Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;277(6):1823-1828.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05904-0. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

Effect of mouth closure on upper airway obstruction in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea exhibiting mouth breathing: a drug-induced sleep endoscopy study

Affiliations

Effect of mouth closure on upper airway obstruction in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea exhibiting mouth breathing: a drug-induced sleep endoscopy study

Soo Kweon Koo et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) exhibit multifactorial aetiologies; mouth breathing increases airway obstruction and upper respiratory tract resistance. Of the many published studies, few have evaluated sleeping subjects. We explored how mouth breathing affected the upper respiratory tract anatomy and OSA during sleep.

Methods: Eighteen patients with OSA, confirmed via full-night polysomnography, were enrolled in this study. We performed drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and defined obstruction sites before and after mouth closure using commercial mouth strips. We evaluated obstruction sites in two ways, i.e. by grading obstructions using our DISE grading system and measuring the affected areas. Patients who improved by at least one DISE grade were defined as responders. Areas were measured based on DISE videos analysed using ImageJ software. The apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) and body mass index (BMI) were recorded.

Results: Based on the DISE grade, 40% (7/18) of patients showed obstruction site improvement. When assessed areally, the mean number of pixels improved significantly at both the retropalatal (p = 0.045) and retrolingual (p = 0.019) levels. However, DISE non-responders exhibited no areal improvements. Responders and non-responders did not differ significantly in terms of AHI or BMI (both p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Mouth closure improves or at least does not lead to further deterioration of the upper airway. Improvements were evident at the retropalatal and especially retrolingual levels. Neither the BMI nor the AHI differed between the two groups. However, responders tended to have a higher AHI than non-responders (39.4 vs. 32.8 events/h).

Keywords: Drug-induced sleep endoscopy; Mouth breathing; Obstructive; Sleep apnoea.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fitzpatrick MF, McLean H, Urton AM, Tan A, O’Donnell D, Driver HS (2003) Effect of nasal or oral breathing route on upper airway resistance during sleep. Eur Respir J 22(5):827–832. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.03.00047903 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meurice JC, Marc I, Carrier G, Series F (1996) Effects of mouth opening on upper airway collapsibility in normal sleeping subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153(1):255–259. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.153.1.8542125 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Isono S, Tanaka A, Tagaito Y, Ishikawa T, Nishino T (2004) Influences of head positions and bite opening on collapsibility of the passive pharynx. J Appl Physiol 97(1):339–346. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00907.2003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bachour A, Maasilta P (2004) Mouth breathing compromises adherence to nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Chest 126(4):1248–1254. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.4.1248 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodenstein DO, Stanescu DC (1984) Soft palate and oronasal breathing in humans. J Appl Physiol 57(3):651–657. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1984.57.3.651 - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources