�
by Richard Enos
October 12,
2018
from
Collective-Evolution Website
Italian
version
�
�
�
�
In Brief
The Facts: There is a growing consensus amongst long-time
alternative news commentators that military
tribunals for
Deep State criminals will be
convened soon.
Reflect On: How would our lives change if the Deep State was
defeated? Do we still have important work to do
rather than just waiting for it to happen?
There is a growing consensus in the narrative within the alternative
news community (commentators, their insiders, and members in
general) that has become too big, too coherent to ignore.
�
Even among the more
skeptical of the commentators who have long bemoaned that real
tangible action of disclosure and legal proceedings seems to be
taking forever, there is now a real optimism, even a certainty among
several, that this time things will be different.
The broad strokes of the narrative go as follows:
Donald Trump was
originally asked by a military and political Alliance of
patriots to run for office, and the election of Donald Trump in
2016 represented the triumph of this Alliance over the Deep
State and their chosen candidate
Hillary Clinton.
�
Trump ran on an
anti-establishment platform that resonated with awakening voters
as Trump promised to 'drain the swamp' - essentially indicating
that crimes that were being committed against the American
people would be brought to light and the Deep State insiders
perpetrating them would be brought to justice.
Since
Donald Trump took
office, the Alliance has been working meticulously to convene secret
Grand Juries to indict Deep State criminals, keeping the indictments
sealed until everything lines up to enable them to make mass arrests
and begin military tribunals.
�
The confirmation of
Justice Kavanaugh seems to pave the way for legal support
from the Supreme Court, as needed, to authorize actions that will
get the ball rolling such as the release of unredacted FISA
Documents which will lay bare the complicity of key players
gumming up the works such as US Deputy Attorney General Rod
Rosenstein, which will lead to their removal from power and
finally
end Deep State obfuscation.
�
�
�
�
What The Commentators
Are Saying
There are many commentators in the alternative news community who
have been at this game for a long time, and to be at this game for a
long time, one needs to be in the habit of being circumspect and
objective when it comes to making unverifiable claims about actions
that will soon come to pass.
�
There is a sense, though,
within the community, that insider testimony, outside evidence, and
the sometimes cryptic political maneuvers and messages that are now
taking place on a regular basis are all converging into the
narrative described above, such that it is no longer a question of
if the Deep State will be removed from power, but when.
The similarity of opinion is striking, as you will see from the
small handful of comments below that I've grabbed from some recent
posts and videos:
'You're going to see
arrests, and you're going to see indictments, and then you're
gonna see convictions, and some of them will spend the next 10
years just going from their cell to the courtroom, before
they're even tried and convicted, which they will be.
�
They are
scared to death.'
John B. Wells
'The prosecution of these criminals is set to finally start now
that the U.S. military government backing President Donald Trump
has secured a majority on the Supreme Court with
the
confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Pentagon sources say.
"Attorney General
Jeff Sessions has already met with the real special
prosecutor, U.S. Attorney John Huber in Utah, so that the
57,000 indictments may be unsealed," the sources explain.
�
"The seating of
Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court should unleash
declassification of FISA and other documents as well as
military tribunals," the sources say.'
Ben Fulford
'The Deep State's on the run, the Deep State is panicked and
we're about to enter a rule of law reset.
-
The first
phase: Kavanaugh.
-
The second
phase: Declassification.
-
<The third
phase:> Military Tribunals will go into effect for the
high-level players when it comes to sedition and
treason.'
Dave Janda
'The Deep State is terrified of military tribunals.
�
We are still in a
state of war. Technically, it is legal right now for military
tribunals to take anybody who is considered an agent of a
foreign power and try them under a military tribunal rather than
in a US court of law. I think that is the bottom line.
�
Kavanaugh is about
helping Trump take down the Deep State.'
Robert David Steele
I suppose the question
is,
is this
near-certainty and optimism justified?
We have to face the fact
that such 'imminent' predictions have been given alternative news
air-time from many different corners of legal and military activism
for many years now.
�
Some of the most vocal
commentators lost their popularity and their credibility as a
consequence when historic actions did not unfold as predicted. And
information from anonymous insiders is difficult to completely
trust, because it's, well, anonymous, and therefore unverifiable.
�
So we have to ask the
question as to whether these people are mostly reading each other's
mail, or if there is enough substantial and verifiable evidence for
us to put stock in the claim that a Deep State takedown is underway.
�
�
�
The Verifiable
Evidence
Much of the cohesion in the alternative news community stems from
the 'Q-Anon' phenomena.
�
For many analysts, the
consistency, reliability, insight, and authoritative voice of the
posts of Q-Anon on the 4Chan and 8Chan online forums have been
enough to convince them that Q-Anon represents a group of White
House insiders, probably made up of or informed by 'white hat'
political, military, and intelligence personnel that have direct
access to President Donald Trump, if indeed he is not directly part
of this group.
�
Q refers in his drops to
all of the pieces of evidence below and often helps to create a
context that points to their significance.
�
�
�
�
Executive Order
#13818
On December 21st, 2017, Donald Trump signed the 'Executive
Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human
Rights Abuse or Corruption.'
�
Those well-versed in the
crimes and manipulations of the Deep State find, in this document,
an incontestable effort to seek to reveal and prosecute the kinds of
crimes that have been ignored or hidden from public view by previous
administrations.
�
As Dr. Michael Salla
notes in
his article,
While the mainstream
media has largely ignored Trump's Executive Order, the
alternative media has been paying close attention. Many have
noted the Executive Order is far more significant than what it
appears to be on the surface.
�
Rather than just
freezing the financial resources of foreign citizens linked to
the Russian sphere of influence, as it superficially appears to
do, it is really targeted at members of the "Deep State" (aka
Cabal or Illuminati) that have been involved in human
trafficking, pedophilia and systemic corruption all over the
planet.
This interpretation is
supported by the words and actions of Attorney General Jeff
Sessions.
�
Again, there are signs
that this administration is willing to speak tough about and bring
to light the types of crimes, including human and drug trafficking
and dark web activities, that are being perpetrated by the Deep
State and that previous administrations dared not make a mention of.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions hosts law enforcement officials from
around the Western world at the DOJ's Robert F. Kennedy building in
Washington D.C., to discuss ways our nations can work together to
combat transnational criminal organizations that,
"are so powerful and
so wealthy" that they "threaten the very sovereignty of
nation-states."
Sessions does not specify
exactly which organizations he is referring to, but he does mention
drug and human trafficking, the dark web, and terrorism.
"The day I was sworn
in as Attorney General, the president ordered me to focus on
dismantling transnational criminal organizations at the DOJ,"
Sessions said.
�
"We've been faithful
to that order."
source
Sessions has also spoken
directly about the fight against child sex trafficking, and his
words about tackling the crimes associated with the Deep State have
been backed up by actions, as noted in this article about 'Operation
Broken Heart', 'Justice
Task Forces Arrest 2,300 Online Child Sex Suspects.'
�
�
�
The Sealed
Indictments
Much of the confidence in the imminent Deep State takedown rests on
the incontestable fact that there has been an unusually high number
of sealed indictments that have been created since the early days of
the Trump presidency.
�
These sealed indictments
can be found on the official government website pacer.gov, which
represents the 'Public Access to Court Electronic Records.'
�
There have been
researcher teams taking the trouble to count the number of sealed
indictments entered on pacer.gov every month.
�
Based on the update
below, for example, it is noted that there have been 55,677 sealed
indictments created between November 2017 and August 2018.
Why this is considered significant is because there have been on
average over 5000 new indictments created each month, while the norm
is noted to be a little over a thousand per year.
Adding fuel to the fire is Q, who points us to the idea that the
appointment of federal prosecutor John Huber to work in concert with
Inspector General Michael Horowitz is what is allowing for the
possibility that so many sealed indictments are being created, each
of which require the convening of a secret grand jury.
�
�
�
As noted in
the article Q refers to,
President Trump
should be very happy that Sessions chose this route of
appointing Huber, who has the power to seek indictments and
prosecute cases, and teamed him up with Horowitz, who has 470
investigators at his disposal, if the president wants to see
swift and decisive action.
The validity of the
calculation of sealed indictments and the speculation about their
true purpose have been brought into question by some.
�
In a future article, I
hope to work more in-depth into what we know about these sealed
indictments and if the assumptions about them are correct.
�
Suffice it to say for
here, there are a lot more sealed indictments today than there were
before the Trump presidency, and it seems reasonable at this
juncture to believe these sealed indictments point to a
significantly large government-driven law enforcement operation
going on right now.
