�
by Susanne Posel
Contributor
May 2, 2012
from
ActivistPost Website
�
�
Susanne Posel is
the Chief Editor of
Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative
news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it
actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately
funded mainstream media. |
�
�
�
�
The global Elite have many different clubs they frequent where they discuss
plans to achieve their plan for global governance.
�
One of these is
the Royal
Society, a 350-year-old establishment comprised of global Elitists who are
promoting the
hoax of man-made climate change which masks their depopulation
agenda.
�
They are also integral in coercing elected officials into supporting
global carbon taxing that will funnel exorbitant amounts of money into the
hands of the Elite to fund their march toward global governance.
They have published a report on their website entitled
People
and The Planet.
According to the Royal Society,
�the world�s human population, coupled with
unprecedented levels of consumption present profound challenges to human
health and well being, and the natural environment.�
This group of Eco-fascists believes that securitizing the resources of third
world countries, combined with reducing their consumption globally will
stabilize the planet�s failing environment.
Sir John Sulson of the Human Genome Project
suggests that,
�this is a topic
that has gone to and fro in the last few decades, and appears to be moving
back up the political agenda now.
�
So it seems a good moment for the Royal
Society to launch a study that looks objectively at the scientific basis for
changes in population, for the different regional and cultural factors that
may affect that, and at the effects that population changes will have on our
future in term of sustainable development.�
�
�
�
�
�
The Royal Society is supporting the UN�s plan for the
Virtuous Green Path
that they will unveil at the Earth Summit in Rio+20 this June.
�
The United
Nations has
moved their focus to biodiversity, blaming humanity for not only climate
change, deforestation and depletion of water resources, but also the untold
loss of species of animals every year.
The UN and the Royal Society fail to point out that these issues are
directly caused by multinational corporations and governments who are
responsible for this specific destruction impacting our planet.
Rather, these globalists call for depopulation - the mass murder of 90% of
the human population to save the planet from devastation.
According to a UN
report,
�The population of the most developed countries
will remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until 2050.�
They suppose
that third world countries are having population explosion that is
destroying the planet.
While they believe that industrialized countries even out their populations
through societal controls, those populations of unindustrialized countries
are out of control.
The report from the Royal Society suggest that through resource consumption
reduction, combined with required family planning programs and changing our
perspective of population and environment as one subject will solve this
problem.
Jules Pretty of the Royal Society working group is proposing,
�When we slow
down population growth we empower women and provide more money for least
developed countries to invest in education. The majority of women want fewer
children.�
Jonathon Porritt, member of the Royal Society and former chair of the UK
Sustainable Development Commission
has stated on record that the British
population must be reduced from 60 million to 30 million to remain a
sustainable society.
Professor Paul Ehrlich, who co-authored
Ecoscience with Obama�s Science Czar
John Holdren, was
quoted in the Guardian as supporting a drastic population
reduction before the population rises to 9 billion in 2050.
Ehrlich said:
How many you support depends on lifestyles. We came up with 1.5 to 2 billion
because you can have big active cities and wilderness.
�
If you want a battery
chicken world where everyone has minimum space and food and everyone is kept
just about alive you might be able to support in the long term about 4 or 5
billion people. But you already have 7 billion.
�
So we have to humanely and
as rapidly as possible move to population shrinkage... The question is:
can you go over the top without a disaster, like a worldwide plague or a
nuclear war between India and Pakistan? If we go on at the pace we are
there�s going to be various forms of disaster.
�
Some maybe slow motion
disasters like people getting more and more hungry, or catastrophic
disasters because the more people you have the greater the chance of some
weird virus transferring from animal to human populations, there could be a
vast die-off.
Global Elite societies have a clear agenda that involve depopulation through
the guise of environmentalism, CO2 reduction and governmental control.
They narcissistically publish their writings because it is always easier to
hide in plain sight.
We need to pay more attention to the agendas behind the people we place in
positions of influential power.
�
