Benjamin Nathan Cardozo (May 24, 1870 – July 9, 1938) was an Americanjurist who served on the New York Court of Appeals and later as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. Cardozo is remembered for his significant influence on the development of American common law in the 20th century, in addition to his philosophy and vivid prose style. Cardozo served on the Supreme Court six years, from 1932 until his death in 1938. Many of his landmark decisions were delivered during his eighteen-year tenure on the New York Court of Appeals, the highest court of that state.
The True Crime of What’s inside the Box? | LegalEagle
When are you responsible for what’s in the box?
Get CuriosityStream AND Nebula for 30 days free https://curiositystream.com/legaleagle Special EXTENDED version only on Nebula!
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928). #TrueCrime #LegalEagle
Written by Devin Stone, Ilyse Fishman, & Tricia Aurand
Illustrations by Nik Gothic and Alex Duran
Edited by Amy McClung
Voices by Alexander Masters, Jamie Werner, and Kevin O’Connell
Summary from Wikipedia:
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928), is a leading case in American tort law on the question of liability to an unforeseeable plaintiff. The case was heard by the New York Court of Appeals, the highest state court in New York; its opinion was written by Chief Judge Benjamin Cardozo, ...
published: 29 Feb 2020
Benjamin N. Cardozo: Judge, Justice, Scholar - Jewish Law Institute Conference Day 1
published: 23 Mar 2017
The Nature of the Judicial Process by Benjamin N. CARDOZO read by Kazbek | Full Audio Book
The Nature of the Judicial Process by Benjamin N. CARDOZO (1870 - 1938)
Genre(s): Law
Read by: Kazbek in English
Chapters:
00:00:00 - 01 - Lecture I. Introduction. The Method of Philosophy.
00:51:08 - 02 - Lecture II. The Methods of History, Tradition and Sociology.
01:44:42 - 03 - Lecture III. The Method of Sociology. The Judge as a Legislator.
02:34:06 - 04 - Lecture IV. Adherence to Precedent. The Subconscious Element in the Judicial Process. Conclusion.
Benjamin N. Cardozo, one of the most influential American justists of his era, served as the New York Court of Appeals Chief Justice, before joining the Supreme Court. His 1921 book The Nature of the Judicial Process, now considered a legal classic, was compiled from The Storrs Lectures delivered at Yale Law School earlier...
published: 10 Jan 2021
Benjamin N. Cardozo: Judge, Justice, Scholar - Jewish Law Institute Conference Day 2
published: 25 Mar 2017
ICCMW Day 1: Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, US, is one of 67 universities taking part in the International Chamber of Commerce Mediation Competition 2015. The Competition is by far ICC’s biggest educational event and presents a unique opportunity to champion the merits of mediation as a form of dispute resolution. Follow the event with #ICCMW
published: 06 Feb 2015
The Benjamin N. Cardozo Portrait
Executive Director Trevor Goring talks about the Benjamin N. Cardozo Portrait.
The Trial Lawyer National Portrait Gallery is a vivid portrayal in portraiture and word of those who seek justice and defend the rights of those most vulnerable.
Welcome to our online video archive of original art documenting and celebrating the trial lawyer community.
View the full portrait here on our website: https://bit.ly/312d6QP
Follow us on social media
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawyerGallery
Facebook: https://bit.ly/2Gm12BK
Instagram: https://bit.ly/2umaGP8
When are you responsible for what’s in the box?
Get CuriosityStream AND Nebula for 30 days free https://curiositystream.com/legaleagle Special EXTENDED version...
When are you responsible for what’s in the box?
Get CuriosityStream AND Nebula for 30 days free https://curiositystream.com/legaleagle Special EXTENDED version only on Nebula!
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928). #TrueCrime #LegalEagle
Written by Devin Stone, Ilyse Fishman, & Tricia Aurand
Illustrations by Nik Gothic and Alex Duran
Edited by Amy McClung
Voices by Alexander Masters, Jamie Werner, and Kevin O’Connell
Summary from Wikipedia:
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928), is a leading case in American tort law on the question of liability to an unforeseeable plaintiff. The case was heard by the New York Court of Appeals, the highest state court in New York; its opinion was written by Chief Judge Benjamin Cardozo, a leading figure in the development of American common law and later a United States Supreme Court justice.
The plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf, was waiting at a Long Island Rail Road station in August 1924 while taking her daughters to the beach. Two men attempted to board the train before hers; one (aided by railroad employees) dropped a package that exploded, causing a large coin-operated scale on the platform to hit her. After the incident, she began to stammer, and subsequently sued the railroad, arguing that its employees had been negligent while assisting the man, and that she had been harmed by the neglect. In May 1927 she obtained a jury verdict of $6,000, which the railroad appealed. Palsgraf gained a 3–2 decision in the Appellate Division, and the railroad appealed again. Cardozo wrote for a 4–3 majority of the Court of Appeals, ruling that there was no negligence because the employees, in helping the man board, did not have a duty of care to Palsgraf as injury to her was not a foreseeable harm from aiding a man with a package. The original jury verdict was overturned, and the railroad won the case.
A number of factors, including the bizarre facts and Cardozo's outstanding reputation, made the case prominent in the legal profession, and it remains so, taught to most if not all American law students in torts class. Cardozo's conception, that tort liability can only occur when a defendant breaches a duty of care the defendant owes to a plaintiff, causing the injury sued for, has been widely accepted in American law. In dealing with proximate cause, many states have taken the approach championed by the Court of Appeals' dissenter in Palsgraf, Judge William S. Andrews.
(Thanks to CuriosityStream for sponsoring this video and helping to make this channel possible)
New episodes weekly! Subscribe here:
https://www.youtube.com/legaleagle?sub_confirmation=1
★More series on LegalEagle★
Real Lawyer Reacts: https://goo.gl/hw9vcE
Laws Broken: https://goo.gl/PJw3vK
Law 101: https://goo.gl/rrzFw3
Real Law Review: https://goo.gl/NHUoqc
I get asked a lot about whether being a practicing attorney is like being a lawyer on TV. I love watching legal movies and courtroom dramas. It's one of the reasons I decided to become a lawyer. But sometimes they make me want to pull my hair out because they are ridiculous. So I decided to make my own series exploring real cases and true crime. I believe that if you give people the relevant information they can make informed decisions about our world. The “law” is not necessarily the statutes that are passed by congress but are the rules that everyone agrees to live by. This series explores the cases and stories that shaped our law.
All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Music by Epidemic Sound: http://epidemicsound.com/creator
Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos!
========================================================
★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ ➜ https://twitter.com/LegalEagleDJ
★ More vids on Facebook: ➜ https://www.facebook.com/legaleaglereacts
★ Stella’s Insta ➜ https://www.instagram.com/stellathelegalbeagle
For promotional inquiries please reach out here: [email protected]
When are you responsible for what’s in the box?
Get CuriosityStream AND Nebula for 30 days free https://curiositystream.com/legaleagle Special EXTENDED version only on Nebula!
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928). #TrueCrime #LegalEagle
Written by Devin Stone, Ilyse Fishman, & Tricia Aurand
Illustrations by Nik Gothic and Alex Duran
Edited by Amy McClung
Voices by Alexander Masters, Jamie Werner, and Kevin O’Connell
Summary from Wikipedia:
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928), is a leading case in American tort law on the question of liability to an unforeseeable plaintiff. The case was heard by the New York Court of Appeals, the highest state court in New York; its opinion was written by Chief Judge Benjamin Cardozo, a leading figure in the development of American common law and later a United States Supreme Court justice.
The plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf, was waiting at a Long Island Rail Road station in August 1924 while taking her daughters to the beach. Two men attempted to board the train before hers; one (aided by railroad employees) dropped a package that exploded, causing a large coin-operated scale on the platform to hit her. After the incident, she began to stammer, and subsequently sued the railroad, arguing that its employees had been negligent while assisting the man, and that she had been harmed by the neglect. In May 1927 she obtained a jury verdict of $6,000, which the railroad appealed. Palsgraf gained a 3–2 decision in the Appellate Division, and the railroad appealed again. Cardozo wrote for a 4–3 majority of the Court of Appeals, ruling that there was no negligence because the employees, in helping the man board, did not have a duty of care to Palsgraf as injury to her was not a foreseeable harm from aiding a man with a package. The original jury verdict was overturned, and the railroad won the case.
A number of factors, including the bizarre facts and Cardozo's outstanding reputation, made the case prominent in the legal profession, and it remains so, taught to most if not all American law students in torts class. Cardozo's conception, that tort liability can only occur when a defendant breaches a duty of care the defendant owes to a plaintiff, causing the injury sued for, has been widely accepted in American law. In dealing with proximate cause, many states have taken the approach championed by the Court of Appeals' dissenter in Palsgraf, Judge William S. Andrews.
(Thanks to CuriosityStream for sponsoring this video and helping to make this channel possible)
New episodes weekly! Subscribe here:
https://www.youtube.com/legaleagle?sub_confirmation=1
★More series on LegalEagle★
Real Lawyer Reacts: https://goo.gl/hw9vcE
Laws Broken: https://goo.gl/PJw3vK
Law 101: https://goo.gl/rrzFw3
Real Law Review: https://goo.gl/NHUoqc
I get asked a lot about whether being a practicing attorney is like being a lawyer on TV. I love watching legal movies and courtroom dramas. It's one of the reasons I decided to become a lawyer. But sometimes they make me want to pull my hair out because they are ridiculous. So I decided to make my own series exploring real cases and true crime. I believe that if you give people the relevant information they can make informed decisions about our world. The “law” is not necessarily the statutes that are passed by congress but are the rules that everyone agrees to live by. This series explores the cases and stories that shaped our law.
All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Music by Epidemic Sound: http://epidemicsound.com/creator
Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos!
========================================================
★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ ➜ https://twitter.com/LegalEagleDJ
★ More vids on Facebook: ➜ https://www.facebook.com/legaleaglereacts
★ Stella’s Insta ➜ https://www.instagram.com/stellathelegalbeagle
For promotional inquiries please reach out here: [email protected]
The Nature of the Judicial Process by Benjamin N. CARDOZO (1870 - 1938)
Genre(s): Law
Read by: Kazbek in English
Chapters:
00:00:00 - 01 - Lecture I. In...
The Nature of the Judicial Process by Benjamin N. CARDOZO (1870 - 1938)
Genre(s): Law
Read by: Kazbek in English
Chapters:
00:00:00 - 01 - Lecture I. Introduction. The Method of Philosophy.
00:51:08 - 02 - Lecture II. The Methods of History, Tradition and Sociology.
01:44:42 - 03 - Lecture III. The Method of Sociology. The Judge as a Legislator.
02:34:06 - 04 - Lecture IV. Adherence to Precedent. The Subconscious Element in the Judicial Process. Conclusion.
Benjamin N. Cardozo, one of the most influential American justists of his era, served as the New York Court of Appeals Chief Justice, before joining the Supreme Court. His 1921 book The Nature of the Judicial Process, now considered a legal classic, was compiled from The Storrs Lectures delivered at Yale Law School earlier that year. In it he analyzes various factors underlying judicial decisions, and how these decisions in their turn influence the development of law, contrasting abstract ideals with court practice, and comparing American and English common law with legal systems of continental Europe.From Lecture I: 'The directive force of a principle may be exerted along the line of logical progression; this I will call the rule of analogy or the method of philosophy; along the line of historical development; this I will call the method of evolution; along the line of the customs of the community; this I will call the method of tradition; along the lines of justice, morals and social welfare, the mores of the day; and this I will call the method of sociology.' (Summary by Kazbek)
More information: https://librivox.org/the-nature-of-the-judicial-process-by-benjamin-n-cardozo/
LibriVox - free public domain audiobooks (https://librivox.org/)
The Nature of the Judicial Process by Benjamin N. CARDOZO (1870 - 1938)
Genre(s): Law
Read by: Kazbek in English
Chapters:
00:00:00 - 01 - Lecture I. Introduction. The Method of Philosophy.
00:51:08 - 02 - Lecture II. The Methods of History, Tradition and Sociology.
01:44:42 - 03 - Lecture III. The Method of Sociology. The Judge as a Legislator.
02:34:06 - 04 - Lecture IV. Adherence to Precedent. The Subconscious Element in the Judicial Process. Conclusion.
Benjamin N. Cardozo, one of the most influential American justists of his era, served as the New York Court of Appeals Chief Justice, before joining the Supreme Court. His 1921 book The Nature of the Judicial Process, now considered a legal classic, was compiled from The Storrs Lectures delivered at Yale Law School earlier that year. In it he analyzes various factors underlying judicial decisions, and how these decisions in their turn influence the development of law, contrasting abstract ideals with court practice, and comparing American and English common law with legal systems of continental Europe.From Lecture I: 'The directive force of a principle may be exerted along the line of logical progression; this I will call the rule of analogy or the method of philosophy; along the line of historical development; this I will call the method of evolution; along the line of the customs of the community; this I will call the method of tradition; along the lines of justice, morals and social welfare, the mores of the day; and this I will call the method of sociology.' (Summary by Kazbek)
More information: https://librivox.org/the-nature-of-the-judicial-process-by-benjamin-n-cardozo/
LibriVox - free public domain audiobooks (https://librivox.org/)
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, US, is one of 67 universities taking part in the International Chamber of Commerce Mediation Competition ...
