The non-aggression principle (NAP) is an ethical and moral principle that aims to avoid conflict between individuals by prohibiting crimes like theft and murder. The crimes prohibited by the NAP are behaviors that are malum in se as opposed to behaviors that are prohibited due to laws, social norms, or moral systems. The principle asserts aggression is always an illegitimate encroachment upon another individual's life, liberty, or property, or attempt to obtain from another via deceit what could not be consensually obtained. For example, the NAP prohibits the initiation of force by one individual or group of individuals against another individual or group of individuals.
The NAP is the defining principle of libertarianism. According to some libertarians the NAP and property rights are closely linked, since what aggression is depends on what a person's rights are. Aggression, for the purposes of NAP, is defined as initiating or threatening the use of violence against an individual or legitimately owned property of another.
The non-aggression principle is an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression", for the purposes of NAP, is defined as initiating or threatening the use of any and all forcible interference with an individual or individual's property.
Is it valid? How does it apply to the FCC? the police?
Credits:
Vsauce - S1E2: The Greater Good (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sl5KJ69qiA&t=1511s)
wearelibertarians.com - Thumbnail
Mises.org - Net Neutrality (https://mises.org/wire/net-neutrality-government-cant-know-correct-price-internet-service)
published: 28 Dec 2017
Non-Aggression Principle
The non-aggression principle (also called the non-aggression axiom, or the anti-coercion or zero aggression principle or non-initiation of force) is an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression" is defined as the "initiation" of physical force against persons or property, the threat of such, or fraud upon persons or their property. In contrast to pacifism, the non-aggression principle does not preclude violent self-defense. The principle is a deontological (or rule-based) ethical stance. The non-aggression principle is the foundation of the Libertarian Party.
The Libertarian Party is not just a political organization. We are a group of dedicated, inspired, and highly motivated Libertarian candidates and activists determined to reduce the size a...
published: 31 Jan 2016
Ayn Rand explains the Non-Aggression Principle
This excerpt was taken from the Phil Donahue interview.
The Non-Aggression Principle, Voluntaryism and LIBERTY are the key fundamentals to a FREE-SOCIETY.
◐ ⓀⒺⓇⓀ ◐
• Album ~ Change Is Gradual
• Artists ~ Processory , Jori Hulkkonen , Jerry Valuri
• Label ~ Sugarcane Recordings [SGR014]
• Rls Date ~ 2011-05-31
• Art ~ http://peacelovemusic248.deviantart.com/
• Buy ~ http://www.beatport.com/release/change-is-gradual/367456
published: 06 May 2012
Excursions, Ep. 72: Defending the Non-Aggression Principle: A Reply to Matt Zwolinski, Part 1
George H. Smith examines the claim that the non-aggression principle should be viewed as a defeasible presumption.
Read this essay: http://bit.ly/1MftLRD
Download the .mp3: http://bit.ly/1NROXTk
Part 1: This video
Part 2: http://bit.ly/1UqGvuI
Part 3: http://bit.ly/1O0yVpa
Part 4: http://bit.ly/1PGvHHH
Part 5: http://bit.ly/1W3NV8O
published: 15 Dec 2015
The Non-Aggression Principle
published: 29 Oct 2019
Intro to The Non-Aggression Principle
The Non-Aggression Principle describes the philosophy that we all live in our personal lives without thinking about it. Don't hurt people and don't take their stuff. What makes the NAP unique is its logical extension of these rules to those that hold authority in our society. Organizations like the government are just groups of people so they should not be immune to the moral standards that we all live by.
Reading:
http://archive.lewrockwell.com/block/block26.html/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/liberty_theory/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/libertytheory/
Website: http://libertytheory.com/
The non-aggression principle is an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression", for the purposes of NAP, is defined ...
The non-aggression principle is an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression", for the purposes of NAP, is defined as initiating or threatening the use of any and all forcible interference with an individual or individual's property.
Is it valid? How does it apply to the FCC? the police?
