-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance "Choosing the Right Estimator" Graphic (scikit-learn algorithm cheat sheet) #30354
Comments
Pinging @lesteve, @Charlie-XIAO, and @thomasjpfan, as they are more qualified than I am to comment on this. Apologies for the spam! |
IMO, the first thing to do is reduce/precise the scope and try to improve the situation by making incremental PRs. About improving "Choosing the right estimator" map in a minimal way for example some quick recent thoughts #30283 (comment). Better suggestions more than welcome! See #7686 for some attempts at improving the map. There is also #28314. |
Also about having doc that uses estimator tags, we kind of already do it in some places e.g. Estimators handling NaNs is actually generated with a sphinx directive using estimator tags. |
Sorry, let me try to clarify my point (I also edited my initial issue):
Thanks for your feedback! Understood, will try to break down into more digestible tasks and will look into your provided links |
Describe the issue linked to the documentation
In its user guide, scikit-learn offers a Choosing the right estimator which is an interactive scikit-learn algorithm cheat sheet that is great.
When thinking about new features for skore, I thought of enhancing the user guide and have a pedagogical table which, for each estimator, says:
EDIT:
When discussing this with @jeromedockes and @Vincent-Maladiere, they told me about scikit-learn's estimator tags such as
is_regressor
. It seems that that knowledge is already partially in the tags.Suggest a potential alternative/fix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: