RFC Errata
Found 3 records.
Status: Verified (1)
RFC 4948, "Report from the IAB workshop on Unwanted Traffic March 9-10, 2006", August 2007
Source of RFC: IAB
Errata ID: 1024
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Stephane Bortzmeyer
Date Reported: 2007-09-15
Verifier Name: Olaf Kolkman
Date Verified: 2008-11-16
Section 4.3.2 says:
for example, a bug in the BIND packet was discovered
It should say:
for example, a bug in the BIND package was discovered
Notes:
from pending
Status: Reported (1)
RFC 4948, "Report from the IAB workshop on Unwanted Traffic March 9-10, 2006", August 2007
Source of RFC: IAB
Errata ID: 6249
Status: Reported
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Greg Skinner
Date Reported: 2020-08-06
Section 1 says:
Over one and half days of intensive discussions
It should say:
Over one and one half days of intensive discussions
Notes:
missing text
Status: Rejected (1)
RFC 4948, "Report from the IAB workshop on Unwanted Traffic March 9-10, 2006", August 2007
Source of RFC: IAB
Errata ID: 3504
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Bharat Joshi
Date Reported: 2013-03-01
Rejected by: Russ Housley
Date Rejected: 2013-04-25
Section 2.4 says:
As a result, not only is there no limit to what a host may do, but also there is no trace after the event of what a host may have done.
It should say:
As a result, not only there is no limit to what a host may do, but also there is no trace of what a host may have done.
Notes:
1. 'is' in the first part of the sentence is not at the correct place.
2. 'after the event' is making the sentence improper.