Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 13;12(1):650.
doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02150-5.

Portuguese version of the citizenship fatigue scale: adaptation and evidence of validity

Affiliations

Portuguese version of the citizenship fatigue scale: adaptation and evidence of validity

Paula C Neves et al. BMC Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: Citizenship fatigue has been identified as a negative consequence of performing organizational citizenship behaviors and has been studied due to its undesirable effects on employees and organizations. This article aims to present the results of adapting the citizenship fatigue scale to Portuguese language and to provide evidence of its validity.

Methods: The research methodology involved multiple stages. Initially, the Citizenship Fatigue Scale was translated into Portuguese using a robust back-translation process involving three bilingual translators to ensure semantic accuracy. Subsequently, for psychometric testing, the Citizenship Fatigue Scale and Compulsory Citizenship Behavior Scale were administered to a sample of 406 employees from different economic sectors (103 male; 303 female), aged 18 to 70 years. Reliability and validity indicators were calculated from the CFA structure, employing the maximum likelihood estimation with bootstrapping. Gender invariance was examined at three different levels: [1] configural invariance [2], factor loading invariance and [3] factor loading and intercept invariance.

Results: The internal consistency, of the whole scale, measured by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.94. The composite reliability value was also very satisfactory (CF = 0.94). The variance extracted from mean (AVE) value of 0.79 was higher than the required limit of 0.50, indicating an adequate fit of the model. The confirmatory analysis supported a single-factor model and showed good to very good fit indexes (CFI = 1.00; GFI = 0.99; RMSEA ≤ 0.01). The model was successfully replicated with a male and female sample.

Discussion: The results confirm that the Portuguese version of the Citizenship Fatigue Scale is a reliable instrument for research with Portuguese speaking samples and international research.

Keywords: Citizenship fatigue; Citizenship fatigue scale; Psychometric properties; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The Research was carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the ethics committee of the Polytechnic of Coimbra (N°25_CEIPC_2022). All participants gave their written informed consent to participate in this study, before starting the questionnaire. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Single-factor model of the citizenship fatigue scale

Similar articles

References

    1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1974;19(6):716–23. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.
    1. Ali Nisar Q, Haider S, Waqas A, Khan WA, Selem KM. (2024). Cost of organizational citizenship behaviors: serial mediation model of citizenship fatigue. Management Research Review, December 2023. 10.1108/mrr-08-2023-0540
    1. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91. - PubMed
    1. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238–46. 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238. - PubMed
    1. Bergeron DM. The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: good citizens at what cost? Acad Manage Rev. 2007;32(4):1078–95. 10.5465/AMR.2007.26585791.

LinkOut - more resources