The effect of cooling on the perception of carbohydrate and intensive sweeteners
- PMID: 3194473
- DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(88)90127-8
The effect of cooling on the perception of carbohydrate and intensive sweeteners
Abstract
The effect of cooling on the perceived intensity of sweetness was measured for four different compounds: glucose, fructose, aspartame and saccharin. Perceived sweetness was rated in a sip and spit paradigm when the taste solution, the tongue, or both were either held at 36 degrees C or cooled to 20 degrees C. It was discovered that for glucose and fructose perceived sweetness was significantly reduced by cooling, and that cooling the tongue reduced sweetness more than did cooling the solution. The perceived sweetness of aspartame was also lessened by cooling, but in that case the temperature of the tongue and the temperature of the solution had similar effects on sweetness. In contrast to the other compounds, the sweetness of saccharin was not affected by temperature. These results (when combined with data previously reported for sucrose) raise the possibility that as a group, carbohydrate sweeteners are affected similarly by temperature, whereas thermal effects on intensive sweeteners may be less predictable. The data thereby provide indirect support for the hypothesis that the sweet taste is mediated by more than one type of gustatory receptor.
Similar articles
-
Temperature Affects Human Sweet Taste via At Least Two Mechanisms.Chem Senses. 2015 Jul;40(6):391-9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjv021. Epub 2015 May 10. Chem Senses. 2015. PMID: 25963040 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal sweetness and side tastes profiles of 16 sweeteners using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA).Food Res Int. 2019 Jul;121:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 12. Food Res Int. 2019. PMID: 31108762
-
Sweet-bitter taste interactions in binary mixtures of sweeteners: Relationship between taste receptor activities and sensory perception.Food Chem. 2024 Nov 30;459:140343. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.140343. Epub 2024 Jul 4. Food Chem. 2024. PMID: 39018621
-
Nonnutritive sweeteners are not supernormal stimuli.Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Feb;39(2):254-9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.109. Epub 2014 Jun 19. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015. PMID: 24942868 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sweeteners and sweetness enhancers.Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2017 Jul;20(4):279-285. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000377. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2017. PMID: 28399012 Review.
Cited by
-
Taste mixture interactions: suppression, additivity, and the predominance of sweetness.Physiol Behav. 2010 Dec 2;101(5):731-7. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.08.013. Epub 2010 Aug 24. Physiol Behav. 2010. PMID: 20800076 Free PMC article.
-
Temperature Affects Human Sweet Taste via At Least Two Mechanisms.Chem Senses. 2015 Jul;40(6):391-9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjv021. Epub 2015 May 10. Chem Senses. 2015. PMID: 25963040 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptual and neural responses to sweet taste in humans and rodents.Chemosens Percept. 2015 Aug;8(2):46-52. doi: 10.1007/s12078-015-9177-8. Chemosens Percept. 2015. PMID: 26388965 Free PMC article.
-
Response of blood glucose and GLP-1 to different food temperature in normal subject and patients with type 2 diabetes.Nutr Diabetes. 2022 May 27;12(1):28. doi: 10.1038/s41387-022-00208-0. Nutr Diabetes. 2022. PMID: 35624116 Free PMC article.
-
Somatosensory factors in taste perception: effects of active tasting and solution temperature.Physiol Behav. 2012 Nov 5;107(4):488-95. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 May 17. Physiol Behav. 2012. PMID: 22609629 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous