Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

Page extended-confirmed-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:PERM)
"WP:PERM" redirects here. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission or Help:Permanent link.
This page is under extended confirmed protection, but non-EC users may edit its subpages.

    Requests for permissions
    Shortcuts

    This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.

    Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

    Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

    Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 17:20, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

    Permissions

    Handled here

    • Account creator (add request · view requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
    • Autopatrolled (add request · view requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
    • AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
    • Confirmed (add request · view requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
    • Event coordinator (add request · view requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
    • Extended confirmed (add request · view requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
    • File mover (add request · view requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
    • Mass message sender (add request · view requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
    • New page reviewer (add request · view requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Page mover (add request · view requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
    • Rollback (add request · view requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
    • Template editor (add request · view requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.

    Handled elsewhere

    Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

    Review and removal of permissions

    The requests for permissions process is not used to review or remove user rights:

    The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight permissions are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

    Process

    Requestors

    To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting permission.

    Administrators

    Full instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Administrator instructions

    Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

    Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

    Other editors

    Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for their own account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.

    A limited exception to this is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.

    Current requests

    Account creator

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Autopatrolled

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:CherryPie94

    New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    One thing that immediately jumped out at me is some biographical articles created (e.g. Kim Na and Son Se-bin) have unsourced biographical information, such as the date of birth. This information should be sourced to ensure compliance with WP:DOB. - Aoidh (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I've considered adding references directly next to DOB, which I did at my two most recent BLPs: Mike Kim and Lee Joon-ho. If birth information is not 100% verifiable, I play it safe (eg. Lee Seung-yoon). Per WP:DOB, links to websites maintained by the subject are generally permitted so I included Kim Na's personal website which states birth year as 1986 in the external links section. I created Son Se-bin over 5 years ago when I was much less experienced, so I don't quite recall which exact source I used for DOB (birth year seems to have been present in Star Today), so I've just amended that. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah I've misinterpreted that personal website policy, though it does fall under WP:ABOUTSELF, I've now also directly sourced it. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Kjansen86

    I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoreviewer" user right. — MusikBot talk 21:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @LEvalyn: I went ahead and adjusted the nomination so it reflects who's actually being discussed, hope you don't mind! For future reference, you can use the "add request" link at the top of this page and replace the {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} with whichever user you're nominating. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you, I really appreciate your fix for this nomination and your tip for next time! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @LEvalyn: Thank you very much for the positive evaluation of my work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate it. Kjansen86 (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:-Verso-

    78 live articles, (64 of which is start class, 5 Cs, 8 Stubs). Only one was deleted which is from 2018. All of the articles are well-sourced. I think this user is good enough for Autopatrolled Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Hteiktinhein

    Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:HurricaneEdgar

    Hello! I've created 27 articles and 7 GA, including multiple ITN and DYK. I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT. Thank you! HurricaneEdgar 11:30, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Keep up your good work! Schwede66 04:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Fade258

    Hello Admin! I have been regularly creating articles and I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT and Wikipedia policies. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    AutoWikiBrowser

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


    User:Brent Silby

    Requesting access mostly to perform reference/grammar edits. Brent Silby (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Protobowladdict

    I’ll mostly use AWB for small fixes like typos and other minor errors ProtobowlAddict talk! 23:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:JesusisGreat7

    I’ve made over 250+ non automated edits and would like to request AWB for repetitive cleanup, fixing links and also to maintain article quality. 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 14:46, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Do you have any specific task in mind to do? I'm not seeing any edits even remotely like that in your contributions. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I got your Point, I often fix grammatical errors by clicking on random articles, If I get this right, I make sure I would use it surely for maintaining articles quality! Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 17:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done Sorry, this is still very vague (AWB can't generally fix grammatical errors), and requesting four different permissions in less that a day reeks of WP:Hat collecting. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:39, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:SamuelNelsonGISP

    I'm interested in making consistent and comprehensive clean-up changes to Wikipedia articles in the domain I work in, mostly Missouri Geography. Cleaning up citations, typos, grammar, syntax, and internal links, and to see what else this can do! SamuelNelsonGISP (talk) 15:46, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Valorrr

    I wish to become an AWB user to help fix minor errors that are hideous todo manually, for example, Fixing citations, grammar and a lot more. I have been patrolling at Wikipedia:AFC/R, and doing the pages using a semi-automated helper with my current edits at 573.

    Valorrr (lets chat) 01:24, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 01:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done You already have two complaints on your talk page (User talk:Valorrr#Special:Diff/1286130200, User talk:Valorrr#User talk:Sangdeboeuf) about inappropriate use of automated tools, which does not bode well for AWB usage. That, and the repeated pestering of admins to respond (User talk:Pppery#I don't mean to bother you...., User talk:Pppery#Quick question.., User talk:Extraordinary Writ#I don't mean to bother you...., User talk:Extraordinary Writ#I know I've been annoying.....) is only proving Extraordinary Writ's comments in the previous AWB request, that you should show down, right. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery:
    Alright, understood, but per that first Special:Diff has been resolved and both have mutually agreed and understood, the Sangdeboeuf was an IP user misunderstanding and the Talk page user has thanked me for the edits, I believe the 2 complaints have been resolved, many others here also have complaints, I am unsure why you would need to mention, the talks if they have been resolved already?
    Also, I understand the complaints about pestering admins to respond, but they haven't asked me to stop, making me believe it was fine, there is no rule guide on asking them to review, I am not mentioning them, or even begging them every day, I asked you if it was okay, and the first time, you said I don't have interest, along with the 2nd time asking if you could, and if it didn't bother you, along with Extraordinary Writ, I asked him the first time, he did them, but the 2nd them, he also did, no one asked or told me to stop.
    I believe the Complaints shouldn't be added as they haven't been archived but resolved between us, without an administrators attention. I believe it is a bit unfair to everyone if they have to have complaints already resolved mentioned in a request for permission, I know I have made mistakes, but I have corrected them and learned from both, meaning I have understood what to do better next time, making me a candidate for AWB.
    I don't mean to be rude but I believe this request should be accepted, I know and understand that I have to slow down, but I did wait to the requirements, and there is none saying that I can't ask, but I do understand the complaints but they were resolved, if you can please re-think this request per my text above, it'd be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks, Valorrr (lets chat) 18:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    For example, looking at your talk page, Special:PermanentLink/1286545782#You've misunderstood... you have this complaint, Special:PermanentLink/1286545782#Notice of noticeboard discussion this and maybe a few others, but I didn't judge you for it, but you judged me for already complaints that have been resolved. Valorrr (lets chat) 18:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    You've misunderstood me completely. I'm not worried about those two specific resolved incidents per se - instead they demonstrate what seems to me to be a pattern of insufficient care in using automated tools, and there's nothing unfair in pointing that out. And then I also found User_talk:Valorrr/Archive_1#My_Mirror_Mirror_Edits_You_Reverted as yet another example of the same pattern. My decline stands. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery:
    The 2 incidents completely should be voided, as they have been resolved with me standing in the correct position, just other editors not understanding.
    But I completely understand your point from the Mirror edits, but I have learned my mistakes, and I have only had around 3 complaints with most of them about me being in the right.
    I use the tools accessible to me in the correct way, but sometimes I may be new and not fully understand, but I have resolved most of my discussions correct, but that mirror mirror edit, I believe it needs to be re-evaluated, I have used automated tools correctly, I request that you re-think the decline you put.
    Thanks, Valorrr (lets chat) 19:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    In that case of the Wikipedia:AFC/R request, he misunderstood why I declined it, but we resolved it.
    Thanks, Valorrr (lets chat) 19:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict) have only had around 3 complaints with most of them about me being in the right isn't true - in only one of those could you reasonably be called in the right. Anyway, no, my decline stands and I will not be making any further responses in this thread. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery:
    This is my first full month, within Wikipedia, but seems like when you joined, you had 2 warnings, I have yet to have one ((Special:PermanentLink/1027704792#August 2016)), But you judge me for making a misunderstanding as I was new, this is not being very friendly and you are judging me for asking someone to review a backlog that barley anyone does?
    Plus, I may have made a mistake in the case of had only one to be called "in the right". But it still proved that I have learned from my mistake and have yet to do it again, but you seem to ignore that, which is not very respectful.
    Per Wikipedia:DNB, all of our first or couple months/day within Wikipedia, we make some wrong edits, and many of the editors that are experienced have had bad errors within their first edit(s), and same applies to me, I've learned as its been my first full month within Wikipedia, that User talk:Valorrr/Archive_1#My_Mirror_Mirror_Edits_You_Reverted, edit was within my first 10-20 days, which I learned from, and you refuse to actually realize that.
    You have made wrongful errors within your first few months, but you are making a bias towards me for doing it? I have used all my tools correctly with some minor mistakes and have been corrected and learned from.
    I can list a few, for example Special:PermanentLink/1048391948#Please stop that you've had similar issues that I dealt with, and you are causing drama over me having an error. Please re-think my decision on the AWB, I am providing reasonable arguments.
    Again, I request that you review it again, which I believe it should be accepted which you refuse to admit. Valorrr (lets chat) 19:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    In your request for New Page Reviewer, they didn't judge you for your previous warnings just approved you, why should you do it to me? ([[2]]) Valorrr (lets chat) 20:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    There are millions of mistakes you've made, but you achieved your role with no complaints, but cannot do that to others, such as Special:PermanentLink/1027704792#New page patrolling, Special:PermanentLink/1027704792#Your signature and way more...
    Thanks, Valorrr (lets chat) 20:07, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery:
    More below;
    Special:PermanentLink/1027704792#User:IACTs
    Special:PermanentLink/888569972#Can we hold off for the full 30-days of the RFC
    Special:PermanentLink/888569972#Don't act like this please
    There is a lot of these, but you hunt me down for mine, keep in mind of WP:DNB Valorrr (lets chat) 20:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    This edit mentioned you, and got approved! I don't know whats different.
    Special:PermanentLink/1284353951#User:OpalYosutebito Valorrr (lets chat) 20:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    And this is to your opinion, not by another person... Valorrr (lets chat) 20:14, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I have made my decision. Nothing you can possibly say will convince me otherwise. End of story. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery:
    I believe you are being bias towards me, and not re-reviewing it, I am providing a valid argument to this discussion, but you refuse to accept it.
    Such as this, they mentioned you, but got accepted Special:PermanentLink/1284353951#User:OpalYosutebito Valorrr (lets chat) 20:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery:
    This request mentioned you, and another admin accepted it, so and the repeated pestering of admins to respond (User talk:Pppery#I don't mean to bother you...., User talk:Pppery#Quick question.., User talk:Extraordinary Writ#I don't mean to bother you...., User talk:Extraordinary Writ#I know I've been annoying.....) is only proving Extraordinary Writ's comments in the previous AWB request, that you should show down, right. this should be removed per Special:PermanentLink/1284353951#User:OpalYosutebito as I said above. Valorrr (lets chat) 20:19, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Now at WP:Administrative action review#April 2025 Decline of AWB Request. by Pppery. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Tylermack999

    Looking to experiment with automated/plugin-assisted editing Tylermack999 (talk) 12:48, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:WormEater13

    I would love to use AWB/JWB to help clean and contribute to articles! WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Pineapple Storage

    Requesting as this tool would aid in updating incoming links to Kuna language, which is now a redirect page for Guna language, per WP:POSTMOVE. (This will likely also include updating some links to Guna people, which was moved from Kuna people in 2020, and many pages still link to the redirect page.) I've already done a few manually, and it has been pretty time-consuming. My mainspace edit count is only 380 at time of posting, so of course I totally understand if this request isn't granted, but given the time it's going to take to complete all 160+ WP:POSTMOVE edits without any automation, I'm submitting a request anyway just in case. Pineapple Storage (talk) 20:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Update: it seem most of the 160+ links to Kuna language were in transcluded templates! Now that I've updated these templates, the outstanding redirect links are down to 72, and about half of these are non-mainspace, so the workload is much more manageable than I thought. Withdrawing my previous request, as other than the WP:POSTMOVE cleanup for Guna language, I don't currently have a need for AWB. Pineapple Storage (talk) 15:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:BarntToust

    Thinking that AutoWikiBrowser perm would be awesome for to me use when making a bunch of repetitive edits, which I do a lot now and with this tool, I would do those kinds of edits a lot more. BarntToust 15:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Confirmed

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:DigitalDreamer90

    Hello, I would like to request the addition of several categories to ensure consistency and navigational ease across Wikipedia articles. These suggested changes reflect verifiable political affiliations and regional associations, or in the case of cultural articles, well-established subject matter. Please see the list below:

    Political Figures – State-Based Category Additions These individuals are notable members of their respective state political parties. The suggested categories already exist and are appropriate based on the individual's biography and public service.

    Ohio Republicans

    • Bernie Moreno
    • John Boehner
    • J.D. Vance
    • Usha Vance

    Florida Republicans

    • Rick Scott
    • Ron DeSantis
    • Matt Gaetz
    • Jeb Bush
    • Marco Rubio

    Texas Republicans

    • Ted Cruz
    • Greg Abbott

    South Carolina Republicans

    • Lindsey Graham
    • Tim Scott

    North Carolina Republicans

    • Madison Cawthorn

    Wisconsin Republicans

    • Paul Ryan
    • Ron Johnson

    South Dakota Republicans

    • Kristi Noem

    New York (state) Democrats

    • Anthony Weiner
    • Kathy Hochul
    • Andrew Cuomo

    Cultural Topic

    Anime article: Please add Category:Culture of Japan to reflect the well-documented cultural origins and influence of anime as a Japanese cultural product.

    All category suggestions are based on publicly verifiable facts and are intended to enhance article consistency across Wikipedia.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.

     Not done as you will automatically become confirmed in less than eight hours. Most of the people you mention aren't in those categories for a good reason: they're already in a sub-category. For instance, Ron DeSantis is in Category:Republican Party governors of Florida and therefore doesn't need to also be in Category:Florida Republicans. If you're interested in categories, consider asking at the Teahouse to learn more about the rules that apply to them. (And please don't post AI-generated messages.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:35, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Request for Democratic Backsliding during the anti-LGBTQ movement

    Would you please add "Category:Democratic backsliding in the United States" in the article about the 2020s anti-LGBTQ movement in the United States?

    That article is in Category:2020s anti-LGBTQ movement in the United States, which is itself already in Category:Democratic backsliding in the United States. But since you're now autoconfirmed, you can edit the page yourself. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:23, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:PharyngealExplosive7

    Legitimate alt of my account – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 05:47, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done – You are now confirmed. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:17, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Ofirius

    Alt account saluere, Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 11:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC) 11:26, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done – You are now confirmed. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Event coordinator

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Extended confirmed

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Tashmetu

    I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([3]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 14:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Xaosflux hey, sorry for tagging you. I just noticed you are the only active admin on this thread and I was wondering if you can look into my request or let me know who I can contact to have it looked at. Tashmetu (talk) 17:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Tashmetu, the ArbCom remedy requires that Tashmetu shows that they have made 500 substantive edits; all I can see is a statement that you did. While I think it doesn't mean you have to provide a list of all the contributions (that would be hard to review and pointlessly redundant to the full list), I personally think you should explain at least in some detail how you improved the encyclopedia since the revocation. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair point, I assumed there would be some process for this but I will do my best to explian. So I have worked mostly on the history side of Wikipedia, contributing to the "years in France" series and "years in Iraq " series, writing articles, adding details, events, and references. I have a huge library of history books so I thought that's the best use of my resources. I also try to create and enrich pages of notable Iraqi figures, though not as often because it's harder to find reliable sources for these. One of the issues I ran into while editing Iraqi history pages, because they are more recent, is the continuous topics keep coming up, like it's hard to talk about Iraq in the 90s without mentioning Kurdistan! This one of the reasons I would appreciate having my confirmation reinstated. Tashmetu (talk) 16:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:IdanST

    I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([5]). — MusikBot talk 18:22, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello IdanST, please describe the meaningful edits and what you'd like to use the permission for. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey, some of the edits I've made were focused on tidying up articles, such as List of snipers (you can check the history). These edits involved a major overhaul: adding sources, removing false or unsourced information, and fixing sentence structures. I've also made substantial edits to other articles, such as Embraer C-390 Millennium (you can check the history), Tilhas Tizi Gesheften, Oradour-sur-Glane massacre, Ayi Silva Kangani, alongside dozens of other articles where I've made meaningful, though not as extensive, contributions.
    You should be aware that most of these edits are the result of my work translating articles to the HE Wikipedia, as you can see here. Since my ECP was revoked, I’ve translated over a hundred articles. While reading the English articles before translating them into Hebrew, I also fix any mistakes or make improvements wherever I see the need. IdanST (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Jlktutu

    I had my EC revoked because of gaming of the system. I believe this happened March 22, 2025. Since then, I have attempted to edit constructively on Wikipedia. I want to see if there is a way that I can get EC. Thanks again

     Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([6]). — MusikBot talk 05:50, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello Jlktutu, please describe how you have constructively edited since the revocation and what you'd like to use the permission for. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:PharyngealExplosive7

    Legitimate alt of my account. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 01:55, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:17, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Ofirius

    Alt Account saluere, Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 11:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    For which purpose? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @ToBeFree Sorry, I did'nt notify. I've made it to edit on public computers. saluere, Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 10:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmm. Your public computer account would then have the same permissions as the main account. The only purpose I can see then is to keep an account in case one is compromised. I will grant extended confirmation if you insist, but I think you should consider enabling two-factor authentication and leaving your public account as unprivileged as possible. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    File mover

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Velella

    I am informed by a courteous bot that my extendedmover rights expire in a few days. This is a useful capability especially for correcting article titles that do not conform to WP:MOS and to move Draft young articles which are unsourced but capable of improvement. Thanks  Velella  Velella Talk   20:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Mass message sender

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


    New page reviewer

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Rahmatula786

    I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors.

    I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations.

    I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer.

    Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot talk 17:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rahmatula786: What do you mean by though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time – did you have another account before this one? – Joe (talk) 08:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No Sir, Before creating this account, I used to edit Wikipedia anonymously and made various contributions. However, after realizing the benefits of having a registered account, I created this one and have since been actively editing and contributing regularly. Rahmatula786 (talk) 09:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) Why did you reject this submission?[8] topic is notable.. it's seems you don't have knowledge about notability guidelines. Hellorld4 (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I have replied on your talk page. Rahmatula786 (talk) 04:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Junbeesh

    I would like to request NPR rights to contribute more effectively to this area and help reduce the backlog at NPP. I have created 18 articles and have been actively involved in patrolling new pages, tagging non-notable and promotional content for CSD and AfD. Many of the articles I have nominated for CSD or AfD have been deleted, which I believe reflects my understanding of Wikipedia's notability and content policies. With NPR rights, I will be able to continue this work more efficiently. I am familiar with relevant guidelines and policies and would appreciate the opportunity to help out in this area. Thanks for your time and consideration! Junbeesh (talk) 07:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Upjav

    I've been an editor for a while and have experience in article creation (mainly on the shorter side for more niche areas with fewer sources) and have a few DYKs under my belt. Think my knowledge of policy demonstrated through this makes me a good fit for these permissions. Upjav (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    As a further note, I'd like to review new pages. Upjav (talk) 02:17, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Just out of pure morbid interest - you reviewed the first page I created back in 2014! Did it all work differently back then or something - like not needing the reviewer right? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Yooooooooooo that's awesome! It didn't require a permission back then (this became a thing in Oct 2016), and I think I was inactive in page review around that time so I didn't notice and didn't apply. Most of what I do is article creation in niche areas, so I haven't bothered to apply. Upjav (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, you left a kind word with your review back then and it's stuck with me since, so you were clearly doing NPP right!!! :) Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:JustARandomEditor123

    I wish to apply for New Page Reviewer permissions to deal with the large backlog of unreviewed pages. I have participated in many AfD discussions, which proves my understanding of Wikipedia's content policies and notability guidelines. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Itemirus

    Hi, I am a quite experienced Wikipedia editor and pending changes reviewer; I may contribute in this field as well. Itemirus (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Yutsi

    I have significant experience patrolling new pages from years ago. I have re-familiarized myself with content policies and would like to resume. — yutsi (talk) 01:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Cyrobyte

    I am requesting this permission because I want to volunteer in reducing the NPP backlog and ensuring that new pages are encyclopedic and properly cited. I believe that I am qualified to be a new page reviewer because I have created many new articles that are encyclopedic and adequately sourced, nominated new pages for speedy deletion when appropriate and have participated in the AfD process. Cyrobyte (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Mekomo

    I have temporary NPP right which will expire in few days, I kindly request renewal of this right to continue reviewing articles. Thank you. Mekomo (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 14:40, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rosguill do you want this one? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:29, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    HJ Mitchell I’m generally fine with other admins reviewing track records for people whom I conferred trial runs to (and arguably the extra set of eyes is a good thing). My activity has been rather inconsistent lately in particular due to other demand on my time so I would expect others to step in more signed, Rosguill talk 22:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:CSMention269

    I am an AFC reviewer asking for another trial or permanent permission for this flag. Last time, it was granted by @Sohom Datta: for a 2-month trial after the first month trial was successful. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 6 April 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 04:40, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Moritoriko

    Hello, I have 1 denied applied about a month ago because I didn't have 500 undeleted Main space edits at the time. I now have 501 so I am reapplying for temporary permissions. I have a decent amount of experience going through AfDs and source searching to check if they are notability. Moritoriko (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([9]). — MusikBot talk 06:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:AstrooKai

    I would like to expand my contributions to Wikipedia by helping address the extensive backlog at NPP. I have been an active participant in the AfC process as a probationary reviewer for multiple months, and I regularly take part in AfDs and occasionally in PRODs within the scope of WP:PHILIPPINES. While I understand that my impact on the backlog may not be significant in terms of numbers, I am committed to performing thorough, policy-aligned reviews to the best of my ability. AstrooKai (Talk) 19:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Yoblyblob

    I had a trial permission to manage redirects close to a year ago, if I remember correctly. I did not have time for the back half of that trial, but have more time now. I have noticed how large the article backlog is and would try to work on lowering that, since I am finding myself with a lot more free time on here. Generally think I have a good past experience with AfD, not as much as some, but understand most guidelines well. May leave some more questionable pages up for a different reviewer, but have a good record adding categories and WikiProjects on my own article. Lots of my current pages are election pages or football pages, so might lean more into reviewing those since I am most familiar with those guidelines. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 15:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:QEnigma

    Hello, I was granted temporary New page reviewer rights on 14 January 2025 ([10]) for a period of two months and again on 20 March ([11]) for an additional month. This current period is due to expire on 20 April. I would appreciate it if these rights could be extended and made permanent. Thank you. QEnigma talk 05:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 05:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Juxlos

    I have been active mostly at the creator side for a while and would like to help out in the filtering/supporting new editors and pages. Juxlos (talk) 07:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Cinder painter

    I was granted temporary New Page Reviewer rights for one month, which expire on 20 April. During this period, I carefully completed a reasonable number of reviews (of pages of various topics), including reviewing and tagging new pages with banners, draftifying, requesting speedy deletions, and creating AfDs. While reviewing new pages, I often searched for additional reliable sources and added them to the articles I was reviewing, to ensure that they were not lacking significant coverage references. It was time-consuming, but I felt it was a good thing to do. Therefore, I kindly ask to review my NPP work and, if it's ok, consider granting me permanent NPP rights. Cinder painter (talk) 07:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 07:40, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Afonso Dimas Martins

    I believe I meet most criteria. Plus I already review scientific articles irl, so I would say I have some experience on reviewing in general. Here to help where needed. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 16:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Ambrosiawater

    Hello, I was given the New Page Reviewer rights as a one-month trial. This permission will expire on 20 April 2025. During this time, I have been doing active reviewing of new pages and learning more about notability, reliable sources, and the CSD/PROD/AfD process. I tried always to be careful and make constructive reviews. I really want to keep helping with this work. So I would like to ask if possible to renew or give the reviewer rights permanently, depending on my work this last month. Thanks a lot for your time and consideration. Ambrosiawater (talk) 09:56, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 10:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Old-AgedKid

    I've been active on Wikipedia for over two years, during which I've created 130+ articles, with 1 being deleted. I've also participated in numerous AfD discussions, been active as an AfC reviewer, and have a profound understanding of Wikipedia's notability guidelines and importance of reliable in-depth coverage in reliable sources. I'd like to help reduce the backlog of unreviewed articles and try a role of NPP. I don't hurry and review the pages carefully when nominating articles for deletion, accepting AfC submissions, and patrolling newly published pages. I hope to become a valuable team-member of the patroller community. Old-AgedKid (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Fade258

    Hi, Currently I am an AFC reviewer and I would like to request for new page reviewer permission right, and I have read Wikipedia's policies and guidelines as requested. Thank you Fade258 (talk) 09:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Bakhtar40

    I believe I meet the criteria to review a page. Kindly verify my eligibility to undertake this task. I am cognizant of the obligatory Wikipedia rules when reviewing a page. I request a trial period; upon successful completion, you may grant me a permanent post. Thank You. Bakhtar40 (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:JesusisGreat7

    Hey, Ive been active on Wikipedia for over 5 months now and have written around 60+ articles fufilling the criteria of 500 mainspace edits. I would like to request, new page reviewer right for my account, to get experience of this task and also to reduce backlog, Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 17:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done Requesting four different permissions in less than a day reeks of WP:Hat collecting. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:40, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Iljhgtn

    The backlog is absolutely gargantuan and only growing by the second. In my view, we need to get more New Page Reviewers on board as soon as possible. The problem? Understandably, we cannot simply allow just anyone and everyone in who might open the floodgates too far and get us into a situation where we have the opposite problem. I have made nearly 60,000 edits and edited for a couple years now, as well as have a 99.4% match rate in my AfD history. I think that should qualify for getting another soldier in this fight who will most accurately and efficiently help in bringing down the backlog. Iljhgtn (talk) 23:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([12]). — MusikBot talk 23:40, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:ZDRX

    I am requesting permission to become a New Page Reviewer as I have considerable experience contributing to Wikipedia. I am aware of AfD (Articles for Deletion), PROD (Proposed Deletion), and CSD (Criteria for Speedy Deletion) processes. Additionally, I have also created and improved numerous pages, I strive to ensure that all new content adheres to Wikipedia’s standards for notability, verifiability, and neutrality while maintaining a high level of editorial quality. THEZDRX (User) | (Contact) 10:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:VirtttX

    Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights and bringing back my version of article Cosmic (Thomas Anders album). VirtttX (talk) 19:45, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had an account for 41 days and has 18 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 19:50, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done * Pppery * it has begun... 19:53, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Page mover

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:HurricaneEdgar

    Greetings and hello! I would like to request the page mover right. I am familiar with the WP:PMCRITERIA and have experience moving files on Wikimedia Commons. Having this right will allow me to move pages on my own, without needing to make a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Here is my page move log, which mostly involves pages related to tropical cyclones that I have moved. Thank you very much! HurricaneEdgar 05:55, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE    )     23:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Pending changes reviewer

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:WormEater13

    Hi! My name is WormEater13. I would like to request PCR rights. Having created multiple articles before and having made over 100 manual mainspace edits, especially for WP:BLP, I believe that I am knowledgable about Wikipedia policies such as WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:NOTABILITY. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([13]). — MusikBot talk 13:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:07, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Somajyoti

    I am requesting permission to be a Pending Changes Reviewer. I spend most of my day editing Wikipedia. I have gone through almost all the pages under Category:Wikipedia policies, including Wikipedia's policies on vandalism detection, BLP policy, NPOV, Verifiability, and copyright. I have read the Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes guideline. Please consider my request. Somajyoti ✉ 07:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had an account for 25 days. — MusikBot talk 07:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:VortexPhantom

    Hi, I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights on English Wikipedia to tackle with the edits protected with pending changes while patrolling in the RC, since I have rollback rights. I think I fulfill the criteria to get this right. Also, I understand the related policies to manage these edits. This would give me a better chance to work to improve Wikipedia.

    Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Imwin567

    Hello, I would like to request permission to become a Pending Changes Reviewer. I have read most of Wikipedia’s core policies. I have also read and understood the guidelines outlined for the Reviewing pending changes. I believe PCR will help me accepting or rejecting edits. I also warn new editors when necessary. Imwin567 (talk) 11:48, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Golem08

    Greetings. I feel confident in my knowledge of Wikipedia's content policies and my ability to apply this permission effectively. Thank you. Golem08 (talk) 23:03, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:28, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:XRozuRozu

    Hello! I am an extended-confirmed rollbacker who has focused on copyediting and anti-vandalism (by patrolling RC) since joining Wikipedia in 2023. I have read WP:C and the guideline on reviewing. Thank you for considering my request. x RozuRozu • teacups 05:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:25, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:HurricaneEdgar

    Greetings and hello! Four years after my previous request was unsuccessful, I’m back again to request the right. I believe I am familiar with Wikipedia policies, including WP:PCCRITERIA. HurricaneEdgar 06:07, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    +1 Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done * Pppery * it has begun... 17:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:JesusisGreat7

    Hey, I have been on Wikipedia from 5 months and have a good editing count and history, Also I had contributed around 60 articles, I would like to request Pending changes reviewer rights for my account in order to prevent vandalism! Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 17:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done Requesting four different permissions in less than a day reeks of WP:Hat collecting. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:40, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Tyloxs

    Hello! I'm Tyloxs, and I'd like to request editor permissions. I've already created several articles and made over 100 manual edits. Tyloxs (talk) 12:01, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has 49 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 14:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Cactusisme

    I have read policy on vandalism and understand what is vandalism and what is not, Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not. I have also read the guideline on reviewing. I am a current rollbacker. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Loserhead4512

    Hello. I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I pass the WP:PCCRITERIA as far as I know, and the right would allow me to help even more to build the encyclopedia by making sure only acceptable edits are approved. Thank you for your consideration. loserhead (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Rollback

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Imwin567

    I would like to request rollback permissions to help combat vandalism more effectively on Wikipedia, I have been reverting vandalism for a good amount of time from recent changes using twinkle and undo. Therefore I think rollback tool can help me to assist in identifying and reverting unconstructive edits efficiently. Imwin567 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:The Seal F1

    Hello. I would like to get a rollback. I often search for vandalism on Wikipedia, and it will obviously be easier for me to fight it with a rollback. I warn users when necessary, and i know the most important WP policies. The Seal F1 (talk) 07:32, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Est. 2021

    As a patroller and changes reviewer, I often find subtle vandalisms I can't easily fix in a click. I'd like to be more effective against disruptive edits. You can check my history at User:Est. 2021/contribs#Maintenance.— Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 09:01, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hey Est. 2021, that's a pretty impressive page. May become tough to maintain if the number of edit requests increases, of course. 🙂 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:10, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:11, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    no Disagree The granting of new user rights has been questioned. Permission granted too hastily, in 9 hours from creation request by this user. Not only the contribution number of edits is important but also the behavior. The user violated the rules on the day the permissions were granted. The matter is explained here: User_talk:Est._2021#+rollback. Since when does Wikipedia treat disposable posting a valid link to an article as "unconstructive" and "disruptive" edits? Please read his application above, I quote, "I often find subtle vandalisms I can't easily fix in a click. I'd like to be more effective against disruptive edits". This is his "to be more effective against disruptive edits"? User named the correct edit as "disruptive" and just got tools to remove such edits more easily. @ToBeFree:: this is unacceptable. Permissions granted too hastily should be revoked. TravelerFromEuropeanUnion (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    TravelerFromEuropeanUnion, oh, here too. Same advice here: Talk to the user if you're unhappy about their conduct. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:JesusisGreat7

    Hello, I would like to request rollback rights to assist with reverting vandalism. I’m familiar with relevant guidelines and will use the tool appropriately. Thank you for your consideration. 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 17:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done Requesting four different permissions in less than a day reeks of WP:Hat collecting. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:40, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery I'm really sorry for applying all the request at once as I thought I have fufilled all the criterias, I would only like to apply for Rollback rights in order to gain a new experience so to prevent vandalism and disruptive edits, Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 08:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Valorrr

    Valorrr (requesting AutoWikiBrowser, Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)

    I wish to have Rollback permissions to revert vandalism as I've been doing for at least a month with 500+ main space edits I wish to use like WP:HUGGLE and a lot more programs to help prevent vandalism. Valorrr (lets chat) 22:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([14]). — MusikBot talk 22:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I know this, and I believe I improved. Valorrr (lets chat) 22:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Question: Valorrr: I'd still like to see you get some more experience before granting you the rollback permission as it will allow you access to some fairly powerful automated tools, as you have indicated. I can see that you have gained some experience though. To show that you understand when you can use permissions to help in a related area that usually has a backlog I'd be happy to grant you the pending changes reviewer permission so that you can help review Special:PendingChanges. Would you be okay with that? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:15, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm perfectly okay with that, do you want me to notify you when I come back for rollback? Valorrr (lets chat) 16:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Callanecc: Just notifying. Valorrr (lets chat) 16:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:WormEater13

    Hi! I've been patrolling, creating, and monitoring articles on Wikipedia for months, but recently i've been able to be more active. I would like to request the rollback right - having the right would make my work patrolling Special:RecentChanges easier, as I wouldn't need to manually undo edits, but rather just be able to rollback edits directly. I use tools such as WP:RedWarn and WP:Twinkle, so having rollback rights would help me combat vandalism easier. Not to mention, I am aware of Wikipedia's core policies - such as WP:N, WP:NPOV, etc. As a newcomer myself, I am very well aware of WP:BITE and try to be as friendly and welcoming to new editors as possible. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has 192 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 00:40, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done. I've just granted you the Pending Changes Reviewer permission from your request there. Let's see how you get on with that first and then we'll take another look again when you've made a few more edits. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Understood. Thank you so much! WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 11:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @Callanecc! I apologize if disturbing, but would I be able to ask for a re-review? Since you replied, i've made about ~300 more edits (60%), and have been able to review quite a few articles with PCR. I would love to utilize the rollback feature, especially since a lot of my contributions as of right now are towards combatting vandalism. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:JesusisGreat7

    I just want to inform that I mistakenly added all requests at once I am sorry I just want to apply for rollback rights so to prevent vandalism and disruptive edits, this will help me to gain a new experience so I can contribute my best.... Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 15:00, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Nahida

    I feel like rollback rights will help me fight vandalism more effectively here on the English Wikipedia. I generally meet the guidelines on the top of this page (I've patrolled actively for the better part of a month now) and I believe it would help me more efficiently fight back against vandalism than being limited to Undo and base Twinkle. I try my best to correctly warn editors as well. Nahida haii 17:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has 166 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 21:50, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Cutlass

    I've been dabbling with antivandalism for a bit now. I think using rollback would be helpful for this. I already have it on another project (Commons) so I understand its usefulness. Thank you for your consideration. CutlassCiera 19:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Template editor

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Est. 2021

    I already had these rights in the past, and I'd like to help with the large amount of pending edit requests. You can check my previous activity at User:Est. 2021/contribs#Edit requests. – Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 08:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I am inclined to decline this; you have been granted the right twice on a temporary basis, and yet have made almost no template-related edits during those periods (and zero template edits during the previous 2024 trial). You have also not made any TPERs since your last trial. What makes this time different from the previous two? Primefac (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Primefac: Well, I didn't easily use these rights unless there were valid pending requests. During my trial, I performed 3 and declined 2 of them. None of them has been contested. Yet I'm not going to eagerly engage in unneeded protected edits just to increase my edit count, I only engage in the ones I'm sure about. If you expect me to abuse TPERs and TE rights, it's not going to happen. I just saw there are currently 19 pending requests and I thought I could be helpful, nothing more. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 12:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes we do need more editors who are willing to look at these requests (currently 25 now), and you could help with this. I think Primefac is asking why you requested the right in Feb 2024 but then made no edits to templates in that period. We would normally expect to see more edits so we can make a decision about applying the right permenantly — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions&oldid=1181725208"