The code comment for WorkerType enum from aws-cdk-lib.aws_stepfunctions_tasks.WorkerConfigurationProperty states that If you need to use a WorkerType that doesn't exist as a static member, you can instantiate a WorkerTypeobject, e.g:WorkerType.of('other type').. However, this is incorrect since WorkerType is a enum, not a class. This might not be an overlook since per AWS Glue > Job runs, WorkerType accepts limited set of values. It might be a copy/paste error with excerpt taken from @aws-cdk/aws-glue-alpha > WorkerType class, which might be defined to support dynamic values (it's an experimental module).

Changing the type of property workerType in WorkerConfigurationProperty interface would be a breaking change and unsure if this should be done. Also, this property is used here in call to sfn.FieldUtils.renderObject(), which renders Parameters definition which is outputted in DefinitionString for AWS::StepFunctions::StateMachine resource in generated CFN template as something like - :states:::glue:startJobRun.sync","Parameters":{"JobName":"Test","WorkerType":"G.025X","NumberOfWorkers":3}}}}. There might not be a way to use escape hatch here. Perhaps introducing another property named workerTypeV2 which uses newly defined Worker Type class and deprecating old property workerType would be a feasible solution.

Needs review with the team.

Thanks for the reply. So I understand that a change must be made at the CDK level to make the workerType dynamic, right?

Is there another way to perform this operation?

I tried with the CallAwsService , Glue service, however I have problems with the integration_pattern, it does not accept synchronously (_sfn.IntegrationPattern.RUN_JOB)

Thanks for the support!

The code comment for WorkerType enum from aws-cdk-lib.aws_stepfunctions_tasks.WorkerConfigurationProperty states that If you need to use a WorkerType that doesn't exist as a static member, you can instantiate a WorkerTypeobject, e.g:WorkerType.of('other type').. However, this is incorrect since WorkerType is a enum, not a class. This might not be an overlook since per AWS Glue > Job runs, WorkerType accepts limited set of values. It might be a copy/paste error with excerpt taken from @aws-cdk/aws-glue-alpha > WorkerType class, which might be defined to support dynamic values (it's an experimental module).

Changing the type of property workerType in WorkerConfigurationProperty interface would be a breaking change and unsure if this should be done. Also, this property is used here in call to sfn.FieldUtils.renderObject(), which renders Parameters definition which is outputted in DefinitionString for AWS::StepFunctions::StateMachine resource in generated CFN template as something like - :states:::glue:startJobRun.sync","Parameters":{"JobName":"Test","WorkerType":"G.025X","NumberOfWorkers":3}}}}. There might not be a way to use escape hatch here. Perhaps introducing another property named workerTypeV2 which uses newly defined Worker Type class and deprecating old property workerType would be a feasible solution.

Needs review with the team.

Hello, thanks for creating this issue. I want to double check with you that you are able to workaround the NumberOfWorkers field and it's only the WorkerType property that doesn't work. If you have something like this class where you can use WorkerType.of(...), would that help solve your issue?

Hello, thanks, yeah the problem is only with WorkerType it's a enum not a class so "WorkerType.of" doesn't work. In the other hand NumberOfWorkers it's an integer type and its accept JsonPath.number_at normally so it works correct.
I think that if I can have a WorkerType that can accept "JsonPath.StringAt" it could solve my problem.
Thanks!