Editorial Notes
Amendments
2021—Subsec. (d)(2)(B). Pub. L. 116–315, § 2009, inserted “chapter 13 or” after “benefits under”.
Subsec. (d)(5)(E). Pub. L. 116–315, § 2003(b)(2)(B), added subpar. (E).
2003—Subsec. (d)(2)(B). Pub. L. 108–183, § 101(a), substituted “The remarriage after age 57 of the surviving spouse of a veteran shall not bar the furnishing of benefits specified in paragraph (5) to such person as the surviving spouse of the veteran. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, the remarriage after age 55” for “The remarriage after age 55”.
Subsec. (d)(4). Pub. L. 108–183, § 708(a)(1)(A)(i), substituted “paragraph (2)(A) or (3)” for “this subsection” in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (d)(4)(A). Pub. L. 108–183, § 708(a)(1)(A)(ii), substituted “paragraph (2)(A)” for “paragraph (2)”.
Subsec. (d)(5). Pub. L. 108–183, § 708(a)(1)(B), substituted “Paragraphs (2)(A)” for “Paragraphs (2)” in introductory provisions.
2002—Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 107–330 designated existing provisions as subpar. (A) and added subpar. (B).
Subsec. (d)(5)(B). Pub. L. 107–135 substituted “1781” for “1713”.
1999—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 106–117 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added pars. (2) to (5).
1991—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–83, § 4(a)(1), (b)(1), (2)(E), substituted “administered by the Secretary” for “administered by the Veterans’ Administration” and “Secretary” for “Administrator”.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–83, § 4(a)(1), substituted “administered by the Secretary” for “administered by the Veterans’ Administration”.
Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 102–83, § 4(a)(2)(A)(i), substituted “Secretary” for “Veterans’ Administration”.
1990—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 101–508, § 8004(a)(1), designated par. (1) as entire subsec. (d) and struck out pars. (2) and (3) which read as follows:
“(2) The remarriage of the surviving spouse of a veteran shall not bar the furnishing of benefits to such person as the surviving spouse of the veteran if the remarriage has been terminated by death or has been dissolved by a court with basic authority to render divorce decrees unless the Veterans’ Administration determines that the divorce was secured through fraud by the surviving spouse or collusion.
“(3) If a surviving spouse ceases living with another person and holding himself or herself out openly to the public as that person’s spouse, the bar to granting that person benefits as the surviving spouse of the veteran shall not apply.”
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 101–508, § 8004(a)(2), designated par. (1) as entire subsec. (e) and struck out par. (2) which read as follows: “The marriage of a child of a veteran shall not bar the recognition of such child as the child of the veteran for benefit purposes if the marriage has been terminated by death or has been dissolved by a court, with basic authority to render divorce decrees unless the Veterans’ Administration determines that the divorce was secured through fraud by either party or collusion.”
1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–576, § 701(2)(A), substituted “person as the widow or widower” for “woman as the widow”, “such person” for “she”, “the veteran” for “him”, “the veteran’s” for “his”, and “legal widow or widower” for “legal widow”.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–576, § 701(2)(B), substituted “surviving spouse” for “widow”.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–576, § 701(2)(C), substituted “person is or was the spouse” for “woman is or was the wife”.
Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 99–576, § 701(2)(D), substituted “surviving spouse of a veteran shall not bar the furnishing of benefits to such person as the surviving spouse” for “widow of a veteran shall not bar the furnishing of benefits to her as the widow”.
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 99–576, § 701(2)(E), substituted “surviving spouse” for “widow” wherever appearing, and “such person” for “her”.
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 99–576, § 701(2)(F), substituted “surviving spouse” for “widow” wherever appearing, “person” for “man”, “himself or herself” for “herself”, “that person’s spouse” for “his wife”, and “that person” for “her”.
1974—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 93–527 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
1970—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 91–376 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added pars. (2) and (3).
1967—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–77 reduced cohabitation period from five years to one year for purposes of deeming a purported marriage valid and provided for cohabitation for any period of time if a child was born of the purported marriage or was born before the marriage.
