Sources of information and behavioral patterns in online health forums: observational study
- PMID: 24425598
- PMCID: PMC3958625
- DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2875
Sources of information and behavioral patterns in online health forums: observational study
Erratum in
-
Title Correction: Sources of Information and Behavioral Patterns in Online Health Forums: Observational Study.J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 31;16(1):e39. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3280. J Med Internet Res. 2014. PMID: 30583454 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Increasing numbers of patients are raising their voice in online forums. This shift is welcome as an act of patient autonomy, reflected in the term "expert patient". At the same time, there is considerable concern that patients can be easily misguided by pseudoscientific research and debate. Little is known about the sources of information used in health-related online forums, how users apply this information, and how they behave in such forums.
Objective: The intent of the study was to identify (1) the sources of information used in online health-related forums, and (2) the roles and behavior of active forum visitors in introducing and disseminating this information.
Methods: This observational study used the largest German multiple sclerosis (MS) online forum as a database, analyzing the user debate about the recently proposed and controversial Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI) hypothesis. After extracting all posts and then filtering relevant CCSVI posts between 01 January 2008 and 17 August 2012, we first identified hyperlinks to scientific publications and other information sources used or referenced in the posts. Employing k-means clustering, we then analyzed the users' preference for sources of information and their general posting habits.
Results: Of 139,912 posts from 11,997 threads, 8628 posts discussed or at least mentioned CCSVI. We detected hyperlinks pointing to CCSVI-related scientific publications in 31 posts. In contrast, 2829 different URLs were posted to the forum, most frequently referring to social media, such as YouTube or Facebook. We identified a total of 6 different roles of hyperlink posters including Social Media Fans, Organization Followers, and Balanced Source Users. Apart from the large and nonspecific residual category of the "average user", several specific behavior patterns were identified, such as the small but relevant groups of CCSVI-Focused Responders or CCSVI Activators.
Conclusions: The bulk of the observed contributions were not based on scientific results, but on various social media sources. These sources seem to contain mostly opinions and personal experience. A small group of people with distinct behavioral patterns played a core role in fuelling the discussion about CCSVI.
Keywords: CCSVI; Internet utilization; data mining; information dissemination; multiple sclerosis; social media; social networks.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Scientific Versus Experiential Evidence: Discourse Analysis of the Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency Debate in a Multiple Sclerosis Forum.J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 1;17(7):e159. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4103. J Med Internet Res. 2015. PMID: 26133525 Free PMC article.
-
"People power" or "pester power"? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy.Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):420-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 2. Patient Educ Couns. 2013. PMID: 23830239 Free PMC article.
-
Most Patients With Bone Sarcomas Seek Emotional Support and Information About Other Patients' Experiences: A Thematic Analysis.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):161-171. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002761. Epub 2023 Jul 11. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 37432118
-
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in multiple sclerosis patients.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD009903. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009903.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 31;5:CD009903. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009903.pub3 PMID: 23235683 Updated. Review.
-
Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) and multiple sclerosis (MS): a critical review.CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2011 Sep 1;10(6):757-61. doi: 10.2174/187152711797247786. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2011. PMID: 21838669 Review.
Cited by
-
The quality of informational social support in online health communities: A content analysis of cancer-related discussions.Digit Health. 2023 Feb 20;9:20552076231155681. doi: 10.1177/20552076231155681. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 36825079 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in Alcohol Consumption among Users of an Internet Drug Forum during a COVID-19 Lockdown.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 7;19(21):14585. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114585. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36361469 Free PMC article.
-
Better safe than sorry: a study on older adults' credibility judgments and spreading of health misinformation.Univers Access Inf Soc. 2022 Aug 4:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10209-022-00899-3. Online ahead of print. Univers Access Inf Soc. 2022. PMID: 35966187 Free PMC article.
-
Examining Patterns of Information Exchange and Social Support in a Web-Based Health Community: Exponential Random Graph Models.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):e18062. doi: 10.2196/18062. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32990628 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Answers to Queries among Anonymous Users with Gastroenterological Problems on an Internet Forum.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 6;17(3):1042. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031042. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32041356 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Donaldson L. Expert patients usher in a new era of opportunity for the NHS. BMJ. 2003 Jun 14;326(7402):1279–1280. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7402.1279. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/12805129 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Greenhalgh T. Patient and public involvement in chronic illness: beyond the expert patient. BMJ. 2009;338:629–631. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources