leaders in
the HJ."
• Device Mnemonics.
• REWARD YOURSELF.
2. For beside nursing, imagine that you are actually taking care of the patient as you go
about answering each question.
3. Utilize the nursing process when determining the correct response to the situation.
5. Avoid passing the buck. Consider all other options before making any referral .
• "why questions"
9. In prioritization questions, use Maslow's Hierachy first. Then consider the use of
ABC's.
Criticism:
Criticism of OBE falls into a few major groups:
Opposition to testing:
Critics claim that existing tests do not adequately measure student mastery of the stated
objectives
Some parents also object to the use of standardized tests (all students take the same test
under the same conditions) because they think it unfair for schools to require the same
level of work or to use the achievement tests for impoverished or disadvantaged students
as they do for more advantaged students.
The OBE philosophy insists that assessment models be carefully matched to the stated
objectives. High-stakes tests are not required in an OBE system; norm-referenced tests
are prohibited. Portfolios, daily assessments, teacher opinions, and other methods of
assessment are perfectly compatible with OBE models. Furthermore, the OBE approach
does not permit special, lower standards for students who have been badly served by
public education in the past.
Inappropriate outcomes:
Many people oppose OBE reforms because they dislike the proposed outcomes. They
may think that the standards are too easy, too hard, or wrongly conceived. Finally, some
so-called OBE critics oppose non-OBE reforms that were presented as a part of a wide-
ranging reform "package", rather than opposing OBE itself.
Standards can be set too low: Most fear that the focus on achievement by all students
will result in "dumbing down" the definition of academic competence to a level that is
achievable by even the weakest students. Critics are unhappy with having all students
meet a minimum standard, instead of most students meeting a somewhat higher standard.
Some critics also question whether even such low goals are realistic or attainable, and
whether success can only be framed in terms of high test scores and high incomes. The
emphasis on higher reading standards and algebra for all appears to devalue vocational
training and the achievement of those who do not get high test scores, but who are likely
to become competent blue-collar workers.
Standards can be set too high: Others object that the standards are too high. OBE
models do not approve of social promotion, so non-disabled students who perform
significantly below the stated standard may be held back or required to take additional
instruction. Especially when the standards are relatively new, and the schools are just
beginning to adjust to the new standards, a majority of students struggle with at least
some of the requirements. Parents are understandably unhappy to learn that their children
have not acquired the necessary skills, and occasionally respond by demanding that the
standards be lowered until their children are declared to be passing.
Sometimes this demand that the standards be lowered is justified, because standards can
be found developmentally inappropriate for all but the brightest students. The State of
Washington found that some fourth grade WASL math problems were much more
difficult than what is typically expected of nine-year-old students. A 2008 draft
mathematics standard proposed that Kindergartners multiply to 30 by skip counting (also
known as counting by twos: 2, 4, 6, 8...), and that second graders solve simple algebra
story problems.
Committees often set standards without considering how many students are currently
achieving at that level. For example, in the 1998 North Carolina Writing Assessment, less
than 1 percent of fourth graders received the highest possible score for writing
[Link] a majority of students passed easily, parents were upset that so few were
rated as being best.
Dislike of specific outcomes: Finally, many complaints are directed against the nature of
certain standards. For example, a politician might propose that standards be included for
education about sex or creationism. Opponents say that many educational agencies have
adopted outcomes which focus too much on attitudes (e.g., "Students will enjoy physical
education class") rather than academic content. Similarly, the "Who Controls Our
Children" campaign in Pennsylvania claimed that an OBE reform effort was part of a
federal program that was "stressing values over academic content, and holding students
accountable for goals that are so vague and fuzzy they can't be assessed at all." The
Western Australian outcomes were criticised for being too vague.
Controversial standards are opposed because of their content, not simply because they are
standards. OBE models always leave the choice of the exact standards to the educational
authority, so that families can influence the choice of standards according to their
community's preferences.
SUMMARY:
Outcome-based education, a performance-based approach at the cutting edge of
curriculum development, offers a powerful and appealing way of reforming and
managing medical [Link] emphasis is on the product-what sort of doctor will be
produced-rather than on the educational process. In outcome-based education the
educational outcomes are clearly and unambiguously specified. These determine the
curriculum content and its organisation, the teaching methods and strategies, the courses
offered, the assessment process, the educational environment and the curriculum
[Link] also provide a framework for curriculum evaluation. A doctor is a unique
combination of different kinds of abilities. A three-circle model can be used to present
the learning outcomes in medical education, with the tasks to be performed by the doctor
in the inner core, the approaches to the performance of the tasks in the middle area, and
the growth of the individual and his or her role in the practice of medicine in the outer
area.
Conclusion:
The paper has provided to the reader the philosophical framework of Outcome Based
Education and thus has established the rational and justification for Outcome Based
Assessment. Outcome Based Assessment has become commonplace and is in hot pursuit
simply due to the enforcement of Accreditation agencies like ABET. The paper’s
contention is that: Outcome Based Assessment is only possible and meaningful and
would bear fruits of Continuous Improvement of the Learning Process only if
implemented after the understanding, appreciation and implementation of Outcome
Based Education.
NET REFERENCE:
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]