|
�
�
by Jim Keith
An excerpt from Jim Keith�s
Casebook on Alternative 3: UFOs,
Secret Societies and World Control
from
ConspiracyArchive Website
�
�
�
There is a solution other than what the
elite consider excess population. Why not prevent the poor - for the
sake of argument, let us venture a conservative 99% of the world�s
population - from having children altogether, or if that isn�t
possible, at least vastly slow their birth rates?
"Eugenics" is a term coined in the latter part of the 19th
century by Englishmen Francis Galton to describe the
"science" of bettering human stock and the elimination of unwanted
characteristics... and individuals. Galton proposed societal
intervention for the furtherance of,
"racial quality," maintaining that
"Jews are specialized for a parasitical existence upon other
nations" and that "except by sterilization I cannot yet see any
way of checking the produce of the unfit who are allowed their
liberty and are below the reach of moral control."
A survey of eugenics in action begins
with isolated incidents such as the sterilization of the mentally
ill by American health officials in the late 1800�s and the
castration of children at the Pennsylvania Training School for
Feebleminded Children in 1889. The movement quickly picked up
momentum.
Formerly established as a study at University College in London in
1904, the first laboratory for the study of the subject was
constructed by Charles B. Davenport at Cold Springs Harbor on Long
Island (which, perhaps significantly, was also the location of the
estates of both Dulles brothers, as well as the current headquarters
of the Human Genome Organization for DNA mapping). The institute was
funded in excess of $11 million by the Harriman and
Rockefellers.
Supported in America by the Eastern Establishment, eugenics was
nurtured in the hotbeds of
Round Table - influenced philosophy, at
Harvard, Columbia, and Cornell. The subject was popularized in
Germany by Ernst Haeckel, who linked romantic German nature
mysticism and the unity of the Volk with clinical bio-policies later
instituted by Hitler.
Haeckel believed that there was no unity among the species of
mankind, since
"the morphological differences
between two generally recognized species - for example sheep and
goats - are much less important than those... between a
Hottentot and a man of the Teutonic race."
In the Aryan race Haeckel saw a,
"symmetry of all parts, and that
equal development, which we call the perfect human beauty."
He also believed the "wooly-haired"
peoples,
"incapable of true inner culture or
of a higher mental development... no wooly-haired nation has
ever had an important history."
Haeckel felt the purpose of the nation
state was to enforce selective breeding, praising the practices of
the Spartans who killed all but "perfectly healthy and strong
children" and thus were "continually in excellent strength and
vigor."
-
In 1906 a group of Haeckel�s academic followers formed the
influential Monist League, agitating for a German government
patterned along social Darwinian lines.
�
-
By 1907 in America, Indiana passed compulsory sterilization for the
mentally ill and other "undesirables," while 475 males received
vasectomies at the Indiana State Reformatory.
�
-
In 1912 the First International Congress of Eugenics was held in
London, including among its directors Winston Churchill, Alexander
Graham Bell, Charles Elliot (President emeritus of Harvard
University), and David Starr Jordan (President of Stanford
University).
�
-
The National Conference on Race Betterment was convened in United
States in 1914, while by 1917 fifteen American states had
eugenics
laws on the books, almost all of them legalizing the sterilization
of habitual criminals, epileptics, the insane, and the retarded.
�
-
H.H. Laughlin, the Expert Eugenics Agent of the U.S.
House of Representatives Committee on Immigration and Naturalization
presented a Model Sterilization Law in 1922. This was to provide the
basis for many state eugenics laws, as well as for eugenics law in
Nazi Germany.
�
-
In 1928 the American Eugenics Society sponsored a contest for essays
on the caused of decline in Nordic fertility, while Dr. Robie, at
the Third International Congress of Eugenics, called for the
sterilization of 14,000,000 Americans with low intelligence scores.
�
-
The Nazi Party in Germany passed in
1933 the "Law for the Prevention
of Hereditary Diseases in Posterity," also known as the
"Sterilization Law," written by professor Ernst Rudin, one of
the country�s leading psychiatrists. "Heredity Health Courts" were
formed, and within three years two hundred and twenty-five thousand
German "undesirables" had been sterilized.
�
-
Hitler�s policies have been characterized as "a rather
straightforward form of German social Darwinism." Far from being
original with him, his policies were expansions upon already-extant
political and scientific culture.
�
-
By 1939 German policies had evolved to include
euthanasia upon
asylum inmates while eugenics concepts were implemented to the
fullest in Nazi concentration camps during World War II.