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, US, is one of 67 universities taking part in the International Chamber of Commerce Mediation Competition 2015. The Competition is by far ICC’s biggest educational event and presents a unique opportunity to champion the merits of mediation as a form of dispute resolution. Follow the event with #ICCMW
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, US, is one of 67 universities taking part in the International Chamber of Commerce Mediation Competition 2015. The Competition is by far ICC’s biggest educational event and presents a unique opportunity to champion the merits of mediation as a form of dispute resolution. Follow the event with #ICCMW
Executive Director Trevor Goring talks about the Benjamin N. Cardozo Portrait.
The Trial Lawyer National Portrait Gallery is a vivid portrayal in portraiture a...
Executive Director Trevor Goring talks about the Benjamin N. Cardozo Portrait.
The Trial Lawyer National Portrait Gallery is a vivid portrayal in portraiture and word of those who seek justice and defend the rights of those most vulnerable.
Welcome to our online video archive of original art documenting and celebrating the trial lawyer community.
View the full portrait here on our website: https://bit.ly/312d6QP
Follow us on social media
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawyerGallery
Facebook: https://bit.ly/2Gm12BK
Instagram: https://bit.ly/2umaGP8
Executive Director Trevor Goring talks about the Benjamin N. Cardozo Portrait.
The Trial Lawyer National Portrait Gallery is a vivid portrayal in portraiture and word of those who seek justice and defend the rights of those most vulnerable.
Welcome to our online video archive of original art documenting and celebrating the trial lawyer community.
View the full portrait here on our website: https://bit.ly/312d6QP
Follow us on social media
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawyerGallery
Facebook: https://bit.ly/2Gm12BK
Instagram: https://bit.ly/2umaGP8
When are you responsible for what’s in the box?
Get CuriosityStream AND Nebula for 30 days free https://curiositystream.com/legaleagle Special EXTENDED version only on Nebula!
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928). #TrueCrime #LegalEagle
Written by Devin Stone, Ilyse Fishman, & Tricia Aurand
Illustrations by Nik Gothic and Alex Duran
Edited by Amy McClung
Voices by Alexander Masters, Jamie Werner, and Kevin O’Connell
Summary from Wikipedia:
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928), is a leading case in American tort law on the question of liability to an unforeseeable plaintiff. The case was heard by the New York Court of Appeals, the highest state court in New York; its opinion was written by Chief Judge Benjamin Cardozo, a leading figure in the development of American common law and later a United States Supreme Court justice.
The plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf, was waiting at a Long Island Rail Road station in August 1924 while taking her daughters to the beach. Two men attempted to board the train before hers; one (aided by railroad employees) dropped a package that exploded, causing a large coin-operated scale on the platform to hit her. After the incident, she began to stammer, and subsequently sued the railroad, arguing that its employees had been negligent while assisting the man, and that she had been harmed by the neglect. In May 1927 she obtained a jury verdict of $6,000, which the railroad appealed. Palsgraf gained a 3–2 decision in the Appellate Division, and the railroad appealed again. Cardozo wrote for a 4–3 majority of the Court of Appeals, ruling that there was no negligence because the employees, in helping the man board, did not have a duty of care to Palsgraf as injury to her was not a foreseeable harm from aiding a man with a package. The original jury verdict was overturned, and the railroad won the case.
A number of factors, including the bizarre facts and Cardozo's outstanding reputation, made the case prominent in the legal profession, and it remains so, taught to most if not all American law students in torts class. Cardozo's conception, that tort liability can only occur when a defendant breaches a duty of care the defendant owes to a plaintiff, causing the injury sued for, has been widely accepted in American law. In dealing with proximate cause, many states have taken the approach championed by the Court of Appeals' dissenter in Palsgraf, Judge William S. Andrews.
(Thanks to CuriosityStream for sponsoring this video and helping to make this channel possible)
New episodes weekly! Subscribe here:
https://www.youtube.com/legaleagle?sub_confirmation=1
★More series on LegalEagle★
Real Lawyer Reacts: https://goo.gl/hw9vcE
Laws Broken: https://goo.gl/PJw3vK
Law 101: https://goo.gl/rrzFw3
Real Law Review: https://goo.gl/NHUoqc
I get asked a lot about whether being a practicing attorney is like being a lawyer on TV. I love watching legal movies and courtroom dramas. It's one of the reasons I decided to become a lawyer. But sometimes they make me want to pull my hair out because they are ridiculous. So I decided to make my own series exploring real cases and true crime. I believe that if you give people the relevant information they can make informed decisions about our world. The “law” is not necessarily the statutes that are passed by congress but are the rules that everyone agrees to live by. This series explores the cases and stories that shaped our law.
All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Music by Epidemic Sound: http://epidemicsound.com/creator
Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos!
========================================================
★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ ➜ https://twitter.com/LegalEagleDJ
★ More vids on Facebook: ➜ https://www.facebook.com/legaleaglereacts
★ Stella’s Insta ➜ https://www.instagram.com/stellathelegalbeagle
For promotional inquiries please reach out here: [email protected]
The Nature of the Judicial Process by Benjamin N. CARDOZO (1870 - 1938)
Genre(s): Law
Read by: Kazbek in English
Chapters:
00:00:00 - 01 - Lecture I. Introduction. The Method of Philosophy.
00:51:08 - 02 - Lecture II. The Methods of History, Tradition and Sociology.
01:44:42 - 03 - Lecture III. The Method of Sociology. The Judge as a Legislator.
02:34:06 - 04 - Lecture IV. Adherence to Precedent. The Subconscious Element in the Judicial Process. Conclusion.
Benjamin N. Cardozo, one of the most influential American justists of his era, served as the New York Court of Appeals Chief Justice, before joining the Supreme Court. His 1921 book The Nature of the Judicial Process, now considered a legal classic, was compiled from The Storrs Lectures delivered at Yale Law School earlier that year. In it he analyzes various factors underlying judicial decisions, and how these decisions in their turn influence the development of law, contrasting abstract ideals with court practice, and comparing American and English common law with legal systems of continental Europe.From Lecture I: 'The directive force of a principle may be exerted along the line of logical progression; this I will call the rule of analogy or the method of philosophy; along the line of historical development; this I will call the method of evolution; along the line of the customs of the community; this I will call the method of tradition; along the lines of justice, morals and social welfare, the mores of the day; and this I will call the method of sociology.' (Summary by Kazbek)
More information: https://librivox.org/the-nature-of-the-judicial-process-by-benjamin-n-cardozo/
LibriVox - free public domain audiobooks (https://librivox.org/)
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, US, is one of 67 universities taking part in the International Chamber of Commerce Mediation Competition 2015. The Competition is by far ICC’s biggest educational event and presents a unique opportunity to champion the merits of mediation as a form of dispute resolution. Follow the event with #ICCMW
Executive Director Trevor Goring talks about the Benjamin N. Cardozo Portrait.
The Trial Lawyer National Portrait Gallery is a vivid portrayal in portraiture and word of those who seek justice and defend the rights of those most vulnerable.
Welcome to our online video archive of original art documenting and celebrating the trial lawyer community.
View the full portrait here on our website: https://bit.ly/312d6QP
Follow us on social media
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawyerGallery
Facebook: https://bit.ly/2Gm12BK
Instagram: https://bit.ly/2umaGP8
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo (May 24, 1870 – July 9, 1938) was an Americanjurist who served on the New York Court of Appeals and later as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. Cardozo is remembered for his significant influence on the development of American common law in the 20th century, in addition to his philosophy and vivid prose style. Cardozo served on the Supreme Court six years, from 1932 until his death in 1938. Many of his landmark decisions were delivered during his eighteen-year tenure on the New York Court of Appeals, the highest court of that state.
Speaking about judicial officers' professional growth, he noted, 'District judiciary—as the first point of contact for citizens seeking justice, it is our collective responsibility to ensure we are ...
18 cutoff ... 3 ... insideschools. 3. Benjamin N. Cardozo High School basketball coach Ron Naclerio during a PSAL game in 2015 ... 3 ... 3 ... Longtime Benjamin N. Cardozo High School coach Ron Naclerio said there should have been a grace period for a the new roster rule.
The Benjamin N. Cardozo High School basketball team played in a memorial game for AamirGriffin — a former member who was killed in a shooting in 2019 ... Cardozo High School Judges, and rotating opponents.
Huge celebrations across the U.S ... Celebrated each year from Sept. 15 to Oct. 15, the month is a chance for many in the U.S ... Latinos’ sprawling histories ...Rep.Edward R ... St ... St ... In 1932, BenjaminNathan Cardozo replaced Oliver Wendell Holmes on the high court.
Hemme’s release was the outcome of a sequence of motions and petitions ... Hemme to be released ... In response, Ms ... Hemme ... Founded in 1992 at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, it has now helped free more than 240 people from prison. ....
IN a way, some dissenting judgements reflect what could have been, and what can one day still be achieved. To quote Benjamin N. Cardozo, the dissenter speaks to the future ... In a powerful dissent, JusticeAyesha A ... Consent must not be assumed ... X ... .