-
Judicial Review: Crash Course Government and Politics #21
Today, Craig Benzine is going to tell you about the Supreme Court's most important case, Marbury v. Madison, and how the court granted itself the power of judicial review. Judicial review is the power to examine and invalidate actions of the legislative and executive branches. It happens at both the state and federal court levels, but today we're going to focus primarily on the court at the top - the Supreme Court of the United States. Now it's important to remember that the court has granted itself these powers and they aren't found within the Constitution, but as with the executive and legislative branches, the courts rely heavily on implied powers to get stuff done.
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios
Support is provided by Voqal: h...
published: 27 Jun 2015
-
What Is the Judicial Branch of the U.S. Government? | History
What are the origins of the judicial branch of the U.S. government? What powers does the Supreme Court have, and what are its most notable rulings?
Subscribe for more HISTORY:
http://histv.co/SubscribeHistoryYT
Newsletter: https://www.history.com/newsletter
Website - http://www.history.com
/posts
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/History
Twitter - https://twitter.com/history
HISTORY Topical Video
Season 1
History Topical
Whether you're looking for more on American Revolution battles, WWII generals, architectural wonders, secrets of the ancient world, U.S. presidents, Civil War leaders, famous explorers or the stories behind your favorite holidays.
HISTORY®, now reaching more than 98 million homes, is the leading destination for award-winning original series and specials that connect...
published: 29 Jan 2018
-
The Judicial Branch Explained
The role of the judicial branch is to interpret and apply the law to settle conflicts. Learn about the different types of courts and the three levels of courts within Georgia’s judicial branch.
For more episodes, specials, and information, check out our website at https://www.gpb.org/georgiastories
Give us a follow!
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GPBEducation
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/gpbeducation/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/GPBEducation
published: 13 Jun 2018
-
EU Judicial Review - Arts 263 and 265 TFEU
An examination of judicial review and the relevant procedure under EU law and in particular articles 263, 264 and 265.
Firstly there has to be a binding piece of secondary legislation such as a regulation, directive or decision and not a recommendation or opinion as these are not binding.
A review has to be brought within two months of publication in the Official Journal or two months from when the applicant first new about the act.
There are four grounds of review:
Lack of competence (Germany v EP & Council [2000] (Tobacco advertising case))
Infringement of an essential procedural requirement (Roquette Frères v Council [1980])
Infringement of the Treaty or any rule of law relating to its application (Hautala v Council [2001])
Misuse of power (UK v Council (Re. Working Time Directive) [...
published: 30 Aug 2016
-
Judicial Decisions: Crash Course Government and Politics #22
Today, Craig Benzine is going to dive into the factors that influence judicial decisions. As you may have noticed, the Supreme Court recently handed down some pretty big decisions on same-sex marriage (in Obergefell v Hodges) and the Affordable Care Act (in King v. Burwell). Now, it's important to remember that these decisions are not made in a vacuum, but influenced by the other branches of government, political affiliations, and past court decisions. We’re also talk about a judge’s judicial philosophy - that is their relative restraint or activism in making decisions on laws. Judicial restraint is often equated with conservatism, but as we’ll show you, this is not always the case.
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios
Support is provi...
published: 10 Jul 2015
-
Opinion: how the government wants to limit judicial review | FT
David Allen Green, the FT's legal expert, explains the changes proposed to the judicial review system. Read more at:
See if you get the FT for free as a student (http://ft.com/schoolsarefree) or start a £1 trial: https://subs.ft.com/spa3_trial?segmentId=3d4ba81b-96bb-cef0-9ece-29efd6ef2132
► Check out our Community tab for more stories or to suggest videos.
► Listen to our podcasts: https://www.ft.com/podcasts
► Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/financialtimes
published: 21 Aug 2020
-
EN VIVO: Audiencia del Poder Judicial contra Keiko Fujimori y Fuerza Popular | Hoy 31/08/2021
EN VIVO: Audiencia del Poder Judicial contra Keiko Fujimori y Fuerza Popular | Hoy 31/08/2021
published: 31 Aug 2021
-
🔴 EN VIVO | AUDIENCIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL CONTRA KEIKO FUJIMORI Y FUERZA POPULAR HOY 31 DE AGOSTO
🔴 EN VIVO | AUDIENCIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL CONTRA KEIKO FUJIMORI Y FUERZA POPULAR HOY 31 DE AGOSTO
#PedroCastillo #Audiencia #KeikoFujimori
Bienvenido a nuestro canal hermano Peruano. A través de este medio queremos hacerte llegar noticias de actualidad, politica y deportes. ✅
Youtube ►http://bit.ly/Peruanoinformado
Sitio Web ► https://peruanoinformado.com/
Facebook ► http://bit.ly/PeruanoInformado
Twitter ► http://bit.ly/Peruano_informado
Instagram ► http://bit.ly/Peruinformado
Si te gusta nuestro contenido, apóyanos compartiendo la informacíon en tus redes sociales.
🔥Si deseas apoyarnos con un donativo especial, el cual será recibido como una muestra de aprecio y motivación para continuar mejorando.
AQUÍ ✅: 👉 https://paypal.me/PeruanoInformado01?locale.x=es_XC
📌Si lo hiciste muchi...
published: 31 Aug 2021
-
Judicial Branch of U.S. Government
The Supreme Court is well-known because it decides landmark cases, but it hears only a fraction of the federal cases each year. This video gives an overview of the Supreme Court and its powers in addition to providing information on federal district and appellate courts. The interaction of the three levels of federal courts is demonstrated as well.
published: 05 Aug 2016
8:01
Judicial Review: Crash Course Government and Politics #21
Today, Craig Benzine is going to tell you about the Supreme Court's most important case, Marbury v. Madison, and how the court granted itself the power of judic...
Today, Craig Benzine is going to tell you about the Supreme Court's most important case, Marbury v. Madison, and how the court granted itself the power of judicial review. Judicial review is the power to examine and invalidate actions of the legislative and executive branches. It happens at both the state and federal court levels, but today we're going to focus primarily on the court at the top - the Supreme Court of the United States. Now it's important to remember that the court has granted itself these powers and they aren't found within the Constitution, but as with the executive and legislative branches, the courts rely heavily on implied powers to get stuff done.
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios
Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org
All Flickr.com images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
https://wn.com/Judicial_Review_Crash_Course_Government_And_Politics_21
Today, Craig Benzine is going to tell you about the Supreme Court's most important case, Marbury v. Madison, and how the court granted itself the power of judicial review. Judicial review is the power to examine and invalidate actions of the legislative and executive branches. It happens at both the state and federal court levels, but today we're going to focus primarily on the court at the top - the Supreme Court of the United States. Now it's important to remember that the court has granted itself these powers and they aren't found within the Constitution, but as with the executive and legislative branches, the courts rely heavily on implied powers to get stuff done.
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios
Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org
All Flickr.com images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
- published: 27 Jun 2015
- views: 1448364
3:09
What Is the Judicial Branch of the U.S. Government? | History
What are the origins of the judicial branch of the U.S. government? What powers does the Supreme Court have, and what are its most notable rulings?
Subscribe f...
What are the origins of the judicial branch of the U.S. government? What powers does the Supreme Court have, and what are its most notable rulings?
Subscribe for more HISTORY:
http://histv.co/SubscribeHistoryYT
Newsletter: https://www.history.com/newsletter
Website - http://www.history.com
/posts
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/History
Twitter - https://twitter.com/history
HISTORY Topical Video
Season 1
History Topical
Whether you're looking for more on American Revolution battles, WWII generals, architectural wonders, secrets of the ancient world, U.S. presidents, Civil War leaders, famous explorers or the stories behind your favorite holidays.
HISTORY®, now reaching more than 98 million homes, is the leading destination for award-winning original series and specials that connect viewers with history in an informative, immersive, and entertaining manner across all platforms. The network’s all-original programming slate features a roster of hit series, epic miniseries, and scripted event programming. Visit us at HISTORY.com for more info.
https://wn.com/What_Is_The_Judicial_Branch_Of_The_U.S._Government_|_History
What are the origins of the judicial branch of the U.S. government? What powers does the Supreme Court have, and what are its most notable rulings?
Subscribe for more HISTORY:
http://histv.co/SubscribeHistoryYT
Newsletter: https://www.history.com/newsletter
Website - http://www.history.com
/posts
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/History
Twitter - https://twitter.com/history
HISTORY Topical Video
Season 1
History Topical
Whether you're looking for more on American Revolution battles, WWII generals, architectural wonders, secrets of the ancient world, U.S. presidents, Civil War leaders, famous explorers or the stories behind your favorite holidays.
HISTORY®, now reaching more than 98 million homes, is the leading destination for award-winning original series and specials that connect viewers with history in an informative, immersive, and entertaining manner across all platforms. The network’s all-original programming slate features a roster of hit series, epic miniseries, and scripted event programming. Visit us at HISTORY.com for more info.
- published: 29 Jan 2018
- views: 846617
5:47
The Judicial Branch Explained
The role of the judicial branch is to interpret and apply the law to settle conflicts. Learn about the different types of courts and the three levels of courts ...