�
-
In 1942, U.S. psychiatrist Foster Kennedy recommended the killing of
retarded children. During the three year period between 1941-1943
over 42,000 people were sterilized in America.
After World War II the idea of "eugenics" was tainted in the public
by its association with Nazism. The term was discarded and a
facelift was performed on its parent study psychiatry, which
resulted in the establishment of the World Federation of Mental
Health (WFMH). Since then, this group has continued to support
electroshock, lobotomization, mind control and other activities
already detailed, as well as employing within its ranks many German
practitioners who had been happy to further Hitlerian goals during
the Second World War.
What this brief survey shows is something the popular press has
chosen to ignore: eugenics programs were not the inventions of mad
Nazi scientists, but that the political climate of Germany allowed a
full implementation of programs part and parcel of international
psychiatry and medicine. Eugenics, from its beginning, was
encouraged and financed by the rich self-styled "aristocrats" of the
day.
Recent programs aimed at abortion and other methods of depopulation
can be traced to essentially the same Freemasonic/Round
Table/Rothschild-spawned crowd; to the studies of
the Club of Rome,
the Trilateral Commission, and to
the CFR. These groups influenced a
change in U.S. policies specifically during 1966-67, when population
control was adopted by the State Department as a stated goal.
The recent world depopulation push retains the flavor of eugenics
bio-policy of the first half of this century in the statements of
advocates such as the Eastern Establishment�s Sergeant Shriver,
speaking before the Congressional Select Committee on Population in
1978:
"...this Committee�s interest [is]
in improving the quality of life and enhancing the biological
product of this society; rather than just controlling or
limiting birds."
Jaffe and Dryfoos of the
federally-funded Guttmacher Institute have stated that,
"With the overall decline in
fertility in the United States, concern has shifted from numbers
of births to insuring that those children being born have fewer
physical, social and economic handicaps."
It is odd that little mention of "the
overall decline in fertility" finds its way into
Rockefeller-subsidized literature of depopulation activists. Nor was
the fact that teenage pregnancy was at its lowest ebb in forty years
brought up when federally mandated family planning and sex education
in schools was enacted in 1978.
Studies have shown that sex education classes increase early sexual
experimentation while doing nothing to reduce adolescent pregnancy.
It has also been demonstrated that when such classes are
discontinued, as in Utah in 1980, the incidence of teenage pregnancy
decreases. Still, officials insist sex classes should extend from
"kindergarten throughout a person�s educational career." Why?
Originators and administrators of the programs candidly admit that
their agenda includes depopulation and eugenics.
Lester Kirkendall, a founder of the Sex Information and Education
Council, wrote in 1965 that,
"sex education is... clearly tied in a
socially significant way to family planning and population
limitation and policy..."
Dr. Jane Hodgson, at the National Abortion
Federation conference in 1980, was even more forthright, calling for
compulsory abortion for pregnant teenagers.
The methods of sex education programs in public schools vary, but
uniformly emphasize the huge expense and drawbacks of having kids,
providing summaries of methods of contraception, serialization, and
abortion. Students are often taken on tours of birth control
clinics, where they meet the staff, fill out patients� forms, and
are assured of the confidentiality of services. Children are also
recruited as depopulation activists with pitches informing them, as
in widely-used text Meeting Yourself Halfway:
�The population problem is very
serious and involves every country on this planet. What steps
would you encourage to help resolve the problem?
...volunteer to organize birth-control information centers
throughout the country;
...join a pro-abortion lobbying group;
...encourage the limitation of two children per family and have
the parents sterilized to prevent further births.�
Much of the sex education literature
portrays the nuclear family � long a cohesive political and social
glue among the populace � as obsolete and statistically
insignificant, while the normalcy of homosexuality and bachelorism
("Playboyism") is stressed. Children are encouraged to report in
detail on conditions at home, to report parental shortcomings, and
to divulge disagreements they have with their parents, opening the
door to intervention by "social services."
Davis in Economic Development and Cultural Change says that an
effective strategy in lowering the birth rate is to
"lessen ... the
identity of children with parents, or lessen... the likelihood that
this identity will be satisfying," adding that certain trends that
might bring population levels down are "very high divorce rates,
homosexuality, pornography and free sexual unions..."
Davis sees a
positive note in
"the child welfare services, which have
increasingly tended to displace the father as a necessary member of
the family, and the health services which have increasingly flouted
parental authority with respect to contraception and abortion."
