Cigarette Smoking Reduction and Health Risks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 32803250
- DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa156
Cigarette Smoking Reduction and Health Risks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Studies have shown the health benefits of cigarette smoking cessation. However, the literature remains unclear about the relationship between smoking reduction and health risks. This comprehensive review and meta-analysis updates previous reviews with the newest estimates.
Aims and methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the association between smoking reduction and some health risks in observational studies. We defined the following smoking categories: heavy smokers smoked ≥15-20 cigarettes per day (CPD), moderate smokers smoked 10-19 CPD, and light smokers smoked <10 CPD. The relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effect models.
Results: We identified 19 studies including four case-control and 15 cohort studies. Compared with continuing heavy smokers, we found decreased lung cancer risk for those who reduced CPD by more than 50% (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.91), from heavy to moderate (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.85), and from heavy to light (RR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.72). We also found lower risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) for those who reduced from heavy to light smoking (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.89) but not those who reduced by more than 50% and reduced smoking from heavy to moderate. We did not find any significant difference in all-cause mortality, all-cancer risks, and smoking-/tobacco-related cancer risk among those who reduced.
Conclusions: Substantial smoking reduction may decrease lung cancer risk but results on CVD (coronary heart disease and stroke combined) risk were mixed. The relationships between smoking reduction and other endpoints examined were not significant.
Implications: This meta-analysis helps clarify our understanding of various smoking reduction levels on some health risks. While smoking reduction may decrease risks of lung cancer, the relationships between smoking reduction and other endpoints, including all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease, remain unclear. Although smoking reduction may decrease lung cancer risks, the magnitude of lung cancer risk remain high. Among smokers, complete cessation remains the most effective approach for cancer and CVD prevention.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].
Similar articles
-
Tobacco smoking and the risk of heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Feb;26(3):279-288. doi: 10.1177/2047487318806658. Epub 2018 Oct 18. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 30335502
-
Changes in Cigarettes per Day and Biomarkers of Exposure Among US Adult Smokers in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Waves 1 and 2 (2013-2015).Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):1780-1787. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa038. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020. PMID: 32221599 Free PMC article.
-
Smoking cessation and the risk of stroke in middle-aged men.JAMA. 1995 Jul 12;274(2):155-60. JAMA. 1995. PMID: 7596004
-
Aspirin Use in Adults: Cancer, All-Cause Mortality, and Harms: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2015 Sep. Report No.: 13-05193-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2015 Sep. Report No.: 13-05193-EF-1. PMID: 26491756 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Interventions for Tobacco Cessation in Adults, Including Pregnant Women: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2021 Jan. Report No.: 20-05264-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2021 Jan. Report No.: 20-05264-EF-1. PMID: 33523610 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Factors contributing to the rising prevalence of waterpipe smoking dependence among university students: a cross-sectional study.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05156-0. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38378525 Free PMC article.
-
Associations between vaping and daily cigarette consumption among individuals with psychological distress.Tob Prev Cessat. 2024 Jun 20;10. doi: 10.18332/tpc/189769. eCollection 2024. Tob Prev Cessat. 2024. PMID: 38903697 Free PMC article.
-
Fisetin-loaded nanoemulsion ameliorates lung cancer pathogenesis via downregulating cathepsin-B, galectin-3 and enolase in an in vitro setting.EXCLI J. 2024 Oct 14;23:1238-1244. doi: 10.17179/excli2024-7583. eCollection 2024. EXCLI J. 2024. PMID: 39574963 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The impact of chronic disease diagnoses on smoking behavior change and maintenance: Evidence from China.Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Jan 23;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/176947. eCollection 2024. Tob Induc Dis. 2024. PMID: 38264188 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the predictive value of smoking history for immunotherapy outcomes in bladder cancer patients.Front Immunol. 2024 Jun 13;15:1404812. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1404812. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38938564 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical