-
What is Public Authority...Under RTI Act 2005 ???...
#aasaanhaieducation
#UPSC
#IAS
PMCARES fund is not a public authority..Under RTI...Says PMO...
published: 03 Jun 2020
-
What is public authority under RTI Act 2005
#lawchamberofadvocaterahulmishrallbllm
#advocaterahulmishra
व्हाट्स एप :- 7651991572
what's app https://wa.me/message/C34IWGJESYDTI1
Follow us on :
Instagram : https://Instagram.com/mishratherahul
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/mishratherahul
Twitter : https://twitter.com/mishratherahul
YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/mishratherahul
About us...
Rahul Mishra Advocate, B.Com ,LL.B ,LL.M ( Constitutional and Administrative Law )
Occupation - Legal Practitioner and Consultant & Leading and renowned criminal Lawyer (Legal adviser of several firms, groups and companies.)
Specialisation- Dealing with the heinous and hard core criminal cases along-with all types of matrimonial matters .
Other Activities- To provide free legal assistance for weaker sect...
published: 12 Dec 2021
-
Public Authorities- Definition & Obligations | Right to Information Act, 2005 | DU | UGC NET | PGT
#ECONOMICFORUPSC
#Vishnueconomicsschool
#NTANETECONOMICS
Website www.vishnueconomicsschool.in
NOTES AND BOOK STORE; - https://www.instamojo.com/vishnugupta55529
Download my app Vishnu ECONOMICS SCHOOL from playlist or link is given below https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=co.jarvis.ves
Contact Phone Number: 9711855529
Mail id: [email protected]
TELEGRAM ;- https://t.me/Vishnueconomicsschool
Our channel for commerce students
WEBSITE www.vishnueconomicsschool.in
DEMO
ENGLISH MEDIUM
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8X-3l6UFjXiMTTdsOdBFE3LxJimmTkXH
HINDI MEDIUM
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8X-3l6UFjXjK_lxp077PFPqvnj-euEAv
Guidelines for Public Authority
Public authorities are the repository of information which the citizen have right to have ...
published: 11 Aug 2021
-
(RTI) Right To Information Act 2005: Obligations of Public Authority under RTI Section 3 & 4 of Act
(RTI) Right To Information Act 2005: Obligations of Public Authority under RTI Section 3 & 4 of Act
#rti #righttoinformation #obligations #publicauthority
If You Have Any Doubt Related To This Video Go To The Comment Section i will definitely ans your question #gyanmshiksha
-------------------------------
PURCHASE LINKS -
Buy Bare Act also from our Website :- http://www.gyanmshiksha.online/p/bare-acts.html
Our Monthly Membership https://pages.razorpay.com/becomemembergyanmshiksha
Appreciate Our Work by Some Love : -https://rzp.io/l/gyanmlovepage
-------------------------------
FOLLOW ME ON -
Subscribe our Channel - https://www.youtube.com/c/GyanmShiksha?sub_confirmation=1
Website: - www.gyanmshiksha.online
E-Mail :- [email protected]
Twitter: - @gyanmshiksha
-------------------------...
published: 21 Jul 2021
-
Obligation of Public Authority
#RTi#PublicAuthority#obligations#Humanrights#citizens
published: 01 Jul 2021
-
Public Authorities
Courts are reluctant to impose liability on public authorities. In X v Bedfordshire County Council, court said that the statutory system to prevent abuse involved a number of different agencies, including local authorities, the police, the education authority etc. and to make one liable would be unjust. To impose a duty on all of them
would make it impossible to determine which one was liable. Therefore the defendant was not liable. This was justified in Gorringe v Calverdale. Substantial claims for compensation will lead to the taxpayers’ money being diverted away from general expenditure on public services. Policy issues are not justiciable; courts are not equipped to adjudicate on public bodies’
policy decisions to provide one service instead of another. This led to policy distinction....
