|
�
by A Lily Bit
September 11, 2024
from
ALilyBit Website
The UN's
New "Pact for the Future"
and its echoes
of Past Elitist Plans...
The latest iteration of the
Pact for the Future, unveiled on
August 27th, bears an uncanny resemblance to the "recommended
environmental governance actions" peddled by the
Global Challenges
Foundation.
�
This is hardly a coincidence, given the Foundation's
penchant for promoting a brand of sustainability that serves the
interests of the powerful at the expense of the marginalized.
The Pact, slated for adoption at the
Summit of the Future on
September 22nd, is a masterclass in alarmist rhetoric, warning of,
"profound global transformation" and "catastrophic and existential
risks" that threaten to plunge humanity into a "future of persistent
crisis and breakdown"...
But let's not be fooled by the apocalyptic language
- this is merely
an attempt to further entrench the status quo.
The Pact's authors
would have us believe that the "choices we make" are the primary
drivers of these existential risks, conveniently glossing over the
role of systemic injustices and the rapacious pursuit of profit that
underpin our current economic order.
The "terrible suffering" endured by "fellow human beings" is not a
natural phenomenon, but rather a direct consequence of the
neoliberal policies that have been foisted upon us by the very same
elites who now claim to be our "saviors"...
The Pact's proposed "course correction" is little more than a fig
leaf, designed to obscure the fact that the only "future of
persistent crisis and breakdown" we need fear is the one that will
inevitably result from the continued dominance of the same power
structures that have brought us to this precipice.
The United Nations' call for an updated global governance system,
ostensibly to safeguard the interests of present and future
generations, tries yet again,
to
consolidate power and impose a
draconian regime of control...
The proposed "management of complex global shocks" is a euphemism
for the further erosion of national sovereignty and the imposition
of a one-size-fits-all solution to the world's problems,
dictated by
the same unelected bureaucrats who have brought us to the brink of
disaster...
It's no coincidence that the adoption of this new governance
framework is set to take place exactly 33 years after the infamous "Initiative
for Eco-92 Earth Charter" was circulated at a
conference in Des Moines.
This document, penned by the Cobden Clubs Secretariat for World
Order, laid bare the true intentions of the global elite:
to impose
a regime of population control, enforced by the
Security Council
through a combination of economic coercion and military force...
The language is direct and unambiguous:
"the Security Council will
inform all nations that its sufferance on population has ended," and
that "all nations have quotas for REDUCTION on a yearly basis", quotas that will be enforced through "selective or total embargo of
credit, items of trade including food and medicine, or by military
force, when required"...
This is not a recipe for sustainable development or environmental
protection, but,
a blueprint for a
totalitarian world order, in which
the rights and freedoms of individuals are subordinated to the whims
of a self-appointed elite.
The fact that this document was circulated in preparation for the
UN's environmental conference in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 is a
reminder that,
the agenda of population control and global governance
has been a long time in the making,
...and that the latest incarnation
of this agenda, the Pact for the Future, is merely the latest
iteration of a decades-long campaign to impose a dystopian future on
humanity.
The true intentions of the global elite are laid bare in this
chilling document.
�
The Security Council, dominated by the
Anglo-Saxon Major Nation Powers, would assume absolute authority
over all nations, dictating population quotas and enforcing them
through economic strangulation, military force, or any other means
deemed necessary.
�
The notion of national sovereignty would be
reduced to a quaint relic of a bygone era, as the Security Council
asserts its,
"complete legal, military and economic jurisdiction"
over every region of the world...
But that's not all:
the Security Council would also seize control
of all natural resources, including watersheds and great forests, to
be exploited and preserved for the benefit of the Major Nations.
�
This is nothing short of a blueprint for a global kleptocracy, in
which the resources of the many are plundered to enrich the few.
�
The
documents reveals a worldview in which the strong do what they will,
and the weak suffer what they must.
The veil of secrecy has been lifted, ever so slightly, on the
Cobden
Clubs, a think tank that peddled the ideology of the British
"Anglo-Saxon Race system".
�
A leaked document, courtesy of business
consultant George W. Hunt's resourceful companion, has shed light on
the true nature of this elite gathering.
�
The contents of this
document are an important reminder that the pursuit of power and
control knows no bounds, not even those of decency or morality.
The eerie similarities between the Cobden Clubs' musings and the
recent proposals from,
-
the Global Challenges Foundation
-
the Potsdam
Institute for Climate Impact Research
-
the United Nations
University,
...are a stark warning that the more things change, the more
they remain the same.
The world's population has ballooned from 5.4 billion to 8.2 billion
since 1991, and yet, the solutions proffered by these
self-proclaimed "guardians of the planet" are nothing short of
draconian.
�
The gloves are off, and the true intentions of these
organizations are laid bare.
The joint proposal from these organizations is a masterclass in
doublespeak, a cynical exercise in rebranding the same old power
grab as a benevolent effort to "protect" humanity.
The "global commons" concept, once a noble idea, has been hijacked
to justify,
the collective management of the very air we breathe, the
water we drink, and the land we inhabit.
�
The atmosphere,
hydrosphere, biosphere, lithosphere, and cryosphere are all to be
managed, controlled, and dictated by a cabal of self-appointed
elites.
The question is,
who gets to decide what constitutes a
"dangerous tipping point", and who will be the beneficiaries of this
grand experiment in global governance?
The siren song of global governance beckons, promising a harmonious
symphony of regulation and control, all in the name of protecting
the "planetary commons".
�
But scratch beneath the surface, and the
true intentions of this grand design become apparent.
The proposed "nested" governance structure, with its multiple layers
of regulation and oversight by a global governance body, is simply a
blueprint for a totalitarian regime...!
�
The fragmentation of national
sovereignty, the siloed approaches to environmental protection, are
to be replaced by a monolithic, one-size-fits-all solution, dictated
by a self-appointed elite...!
And who are the architects of this grand design?
�
The Global
Challenges Foundation, founded by billionaire financier
L�szl�
Szombatfalvy, with its stated aim of developing,
"improved global
decision-making models".
Improved, that is, for the benefit of the
global elite, not the masses.
The proposed solution to this manufactured "problem" of "overpopulation"
is a chilling example of the totalitarian impulse at work.
A new
global treaty, with countries forced to set population targets every
half decade, and a plan to achieve them, is nothing short of a
recipe for demographic engineering on a global scale.
The echoes of
eugenics and social control are deafening, and the
question must be asked:
who gets to decide who lives, who dies, and
who reproduces?
The answer, of course, is the self-appointed
guardians of the planet, who will stop at nothing to impose their
twisted vision on humanity.
The Global Challenges Foundation appears to be a Trojan horse for a
far more insidious agenda.
�
Szombatfalvy's dalliances with the
Club
of Rome's president Anders Wijkman, and his largesse to
The Overpopulation Project (TOP), betray a deep-seated affinity for the
Malthusian worldview.
This is a philosophy that views humanity as a
plague upon the earth, and seeks to impose draconian controls on
population growth...
The eerie resonance between Szombatfalvy's views and those of the
"British Race Patriots" and "living sponsors of the will of the
great Cecil Rhodes" is more than coincidental.
�
The latter's
"Initiative for Eco-92 Earth Charter" is a clarion call for a New
World Order, in which,
the "Major Nations of the Security Council"
would dictate the terms of global governance.
�
This is the recipe for
a global oligarchy, in which the interests of the powerful few would
be paramount...!
The involvement of the Royal Institute of International Affairs
(RIIA
or Chatham House) and its American counterpart, the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR), adds another layer of complexity to this narrative.
These organizations, spawned by the
Round Table Movement, were
designed to further the imperial ambitions of Cecil Rhodes and the
British elite.
�
Their ultimate goal,
a world federation of nations,
is a euphemism for a global empire, with the Anglo-American axis at
its helm.
The notion that these organizations are merely "benign" think tanks,
dedicated to promoting global cooperation, is a risible fiction. In
reality, they are the velvet-gloved instruments of a power elite,
determined to shape the world in their image.
As CFR-historian and Georgetown University professor Carroll Quigley
wrote in
Tragedy and Hope...:
"The chief aims of this elaborate, semi-secret organization were
largely commendable:
-
to coordinate the international activities and
outlooks of all the English-speaking world into one (which would
largely, it is true, be that of the London group)
-
to work to
maintain the peace
-
to help backward, colonial, and underdeveloped
areas to advance toward stability, law and order, and prosperity,
...along lines somewhat similar to those taught at Oxford and the
University of London."
The rarefied world of the power elite is a realm of paradoxes, where
"gracious and cultured gentlemen" with a penchant for the finer
things in life, harbor a Machiavellian streak.
�
Quigley's
characterization of these individuals as being,
"much concerned with
the freedom of expression of minorities and the rule of law for all",
...is a masterful understatement, for it is precisely this fa�ade of
benevolence that conceals their true intentions.
�
Their desire for
anonymity, however, is a telling indicator of the duplicitous nature
of their endeavors.
The Stimson Center, a key player in the preparations for the
Summit
of the Future, is a veritable nexus of power, with its founders,
Barry Blechman and Michael Krepon, being CFR members.
The center's eponymous patron, Henry Stimson, was a stalwart of the CFR, and his tenure as
US Secretary of War during World War II only
serves to underscore the organization's profound influence on the
corridors of power.
The CFR's incestuous relationship with the
Trilateral Commission
think tank, founded by
David Rockefeller, is a case in point.