The role of the judicial branch is to interpret and apply the law to settle conflicts. Learn about the different types of courts and the three levels of courts within Georgia’s judicial branch.
For more episodes, specials, and information, check out our website at https://www.gpb.org/georgiastories
Give us a follow!
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GPBEducation
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/gpbeducation/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/GPBEducation
https://wn.com/The_Judicial_Branch_Explained
The role of the judicial branch is to interpret and apply the law to settle conflicts. Learn about the different types of courts and the three levels of courts within Georgia’s judicial branch.
For more episodes, specials, and information, check out our website at https://www.gpb.org/georgiastories
Give us a follow!
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GPBEducation
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/gpbeducation/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/GPBEducation
- published: 13 Jun 2018
- views: 124669
23:49
EU Judicial Review - Arts 263 and 265 TFEU
An examination of judicial review and the relevant procedure under EU law and in particular articles 263, 264 and 265.
Firstly there has to be a binding piece ...
An examination of judicial review and the relevant procedure under EU law and in particular articles 263, 264 and 265.
Firstly there has to be a binding piece of secondary legislation such as a regulation, directive or decision and not a recommendation or opinion as these are not binding.
A review has to be brought within two months of publication in the Official Journal or two months from when the applicant first new about the act.
There are four grounds of review:
Lack of competence (Germany v EP & Council [2000] (Tobacco advertising case))
Infringement of an essential procedural requirement (Roquette Frères v Council [1980])
Infringement of the Treaty or any rule of law relating to its application (Hautala v Council [2001])
Misuse of power (UK v Council (Re. Working Time Directive) [1996])
Locus standi for privileged applicants such as the European Council, European Commission, European Parliament and Member States is automatic.
Semi-privileged applicants such as the European Central Bank, the Court of Auditors and the Committee of Regions can also challenge legislation when it affects their prerogaative.
Challenging legislation through judicial review is much harder for non-privileged applicants as they can only challenge three types of act:
An act addressed to that person
An act of direct and individual concern
A regulatory act of direct concern with no implementing measures
The interpretation of direct and individual concern by the Court of Justice has been very problematic.
A person is only directly concerned when they are directly affected by a piece of legislation such as in Société Louis Dreyfus et Cie v. Commission [1998]. There can be no intervening discretion exercised by a Member State as was the case in Eridana v Commission [1969].
Individual concern is the most controversial area of judicial review since the case of Plaumann v Commission [1963] and the establishment of the Plaumann test. The idea of a fixed, closed class has been interpreted so narrowly as to be almost meaningless. In fact it almost only ever applies retrospectively as in the case of Alfred Toepfer v Commission [1965].
There have been attempts to ameliorate the effects of Plaumann such as the abstract terminology test of Calpak [1980] but this had little practical effect despite claiming to look behind the form to the substance of a piece of legislation. Codorniu [1994] took Calpak to its logical conclusion but unfortunately has never been followed. Attorney-General Jacobs in Unión de Pequeños Agricultores (UPA) v Council [2002] suggested an alternative test based on whether the legislation had a substantial, adverse impact on the applicant but this was rejected in that case itself as well as in Jégo-Quéré [2004].
The actual meaning of the final type of act (A regulatory act of direct concern with no implementing measures) is still unclear since the Lisbon treaty but both Inuit v EP & Council [2013] and T&L Sugars v Commission [2015] shed some light and suggest the insertion does not break new ground beyond Plaumann.
Article 264 empowers the court to annul a piece of legislation if a successful challenge is brought by an applicant.
Article 265 is the converse to article 263 and allows a challenge for failure to act. However there has to be a duty to act (European Parliament v Commission [1985]) but the legislation must have been addressed to that person (Lord Bethel v Commission [1982]). Even if the applicant is successful the institution can respond by simply defining its position.
An alternative for non-privileged applicants is to use art 267 (the preliminary reference procedure) but this has its own risks. An applicant has to break the law to bring the challenge and it is not certain that a court will make a reference to the CJEU.
https://wn.com/Eu_Judicial_Review_Arts_263_And_265_Tfeu
An examination of judicial review and the relevant procedure under EU law and in particular articles 263, 264 and 265.
Firstly there has to be a binding piece of secondary legislation such as a regulation, directive or decision and not a recommendation or opinion as these are not binding.
A review has to be brought within two months of publication in the Official Journal or two months from when the applicant first new about the act.
There are four grounds of review:
Lack of competence (Germany v EP & Council [2000] (Tobacco advertising case))
Infringement of an essential procedural requirement (Roquette Frères v Council [1980])
Infringement of the Treaty or any rule of law relating to its application (Hautala v Council [2001])
Misuse of power (UK v Council (Re. Working Time Directive) [1996])
Locus standi for privileged applicants such as the European Council, European Commission, European Parliament and Member States is automatic.
Semi-privileged applicants such as the European Central Bank, the Court of Auditors and the Committee of Regions can also challenge legislation when it affects their prerogaative.
Challenging legislation through judicial review is much harder for non-privileged applicants as they can only challenge three types of act:
An act addressed to that person
An act of direct and individual concern
A regulatory act of direct concern with no implementing measures
The interpretation of direct and individual concern by the Court of Justice has been very problematic.
A person is only directly concerned when they are directly affected by a piece of legislation such as in Société Louis Dreyfus et Cie v. Commission [1998]. There can be no intervening discretion exercised by a Member State as was the case in Eridana v Commission [1969].
Individual concern is the most controversial area of judicial review since the case of Plaumann v Commission [1963] and the establishment of the Plaumann test. The idea of a fixed, closed class has been interpreted so narrowly as to be almost meaningless. In fact it almost only ever applies retrospectively as in the case of Alfred Toepfer v Commission [1965].
There have been attempts to ameliorate the effects of Plaumann such as the abstract terminology test of Calpak [1980] but this had little practical effect despite claiming to look behind the form to the substance of a piece of legislation. Codorniu [1994] took Calpak to its logical conclusion but unfortunately has never been followed. Attorney-General Jacobs in Unión de Pequeños Agricultores (UPA) v Council [2002] suggested an alternative test based on whether the legislation had a substantial, adverse impact on the applicant but this was rejected in that case itself as well as in Jégo-Quéré [2004].
The actual meaning of the final type of act (A regulatory act of direct concern with no implementing measures) is still unclear since the Lisbon treaty but both Inuit v EP & Council [2013] and T&L Sugars v Commission [2015] shed some light and suggest the insertion does not break new ground beyond Plaumann.
Article 264 empowers the court to annul a piece of legislation if a successful challenge is brought by an applicant.
Article 265 is the converse to article 263 and allows a challenge for failure to act. However there has to be a duty to act (European Parliament v Commission [1985]) but the legislation must have been addressed to that person (Lord Bethel v Commission [1982]). Even if the applicant is successful the institution can respond by simply defining its position.
An alternative for non-privileged applicants is to use art 267 (the preliminary reference procedure) but this has its own risks. An applicant has to break the law to bring the challenge and it is not certain that a court will make a reference to the CJEU.
- published: 30 Aug 2016
- views: 43785
7:14
Judicial Decisions: Crash Course Government and Politics #22
Today, Craig Benzine is going to dive into the factors that influence judicial decisions. As you may have noticed, the Supreme Court recently handed down some p...
Today, Craig Benzine is going to dive into the factors that influence judicial decisions. As you may have noticed, the Supreme Court recently handed down some pretty big decisions on same-sex marriage (in Obergefell v Hodges) and the Affordable Care Act (in King v. Burwell). Now, it's important to remember that these decisions are not made in a vacuum, but influenced by the other branches of government, political affiliations, and past court decisions. We’re also talk about a judge’s judicial philosophy - that is their relative restraint or activism in making decisions on laws. Judicial restraint is often equated with conservatism, but as we’ll show you, this is not always the case.
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios
Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org
All attributed images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
https://wn.com/Judicial_Decisions_Crash_Course_Government_And_Politics_22
Today, Craig Benzine is going to dive into the factors that influence judicial decisions. As you may have noticed, the Supreme Court recently handed down some pretty big decisions on same-sex marriage (in Obergefell v Hodges) and the Affordable Care Act (in King v. Burwell). Now, it's important to remember that these decisions are not made in a vacuum, but influenced by the other branches of government, political affiliations, and past court decisions. We’re also talk about a judge’s judicial philosophy - that is their relative restraint or activism in making decisions on laws. Judicial restraint is often equated with conservatism, but as we’ll show you, this is not always the case.
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios
Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org
All attributed images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
- published: 10 Jul 2015
- views: 727667
9:53
Opinion: how the government wants to limit judicial review | FT
David Allen Green, the FT's legal expert, explains the changes proposed to the judicial review system. Read more at:
See if you get the FT for free as a stude...
David Allen Green, the FT's legal expert, explains the changes proposed to the judicial review system. Read more at:
See if you get the FT for free as a student (http://ft.com/schoolsarefree) or start a £1 trial: https://subs.ft.com/spa3_trial?segmentId=3d4ba81b-96bb-cef0-9ece-29efd6ef2132
► Check out our Community tab for more stories or to suggest videos.
