Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jun;15(3):236-51.
doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.15.3.236.

Accuracy of urine specific gravity and osmolality as indicators of hydration status

Robert A Oppliger  1 , Scott A Magnes, LeRoy A Popowski, Carl V Gisolfi
Affiliations

Accuracy of urine specific gravity and osmolality as indicators of hydration status

Robert A Oppliger et al. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2005 Jun.

Abstract

To reduce the adverse consequences of exertion-related and acute intentional dehydration research has focused on monitoring hydration status. This investigation: 1) compared sensitivity of urine specific gravity (Usg), urine osmolality (U(osm)) and a criterion measurement of hydration, plasma osmolality (P(osm)), at progressive stages of acute hypertonic dehydration and 2) using a medical decision model, determined whether Usg or U(osm) accurately reflected hydration status compared to P(osm) among 51 subjects tested throughout the day. Incremental changes in P(osm) were observed as subjects dehydrated by 5% of body weight and rehydrated while Usg and U(osm) showed delayed dehydration-related changes. Using the medical decision model, sensitivity and specificity were not significant at selected cut-offs for Usg and U(osm). At the most accurate cut-off values, 1.015 and 1.020 for Usg and 700 m(osm)/kg and 800 m(osm)/kg for U(osm), only 65% of the athletes were correctly classified using Usg and 63% using U(osm). P(osm), Usg, and U(osm) appear sensitive to incremental changes in acute hypertonic dehydration, however, the misclassified outcomes for Usg and U(osm) raise concerns. Research focused on elucidating the factors affecting accurate assessment of hydration status appears warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types