Every CFR chairman since Rockefeller has been a member of TriCom, a
veritable revolving door of power brokers.
The current CFR chair,
David Rubenstein, is a prime example of this
phenomenon, with his dual roles as
Carlyle Group chairman and
World
Economic Forum (WEF) board trustee.
This latter organization, the main
official front for these groups' activities, is a veritable
clearinghouse for the power elite's global agenda.
�
The threads of
influence that bind these entities together form a complex web of
power, one that is designed to ensnare and manipulate the global
polity.
�
The
Fourth World Wilderness Congress, a gathering of the
power elite in 1987, was a revelatory experience for George W. Hunt,
a volunteer who stumbled upon a cabal of influential individuals
hell-bent on reshaping the world in their image:
�
�
The conference was a veritable who's who of the Trilateral
Commission, with luminaries such as,
...in attendance.
�
The presence of IMF president Michel Camdessus and World Bank
president Barber B. Conable, Jr. only served to underscore the
gravity of the proceedings.
As Hunt listened in on the discussions, he was struck by the
cynicism and callousness of the attendees.
�
The Canadian investment
banker David Lank's remarks, in particular, were a stark
illustration of the contempt with which these individuals viewed the
common man.
Lank's suggestion that the agenda of the conference be "sold" to the
public through a process that bypassed democracy, lest it,
"devour
far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder,
unfortunately, which populates the earth,"
...was a chilling admission
of the elite's disdain for the masses.
The use of the term "cannon fodder" to describe the general
population was a particularly egregious example of the dehumanizing
language employed by these individuals, who viewed the world as a
mere chessboard to be manipulated for their own ends.
The Fourth World Wilderness Congress was, in effect, a gathering of
the high priests of the
New World Order, who saw themselves as the
sole arbiters of the planet's destiny.
Theirs was a vision of a
world in which the masses were reduced to mere pawns, to be herded
and controlled by a self-appointed elite.
The conference was a reminder that the
power elite's obsession with
environmental protection was merely a Trojan horse,
for a far more
sinister agenda, one that threatened the very fabric of democracy
and individual freedom...
David Rockefeller wrote in the conference book
For the Conservation of Earth (Part
1 -
Part 2):
"To place all of the blame for unacceptable environmental behavior
on industrialization or large corporations, however, is clearly
grossly inaccurate.
�
Much of the devastation of the world's
environment, especially in today's world, is due to individuals who
are without power and who are trapped in grinding poverty.
�
Deforestation, for instance, is often more the product of actions
taken out of desperation by the poor rather than through
irresponsible exploitation by industrial giants.
�
Some 70 percent of
the world's rapidly growing population currently relies on wood for
energy to cook and heat.
�
The consequences of this fact are little
short of disastrous."
The
ultra-rich superclass, with their
Olympian detachment from the
struggles of the common man,
appears to harbor a profound disdain
for the poor, whom they view as nothing more than a nuisance to be
managed and controlled.
�
The poor, in their eyes, are the embodiment of all that is wrong
with the world - polluting, carbon-emitting, and destructive of the
natural order.
�
They are the "other", the enemy of the Earth, and
must be governed by the "enlightened philosopher kings" who know
what is best for them.
The
Trilateral Commission's report,
Beyond Interdependence - The Meshing the Worlds Economy and the
Worlds Ecology, is a manifesto for this new
world order, in which the "sustainable business practices" of the
ultra-rich will save the world from the ravages of the poor.
It is a cynical and self-serving document, designed to justify the
continued dominance of the elite over the masses.
�
The report's
authors, no doubt, see themselves as the guardians of the planet,
tasked with the "noble mission" of saving the world from the
destructive tendencies of the poor.
The first World Wilderness Congress, held in South Africa in 1977,
was a seminal event in the development of this new world order.
�
The
presence of French-Swiss banker
Edmond de Rothschild and South
African conservationist Ian Player was no coincidence, given the
long history of collaboration between the
Rothschild family
and the South African diamond company
De Beers.
�
The choice of location, too, was likely deliberate, given the role
of Cecil Rhodes in creating a monopoly on the world's diamond trade.
Rhodes, the arch-imperialist, had a vision of a world in which
British rule was supreme, and he was willing to do whatever it took
to achieve it.
�
His "Secret Society" (The
Round Table), established with the goal of
promoting British interests and laying the foundation for a new
world order, was a precursor to the modern-day elite's obsession
with global governance.
The fact that Rhodes was able to expropriate land from black
Africans and instigate the colonization of Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe)
with impunity is a stark reminder of the brutal and exploitative
nature of imperialism.
�
And yet, this is the legacy that
the
modern-day elite seeks to build upon, with their talk of
"sustainable development" and "global citizenship"...
�
�
�
|
