The Bald Soprano

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Tense,

Time, and Absurdity Within The Bald Soprano



In The Bald Soprano, by Eugne Ionesco, Mrs. Martin exclaims, Thanks to you, weve

passed a thoroughly Cartesian quarter of an hour (42). Although she addresses this comment
specifically to the Fire Captain, her statement aptly describes the entirety of this bizarre and
truly thought-provoking drama. By completely upending his characters senses of time and
communication, Ionesco not only creates a comically nonsensical piece, but also demands that
his readers question their own grasps of language and reality in a social world.

In nearly every scene of Bald Soprano, the striking of the clock punctuates random

moments of conversation with a frenzy of tolls: sometimes many tolls at once, and at other
times (somehow) no tolls at all. In fact, Ionesco notes, The clock strikes as often as it likes
(17). Within these characters world, time seems to have no bearing on reality; time is not
linear, as it tends to jump ahead, skip back, and repeat whenever it desires. Twice within the
play the clock actually mimics the tension between [the characters] and strikes accordingly
(18). That the clock appears not to be an objective constant suggests that people do not live
according to time, but that time is a product of the human mind. This revelation calls into
question the usage of time within language and what purpose it serves.

In evaluating the play as a cohesive whole, it is clear that one overarching theme is the

arbitrariness of language. During one particularly perplexing scene, Mr. and Mrs. Smith are
discussing their deceased friend, Bobby Watson; however, although the conversation begins by
marking Bobby 2-years-dead, within the next few lines he is four-years-dead, then alive and
engaged, and finally married with children. During the course of this exchange, the Smiths

regularly change the tense with which they talk about Bobby. Since a languages tense typically
serves as a marker for communication, these random linguistic shifts are unsettling. Ultimately,
Ionesco devalues the importance of time within language by connecting an irrational and
jumbled sequence of past, future, and present tenses until, with every strike of the clock, tense
not only changes but so too, seemingly, does reality. As a result, the reader is forced to
consider his own unthinking dependence upon language to make sense of the world.
Language has no actual effect upon the condition of Bobby Watson; yet, without
language, one would have no way to communicate events within temporal space and,
consequently, the construction and verbal conveyance of memory would be severely limited.
Furthermore, without proper arrangement of memory within time, one loses ones sense of
self, as seen in the first conversation between Mr. and Mrs. Martin: I feel Ive met you before
but I have a poor memory, dear sir, so I cant say (11). Without sense of self, one forfeits
individual identity and becomes simply a person a Bobby Watson like everyone else.
Following the complete breakdown of language by the end of the play, that is exactly what
happens: Mr. and Mrs. Martin restart as Mr. and Mrs. Smith, indicating that no character is
truly able to grasp his or her own identity.

You might also like