published: 29 Nov 2018
-
mod07lec33 - Public Authority - I
Public Authority (PA), definition of 'public authority' under section 2 of the RTI Act, importance of being a PA, duties of PA
published: 03 Nov 2020
-
Responsibility of public authority Explained | @VelmuruganKasi
This video about, RTI Act 2005 Section 4(1)(a) in Tamil | Responsibility of public authority Explained | @VelmuruganKasi
💥 Join our WhatsApp group by clicking the link below (free): 👇👇👇
https://chat.whatsapp.com/LrB1DIRkYdcFJ8Nhrnk8P2
Section 4(1)(a) in The Right To Information Act, 2005
(a) maintain all its records duly catalogued and indexed in a manner and the form which facilitates the right to information under this Act and ensure that all records that are appropriate to be computerised are, within a reasonable time and subject to availability of resources, computerised and connected through a network all over the country on different systems so that access to such records is facilitated;
🔴 Subscribe for more awareness information just like this:
https://youtube.com/c/VelmuruganK...
published: 02 May 2022
-
Darlene Cay, mula sa news authority ng Filipino
‘Bilang news authority ng Filipino, mas malaki ang misyon natin na bigyang-boses ang bawat Filipino.’ - Darlene Cay
Para sa mas malaking misyon, para sa mas malawak na paglilngkod sa bayan, ito ang GMA Integrated News sa GMA Pinoy TV.
published: 04 Mar 2024
-
mod08lec40 - Public Authority - VIII
Continuation of the discussion on the status of NGOs under the RTI Act
published: 03 Nov 2020
3:48
What is Public Authority...Under RTI Act 2005 ???...
#aasaanhaieducation
#UPSC
#IAS
PMCARES fund is not a public authority..Under RTI...Says PMO...
#aasaanhaieducation
#UPSC
#IAS
PMCARES fund is not a public authority..Under RTI...Says PMO...
https://wn.com/What_Is_Public_Authority...Under_Rti_Act_2005_...
#aasaanhaieducation
#UPSC
#IAS
PMCARES fund is not a public authority..Under RTI...Says PMO...
- published: 03 Jun 2020
- views: 10328
1:25
What is public authority under RTI Act 2005
#lawchamberofadvocaterahulmishrallbllm
#advocaterahulmishra
व्हाट्स एप :- 7651991572
what's app https://wa.me/message/C34IWGJESYDTI1
Follow us on :
Instagram...
#lawchamberofadvocaterahulmishrallbllm
#advocaterahulmishra
व्हाट्स एप :- 7651991572
what's app https://wa.me/message/C34IWGJESYDTI1
Follow us on :
Instagram : https://Instagram.com/mishratherahul
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/mishratherahul
Twitter : https://twitter.com/mishratherahul
YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/mishratherahul
About us...
Rahul Mishra Advocate, B.Com ,LL.B ,LL.M ( Constitutional and Administrative Law )
Occupation - Legal Practitioner and Consultant & Leading and renowned criminal Lawyer (Legal adviser of several firms, groups and companies.)
Specialisation- Dealing with the heinous and hard core criminal cases along-with all types of matrimonial matters .
Other Activities- To provide free legal assistance for weaker section, Legal training is also been provided to the leaders of several women's organizations.
Special skills- Motivational and social speaker.
Place of Practice- Allahabad , Lucknow Uttar Pradesh & Delhi ( Supreme Court and various High Courts of India )
Court chamber - C Block, Hall, High Court, Lucknow 226010
Personal Office - S.53 ,Viram Khand ,Gomti Nagar ,Lucknow 226010.
About Channel - In this channel legal informations latest High court and Supreme court
Judgements information is being provided. Legal education and solution of legal problems is being provided here. Legal provisions of different acts are being discussed here.
#lawchamberofadvocaterahulmishrallbllm
व्हाट्स एप :- 7651991572
#advocaterahulmishra #rahulmishra
https://wn.com/What_Is_Public_Authority_Under_Rti_Act_2005
#lawchamberofadvocaterahulmishrallbllm
#advocaterahulmishra
व्हाट्स एप :- 7651991572
what's app https://wa.me/message/C34IWGJESYDTI1
Follow us on :
Instagram : https://Instagram.com/mishratherahul
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/mishratherahul
Twitter : https://twitter.com/mishratherahul
YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/mishratherahul
About us...
Rahul Mishra Advocate, B.Com ,LL.B ,LL.M ( Constitutional and Administrative Law )
Occupation - Legal Practitioner and Consultant & Leading and renowned criminal Lawyer (Legal adviser of several firms, groups and companies.)
Specialisation- Dealing with the heinous and hard core criminal cases along-with all types of matrimonial matters .
Other Activities- To provide free legal assistance for weaker section, Legal training is also been provided to the leaders of several women's organizations.
Special skills- Motivational and social speaker.
Place of Practice- Allahabad , Lucknow Uttar Pradesh & Delhi ( Supreme Court and various High Courts of India )
Court chamber - C Block, Hall, High Court, Lucknow 226010
Personal Office - S.53 ,Viram Khand ,Gomti Nagar ,Lucknow 226010.
About Channel - In this channel legal informations latest High court and Supreme court
Judgements information is being provided. Legal education and solution of legal problems is being provided here. Legal provisions of different acts are being discussed here.
#lawchamberofadvocaterahulmishrallbllm
व्हाट्स एप :- 7651991572
#advocaterahulmishra #rahulmishra
- published: 12 Dec 2021
- views: 4094
17:23
Public Authorities- Definition & Obligations | Right to Information Act, 2005 | DU | UGC NET | PGT
#ECONOMICFORUPSC
#Vishnueconomicsschool
#NTANETECONOMICS
Website www.vishnueconomicsschool.in
NOTES AND BOOK STORE; - https://www.instamojo.com/vishnugu...
#ECONOMICFORUPSC
#Vishnueconomicsschool
#NTANETECONOMICS
Website www.vishnueconomicsschool.in
NOTES AND BOOK STORE; - https://www.instamojo.com/vishnugupta55529
Download my app Vishnu ECONOMICS SCHOOL from playlist or link is given below https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=co.jarvis.ves
Contact Phone Number: 9711855529
Mail id:
[email protected]
TELEGRAM ;- https://t.me/Vishnueconomicsschool
Our channel for commerce students
WEBSITE www.vishnueconomicsschool.in
DEMO
ENGLISH MEDIUM
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8X-3l6UFjXiMTTdsOdBFE3LxJimmTkXH
HINDI MEDIUM
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8X-3l6UFjXjK_lxp077PFPqvnj-euEAv
Guidelines for Public Authority
Public authorities are the repository of information which the citizen have right to have under the Right to Information Act, 2005. As defined in the Act, a “ Public authority ” is any authority or body or institution of self government established or constituted by or under the Constitution; or by any other law made by the Parliament or a State Legislature; or by notification issued or order made by the Central Government or a State Government. Bodies owned, controlled or substantially financed by the Central Government substantially financed by the Central Government or State Government also fall within the definition of public authority. The financing of the body or the NGO by the Government may be direct or indirect.
The Act casts important obligation on public authorities so as to facilitate the citizens or the country to access the information held under their control. The obligations of the authority are basically the obligations of the head of the authority, which should ensure that these are met in right earnest. Reference made to public authority in this document is, in face, a reference to the head of the public authority.
What is Information
Information is not an abstract concept under the RTI Act. It is conceived as being contained in any material including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form. If also includes information relating to any private body which can be accessed by the public authority under any law for the time being in force.
Right to Information under the Act
A citizen has a right to seek such information from a public authority which is held by the public authority or which held under its control. This right includes inspection on work, documents and records; taking notes, extracts or certified copies of documents or records; and taking certified samples of material held by the public authority or held under control of the public authority.
The Act gives the citizen a right to information at per with the Members of Parliament and the Members of State Legislatures. According to Act, the information, which cannot be denied to the Parliament or a State Legislature, shall not be denied to any person.
A citizen has a right to obtain an information in the from of diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or in any other electronic mode or through print-outs provided such information is already stored in a computer or in any other device from which the information may be transferred to diskettes etc
The information to the applicant should ordinarily be provided in the form in which it is sough. However, if the supply of information sought in a particular form would disproportionately divert the resources of the public authority or may cause harm to the safety or preservation of the records, supply of information in that form may be denied.
The Act gives the right to information only to the citizen of India. It does not make provision for giving information to Corporations, Associations, and Companies etc. Which are legal entities/persons, but not citizens. However, if an application is made by an employee or office - bearer of any Corporation, Association, Company, NGO etc. indicating his name and such employee/office bearer is a citizen of India, information may be supplied to him/her. In such cases, it would be presumed that a citizen has sought information at the address of the Corporation etc.
https://wn.com/Public_Authorities_Definition_Obligations_|_Right_To_Information_Act,_2005_|_Du_|_Ugc_Net_|_Pgt
#ECONOMICFORUPSC
#Vishnueconomicsschool
#NTANETECONOMICS
Website www.vishnueconomicsschool.in
NOTES AND BOOK STORE; - https://www.instamojo.com/vishnugupta55529
Download my app Vishnu ECONOMICS SCHOOL from playlist or link is given below https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=co.jarvis.ves
Contact Phone Number: 9711855529
Mail id:
[email protected]
TELEGRAM ;- https://t.me/Vishnueconomicsschool
Our channel for commerce students
WEBSITE www.vishnueconomicsschool.in
DEMO
ENGLISH MEDIUM
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8X-3l6UFjXiMTTdsOdBFE3LxJimmTkXH
HINDI MEDIUM
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8X-3l6UFjXjK_lxp077PFPqvnj-euEAv
Guidelines for Public Authority
Public authorities are the repository of information which the citizen have right to have under the Right to Information Act, 2005. As defined in the Act, a “ Public authority ” is any authority or body or institution of self government established or constituted by or under the Constitution; or by any other law made by the Parliament or a State Legislature; or by notification issued or order made by the Central Government or a State Government. Bodies owned, controlled or substantially financed by the Central Government substantially financed by the Central Government or State Government also fall within the definition of public authority. The financing of the body or the NGO by the Government may be direct or indirect.
The Act casts important obligation on public authorities so as to facilitate the citizens or the country to access the information held under their control. The obligations of the authority are basically the obligations of the head of the authority, which should ensure that these are met in right earnest. Reference made to public authority in this document is, in face, a reference to the head of the public authority.
What is Information
Information is not an abstract concept under the RTI Act. It is conceived as being contained in any material including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form. If also includes information relating to any private body which can be accessed by the public authority under any law for the time being in force.
Right to Information under the Act
A citizen has a right to seek such information from a public authority which is held by the public authority or which held under its control. This right includes inspection on work, documents and records; taking notes, extracts or certified copies of documents or records; and taking certified samples of material held by the public authority or held under control of the public authority.
The Act gives the citizen a right to information at per with the Members of Parliament and the Members of State Legislatures. According to Act, the information, which cannot be denied to the Parliament or a State Legislature, shall not be denied to any person.
A citizen has a right to obtain an information in the from of diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or in any other electronic mode or through print-outs provided such information is already stored in a computer or in any other device from which the information may be transferred to diskettes etc
The information to the applicant should ordinarily be provided in the form in which it is sough. However, if the supply of information sought in a particular form would disproportionately divert the resources of the public authority or may cause harm to the safety or preservation of the records, supply of information in that form may be denied.
The Act gives the right to information only to the citizen of India. It does not make provision for giving information to Corporations, Associations, and Companies etc. Which are legal entities/persons, but not citizens. However, if an application is made by an employee or office - bearer of any Corporation, Association, Company, NGO etc. indicating his name and such employee/office bearer is a citizen of India, information may be supplied to him/her. In such cases, it would be presumed that a citizen has sought information at the address of the Corporation etc.
- published: 11 Aug 2021
- views: 10098
8:33
(RTI) Right To Information Act 2005: Obligations of Public Authority under RTI Section 3 & 4 of Act
(RTI) Right To Information Act 2005: Obligations of Public Authority under RTI Section 3 & 4 of Act
#rti #righttoinformation #obligations #publicauthority
If Y...
