Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul;95(27):e4085.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004085.

Expression profile of SIX family members correlates with clinic-pathological features and prognosis of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Expression profile of SIX family members correlates with clinic-pathological features and prognosis of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Han-Xiao Xu et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Sineoculis homeobox homolog (SIX) family proteins, including SIX1, SIX2, SIX3, SIX4, SIX5, and SIX6, have been implicated in the initiation and progression of breast cancer, but the role of each member in breast tumor is not fully understood. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between the mRNA levels of all 6 members and clinic-pathological characteristics and clinical outcome of breast cancer patients based on the PRISMA statement criteria.ArrayExpress and Oncomine were searched for eligible databases published up to December 10, 2015. The association between the mRNA expression of SIX family members and clinic-pathological features and prognosis was measured by the odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), respectively. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA software.In total, 20 published Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases with 3555 patients were analyzed. Our analysis revealed that patients with SIX1 overexpression had worse overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.03-1.58) and shorter relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.05-1.56), and much worse prognosis for luminal breast cancer patients with SIX1 overexpression (OS: HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.13-2.39; RFS: HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.06-1.93). We found that patients with higher SIX2 level had shorter time to both relapse and metastasis. However, high SIX3 mRNA level was a protective factor for OS and RFS of basal-like breast cancer patients.Our study suggested that members of SIX family played distinct roles in breast cancer. Detailed analysis of the expression of the SIX family members might provide useful information to predict breast cancer progression and prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of article selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of odds ratio (OR). CI = confidence interval. (A). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX1 and breast cancer risks in comparison to normal breast tissues. (B). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX2 and breast cancer risks in comparison to normal breast tissues. (C). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX3 and breast cancer risks in comparison to normal breast tissues. (D). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX4 and breast cancer risks in comparison to normal breast tissues.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of odds ratio (OR). CI = confidence interval. (A). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX1 and histological grade of breast cancer. (B). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX2 and histological grade of breast cancer. (C). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX3 and histological grade of breast cancer.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of odds ratio (OR). CI = confidence interval. (A). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX1 and ER status of breast cancer. (B). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX2 and ER status of breast cancer. (C). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX3 and ER status of breast cancer. (D). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX1 and PR status of breast cancer. (E). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX2 and PR status of breast cancer. (F). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX3 and PR status of breast cancer.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of odds ratio (OR). CI = confidence interval. (A). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX1 and basal-like breast cancer in comparison to luminal subtype. (B). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX2 and basal-like breast cancer in comparison to luminal subtype. (C). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX3 and basal-like breast cancer in comparison to luminal subtype.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of hazard radio (HR). CI = confidence interval. (A). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX1 and OS of breast cancer. (B). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX1 and RFS of breast cancer. (C). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX1 and MFS of breast cancer. (D). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX2 and OS of breast cancer. (E). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX2 and RFS of breast cancer. (F). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX2 and MFS of breast cancer.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot of hazard radio (HR). CI = confidence interval. (A). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX1 and OS of luminal breast cancer. (B). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX1 and RFS of luminal breast cancer. (C). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX6 and OS of luminal breast cancer. (D). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX6 and RFS of luminal breast cancer. (E). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX3 and OS of basal-like breast cancer. (F). Association between the mRNA expression of SIX3 and RFS of basal-like breast cancer.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66:7–30. - PubMed
    1. Makki J. Diversity of breast carcinoma: histological subtypes and clinical relevance. Clin Med Insights Pathol 2015; 8:23–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Radenkovic S, Milosevic Z, Konjevic G, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase in tumor tissue of breast cancer patients in respect to mammographic findings. Cell Biochem Biophys 2013; 66:287–295. - PubMed
    1. Pearson JC, Lemons D, McGinnis W. Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning. Nat Rev Genet 2005; 6:893–904. - PubMed
    1. Li X, Oghi KA, Zhang J, et al. Eya protein phosphatase activity regulates Six1-Dach-Eya transcriptional effects in mammalian organogenesis. Nature 2003; 426:247–254. - PubMed