Scribd
Upload
54 views1 page

Current Issues Assignment: Issue Identification (CT)

The document provides an assessment rubric for a current issues assignment. It evaluates students on 6 criteria on a scale from 1 to 10: identifying and describing current issues clearly, conducting a coherent analysis based on relevant concepts and high-quality sources, maintaining a comprehensive perspective that acknowledges others' views, using appropriate and relevant content, engaging in a well-prepared group discussion about the issue, and recognizing own cultural biases in discussion. The student received marks between 1-10 for each criterion, with no criteria scoring in the top half of the scale.

Uploaded by

LeK
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
54 views1 page

Current Issues Assignment: Issue Identification (CT)

The document provides an assessment rubric for a current issues assignment. It evaluates students on 6 criteria on a scale from 1 to 10: identifying and describing current issues clearly, conducting a coherent analysis based on relevant concepts and high-quality sources, maintaining a comprehensive perspective that acknowledges others' views, using appropriate and relevant content, engaging in a well-prepared group discussion about the issue, and recognizing own cultural biases in discussion. The student received marks between 1-10 for each criterion, with no criteria scoring in the top half of the scale.

Uploaded by

LeK
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Current Issues Assignment

Issue identification (CT)


Current issues not clearly
stated and described.
Significant omissions and
errors

10

Current issues considered


critically and clearly.
Relevant information for
understanding

10

Coherent analysis based on


relevant concepts.
Information gathered from
high quality sources

Evidence based Analysis (CT)


Analysis not coherent and
based on irrelevant
concepts. Limited sources

Perspective (CT)
Perspective unclear and
does not account for
complexities. Others not
acknowledged

10

Perspective comprehensive.
Others views analysed and
synthesised. Limits of
position acknowledged

Content development (WC)


Did not use appropriate and
relevant content to develop
ideas

10

Appropriate, relevant and


compelling content to
illustrate mastery of the
subject

20

Well prepared and


meaningful group
discussion that focuses on
current issue

In-class engagement (OC)


Group discussion minimal
and detracts from current
issue

10

12

14

16

18

Knowledge of cultural self- awareness (ES)


In-class discussion, unable
to recognise own cultural
rules and biases

10

In-class discussion
recognises complexity of
cultural rules and biases
with evidence of originality

10

12

14

16

18

20

Delivery techniques
achieved complete
audience engagement

10

Independently analyses
from organisational sociocultural perspectives with
evidence of originality

Delivery (OC)
Delivery techniques did not
achieve adequate audience
engagement

Analysis of knowledge (ES)


Analysed without reference
to organisational sociocultural perspectives

Student Name: __________________________________

Total Mark: __________

You might also like