(RTI) Right To Information Act 2005: Obligations of Public Authority under RTI Section 3 & 4 of Act
#rti #righttoinformation #obligations #publicauthority
If You Have Any Doubt Related To This Video Go To The Comment Section i will definitely ans your question #gyanmshiksha
-------------------------------
PURCHASE LINKS -
Buy Bare Act also from our Website :- http://www.gyanmshiksha.online/p/bare-acts.html
Our Monthly Membership https://pages.razorpay.com/becomemembergyanmshiksha
Appreciate Our Work by Some Love : -https://rzp.io/l/gyanmlovepage
-------------------------------
FOLLOW ME ON -
Subscribe our Channel - https://www.youtube.com/c/GyanmShiksha?sub_confirmation=1
Website: - www.gyanmshiksha.online
E-Mail :-
[email protected]
Twitter: - @gyanmshiksha
-------------------------------
MORE VIDEOS : -
Indian Trust Act Lectures - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgl3teCHdx9DCS11-cFzYapX1s6-fmUnh
IPC Lectures - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgl3teCHdx9CxrYNlwrqxvi1TUy8UCD6Y
Transfer of Property Act Lectures - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgl3teCHdx9DID1HNCXFjz05gFshPqR9f
International Law Lectures- youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgl3teCHdx9Ci6Er6ox996VCaDPBDfXNK
Family Law Lectures -https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgl3teCHdx9Ccqjk4J08ZfXDsAbhnH61j
Any other Video Lectures - https://www.youtube.com/c/GyanmShiksha/playlists
-------------------------------
I Hope This video is Helpfull for you and if you like this video please like and subscribe our channel for further new videos
Gyanm Shiksha
-------------------------------
https://wn.com/(Rti)_Right_To_Information_Act_2005_Obligations_Of_Public_Authority_Under_Rti_Section_3_4_Of_Act
(RTI) Right To Information Act 2005: Obligations of Public Authority under RTI Section 3 & 4 of Act
#rti #righttoinformation #obligations #publicauthority
If You Have Any Doubt Related To This Video Go To The Comment Section i will definitely ans your question #gyanmshiksha
-------------------------------
PURCHASE LINKS -
Buy Bare Act also from our Website :- http://www.gyanmshiksha.online/p/bare-acts.html
Our Monthly Membership https://pages.razorpay.com/becomemembergyanmshiksha
Appreciate Our Work by Some Love : -https://rzp.io/l/gyanmlovepage
-------------------------------
FOLLOW ME ON -
Subscribe our Channel - https://www.youtube.com/c/GyanmShiksha?sub_confirmation=1
Website: - www.gyanmshiksha.online
E-Mail :-
[email protected]
Twitter: - @gyanmshiksha
-------------------------------
MORE VIDEOS : -
Indian Trust Act Lectures - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgl3teCHdx9DCS11-cFzYapX1s6-fmUnh
IPC Lectures - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgl3teCHdx9CxrYNlwrqxvi1TUy8UCD6Y
Transfer of Property Act Lectures - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgl3teCHdx9DID1HNCXFjz05gFshPqR9f
International Law Lectures- youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgl3teCHdx9Ci6Er6ox996VCaDPBDfXNK
Family Law Lectures -https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgl3teCHdx9Ccqjk4J08ZfXDsAbhnH61j
Any other Video Lectures - https://www.youtube.com/c/GyanmShiksha/playlists
-------------------------------
I Hope This video is Helpfull for you and if you like this video please like and subscribe our channel for further new videos
Gyanm Shiksha
-------------------------------
- published: 21 Jul 2021
- views: 24507
8:21
Obligation of Public Authority
#RTi#PublicAuthority#obligations#Humanrights#citizens
#RTi#PublicAuthority#obligations#Humanrights#citizens
https://wn.com/Obligation_Of_Public_Authority
#RTi#PublicAuthority#obligations#Humanrights#citizens
- published: 01 Jul 2021
- views: 6616
4:41
Public Authorities
Courts are reluctant to impose liability on public authorities. In X v Bedfordshire County Council, court said that the statutory system to prevent abuse involv...
Courts are reluctant to impose liability on public authorities. In X v Bedfordshire County Council, court said that the statutory system to prevent abuse involved a number of different agencies, including local authorities, the police, the education authority etc. and to make one liable would be unjust. To impose a duty on all of them
would make it impossible to determine which one was liable. Therefore the defendant was not liable. This was justified in Gorringe v Calverdale. Substantial claims for compensation will lead to the taxpayers’ money being diverted away from general expenditure on public services. Policy issues are not justiciable; courts are not equipped to adjudicate on public bodies’
policy decisions to provide one service instead of another. This led to policy distinction. The danger of liability will lead to “defensive” practices; they may be over-cautious and not act for public benefit in order to minimise the risk of tort liability. Maladministration by public bodies can be remedied in other ways e.g. breach of statutory duty claims, complaints to the Parliamentary Ombudsman etc.
In Dorset Yacht: the authority was liable in negligence for allowing boys to escape, but could never have been liable for policy of allowing borstal boys to work on the island. In Stovin v Wise [1996] Lord Hoffmann held “the distinction between policy and operations is an inadequate tool with which to discover whether it is inappropriate to impose a duty of care” because the distinction is often illusive in practice. The distinction was subsequently revived by the House of Lords in Barrett v Enfield [1999]. Lord Slynn stated “The greater the element of policy involved, the wider the area of discretion accorded, the more likely it is that the matter is not justifiable so no action in negligence can be brought”. The distinction now plays a relatively minor role in deciding whether a public authority owes a duty of care. It is just one factor in deciding whether a decision is justiciable. It is now more common to limit public authority liability on the basis of other factors — e.g. Caparo test.
It is clear authorities owe a duty of care in relation to their positive operational acts: e.g. Rigby v
Chief Constable [1985]: police driver owed a duty of care in relation to other road users or pedestrians.
Furhtermore in Gorringe v Calverdale [2004], it was held that authorities are subject to the same test for a duty of care as private bodies,the mere existence of a statutory power/duty to act cannot give rise to a duty of care in negligence. It is understandable where the authority has assumed responsibility for C’s safety, they will generally be liable for omissions but the court will still consider Fair Just and Reasonable rule.
Are authorities under a duty to protect Claimant from harm caused by a third party? There are Two key categories of cases here: (i) police failing to prevent third party from harming Claimant; (ii) an ambulance failing to save Claimant who was injured previously by third party. Police are generally not liable for 3rd party harming Claimant, whereas an ambulance comes under a duty to help Claimant and will be liable for failing to aid. In Kent v Griffiths, Claimant suffered an asthma attack. Ambulance took 40 mins to arrive as a result Claimant suffered brain damage. It was held that ambulance owed Claimant a duty of care. The key issue is assumption of responsibility. By answering a 999 call, the ambulance assumes responsibility toward the injured person. Further, it is Fair Just and Reasonable because it will encourage the ambulance service to properly perform their core service.
Whereas the police and other public bodies will generally not be under a duty of care to take positive action to protect Claimant from injury by 3rd party, unless they have: (i) clearly assumed responsibility for Claimant in respect of his safety which requires more than a 999 call and (ii) they have assumed control over 3rd party and should have foreseen third party would cause harm to people in close proximity. In Hill v Chief Constable, there was insufficiently proximate relationship between the police conduct and potential
victims. The police only knew a broad class of people would be affected by the failure to catch the killer, no nexus to a specific victim. Further it was not Fair Just and Reasonable because liability may have a chilling effect on police.
https://wn.com/Public_Authorities
Courts are reluctant to impose liability on public authorities. In X v Bedfordshire County Council, court said that the statutory system to prevent abuse involved a number of different agencies, including local authorities, the police, the education authority etc. and to make one liable would be unjust. To impose a duty on all of them
would make it impossible to determine which one was liable. Therefore the defendant was not liable. This was justified in Gorringe v Calverdale. Substantial claims for compensation will lead to the taxpayers’ money being diverted away from general expenditure on public services. Policy issues are not justiciable; courts are not equipped to adjudicate on public bodies’
policy decisions to provide one service instead of another. This led to policy distinction. The danger of liability will lead to “defensive” practices; they may be over-cautious and not act for public benefit in order to minimise the risk of tort liability. Maladministration by public bodies can be remedied in other ways e.g. breach of statutory duty claims, complaints to the Parliamentary Ombudsman etc.
In Dorset Yacht: the authority was liable in negligence for allowing boys to escape, but could never have been liable for policy of allowing borstal boys to work on the island. In Stovin v Wise [1996] Lord Hoffmann held “the distinction between policy and operations is an inadequate tool with which to discover whether it is inappropriate to impose a duty of care” because the distinction is often illusive in practice. The distinction was subsequently revived by the House of Lords in Barrett v Enfield [1999]. Lord Slynn stated “The greater the element of policy involved, the wider the area of discretion accorded, the more likely it is that the matter is not justifiable so no action in negligence can be brought”. The distinction now plays a relatively minor role in deciding whether a public authority owes a duty of care. It is just one factor in deciding whether a decision is justiciable. It is now more common to limit public authority liability on the basis of other factors — e.g. Caparo test.
It is clear authorities owe a duty of care in relation to their positive operational acts: e.g. Rigby v
Chief Constable [1985]: police driver owed a duty of care in relation to other road users or pedestrians.
Furhtermore in Gorringe v Calverdale [2004], it was held that authorities are subject to the same test for a duty of care as private bodies,the mere existence of a statutory power/duty to act cannot give rise to a duty of care in negligence. It is understandable where the authority has assumed responsibility for C’s safety, they will generally be liable for omissions but the court will still consider Fair Just and Reasonable rule.
Are authorities under a duty to protect Claimant from harm caused by a third party? There are Two key categories of cases here: (i) police failing to prevent third party from harming Claimant; (ii) an ambulance failing to save Claimant who was injured previously by third party. Police are generally not liable for 3rd party harming Claimant, whereas an ambulance comes under a duty to help Claimant and will be liable for failing to aid. In Kent v Griffiths, Claimant suffered an asthma attack. Ambulance took 40 mins to arrive as a result Claimant suffered brain damage. It was held that ambulance owed Claimant a duty of care. The key issue is assumption of responsibility. By answering a 999 call, the ambulance assumes responsibility toward the injured person. Further, it is Fair Just and Reasonable because it will encourage the ambulance service to properly perform their core service.
Whereas the police and other public bodies will generally not be under a duty of care to take positive action to protect Claimant from injury by 3rd party, unless they have: (i) clearly assumed responsibility for Claimant in respect of his safety which requires more than a 999 call and (ii) they have assumed control over 3rd party and should have foreseen third party would cause harm to people in close proximity. In Hill v Chief Constable, there was insufficiently proximate relationship between the police conduct and potential
victims. The police only knew a broad class of people would be affected by the failure to catch the killer, no nexus to a specific victim. Further it was not Fair Just and Reasonable because liability may have a chilling effect on police.
- published: 29 Nov 2018
- views: 2758
15:13
mod07lec33 - Public Authority - I
Public Authority (PA), definition of 'public authority' under section 2 of the RTI Act, importance of being a PA, duties of PA
Public Authority (PA), definition of 'public authority' under section 2 of the RTI Act, importance of being a PA, duties of PA
https://wn.com/Mod07Lec33_Public_Authority_I
Public Authority (PA), definition of 'public authority' under section 2 of the RTI Act, importance of being a PA, duties of PA
- published: 03 Nov 2020
- views: 1896
13:31
Responsibility of public authority Explained | @VelmuruganKasi
This video about, RTI Act 2005 Section 4(1)(a) in Tamil | Responsibility of public authority Explained | @VelmuruganKasi
💥 Join our WhatsApp group by clickin...
