|
�
by Joaquin Flores
November 11,
2020
from
Strategic-Culture Website
Spanish
version
�
�
�
�
� Photo: Wikimedia
�
�
And the
Lord came down
to see the city
and the tower,
which the
children of men builded.
Genesis 11:5
�
�
The Great Reset
�
The 4th Industrial Revolution
�
The 4th
Turning
�
The Great Awakening and Artificial Intelligence...
These are the real themes
that are shaping the socio-political, cultural, and ideological
landscape of our lives in 2020.
The push for lockdown and quarantine towards
a Great Reset is
increasingly understood by critics as program of mass enslavement
and collective punishment, population reduction, presented within
the trappings progressive talking points.
�
In our last piece on the
Great Reset, 'Whose Great Reset? The Fight for Our Future -
Technocracy vs. the Republic', we confronted the Orwellian nature of
the term itself, showing that the ostensibly technocratic new
proposal was being made in a way that appears to short-cut the
decision making processes of sovereign states as well as democratic
processes within republics.
In the eternal words of the Irish author, Oscar Wilde,
'Life
imitates art far more than art imitates life'.
"That we live in a time where
the plans of the elite are more openly
and more brazenly spelled out, in fiction, in public mythology, in
culture, and are manufactured in a way entirely out of the hands of
the vast majority of people whose lives will be forever changed,
likely for the worse, is hands-down the real catastrophe of our
time."
There is a strange, if little known fact about the lived lives of
prisoners...
�
Now that humanity faces the real daunting probability of
a lockdown regime on the flimsy pretext of
a virus with a 99.9%
survival rate, we need to understand something about prisoners and
the Great Awakening.
�
The Great Awakening is the product of,
how
actually imprisoned people respond to imprisonment...
Just as a person
deprived of vision develops an outstanding sense of smell and
hearing, a person deprived of physical freedom develops a profound
and reified spiritual or supernatural freedom, which is
the
awakening.
In a strange twist of fate, the more that people are
locked down, the more they awaken.
We are caught between two seeming contradictions which in fact
reconcile each other.
On the one hand we understand that everything
happens for a reason and that justice always prevails in the end.
�
On the other hand we know that the possible destiny that we can
have only comes at the cost of tremendous struggle, self-discipline,
moral fortitude, and sacrifice.
This much is the mindset of the
awakened, of the political soldier, in the course of the fight
of the Great Awakening and within the Age of the 4th Turning.
�
�
Censoring
Facts, Reifying Fiction
Last month, the father of UK PM Boris Johnson, Stanley Johnson, was
caught at a second time in public,
not wearing a mask.
Was he
unaware that there is a 'highly contagious' pandemic, one which
affects his age group in particular?
�
Does he not know what is going
on in the UK and around the world?
Or does he know something that the rest of us do not?
The folly that
it may be, it came to be learned that it was Stanley Johnson who
wrote the dystopian fiction novel,
The Virus, one that describes
much of what we are living through today.
�
He is also the author of
World Population and the United Nations - Challenge and Response, a
non-fiction primer on the subject described in its title.
�
In The
Virus,
in both the narrative arc of the novel, and in his own introduction,
Stanley Johnson lays out the necessity of a virus in the eyes of an
insidious elite to curb population growth.
�
This coincidence with the
actual
Agenda 21/2030 of the UN on population control, and the
commitment of vaccine advocate and
WHO beneficiary
Bill Gates to
decrease world population, is absolutely disconcerting and raises
questions about further 'coincidences' that have since arisen.
�
This of
course includes the very position that Boris Johnson holds today in
managing the real-life version of the virus in Britain today.
But is this a mere matter of coincidence, or not...?
�
That question has
become the subject of a vigorous debate, with one side of the debate
arguing that it is not a coincidence being tremendously censored by
social media and effectively barred from giving their side, and the
other side being the only voice one hears and sees across social and
legacy media.
The fact of this censorship over this question alone appears to lend
credence to those being censored, as is often the unintended
consequence of censorship, and perhaps the last hope of man.
This is an astonishing example of life imitating art, and now with
an increasing public awareness on the relationship between vaccines
and infertility, we arrive at the predicate to the film 'Children of
Men'.
Children of Men depicts a world in global chaos, war, strife, open
street battles between members of quasi-governmental forces and
various radical and religious cults, a jihadist military push
through the streets of Paris, a paramilitary junta, the effects of
mass migration, open air prisons, and worse.
This has taken hold of
most of Europe and presumably the world.
�
This breakdown seems to
have been the product of a global pandemic of infertility of an
unknown origin.
A film from 2008, anyone seeing the film today would
instantly recognize the scenes as approximating real-life footage
seen on the news in the world of 2020.
The global infertility crisis creates a pervasive sense of
insecurity, the impossibility of a stock market, and a conscious
sense of impending doom and nihilist response on the part of elites.
Taken together with Johnson's 'The Virus', we can make a rather
educated guess how such an outcome would manifest in a reality where
life is imitating art:
the virus or the vaccine created to the cure
the virus, in fact
lends towards infertility...
It isn't difficult to make such a guess, for the reason that, day by
day, we see this dystopia becoming our everyday reality.
�
It has
become a matter of fact much more than of fiction.
