Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Oct;52(10):918-924.
doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.7.03. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

Acute Passive Static Stretching and Cramp Threshold Frequency

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Acute Passive Static Stretching and Cramp Threshold Frequency

Gino Panza et al. J Athl Train. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Context: Exercise-associated muscle cramps are a common clinical problem for athletes.

Objective: To determine whether acute passive static stretching altered cramp threshold frequency (CTF) of electrically induced muscle cramps.

Design: Crossover study.

Setting: Laboratory.

Patients or other participants: Seventeen healthy college-aged individuals.

Intervention(s): Stretching or no stretching.

Main outcome measure(s): The independent variable was the static stretch versus the no-stretch condition, and the dependent variable was the CTF.

Results: The CTF increased in both the control (pretest: 18.12 ± 6.46 Hz, posttest: 19.65 ± 7.25 Hz; P = .033) and stretching (pretest: 18.94 ± 5.96 Hz, posttest: 20.47 ± 7.12 Hz; P = .049) groups. No difference between the groups was found (t15 = 0.035, P = .97).

Conclusions: Acute passive static stretching did not seem to increase the CTF.

Keywords: Golgi tendon organ reflex response; electrically induced muscle cramps; exercise-associated muscle cramps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Electromyography and root mean square data for 3 participants. The top graph shows the raw electromyographic data at rest, stimulation, and during the electrically induced muscle cramp. The bottom graph shows the root mean square data during the same time frame.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The mean cramp threshold frequency (CTF) for each day and condition. No-stretching (NS) condition pretest CTF = 18.12 ± 6.46 Hz, posttest CTF = 19.65 ± 7.25 Hz. Static stretching (SS) condition pretest CTF = 18.94 ± 5.96 Hz, posttest CTF = 20.47 ± 7.12 Hz. a Denotes differences between pretest and posttest within the NS and SS conditions (P ≤ .05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schwellnus MP, Derman EW, Noakes TD. Aetiology of skeletal muscle “cramps” during exercise: a novel hypothesis. J Sports Sci. 1997; 15 3: 277– 285. - PubMed
    1. Kantorowski PG, Hiller WDB, Garrett WE, Jr, Douglas PS, Smith R, O'Toole M. Cramping studies in 2600 endurance athletes [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990; 22 2: S104.
    1. Miller KC, Knight KL. Electrical stimulation cramp threshold frequency correlates well with the occurrence of skeletal muscle cramps. Muscle Nerve. 2009; 39 3: 364– 368. - PubMed
    1. Stone MB, Edwards JE, Babington JP, Ingersoll CD, Palmieri RM. Reliability of an electrical method to induce muscle cramp. Muscle Nerve. 2003; 27 1: 122– 123. - PubMed
    1. Miller KC, Knight KL. Pain and soreness associated with a percutaneous electrical stimulation muscle cramping protocol. Muscle Nerve. 2007; 36 5: 711– 714. - PubMed

Publication types