This video about, RTI Act 2005 Section 4(1)(a) in Tamil | Responsibility of public authority Explained | @VelmuruganKasi
💥 Join our WhatsApp group by clicking the link below (free): 👇👇👇
https://chat.whatsapp.com/LrB1DIRkYdcFJ8Nhrnk8P2
Section 4(1)(a) in The Right To Information Act, 2005
(a) maintain all its records duly catalogued and indexed in a manner and the form which facilitates the right to information under this Act and ensure that all records that are appropriate to be computerised are, within a reasonable time and subject to availability of resources, computerised and connected through a network all over the country on different systems so that access to such records is facilitated;
🔴 Subscribe for more awareness information just like this:
https://youtube.com/c/VelmuruganKasi
🎬 Watch my most recent uploads:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC279Khzc48NZrY3100EG0pg
🌟Follow this playlist link:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqDOnsBjWSsbwPmMN49CjIWRMDg5jvhQ5
Facebook :
https://www.facebook.com/velmurugankasi2
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/velmurugan_kasi
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/velmurugankasi4
Telegram Group:
https://t.me/+ryxwuIOpnK4zZGY1
_______________________________________________
#RTI
#rtiact2005section4(1)(a)
#Responsibilityofpublicauthorityexplained
#velmurugankasi
_______________________________________________
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
https://wn.com/Responsibility_Of_Public_Authority_Explained_|_Velmurugankasi
This video about, RTI Act 2005 Section 4(1)(a) in Tamil | Responsibility of public authority Explained | @VelmuruganKasi
💥 Join our WhatsApp group by clicking the link below (free): 👇👇👇
https://chat.whatsapp.com/LrB1DIRkYdcFJ8Nhrnk8P2
Section 4(1)(a) in The Right To Information Act, 2005
(a) maintain all its records duly catalogued and indexed in a manner and the form which facilitates the right to information under this Act and ensure that all records that are appropriate to be computerised are, within a reasonable time and subject to availability of resources, computerised and connected through a network all over the country on different systems so that access to such records is facilitated;
🔴 Subscribe for more awareness information just like this:
https://youtube.com/c/VelmuruganKasi
🎬 Watch my most recent uploads:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC279Khzc48NZrY3100EG0pg
🌟Follow this playlist link:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqDOnsBjWSsbwPmMN49CjIWRMDg5jvhQ5
Facebook :
https://www.facebook.com/velmurugankasi2
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/velmurugan_kasi
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/velmurugankasi4
Telegram Group:
https://t.me/+ryxwuIOpnK4zZGY1
_______________________________________________
#RTI
#rtiact2005section4(1)(a)
#Responsibilityofpublicauthorityexplained
#velmurugankasi
_______________________________________________
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
- published: 02 May 2022
- views: 1158
0:16
Darlene Cay, mula sa news authority ng Filipino
‘Bilang news authority ng Filipino, mas malaki ang misyon natin na bigyang-boses ang bawat Filipino.’ - Darlene Cay
Para sa mas malaking misyon, para sa mas ma...
‘Bilang news authority ng Filipino, mas malaki ang misyon natin na bigyang-boses ang bawat Filipino.’ - Darlene Cay
Para sa mas malaking misyon, para sa mas malawak na paglilngkod sa bayan, ito ang GMA Integrated News sa GMA Pinoy TV.
https://wn.com/Darlene_Cay,_Mula_Sa_News_Authority_Ng_Filipino
‘Bilang news authority ng Filipino, mas malaki ang misyon natin na bigyang-boses ang bawat Filipino.’ - Darlene Cay
Para sa mas malaking misyon, para sa mas malawak na paglilngkod sa bayan, ito ang GMA Integrated News sa GMA Pinoy TV.
- published: 04 Mar 2024
- views: 134
11:27
mod08lec40 - Public Authority - VIII
Continuation of the discussion on the status of NGOs under the RTI Act
Continuation of the discussion on the status of NGOs under the RTI Act
https://wn.com/Mod08Lec40_Public_Authority_Viii
Continuation of the discussion on the status of NGOs under the RTI Act
- published: 03 Nov 2020
- views: 921