Currently submitted to: JMIR Mental Health
Date Submitted: Nov 22, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 27, 2024 - Jan 22, 2025
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Effects of Sound Interventions on the Mental Stress Response in Adults: A Scoping Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
This scoping review explores the effects of various sound interventions, including music, natural sounds, and speech, on stress response in adults.
Objective:
The review identifies key therapeutic factors, including sound type, individual listener characteristics, and environmental factors. As part of our review, we synthesize evidence of the body's response to sound interventions and highlight current research gaps.
Methods:
A systematic search was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO, focusing on studies from 1990 to the present. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and laboratory experiments that measured stress through physiological markers (e.g., heart rate variability, cortisol) and self-reports. Data from 34 studies were included, and thematic analysis was conducted to categorize the factors influencing the effectiveness of sound interventions.
Results:
Findings suggest that music, especially classical and self-selected pieces, effectively reduces physiological stress markers, including heart rate variability, blood pressure, and cortisol levels. Non-musical sounds, such as nature sounds and calming voices, also demonstrate stress-relief potential, though research in this area is less comprehensive. While most sound interventions demonstrated positive effects, some studies reported adverse responses, suggesting that sound can induce stress as much as mitigate it. The outcomes were significantly affected by context factors, such as personal preferences, delivery methods, cultural context, etc., which emphasizes the importance of personalized interventions.
Conclusions:
Sound interventions offer promising non-invasive methods for stress reduction. This review suggests a future focus on addressing the gaps in research on non-musical sound interventions and further investigation of the neural mechanisms underlying stress responses to sound.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.