This compels us to approach, soberly, a reassessment of the concept
of progress and where it leads
The themes of a virus used as a predicate for both population
control and a total social transformation, as we wrote about in
'Whose
Great Reset', is one which mirrors the effects of war:
both
in terms of a mass casualty event and the need to 'build back
better' after an apparent socio-economic collapse induced either by
the calamity or by the government's heavy-handed response.
�
The
Ideological State Apparatus of Technocratic Late Modernity
For any number of years, social critics and public philosophers have
raised concerns about the never-ending rise of the technocratic and
futurist cult of late modernity.
�
In many ways, this is caught up
with the entire ideological project of our epoch, as a left-fa�ade
over a technocratic thought-police-state has been weaponized as what
Louis Althusser had called the
Ideological State Apparatus (ISA) in
his landmark text of the same name, "Id�ologie et appareils
id�ologiques d'�tat - Notes pour une recherche".
We live in a time where the plans of the elite are,
more openly
and more brazenly spelled out, in fiction, in public mythology, in
culture, and are manufactured in a way entirely out of the hands of
the vast majority of people whose lives will be forever changed,
likely for the worse, is hands-down the real catastrophe of our
time...
For generations, citizens were bombarded with
futurist and
technocratic motifs, where people were encouraged to naively project
their own goodness onto the aims of political and corporate leaders,
and scientists, even while this goodness had not been proven or
established.
�
The white lab-coat had become synonymous not only with
trust, but with good intentions, and in that sense replaced the
priest's frock and black robe.
This has cultivated a fertile soil
for the likes of the Dr.
Anthony Fauci and his ilk.
�
This has
culminated in the now open implementation of a so-called '4th
Industrial Revolution', a progressivist framework wrapped within the
sociology of Marx but absent its humanism and emancipatory
components - a 'technocratic Marxism of elites'.
The church of the progress myth has characterized much of the
socio-political discourse of the last century.
�
It has been one which
has prepared several generations to accept the 'challenges of
change' as a foregone necessity, towards the forging of a 'brave new
world'.
�
It has served as the underlying assumption of the three most
impactful ideologies of the 20th century:
-
liberalism
-
fascism
-
communism
So many apple-carts have been overturned along the way
towards some combination of those ends, that today there are
hundreds of millions of people who have never seen an apple cart
with their own eyes.
The Ideological State Apparatus has proscribed that criticisms of
real-existing policies, plans, and commitments at the level of
the
United Nations, such as
Agenda 21 and
Agenda 2030, are censored across social
media.
�
The censorship itself gives credence to the 'no coincidence'
side of the present debate, because the aim of global population
reduction is not only explicit, but central.
�
The established
ideological apparatus proscribes that questioning the agenda is
'science denial', and 'far-right conspiracy', which are the
double-plus ungood thought-crimes of our day.
�
Central to the
ideological apparatus were the cultural and political tropes which
thematically dovetailed with cultural and supply-line globalization
within the framework of first-world service-based economies, itself
founded on the premise of planned-obsolescence.
Population reduction however is an open goal of elites and their
global governance institutions, and all that is contentious is the
idea that the same governments that lied about the pretexts for the
wars in Iraq and Vietnam, which then went on to murder millions of
innocent people, may be lying again today about the methods they may
use towards that end.
And yet the past methods of population control such as warfare of
the total war type, are unacceptable for elites today because of the
specter of a nuclear holocaust that would also contaminate life for
the elites themselves.
�
Johnson is not only aware of this, but is
explicit in his introduction to 'The Virus'.
�
We can also include
that war will result in one side or the other being blamed at a time
of great collusion between world powers, but yet a global pandemic
seems to be an act of god - when in fact perhaps it is the outcome
of man playing at god.
The
Ideological State Apparatus
(ISA) began to mutate in the late 1970's,
absorbing, deforming and then projecting back onto a society a
mutated form of the very same protest radicalism which previously
challenged the older Ideological State Apparatus.
This new ISA was
characterized by a new social morality, which delivered the now
pervasive cult of political correctness.
�
This ideological
authoritarianism is one where slavery and self-harm are virtue
signals, and this cultural shift towards public flagellation made
possible the idea that
lockdown, quarantine, and
mask wearing was a
sign of 'virtue' more so than 'health'.
�
Without this change in the ISA
over the past few decades, there could have never been a new normal...
�
�
�
Video
�
�
It has become
an unquestioned "fact" that the world is doomed by vast
overpopulation.
�
From children's textbooks to apocalyptic
movies the narrative is unquestioningly pushed.
�
But how
exactly do we know when and if there is a breaking
point?
�
Conclusion
As we have laid out the surface of the problem and begun to hint at
the necessary course of solutions, in Part II we will dig deeper
into the problem and flesh out what a just order would look like.
�
In Part II, we will look
at the origins of the social contract and the problem of free men
versus the growing bureaucratic form, in history.
�
This will set us up to
look at why at the philosophical level our present elites have
landed on misanthropy and genocide as a human population reduction
program, as the best possible solution.
�
Finally we will explain
that while a 4th industrial revolution will come either way, that
population reduction and slavery is not a necessary component of it.
�
Rather, that it is up to
free men to determine what that will look like and we will sketch
out its actual functions...
�
�
�
|