Credits:
Vsauce - S1E2: The Greater Good (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sl5KJ69qiA&t=1511s)
wearelibertarians.com - Thumbnail
Mises.org - Net Neutrality (https://mises.org/wire/net-neutrality-government-cant-know-correct-price-internet-service)
The non-aggression principle is an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression", for the purposes of NAP, is defined as initiating or threatening the use of any and all forcible interference with an individual or individual's property.
Is it valid? How does it apply to the FCC? the police?
Credits:
Vsauce - S1E2: The Greater Good (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sl5KJ69qiA&t=1511s)
wearelibertarians.com - Thumbnail
Mises.org - Net Neutrality (https://mises.org/wire/net-neutrality-government-cant-know-correct-price-internet-service)
The non-aggression principle (also called the non-aggression axiom, or the anti-coercion or zero aggression principle or non-initiation of force) is an ethical ...
The non-aggression principle (also called the non-aggression axiom, or the anti-coercion or zero aggression principle or non-initiation of force) is an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression" is defined as the "initiation" of physical force against persons or property, the threat of such, or fraud upon persons or their property. In contrast to pacifism, the non-aggression principle does not preclude violent self-defense. The principle is a deontological (or rule-based) ethical stance. The non-aggression principle is the foundation of the Libertarian Party.
The Libertarian Party is not just a political organization. We are a group of dedicated, inspired, and highly motivated Libertarian candidates and activists determined to reduce the size and scope of intrusive government and private organizations seeking to use government power against their competition and the people. If this is something you are interested in, please join with us- http://lpwa.org/
Video produced by http://www.LibertarianLeadership.org
The non-aggression principle (also called the non-aggression axiom, or the anti-coercion or zero aggression principle or non-initiation of force) is an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression" is defined as the "initiation" of physical force against persons or property, the threat of such, or fraud upon persons or their property. In contrast to pacifism, the non-aggression principle does not preclude violent self-defense. The principle is a deontological (or rule-based) ethical stance. The non-aggression principle is the foundation of the Libertarian Party.
The Libertarian Party is not just a political organization. We are a group of dedicated, inspired, and highly motivated Libertarian candidates and activists determined to reduce the size and scope of intrusive government and private organizations seeking to use government power against their competition and the people. If this is something you are interested in, please join with us- http://lpwa.org/
Video produced by http://www.LibertarianLeadership.org
This excerpt was taken from the Phil Donahue interview.
The Non-Aggression Principle, Voluntaryism and LIBERTY are the key fundamentals to a FREE-SOCIETY.
This excerpt was taken from the Phil Donahue interview.
The Non-Aggression Principle, Voluntaryism and LIBERTY are the key fundamentals to a FREE-SOCIETY.
This excerpt was taken from the Phil Donahue interview.
The Non-Aggression Principle, Voluntaryism and LIBERTY are the key fundamentals to a FREE-SOCIETY.
George H. Smith examines the claim that the non-aggression principle should be viewed as a defeasible presumption.
Read this essay: http://bit.ly/1MftLRD
Downl...
George H. Smith examines the claim that the non-aggression principle should be viewed as a defeasible presumption.
Read this essay: http://bit.ly/1MftLRD
Download the .mp3: http://bit.ly/1NROXTk
Part 1: This video
Part 2: http://bit.ly/1UqGvuI
Part 3: http://bit.ly/1O0yVpa
Part 4: http://bit.ly/1PGvHHH
Part 5: http://bit.ly/1W3NV8O
George H. Smith examines the claim that the non-aggression principle should be viewed as a defeasible presumption.
Read this essay: http://bit.ly/1MftLRD
Download the .mp3: http://bit.ly/1NROXTk
Part 1: This video
Part 2: http://bit.ly/1UqGvuI
Part 3: http://bit.ly/1O0yVpa
Part 4: http://bit.ly/1PGvHHH
Part 5: http://bit.ly/1W3NV8O
The Non-Aggression Principle describes the philosophy that we all live in our personal lives without thinking about it. Don't hurt people and don't take their s...
The Non-Aggression Principle describes the philosophy that we all live in our personal lives without thinking about it. Don't hurt people and don't take their stuff. What makes the NAP unique is its logical extension of these rules to those that hold authority in our society. Organizations like the government are just groups of people so they should not be immune to the moral standards that we all live by.
Reading:
http://archive.lewrockwell.com/block/block26.html/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/liberty_theory/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/libertytheory/
Website: http://libertytheory.com/
The Non-Aggression Principle describes the philosophy that we all live in our personal lives without thinking about it. Don't hurt people and don't take their stuff. What makes the NAP unique is its logical extension of these rules to those that hold authority in our society. Organizations like the government are just groups of people so they should not be immune to the moral standards that we all live by.
Reading:
http://archive.lewrockwell.com/block/block26.html/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/liberty_theory/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/libertytheory/
Website: http://libertytheory.com/
The non-aggression principle is an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression", for the purposes of NAP, is defined as initiating or threatening the use of any and all forcible interference with an individual or individual's property.
Is it valid? How does it apply to the FCC? the police?
Credits:
Vsauce - S1E2: The Greater Good (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sl5KJ69qiA&t=1511s)
wearelibertarians.com - Thumbnail
Mises.org - Net Neutrality (https://mises.org/wire/net-neutrality-government-cant-know-correct-price-internet-service)
The non-aggression principle (also called the non-aggression axiom, or the anti-coercion or zero aggression principle or non-initiation of force) is an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression" is defined as the "initiation" of physical force against persons or property, the threat of such, or fraud upon persons or their property. In contrast to pacifism, the non-aggression principle does not preclude violent self-defense. The principle is a deontological (or rule-based) ethical stance. The non-aggression principle is the foundation of the Libertarian Party.
The Libertarian Party is not just a political organization. We are a group of dedicated, inspired, and highly motivated Libertarian candidates and activists determined to reduce the size and scope of intrusive government and private organizations seeking to use government power against their competition and the people. If this is something you are interested in, please join with us- http://lpwa.org/
Video produced by http://www.LibertarianLeadership.org
This excerpt was taken from the Phil Donahue interview.
The Non-Aggression Principle, Voluntaryism and LIBERTY are the key fundamentals to a FREE-SOCIETY.
George H. Smith examines the claim that the non-aggression principle should be viewed as a defeasible presumption.
Read this essay: http://bit.ly/1MftLRD
Download the .mp3: http://bit.ly/1NROXTk
Part 1: This video
Part 2: http://bit.ly/1UqGvuI
Part 3: http://bit.ly/1O0yVpa
Part 4: http://bit.ly/1PGvHHH
Part 5: http://bit.ly/1W3NV8O
The Non-Aggression Principle describes the philosophy that we all live in our personal lives without thinking about it. Don't hurt people and don't take their stuff. What makes the NAP unique is its logical extension of these rules to those that hold authority in our society. Organizations like the government are just groups of people so they should not be immune to the moral standards that we all live by.
Reading:
http://archive.lewrockwell.com/block/block26.html/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/liberty_theory/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/libertytheory/
Website: http://libertytheory.com/
The non-aggression principle (NAP) is an ethical and moral principle that aims to avoid conflict between individuals by prohibiting crimes like theft and murder. The crimes prohibited by the NAP are behaviors that are malum in se as opposed to behaviors that are prohibited due to laws, social norms, or moral systems. The principle asserts aggression is always an illegitimate encroachment upon another individual's life, liberty, or property, or attempt to obtain from another via deceit what could not be consensually obtained. For example, the NAP prohibits the initiation of force by one individual or group of individuals against another individual or group of individuals.
The NAP is the defining principle of libertarianism. According to some libertarians the NAP and property rights are closely linked, since what aggression is depends on what a person's rights are. Aggression, for the purposes of NAP, is defined as initiating or threatening the use of violence against an individual or legitimately owned property of another.