Jump to content

Talk:Qualcomm Snapdragon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

“Brand names” - necessary for a fact sheet?

[edit]

is a list of brands (all of them prefixed by “qualcomm snapdragon” already) used by qualcomm necessary? irisChronomia (talk) 02:04, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should put more emphasis on the technical and practical aspects of Snapdragon (eg. the architecture of Adreno (being an extension of ATI's Terascale), ISP, CPU uarch details). Some portions of this article, (in my opinion,) reads a bit like a summary of every news headlines about this brand in a chronological order - and I'd argue that it's not really necessary - just like how we wouldn't write too much about Apple's announcements on their products in a page about eg. iPad. irisChronomia (talk) 21:01, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]