1962—Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 87–674 added subsecs. (d) and (e).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Pub. L. 107–330, title I, § 101(c), Dec. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 2821, provided that:
“The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall take effect on the date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 6, 2002].”
Effective Date of 1990 Amendment
Pub. L. 101–508, title VIII, § 8004(b), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–343, provided that:
“The amendments made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply with respect to claims filed after
October 31, 1990, and shall not operate to reduce or terminate benefits to any individual whose benefits were predicated on section
103(d)(2),
103(d)(3), or
103(e)(2) before the effective date of those amendments.”
Retroactive Benefits Prohibited
Pub. L. 108–183, title I, § 101(d), Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2653, provided that:
“No benefit may be paid to any person by reason of the amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) [amending this section and
section 1311 of this title] for any period before the effective date specified in subsection (c) [set out as an Effective Date of 2003 Amendment note above].”
Application for Benefits
Pub. L. 108–183, title I, § 101(e), Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2653, provided that:
“In the case of an individual who but for having remarried would be eligible for benefits under title 38, United States Code, by reason of the amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] and whose remarriage was before the date of the enactment of this Act [
Dec. 16, 2003] and after the individual had attained age 57, the individual shall be eligible for such benefits by reason of such amendment only if the individual submits an application for such benefits to the
Secretary of
Veterans Affairs not later than the end of the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.”
Pub. L. 107–330, title I, § 101(b), Dec. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 2821, as amended by Pub. L. 108–183, title I, § 101(f), Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2653, provided that:
“In the case of an individual who but for having remarried would be eligible for medical care under
section 1781 of title 38, United States Code, and whose remarriage was before the date of the enactment of this Act [
Dec. 6, 2002] and after the individual had attained age 55, the individual shall be eligible for such medical care by reason of the amendments made by subsection (a) [amending this section] only if an application for such medical care is received by the
Secretary of
Veterans Affairs before the end of the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of the
Veterans Benefits Act of 2003 [
Dec. 16, 2003].”
Limitation on Payments
Pub. L. 106–117, title V, § 502(d), Nov. 30, 1999, 113 Stat. 1574, provided that:
“No payment may be made to a person by reason of paragraphs (2) and (3) of
section 103(d) of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), for any period before the effective date specified in subsection (c) [set out as an Effective Date of 1999 Amendment note above].”
Applicability of Amendments
Pub. L. 102–568, title I, § 103, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4322, provided that:
“(a) Exception.—
The amendments made by section 8004 of the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (
105 Stat. 424) [
Pub. L. 101–508,
104 Stat. 1388–343, amending this section] shall not apply to any case in which a legal proceeding to terminate an existing marital relationship was commenced before
November 1, 1990, by an individual described in subsection (b) if that proceeding directly resulted in the termination of such marriage.
“(b) Covered Individuals.—
An individual referred to in subsection (a) is an individual who, but for the marital relationship referred to in subsection (a), would be considered to be the
surviving spouse of a
veteran.”
Pub. L. 102–86, title V, § 502, Aug. 14, 1991, 105 Stat. 424, provided that:
“The amendments made by section 8004 of the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (
Public Law 101–508) [amending this section] shall not apply with respect to any individual who on
October 31, 1990, was a
surviving spouse or child within the meaning of title 38, United States Code, unless after that date that individual (1) marries, or (2) in the case of a
surviving spouse, begins to live with another person while holding himself or herself out openly to the public as that person’s
spouse.”
Reinstatement of Benefits Subsequent to Termination of Relationship or Conduct Restricting Payment of Benefits; Effective Date of Award
Pub. L. 91–376, § 5, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 789, effective January 1, 1971, provided that:
“(a)
If a widow terminates a relationship or conduct which resulted in imposition of a prior restriction on payment of benefits, in the nature of inference or presumption of remarriage, or relating to open and notorious adulterous cohabitation or similar conduct, she shall not be denied any benefits by the
Veterans’ Administration, other than insurance, solely because of such prior relationship or conduct.
“(b)
The effective date of an award of benefits resulting from enactment of subsection (a) of this section shall not be earlier than the date of receipt of application therefor, filed after termination of the particular relationship or conduct and after December 31, 1970.”
