Part 1
Identifying Your Generational Gaps in MusicWe asked thousands of people whether they recognized hit songs from the â90s, such as âWannabeâ and âNo Scrubsâ, ordering the results by birth year.
Measuring musicâs popularity has always been contained to a certain period of time: peak chart ranking, awards, opening-week salesâa songâs performance at its prime.
But for me, itâs equally important to quantify how music is passed down from generation to generation, parent to teen. In 2020, weâre amid that critical juncture for â90s musicâwe can finally start asking todayâs teens, âWhat music do you recognize from the â90s?â
The answer will indicate how future generations will characterize the decade. I always believed âNo Diggityâ by Blackstreet would be a â90s standard, uniting the old and young crowds at weddings of the 2050s. And to test this belief, I used 3 million data points that I collected via a music quiz, which asked readers if they recognized thousands of songs that charted on the Billboard Hot 100.
Sinatra, Elvis, and Chuck Berry are emblematic of â50s music, but whatâs the â90s equivalent? Using the recognition data we collected, we can begin to define the canon. These will be the artists and songs that Gen Z and beyond seem to recognize (and value) among all the musical output from the decade.
First, itâs important to understand the general trends in the data. âNo Diggityâ knowledge peaks among people born in 1983, who were 13 years old when the track debuted in 1996. We also see a slow drop off among people who were not fully sentient when âNo Diggityâ was in its prime, individuals who were 5 years old or younger (or not born yet) in 1996.
That drop-off rate between generationsâin this case, Millennials to Gen Zâis one indicator for whether âNo Diggityâ is surviving the test of time.
To make this a bit easier to read, weâll chart a personâs age at the time of a songâs release, rather than birth year. For songs to be passed to down, generation to generation, weâd expect a slower decay rateâevidence that theyâre part of the collective memory.
Letâs look at another example from the mid-nineties: âThe Signâ by Ace of Base .
Only half of readers currently in their teens recognized âThe Sign.â The trend here is that music has a natural half-life. Find someone 10 to 15 years your junior, and the likelihood that theyâll know your childhood music references is lower than you think.
How much lower?
Song knowledge erodes with each passing year. This is why I shouldnât be shocked that my Gen Z colleague has never heard âThe Sign,â or that teens are filming themselves listening to âBohemian Rhapsodyâ for the first time. This is a normal part of the aging process for music.
If you take any present-day hit thatâs culturally pervasive, such as âOld Town Roadâ or âDespacito,â weâd expect that someone born today, in 2020, will probably not recognize it twenty years from now. In short, thereâs a good chance theyâll interpret your karaoking of Lizzo, Drake, or the Jonas Brothers in 2040 as an obscure act.
There are some especially sobering examples of this decay.
In 1999, âWild Wild Westâ was the song of the summer. Yet it is fading far faster than any other â90s hit with comparable starting popularity. Twenty years ago, it was inescapable. Maybe Millennials are still too sick of it, even for nostalgia rotation. Perhaps it wasnât even that great of a song to begin with, artificially inflated by Smithâs celebrity and cross-promotion with the film Wild Wild West.
âQuit Playing Gamesâ is the Backstreet Boysâ fastest-decaying hit (âEverybodyâ is the opposite, known by 97% of Millennials and 86% of Gen Z). Iâm not sure where a love ballad like âQuit Playing Gamesâ fits in 2020, but I was definitely surprised by how few Gen Zers know it. Same thing for J.Loâs âIf You Had My Love,â though there are far better songs from her oeuvreâshe didnât even perform it at the Super Bowl.
Other songs, meanwhile, remain unusually resilient and have higher-than-expected universal recognition.
Why have these songs transcended generations? Thereâs no unifying theory. âJump Aroundâ still gets airplay during timeouts at sporting events. âMacarenaâ is still a bar mitzvah mainstay. âI Will Always Love Youâ is Whitney Houstonâs magnum opus (or perhaps itâs Dolly Partonâs resurgence). While there are countless reasons for a song to stay culturally relevant, its staying power is not merely a function of its popularity in the year of release.
Thereâs another fascinating cut of this data: songs that are generational markers, which are approaching zero recognition by Gen Z.
It seems sacreligious to think that future generations will not know the significance of âAll My Lifeâ . Itâs disconcerting to think that the markers of my childhood, what was culturally ubiquitous, will, in a couple of decades, be lost to time. There will be a moment when I can, incredibly, play it for someone and theyâll hear it for the first time.
Maybe theyâll think itâs âgood music.â That does seem to be the story of every generation: my parents went through the same existential shock when my knowledge of the â70s was spottier than they expected.
Every parent makes a mental note of music theyâll pass down to their childrenârecords that they hope will shape their childrenâs taste and barometer for quality. That process is a marvelous filtering mechanism, a value judgement of what should be cherished versus what just happened to be popular. Billboard #1 hits mean nothing if future parents donât tell their children, âThis is good music.â
When records are not replayed, they become fleeting fads in the eyes of history. In the case of âWild Wild West,â the only people who understood its importance were those who were there in 1999, at peak Will Smith.
But, some songs will surviveâthe ones most recognized by Gen Z.
This project is part of a series by The Pudding about
How Music is Remembered
View Part 1
Identifying Your Generational Gaps in Music