�
�
by Susanne Posel
June 30, 2012
from
OccupyCorporatism Website
�
�
�
�
�
The
Tellus Institute, a non-profit
sustainability research organization, created �sophisticated human
population models� with their PoleStar project (PSP).
�
Using data provided to
them by,
...they analyzed
parameters such as energy consumption, land use and pollution.
The PSP predicts simulated outcomes that are being used to shape
international policy.
�
Richard Rosen, executive vice president of Tellus
claims that if we are to make this world a pleasant place to live, we should,
�get going immediately. There�s no leisurely way.�
Geophysicists at the
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research states
that only 2.82 billion people could be �packed onto the planet� with all
other land reserved for food cultivation only.
The PSP infers 4 possible scenarios that will come to pass because of the
growing human population.
�
1 - Market Forces
If we continue �business as usual�, by the year 2100, we will see the poorer
regions suffer from the growth of industry. Environmental problems abound
and become more acute.
We can expect family planning policies that restrict the right to have
children. The expectation of population growth would be pushing the
boundaries of sustainability; being 9.3 billion.
With more humans on the planet will come income disparity. The average take
home pay could be as low as 5cents per dollar earned.
Water securitization would be implemented to ensure water stress is reduced
to an acceptable minimum. However by 2100, water shortages could reach as
high as 50%.
Under strict food securitization policies, less than 6% of the world�s
population could be affected by starvation.
�
�
2 - Policy Reform
In this scenario, by 2100, governments have adhered to
the UN�s climate
change targets and sustainability goals; however economic growth is hindered
and stronger policies must be put in place to curb the affects.
With family planning services enforced onto the population, only 8.4 billion
people would be straining natural resources.
The average income would only be worth 11 cents on the dollar. Expected
water shortages would force 23% of the world�s water resources to be
controlled by governmental policies.
International mandates controlling food would result in only 3% of the
world�s population to suffer from hunger.
�
�
3 - Fortress World
By 2100 this global society would be controlled by an authoritarian
government in order to control distribution of resources.
�
Economic, social and environmental downgrades
would cause the wealthy to retreat to protected areas; leaving the masses to
fend for themselves in the wastelands.
Implementing family planning services would be near impossible, leaving the
global population to rise to 10.2 billion. The average income would be
reduced to 2 cents on the dollar. Water securitization would control 46% of
the world�s water supplies.
Global hunger could soar to nearly 15% of the entire population.
�
�
4 - The Great Transition
By 2100, if the world�s societies were to radically alter their
environmental preservation policies and prioritize social memes to reflect
those of the UN, the planet could live in a world of social equality and
cooperation.
Family planning would have successfully controlled population growth to a
stable 7.3 billion worldwide. Take home income could be raised to 36 cents
on the dollar.
With less people, water securitization could be kept to a minimum of 21%.
The incidents of global hunger would be negligible.
�
Regardless of global population decline, the UN�s Populations Fund (UNFPA)
is calling for more family planning services in order to further decrease
fertility rates worldwide.
The UNFPA
released a report in 2011 that erroneously claimed that the
world�s population will rise to 9.15 billion by 2050.
�
In response, the UNFPA
has focused efforts on,
"STD immunizations, abortion and contraception more
readily available under the non-discriminant term, family planning�.
Their concept for the future appears to be miserable without the submission
of all humans on planet Earth to their globalist Elite schemes. They are
quite good at using fear to justify their policies to elected officials,
governments and average citizens.
�
Their continued success will surely lead to the
worst of possible futures.
�
�
