Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Page move request

[edit]

See Talk:Folklore of Russia: rename to Russian folklore. --Altenmann >talk 18:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RuASG has created Succession, continuity and legacy of the Soviet Union if anyone is interested in reviewing the article and providing feedback. Mellk (talk) 15:36, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Mezhdunarodnaya (Moscow Metro)#Requested move 28 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Scolding Letters#Requested move 13 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review of Anti-Russian violence in Chechnya (1991–1994)

[edit]

You may want to weigh in here. Alaexis¿question? 07:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invite: length of Joseph Stalin article

[edit]

Editors are invited to give comments on the legnth of the article Joseph Stalin. The discussion can be found at on the article's talk page. Z1720 (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:RSM-56 Bulava#Requested move 3 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Frostly (talk) 06:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Class promotion for 1995 Neftegorsk earthquake

[edit]

According to WP:A?, when there is not a formal process to assess A class, it requires the support of at least two uninvolved editors without significant opposes. This is to let you know know that I have started a discussion for whether to upgrade the 1995 Neftegorsk earthquake to A. I hope to hear feedback. Thanks, SamBroGaming (talk) 01:07, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Eurasian Economic Union

[edit]

Eurasian Economic Union has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]