Spontaneous giving and calculated greed
- PMID: 22996558
- DOI: 10.1038/nature11467
Spontaneous giving and calculated greed
Abstract
Cooperation is central to human social behaviour. However, choosing to cooperate requires individuals to incur a personal cost to benefit others. Here we explore the cognitive basis of cooperative decision-making in humans using a dual-process framework. We ask whether people are predisposed towards selfishness, behaving cooperatively only through active self-control; or whether they are intuitively cooperative, with reflection and prospective reasoning favouring 'rational' self-interest. To investigate this issue, we perform ten studies using economic games. We find that across a range of experimental designs, subjects who reach their decisions more quickly are more cooperative. Furthermore, forcing subjects to decide quickly increases contributions, whereas instructing them to reflect and forcing them to decide slowly decreases contributions. Finally, an induction that primes subjects to trust their intuitions increases contributions compared with an induction that promotes greater reflection. To explain these results, we propose that cooperation is intuitive because cooperative heuristics are developed in daily life where cooperation is typically advantageous. We then validate predictions generated by this proposed mechanism. Our results provide convergent evidence that intuition supports cooperation in social dilemmas, and that reflection can undermine these cooperative impulses.
Comment in
-
Human behaviour: A cooperative instinct.Nature. 2012 Sep 20;489(7416):374-5. doi: 10.1038/489374a. Nature. 2012. PMID: 22996549 No abstract available.
-
Psychology: Social insight rings true 125 years on.Nature. 2012 Oct 25;490(7421):487. doi: 10.1038/490487b. Nature. 2012. PMID: 23099398 No abstract available.
-
Intuition and cooperation reconsidered.Nature. 2013 Jun 6;498(7452):E1-2; discussion E2-3. doi: 10.1038/nature12194. Nature. 2013. PMID: 23739429 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Intuition and cooperation reconsidered.Nature. 2013 Jun 6;498(7452):E1-2; discussion E2-3. doi: 10.1038/nature12194. Nature. 2013. PMID: 23739429 No abstract available.
-
Human behaviour: A cooperative instinct.Nature. 2012 Sep 20;489(7416):374-5. doi: 10.1038/489374a. Nature. 2012. PMID: 22996549 No abstract available.
-
Psychology: Social insight rings true 125 years on.Nature. 2012 Oct 25;490(7421):487. doi: 10.1038/490487b. Nature. 2012. PMID: 23099398 No abstract available.
-
Team reasoning: Solving the puzzle of coordination.Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1770-1783. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1399-0. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018. PMID: 29101730 Review.
-
Cooperation and decision time.Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Apr;26:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 23. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019. PMID: 29879640 Review.
Cited by
-
Time pressure effects on decision-making in intertemporal loss scenarios: an eye-tracking study.Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 11;15:1451674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451674. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39463459 Free PMC article.
-
Punishment is slower than cooperation or defection in online network games.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 3;14(1):23024. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72939-2. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39362883 Free PMC article.
-
Commentary: The effect of positive inter-group contact on cooperation: the moderating role of individualism.Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 16;15:1452840. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1452840. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39351114 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Time pressure and deliberation affect moral punishment.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67268-3. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39014033 Free PMC article.
-
Cooperation and social organization depend on weighing private and public reputations.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67080-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39014019 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources