X-rays are a type of radiation that can generate images of tissues and structures inside the body. Although a vital imaging tool, X-rays pose risks and can cause alterations in DNA.
X-rays are a naturally occurring form of electromagnetic radiation. They are produced when charged particles of sufficient energy hit a material.
Over the years, scientists have shown concern over the health implications of X-rays. After all, they involve firing radiation at the patient. But, do its benefits outweigh its risks?
This MNT Knowledge Center article will discuss what X-rays are, how they are used in medical science, and the level of risk that they pose.
Fast facts on X-rays
X-rays are a naturally occurring type of radiation.
They are classed as a carcinogen.
The benefits of X-rays far outweigh any potential negative outcomes.
CT scans give the largest dose of X-rays compared to other X-ray procedures.
In X-rays, bones show up white, and gasses appear black.
Wilhelm Röntgen is credited with first describing X-rays. Just weeks after he discovered that they could help visualize bones, X-rays were being used in a medical setting.
The first person to receive an X-ray for medical purposes was young Eddie McCarthy of Hanover, who fell while skating on the Connecticut River in 1896 and fractured his left wrist.
Everyone on the planet is exposed to a certain amount of radiation as they go about their daily lives. Radioactive material is found naturally in the air, soil, water, rocks, and vegetation. The greatest source of natural radiation for most people is radon.
Additionally, the Earth is constantly bombarded by cosmic radiation, which includes X-rays. These rays are not harmless but they are unavoidable, and the radiation is at such low levels that its effects are virtually unnoticed.
Pilots, cabin crew, and astronauts are at more risk of higher doses because of the increased exposure to cosmic rays at altitude.
There have, however, been few studies linking an airborne occupation to increased incidence of cancer.
To produce a standard X-ray image, the patient or part of their body is placed in front of an X-ray detector and illuminated by short X-ray pulses. Because bones are rich in calcium, which has a high atomic number, the X-rays are absorbed and appear white on the resulting image.
Any trapped gases, for instance, in the lungs, show up as dark patches because of their particularly low absorption rates.
Radiography: This is the most familiar type of X-ray imaging. It is used to image broken bones, teeth, and the chest. Radiography also uses the smallest amounts of radiation.
Fluoroscopy: The radiologist, or radiographer, can watch the X-ray of the patient moving in real-time and take snapshots. This type of X-ray might be used to watch the activity of the gut after a barium meal. Fluoroscopy uses more X-ray radiation than a standard X-ray, but the amounts are still extremely small.
Computed tomography (CT): The patient lies on a table and enters a ring-shaped scanner. A fan-shaped beam of X-rays passes through the patient onto a number of detectors. The patient moves slowly into the machine so that a series of âslicesâ can be taken to build up a 3D image. This procedure uses the highest dose of X-rays because a large number of images are taken in one sitting.
X-rays can cause mutations in our DNA and, therefore, might lead to cancer later in life. For this reason, X-rays are classified as a carcinogen by both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United States government. However, the benefits of X-ray technology far outweigh the potential negative consequences of using them.
It is estimated that 0.4 percent of cancers in the U.S. are caused by CT scans.Some scientists expect this level to rise in parallel with the increased use of CT scans in medical procedures. At least 62 million CT scans were carried out in America in 2007.
According to one study, by the age of 75 years, X-rays will increase the risk of cancer by 0.6 to 1.8 percent. In other words, the risks are minimal compared to the benefits of medical imaging.
Each procedure has a different associated risk that depends on the type of X-ray and the part of the body being imaged. The list below shows some of the more common imaging procedures and compares the radiation dose to the normal background radiation that all people encounter on a daily basis.
Chest X-ray: Equivalent to 2.4 days of natural background radiation
Skull X-ray: Equivalent to 12 days of natural background radiation
Lumbar spine: Equivalent to 182 days of natural background radiation
IV urogram: Equivalent to 1 year of natural background radiation
Upper gastrointestinal exam: Equivalent to 2 years of natural background radiation
Barium enema: Equivalent to 2.7 years of natural background radiation
CT head: Equivalent to 243 days of natural background radiation
CT abdomen: Equivalent to 2.7 years of natural background radiation.
These radiation figures are for adults. Children are more susceptible to the radioactive effects of X-rays.
The fact that X-rays have been used in medicine for such a significant length of time shows how beneficial they are considered to be. Although an X-ray alone is not always sufficient to diagnose a disease or condition, they are an essential part of the diagnostic process.
Some of the main benefits are as follows:
Non-invasive: An X-ray can help diagnose a medical issue or monitor treatment progression without the need to physically enter and examine a patient.
Guiding: X-rays can help guide medical professionals as they insert catheters, stents, or other devices inside the patient. They can also help in the treatment of tumors and remove blood clots or other similar blockages
Unexpected finds: An X-ray can sometimes show up a feature or pathology that is different from the initial reason for the imaging. For instance, infections in the bone, gas or fluid in areas where there should be none, or some types of tumor.
An average CT scan might raise the chance of fatal cancer by 1 in 2,000. This figure pales in comparison to the natural incidence of fatal cancer in the US of 1 in 5.
Additionally, there is some debate as to whether very low X-ray exposure can cause cancer at all. A recent report on the matter, published in the American Journal of Clinical Oncology, claims that X-ray procedures carry no risk.
The paper argues that the type of radiation experienced in a scan is not enough to cause long-lasting damage. The authors claim that any damage caused by low-dose radiation is repaired by the body, leaving no lasting mutations. It is only when a certain threshold is reached that permanent damage can be produced. This threshold, according to the authors, is far higher than the standard X-ray dose from any type of scan.
It is important to note that these safety facts apply to adults only. CT scans in children may triple the risk of brain cancer and leukemia, especially when administered to the abdomen and chest at certain doses. They are still performed but need to be done only after discussing the risks and benefits with the childâs family.
The authors go on to point out that despite being bombarded by cosmic rays and background radiation, the people of America are living longer than ever, partly because of advancements in medical imaging, such as the CT scan.
Overall, the importance of making the right diagnosis and choosing the correct course of treatment makes X-rays far more beneficial than they are dangerous. Whether there is a small risk or no risk at all, the X-ray is here to stay.
Medical News Today has strict sourcing guidelines and relies on peer-reviewed studies, academic research institutions, and medical journals and associations. We only use quality, credible sources to ensure content accuracy and integrity. You can learn more about how we ensure our content is accurate and current by reading our editorial policy.
Berrington de González, A. & Darby, S. (2004, January 31). Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries [Abstract]. The Lancet, 363(9406), 345-351 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15070562
Lim, M. K. (2001, September). Exposure of airline pilots and cabin crew to cosmic radiation during flight--what's the fuss? [Abstract] Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, 30(5), 494-498 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11603132
Pearce, M. S., Salotti, J. A., Little, M. P., McHugh, K., Lee, C., Kim, K. P., ... & Berrington de González, A. (2012, August). Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet, 380(9840), 499-505 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3418594/
Roobottom, C. A., Mitchell, G., & Morgan-Hughes, G. (2010, November). Radiation-reduction strategies in cardiac computed tomographic angiography [Abstract]. Clinical Radiology, 65(11), 859-867 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20933639