► Listen to our podcasts: https://www.ft.com/podcasts
► Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/financialtimes
https://wn.com/Opinion_How_The_Government_Wants_To_Limit_Judicial_Review_|_Ft
David Allen Green, the FT's legal expert, explains the changes proposed to the judicial review system. Read more at:
See if you get the FT for free as a student (http://ft.com/schoolsarefree) or start a £1 trial: https://subs.ft.com/spa3_trial?segmentId=3d4ba81b-96bb-cef0-9ece-29efd6ef2132
► Check out our Community tab for more stories or to suggest videos.
► Listen to our podcasts: https://www.ft.com/podcasts
► Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/financialtimes
- published: 21 Aug 2020
- views: 9523
25:25
🔴 EN VIVO | AUDIENCIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL CONTRA KEIKO FUJIMORI Y FUERZA POPULAR HOY 31 DE AGOSTO
🔴 EN VIVO | AUDIENCIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL CONTRA KEIKO FUJIMORI Y FUERZA POPULAR HOY 31 DE AGOSTO
#PedroCastillo #Audiencia #KeikoFujimori
Bienvenido a nuestr...
🔴 EN VIVO | AUDIENCIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL CONTRA KEIKO FUJIMORI Y FUERZA POPULAR HOY 31 DE AGOSTO
#PedroCastillo #Audiencia #KeikoFujimori
Bienvenido a nuestro canal hermano Peruano. A través de este medio queremos hacerte llegar noticias de actualidad, politica y deportes. ✅
Youtube ►http://bit.ly/Peruanoinformado
Sitio Web ► https://peruanoinformado.com/
Facebook ► http://bit.ly/PeruanoInformado
Twitter ► http://bit.ly/Peruano_informado
Instagram ► http://bit.ly/Peruinformado
Si te gusta nuestro contenido, apóyanos compartiendo la informacíon en tus redes sociales.
🔥Si deseas apoyarnos con un donativo especial, el cual será recibido como una muestra de aprecio y motivación para continuar mejorando.
AQUÍ ✅: 👉 https://paypal.me/PeruanoInformado01?locale.x=es_XC
📌Si lo hiciste muchisimas gracias 🥺
🧏♂️ Recuerda "UN PERUANO INFORMADO ES UN PERUANO QUE SE RESPETA!
https://wn.com/🔴_En_Vivo_|_Audiencia_Del_Poder_Judicial_Contra_Keiko_Fujimori_Y_Fuerza_Popular_Hoy_31_De_Agosto
🔴 EN VIVO | AUDIENCIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL CONTRA KEIKO FUJIMORI Y FUERZA POPULAR HOY 31 DE AGOSTO
#PedroCastillo #Audiencia #KeikoFujimori
Bienvenido a nuestro canal hermano Peruano. A través de este medio queremos hacerte llegar noticias de actualidad, politica y deportes. ✅
Youtube ►http://bit.ly/Peruanoinformado
Sitio Web ► https://peruanoinformado.com/
Facebook ► http://bit.ly/PeruanoInformado
Twitter ► http://bit.ly/Peruano_informado
Instagram ► http://bit.ly/Peruinformado
Si te gusta nuestro contenido, apóyanos compartiendo la informacíon en tus redes sociales.
🔥Si deseas apoyarnos con un donativo especial, el cual será recibido como una muestra de aprecio y motivación para continuar mejorando.
AQUÍ ✅: 👉 https://paypal.me/PeruanoInformado01?locale.x=es_XC
📌Si lo hiciste muchisimas gracias 🥺
🧏♂️ Recuerda "UN PERUANO INFORMADO ES UN PERUANO QUE SE RESPETA!
- published: 31 Aug 2021
- views: 64401
5:55
Judicial Branch of U.S. Government
The Supreme Court is well-known because it decides landmark cases, but it hears only a fraction of the federal cases each year. This video gives an overview of...
The Supreme Court is well-known because it decides landmark cases, but it hears only a fraction of the federal cases each year. This video gives an overview of the Supreme Court and its powers in addition to providing information on federal district and appellate courts. The interaction of the three levels of federal courts is demonstrated as well.
https://wn.com/Judicial_Branch_Of_U.S._Government
The Supreme Court is well-known because it decides landmark cases, but it hears only a fraction of the federal cases each year. This video gives an overview of the Supreme Court and its powers in addition to providing information on federal district and appellate courts. The interaction of the three levels of federal courts is demonstrated as well.
- published: 05 Aug 2016
- views: 66989