�
�
�
Lindsey
Graham's Questions to Brett Kavanaugh
During the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, Senator Lindsey
Graham went through a line of questioning which many are casting
as a dramatic foreshadowing of events soon to come:
GRAHAM: Let's talk
about the law in war. Is there a body of law called the law of
armed conflict?
KAVANAUGH: There is - there is such a body, Senator.
�
GRAHAM: Is there a
body of law that's called the basic criminal law?
KAVANAUGH: Yes, Senator.
�
GRAHAM: Are there
differences between those two bodies of law?
KAVANAUGH: Yes, Senator.
�
GRAHAM: From an
American citizen's point of view, do your constitutional rights
follow you? If you're in Paris, does the Fourth Amendment
protect you as an American from your own government?
KAVANAUGH: From your own government, yes.
�
GRAHAM: OK. So if
you're in Afghanistan, do your constitutional rights protect you
against your own government?
KAVANAUGH: If you're an American in Afghanistan, you have
constitutional rights against the U.S. government.
�
GRAHAM: Is there a
long-standing�
KAVANAUGH: That's - that's long-settled law.
�
GRAHAM: Isn't there
also a long-settled law that - it goes back to Eisentrager case,
I can't remember the name of it.
KAVANAUGH: Yes, Johnson vs. Eisentrager.
�
GRAHAM: Right - that
American citizens who collaborate with the enemy have considered
enemy combatants?
KAVANAUGH: They can be.
�
GRAHAM: Can be.
KAVANAUGH: They can be. They're often - some - they're sometimes
criminally prosecuted, sometimes treated in the military sense.
�
GRAHAM: Well let's
talk about can be. I think the �
KAVANAUGH: Under a Supreme Court precedent �
�
GRAHAM: Right.
KAVANAUGH: Just want to make - yeah.
�
GRAHAM: There's a
Supreme Court decision that said that American citizens who
collaborated with Nazi saboteurs were tried by the military. Is
that correct?
KAVANAUGH: That is correct.
�
GRAHAM: I think a
couple of them were executed.
KAVANAUGH: Yeah.
�
GRAHAM: So if anybody
doubts there's a long-standing history in this country that your
constitutional rights follow you wherever you go, but you don't
have a constitutional right to turn on your own government and
collaborate with the enemy of the nation.
This exchange is unusual
because on its own it does not seem as though Lindsay Graham is
asking these questions to know about Kavanaugh's opinion on the
matter, but rather seems to be trying to educate the public as to
the difference between basic criminal law and the law of armed
conflict.
�
More specifically, he
appears to be sending a message out to perpetrators of the law of
armed conflict - which includes those who have 'collaborated with
the enemy' against American citizens - that they can and will be
prosecuted in military tribunals.
�
�
�
The Body of
Evidence
Taken separately, these pieces of evidence and others I haven't
mentioned are not enough to justify confidence that the removal from
power of a force that has served as our authority all our lives is
about to happen right in front of our eyes.
�
However taken all
together, many commentators with years of experience feel that they
all contribute to a hidden reality that finally, humanity has gained
the power to bring the crimes and obfuscations perpetrated by this
authority we call the Deep State to light.
We have seen that these crimes are rife in virtually all fields of
human endeavor:
finance, politics,
education, health, entertainment, religion, science, and the
list goes on...
These have been
perpetrated, it would seem, all in the name of control and
enslavement.
�
In the words of the late
William Thompkins,
"We've been lied to
about everything."
And while some of the
information will be difficult for us to hear, the truth about these
matters is indeed poised to set us free.
�
�
�
The Takeaway
While there is no question that an actual takedown of the the Deep
State (the cabal, the Illuminati) would be a monumental event in the
history of the world, this does not mean that we need to be holding
our breath and disengaging from our own personal work waiting for it
to occur.
�
If we believe we will
find healing in the arraignment and conviction of Deep State
criminals, as we lustfully await our opportunity to spit on and
condemn those who have had power over us, we have somewhat missed
the point.
Certainly we must exert all effort to remove these forces from
power; but it remains important for us reach for neutrality and
equanimity in the process, and step back from raw vengeance. It is
the perfect time to stay alert and recognize the purpose that this
darkness holds for us, lest we be enveloped by it.
�
As I alluded to in my
Lucifer series, the darkness sparks our awakening and our evolution.
�
Lets ensure it serves us
in that way.
�
�
�
�
Additional Information
�
� |