Docker and Jenkins are both popular tools in the DevOps world, but they have different purposes and functionalities. Here are the key differences between Docker and Jenkins:\n\n
\n
Containerization vs Automation: Docker is a containerization platform that allows developers to package their applications and run them in isolated environments. It provides a lightweight and portable solution for deploying applications. On the other hand, Jenkins is an automation server that helps in the continuous integration and delivery of software. It automates the build, test, and deployment processes.\n
Scope of Functionality: Docker focuses on the packaging and running of applications in containers. It provides a consistent and reproducible environment for applications to run without the need for dependencies on the host system. Jenkins, on the other hand, provides a wide range of functionalities for automating the software development lifecycle. It helps in building, testing, and deploying applications across multiple platforms.\n
Container Orchestration: Docker has built-in support for container orchestration through tools like Docker Swarm and Kubernetes. It allows users to deploy and manage containerized applications across multiple hosts. Jenkins, on the other hand, does not have built-in container orchestration capabilities. However, it can integrate with container orchestration platforms to automate the deployment of applications.\n
Focus on Continuous Integration: Jenkins is primarily built for continuous integration, where it helps in integrating code changes from multiple developers into a shared repository. It provides a platform for automating the build and testing of applications, enabling developers to find and fix issues early in the development process. Docker, on the other hand, is not specifically designed for continuous integration but can be used in conjunction with tools like Jenkins for automating the build and deployment processes.\n
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Docker has a relatively shorter learning curve compared to Jenkins. Docker's simplicity lies in its ability to package applications in containers and run them consistently across different environments. Jenkins, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and the need for configuring pipelines and jobs.\n
Tool Ecosystem and Integrations: Docker has a vast ecosystem of tools and services that integrate with it. It has extensive support from various cloud platforms, enabling users to easily deploy containerized applications in cloud environments. Jenkins also has a large number of plugins and integrations that extend its functionality and allow it to integrate with various development tools and platforms.\n\n\n
In summary, Docker is primarily focused on containerization and provides a lightweight and portable solution for packaging and running applications. Jenkins, on the other hand, is an automation server that helps in the continuous integration and delivery of software. While Docker provides container orchestration capabilities and has a simpler learning curve, Jenkins has a wide range of functionalities and extensive integration options.\n","content2":"","topContent":"","bottomContent":"","packageStackup":false,"screenshotImageUrl":"https://img.stackshare.io/stackup/6319150/docker-vs-jenkins.png","function":null,"path":"/stackups/docker-vs-jenkins","title":"Docker vs Jenkins","seoUpdatedAt":null,"cachedStackDecisionsGetAdvice":{"type":"json","json":{"count":4,"edges":[{"node":{"id":"104029123508798710","user":{"id":"103463298864281145","title":"","imageUrl":"https://img.stackshare.io/user/337191/default_f874748b533fe77de94152c7cae82bc178df2d7e.png","thumbUrl":"https://img.stackshare.io/user/337191/thumb_f874748b533fe77de94152c7cae82bc178df2d7e.png","username":"balaramesht408","__typename":"User","companyName":"","displayName":"Balaramesh Thiyagaraj"},"stack":null,"topics":[],"answers":{"count":1,"edges":[{"node":{"id":"104056350646912039","link":null,"user":{"id":"104016070157932212","path":"/shaileshs212","title":null,"imageUrl":"https://img.stackshare.io/user/523343/default_a40cbdb7f269223648a3cce6019e2ef1f1dcca74.jpg","username":"shaileshs212","__typename":"User","companyName":null,"displayName":"shailesh shah"},"draft":false,"topics":[],"company":null,"flagged":false,"private":false,"toTools":[],"upvoted":false,"publicId":"104056350646912039","services":[],"createdAt":"2020-04-25T00:18:25Z","fromTools":[],"viewCount":510289,"__typename":"StackDecision","bookmarked":false,"rawContent":"If your source code is on GitHub, also take a look at Github actions. https://github.com/features/actions","htmlContent":"
Docker and Jenkins are both popular tools in the DevOps world, but they have different purposes and functionalities. Here are the key differences between Docker and Jenkins:
Containerization vs Automation: Docker is a containerization platform that allows developers to package their applications and run them in isolated environments. It provides a lightweight and portable solution for deploying applications. On the other hand, Jenkins is an automation server that helps in the continuous integration and delivery of software. It automates the build, test, and deployment processes.
Scope of Functionality: Docker focuses on the packaging and running of applications in containers. It provides a consistent and reproducible environment for applications to run without the need for dependencies on the host system. Jenkins, on the other hand, provides a wide range of functionalities for automating the software development lifecycle. It helps in building, testing, and deploying applications across multiple platforms.
Container Orchestration: Docker has built-in support for container orchestration through tools like Docker Swarm and Kubernetes. It allows users to deploy and manage containerized applications across multiple hosts. Jenkins, on the other hand, does not have built-in container orchestration capabilities. However, it can integrate with container orchestration platforms to automate the deployment of applications.
Focus on Continuous Integration: Jenkins is primarily built for continuous integration, where it helps in integrating code changes from multiple developers into a shared repository. It provides a platform for automating the build and testing of applications, enabling developers to find and fix issues early in the development process. Docker, on the other hand, is not specifically designed for continuous integration but can be used in conjunction with tools like Jenkins for automating the build and deployment processes.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Docker has a relatively shorter learning curve compared to Jenkins. Docker's simplicity lies in its ability to package applications in containers and run them consistently across different environments. Jenkins, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and the need for configuring pipelines and jobs.
Tool Ecosystem and Integrations: Docker has a vast ecosystem of tools and services that integrate with it. It has extensive support from various cloud platforms, enabling users to easily deploy containerized applications in cloud environments. Jenkins also has a large number of plugins and integrations that extend its functionality and allow it to integrate with various development tools and platforms.
In summary, Docker is primarily focused on containerization and provides a lightweight and portable solution for packaging and running applications. Jenkins, on the other hand, is an automation server that helps in the continuous integration and delivery of software. While Docker provides container orchestration capabilities and has a simpler learning curve, Jenkins has a wide range of functionalities and extensive integration options.
We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.
I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.
I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have .
Thanks in advance !
I would definetly recommend Concourse to you, as it is one of the most advanced modern methods of making CI/CD while Jenkins is an old monolithic dinosaur. Concourse itself is cloudnative and containerbased which helps you to build simple, high-performance and scalable CI/CD pipelines.
In my opinion, the only lack of skills you have with Concourse is your own knowledge of how to build pipelines and automate things. Technincally there is no lack, i would even say you can extend it way more easily. But as a Con it is more easy to interact with Jenkins if you are only used to UIs. Concourse needs someone which is capable of using CLIs.
From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"
We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.
As the maintainer of the Karate DSL open-source project - I found Travis CI very easy to integrate into the GitHub workflow and it has been steady sailing for more than 2 years now ! It works well for Java / Apache Maven projects and we were able to configure it to use the latest Oracle JDK as per our needs. Thanks to the Travis CI team for this service to the open-source community !
I use Google Cloud Build because it's my first foray into the CICD world(loving it so far), and I wanted to work with something GCP native to avoid giving permissions to other SaaS tools like CircleCI and Travis CI.
I really like it because it's free for the first 120 minutes, and it's one of the few CICD tools that enterprises are open to using since it's contained within GCP.
One of the unique things is that it has the Kaniko cache, which speeds up builds by creating intermediate layers within the docker image vs. pushing the full thing from the start. Helpful when you're installing just a few additional dependencies.
I use Travis CI because of various reasons -
1. Cloud based system so no dedicated server required, and you do not need to administrate it.
2. Easy YAML configuration.
3. Supports Major Programming Languages.
4. Support of build matrix
6. Supports AWS, Azure, Docker, Heroku, Google Cloud, Github Pages, PyPi and lot more.
7. Slack Notifications.
You are probably looking at another hosted solution: Jenkins is a good tool but it way too work intensive to be used as just a backup solution.
I have good experience with Circle-CI, Codeship, Drone.io and Travis (as well as problematic experiences with all of them), but my go-to tool is Gitlab CI: simple, powerful and if you have problems with their limitations or pricing, you can always install runners somewhere and use Gitlab just for scheduling and management. Even if you don't host your git repository at Gitlab, you can have Gitlab pull changes automatically from wherever you repo lives.
If you are considering Jenkins I would recommend at least checking out Buildkite. The agents are self-hosted (like Jenkins) but the interface is hosted for you. It meshes up some of the things I like about hosted services (pipeline definitions in YAML, managed interface and authentication) with things I like about Jenkins (local customizable agent images, secrets only on own instances, custom agent level scripts, sizing instances to your needs).
There are not much space for Jenkins competitors for now from my point of view. With declarative pipelines now in place, its super easy to maintain them and create new ones(altho I prefer scripted still). Self-hosted, free, huge community makes it the top choice so honestly for me it was an easy pick.
Within our deployment pipeline, we have a need to deploy to multiple customer environments, and manage secrets specifically in a way that integrates well with AWS, Kubernetes Secrets, Terraform and our pipelines ourselves.
Jenkins offered us the ability to choose one of a number of credentials/secrets management approaches, and models secrets as a more dynamic concept that GitHub Actions provided.
Additionally, we are operating Jenkins within our development Kubernetes cluster as a kind of system-wide orchestrator, allowing us to use Kubernetes pods as build agents, avoiding the ongoing direct costs associated with GitHub Actions minutes / per-user pricing. Obviously as a consequence we take on the indirect costs of maintain Jenkins itself, patching it, upgrading etc. However our experience with managing Jenkins via Kubernetes and declarative Jenkins configuration has led us to believe that this cost is small, particularly as the majority of actual building and testing is handled inside docker containers and Kubernetes, alleviating the need for less supported plugins that may make Jenkins administration more difficult.
Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.
CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible.
Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.
And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