This
"flouting of parental authority" is a familiar theme in sex
education classes, which repeatedly emphasize the child�s
independence from their parents and their ability to make decisions
for themselves.
The message to children, provided by proponents of sex education
without the courtesy of having the parents agree upon it, is
obvious; the world is awash in excess poor population, and something
has to be done about it in a hurry, starting at the nearest abortion
clinic.
Educator John Taylor Gatto, voted New York�s Top Teacher of 1991,
further comments on the mechanisms:
�Social machinery to suppress
proliferation of systematic families... has two components: one,
a campaign aimed at family-formation before it commences,
employing such tactics as encouragement of personal greed (best
enjoyed in bachelor style, of course), public pornographic
celebrations of the body parts of nubile young woman, effortless
divorce, mass adoption, tolerance of sexual ambiguity, and many
similar tactics.
�
The second component aims at producing
pseudo-families: small households (whether biological or
synthetic) without any overriding loyalty to the common family
cause. Instead, these are associations of expedience wearing the
costume of affection and concern, but always on the lookout for
a better deal... During the childhood phase, parents in
pseudo-families are made use of by the state to transmit certain
values, to maintain and discipline a new serf class composed of
their own children, and to report radical cases of deviance to
medical, police and re-training authorities... It is a system
infused in many places with such black genius in understanding
crowd control it is hard not to stand in awe of its unseen
architects.�
Target populations for sterilization in
the United States bear noting. According to Michael Garrity in
Trilateralism, edited by Holly Sklar, American Indian women are
being sterilized unbeknownst to them or against their wishes in
public health clinics nationwide. Garrity also maintains,
"Full blooded Indian woman are the
special target of the doctors."
Ruthann Evannoff, in "Reproductive
Rights and Occupational Health" in WIN, has said that,
"Overall, at least 25 percent of the
Native American women of childbearing age have been sterilized,
although the total population numbers less than one million.
Recent reports estimate that the percentage sterilized in one
tribe alone, the Northern Cheyenne, is close to 80 percent."
The secret (now declassified) paper
NSSM
200, "Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security
and Overseas Interests," also known as the Scowcroft Document
(authored by the CFR�s Brent Scowcroft), gives insight into U.S.
government plans for population reduction internationally, linking
these plans to goals that have very little to do with alleviating
human suffering, and everything to do with the maximization of
profit.
Prepared in 1974 for the National Security Council (and remember,
this is a government document, although one not likely to be offered
for free in late night Public Service Announcements)
NSSm 200
proposes means for the reduction of worldwide population by
"concentration on key [i.e. Third World] countries," with the stated
goal of reduction of population growth rate from an annual 2 percent
growth to 1.7 percent.
While this might sound like an altruistic goal proposed by
clear-sighted social stewards, intended to reduce suffering in
countries with marginal standards of living, the study makes it
clear that government interest in depopulation has nothing to do
with concern for living standards in developing countries. It is
because
"The United States has become increasingly dependent on
mineral imports from developing countries" and " endemic famine,
food riots, and breakdown of social order... are scarcely inducive
to systematic exploration for mineral deposits or the long-term
investments necessary for their exploration."
Note that the
breakdown of "social order" referred to consists of the populace
revolting against their living conditions.
One of the conclusions of the study is that "mandatory [emphasis
added] population control measures" may be "appropriate."
Speaking of depopulation programs currently being implemented in the
Third World, former Brazilian health minister Carlos Santana said,
"The World Bank, through their reports of its Presidents, has always
made its proselytizing for a rigid birth control policy explicit"
Santana reported that included in World Bank credit packages and
investment in Third World countries is an implicit agenda of
depopulation, and questioned why Brazil was targeted for birth
reduction, with approximately forty per cent of Brazilian woman
having been already sterilized.
What the depopulators omit saying is that in Brazil mast of the
depopulation programs are being directed toward the native
population, and that they are implementing an alternative program to
the pistoleros hired to attack small landowning families,
appropriating the land for the use of large cash-croppers and the
international conglomerates that are stripping the country bare.
Depopulation programs run worldwide are directed and funded by major
international money interests, including McGeorge Bundy of the CFR,
the architect of nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction policy;
Warren
E. Buffet, the second wealthiest man in the United States; and,
ubiquitous when it comes to eugenics funding, the Rockefellers.
Planned Parenthood Federation of America and International Planned
Parenthood Federation are Buffett-funded and run a huge abortion and
sterilization network worldwide, with one subsidiary, the Brazilian
Society for Family Welfare, having over 2,500 outlets in that
country.
While, at first glance depopulation programs may seem like a good
idea to promote the reduction of mouths-to-feed worldwide, what they
ignore are the root causes of overpopulation. High birth rates are
the direct result of poor living standards of he areas, and in
countries where malnutrition has been reduced and the incidence of
child-death lowered, birth rates have also lessened.
The Third World (in particular) is being forcefully relieved of
natural resources and exploited for cheap labor, and is in fact no
doubt seen by elite landowners and major corporations as only
maintaining maximum profitability as long as it is kept in abject
poverty.
"The strategy of underdevelopment" is the term used by agriculture
economist Harry Cleaver. Rather than offering the people in rich
countries such as Brazil, in actuality one of the richest countries
in the world, an equitable portion of profits made through the use
of their resources, they are manipulated (when not killed outright)
and kept at the razor edge between starvation and profitability.
Depopulation organizations propagandize that we are experiencing a
crisis of epic proportions; that the world is reaching the point
where it can no longer support the number of people living on it. In
many instances population may in fact be economically beneficial,
and tending to a long-term increase of arable land and per capita
(rather than per corporation) income. Also noted is a current usage
of approximately three-tenths of one percent of the planet�s surface
for human habitation, an amount sustainable with no limit to growth
on sight.
United Nations and U.S. Department of Agriculture statistics show
that world food production has increased more rapidly than
population growth in recent years, while Colin Clark, former
director of the Agriculture Economic Institute of Oxford University
has stated that farmers could currently support seven times the
current population of the Earth, or twenty-one times the current
population at Japanese standards of food consumption.
Roger Revelle, former director of the Harvard Center for Population
Studies estimates that current agricultural resources could provide
an adequate diet for eight times the current populace, i.e. forty
billion individuals, and has estimated that Africa is capable of
feeding ten times its current population. Revelle quotes Dr. David
Hopper, another agricultural expert:
"The world�s food problem does not
arise from any physical limitation on potential output or any
danger of unduly stressing the environment. The limitations on
abundance are to be found in social and political structures of
nations and in the economic relations among them. The
unexploited global food resources are there, between Cancer and
Capricorn. The successful husbandry of that resource depends on
the will and actions of men."
Hopper pronounces "world fascism" very
politely.
Francis Moore Lappe of the Institute for Food and Development Policy
maintains:
"If the cause of hunger is neither
scarcity of food, nor scarcity of land, we�ve come to see that
it�s a scarcity of democracy. That may sound rather contrived,
because in the West we tend to think of democracy as a political
concept. But democracy is really a principle of accountability;
in other words, those making the decisions must be accountable
to those who are affected by them. Once we understand hunger as
a scarcity of democracy, what we are saying is that from the
village level to the level of international commerce, fewer and
fewer people are making decisions, and more and more
anti-democratic structures are being entrenched. This is the
cause of hunger."
And, it should be repeated, the cause of
overpopulation.
�
�
�
�
�[Sterilization could] be applied to an ever widening circle of
social discards, beginning always with the criminal, the
diseased and the insane, and extending gradually to types which
may be called weaklings rather than defectives, and perhaps
ultimately to worthless race types.�
�
-
The Passing of the Great Race
by Madison Grant, co-founder
American Eugenics Society
�
�
�The very word eugenics is in
disrepute in some quarters ... We must ask ourselves, what have
we done wrong?
I think we have failed to take into account a trait which is
almost universal and is very deep in human nature. People simply
are not willing to accept the idea that the genetic base on
which their character was formed is inferior and should not be
repeated in the next generation. We have asked whole groups of
people to accept this idea and we have asked individuals to
accept it. They have constantly refused and we have all but
killed the eugenic movement ... they won�t accept the idea that
they are in general second rate. We must rely on other
motivation. ... it is surely possible to build a system of
voluntary unconscious selection. But the reasons advanced must
be generally acceptable reasons. Let�s stop telling anyone that
they have a generally inferior genetic quality, for they will
never agree. Let�s base our proposals on the desirability of
having children born in homes where they will get affectionate
and responsible care, and perhaps our proposals will be
accepted.�
�
- From Galton and Mid Century
Eugenics by Frederick Osborn, Galton Lecture 1956, in
Eugenics Review, vol. 48, 1, 1956
�
�
�Those least fit to carry on the
race are increasing most rapidly ... Funds that should be used
to raise the standard of our civilization are diverted to
maintenance of those who should never have been born.�
�
- From
The Pivot of Civilization
quoted in Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned
Parenthood), by Elsah Droghin.
�
� |
