Talk:Diana Walsh Pasulka

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Diana Walsh Pasulka article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

missing citations and poor construction of article body and lede

@Normchou: I noticed several additions from you without any citations. This gets an article in trouble quickly, so I've flagged them. Please supply strong source for these and any future additions.

Separately, this article lede does not follow the ideal standard of being a summation of just the key points from the article body. Normally, the goal is to have no citations in the lede because all facts in the lede are summarized from the article body where they are fully supported by citations. Once some sources are in place for all facts, I'm glad to help move them all into the article body so that the lede can be rewritten as simply a key summary of facts from the body with no citations needed. Jjhake (talk) 02:11, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kirkus Reviews commentary on what is real

It is ridiculous to use a quote that someone at Kirkus Reviews wrote claiming that there is something to the nonsense about UFO abductions. This is an instance of quoting a reviewer who has no business describing what is actually true. jps (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The need for WP:FRIND sources

Text is being cited to a transcript hosted at thedaughtersgrimoire.com, which seems to specialize in credulous UFO narratives. It's not a WP:FRIND source, and we need one to both avoid advocacy when describing the fringe concepts, and gauge the notability of same. - LuckyLouie (talk) 23:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]